Skip to Main Navigation

Lao People's Democratic Republic - Scaling-up Participatory Sustainable Forest Management Project : resettlement plan (Inglés)

The objectives of the Scaling-up Participatory Sustainable Forest Management Project (SUPSFM) Project for Lao PDR are building and expanding on the progress made under Sustainable Forestry and Rural Development Project, or SUFORD and SUFORD Additional Financing, or AF but are substantially broader in that SUPSFM explicitly includes reductions in forest carbon emissions, increasing forest carbon sequestration through forest restoration and inter agency coordination at the landscape scale. Some of the negative and mitigation measures include: a) where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the persons affected by the project to share in project benefits. Affected persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs; b) affected persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher; c) affected land, or assets such as structures, trees and standing crops, will be compensated at their replacement values; and d) no physical relocation of households or existing businesses is allowed under the project. No major land acquisition that may affect more than 10 percent of the total productive lands owned by affected households is allowed. Detailed designs will be adjusted to avoid such impacts.

Información

  • Fecha del documento

    2013/01/01

  • Tipo de documento

    Plan de reasentamiento

  • Número del informe

    RP1385

  • Volumen

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    2

  • País

    República Democrática Popular Lao,

  • Región

    Asia oriental y el Pacífico,

  • Fecha de divulgación

    2013/01/28

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nom. del doc.

    Lao People's Democratic Republic - Scaling-up Participatory Sustainable Forest Management Project : resettlement plan

  • Palabras clave

    Environment and Natural Resources;Forest Law Enforcement and Governance;legal and regulatory framework;sustainable management of forest;national forest strategy;monitoring and evaluation mechanism;access to justice;data collection and analysis;state forest area;resettlement of people;loss of forest;Broad Community Support;law and regulation;ethnic group;lack of availability;community forestry management;minority ethnic group;loss of livelihood;natural resource use;interest loan;forest management plan;sustainable forest management;mode of production;reduction in forest;forest carbon sequestration;availability of technology;civil society sector;investment in capacity;loss of crop;inclusion of women;area of forest;land management system;fragmentation of forest;adverse social impact;negative environmental impact;right to equality;factor of production;areas of expertise;land use practice;land tenure arrangements;increase in land;agricultural land management;impact of land;distribution of poverty;access to land;participation of communities;grievance redress mechanism;community engagement;village cluster;livelihood development;living standard;benefit sharing;grievance mechanism;forest degradation;national policy;household survey;forest restoration;government staff;market condition;natural regeneration;land acquisition;income stream;social safeguard;livelihood support;rural area;landscape approach;criminal case;participatory assessment;annual emission;regional university;customary land;biodiversity corridor;customary use;forest zone;land policy;aerial photograph;participating community;lessons learnt;land policies;public awareness;community land;signed agreements;self-help group;community participation;carbon stock;home base;Project Monitoring;social institution;sustainable livelihood;carbon emission;community awareness;remote sensing;forest extension;informed consent;monitoring indicator;community consultation;formal mechanisms;effective participation;forest land;step procedure;vulnerable group;livelihood opportunity;headed household;registration form;organizational structure;subsistence farming;vulnerable people;grievance procedure;Safeguard Policies;safeguard policy;land-use decision;management capacity;participatory analysis;organizational basis;high resolution;organizational complexity;external market;quantitative data;livelihood strategy;land grabbing;national assembly;selection criterion;land resource;land resources;development partner;resource users;district authority;labor availability;contract farming;forestry sector;support structure;affected communities;community for use;customary law;know how;accessible location;positive impact;local justice;community education;forest committee;land productivity;small population;resource access;exclusion criteria;project financing;village enterprise;mutual agreement;legal framework;local traditions;state law;national language;timber resource;customary systems;neutral party;small villages;extension service;upland area;gender equity;dominant group;ancestral territory;indigenous language;community level;political institution;significant acquisition;sustainable access;improved livelihood;longer-term process;full participation;literature review;field survey;Indigenous Peoples;communal title;strategic unit;movable asset;land law;community management;forestry law;indigenous group;geographical area;customary right;income source;forest landscape;regulatory environment;ethnic background;core principle;social status;sustainable community;social vulnerability;constitutional framework;community livelihoods;tenure security;beneficiary selection;forestry systems;managed forest;participatory management;forestry model;core objectives;monetary benefit;carbon storage;effective capacity;baseline data;private land;land owner;Fixed Assets;water resource;environment protection;carbon value;degraded lands;forestry planning;concession area;farmer organization;Market Studies;field visits;market study

Descargas

INFORME COMPLETO

Versión oficial del documento (puede incluir firmas, etc.)

  • Versión oficial (PDF)
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *La versión texto es una versión realizada con reconocimiento óptico de caracteres, sin corregir. Esta versión se ofrece únicamente en beneficio de los usuarios que cuentan con una conexión lenta.