Disaster Response, LLC DRAFT - Air Screening Results For Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site and Temporary Debris Site International Advisory Support for Debris Management and Short Term Solid Waste Priorities for the Hurricane Irma Reconstruction, Recovery and Resilience Program Sint Maarten World Bank Contract: 7187552 Presented to World Bank Group 1818 H. Street, NW Washington DC, 20443 Presented by Disaster Response, LLC 5751 Miami Lakes Drive Miami Lakes, FL 33014 (305) 374-8300 www.eeandg.com December 13, 2018 EE&G Project Number: 2018-4191 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 5 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 5 1.2 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION....................................................................................... 7 2.2 CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN ........................................................................ 9 2.3 DETERMINATION OF INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA ............................................. 9 2.4 SAMPLING METHODS, DEVICES AND MEDIA................................................ 10 2.5 COC COMPARISON CRITERIA ........................................................................ 11 SECTION 3.0 – FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... 19 3.1 SCREENING RESULTS .................................................................................... 19 3.2 DATA INTERPRETATION ................................................................................. 27 SECTION 4.0 – CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................. 31 4.1 SMOKE SAMPLING .......................................................................................... 31 4.2 UPWIND SAMPLING ......................................................................................... 32 4.3 PERSONNEL SAMPLING ................................................................................. 33 SECTION 5.0 – RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 34 TABLES Table 2 – Instantaneous Testing Results Table 3 – Landfill Gas Testing Results Table 4 – Particulate (PM 2.5) Results Table 5 – VOC Analytical Testing Results Table 6 – H2S Analytical Testing Results Table 7 – PAH Testing Results Table 8 – Ozone (O3) Testing Results Tables 9a, 9b and 9c – Dioxin/Furan Testing Results Table 10 – Heavy Metal Testing Results FIGURES Figure 1 – Site Sampling Plan Figure 2 – Locations of CO Analytical Sampling Results Figure 3 – Locations of Instantaneous Particulate (PM 2.5) Results Figure 4 – Locations of Benzene Sampling Results Figure 5 – Locations of H2S Sampling Results Figure 6 – Locations of Acenaphthylene Sampling Results Figure 7 – Locations of Benzo(a)pyrene Sampling Results Figure 8 – Locations of Ozone Sample Results Figure 9 – Locations of Dioxin and Furan Results Figure 10A – Locations with Results Above COCs – Northwest Municipal Waste Disposal Site i Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Figure 10B – Locations with Results Above COCs – South Municipal Waste Disposal Site Figure 10C – Locations with Results Above COCs – Temporary Debris Site ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Photo Pages Attachment B – COCs and NIOSH Links Attachment C – Laboratory Results, Landfill Gases (CH4, CO2, and CO) Attachment D – Laboratory Results, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Attachment E – Laboratory Results, Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Attachment F – Laboratory Results, PAHs Attachment G – Laboratory Results, Ozone (O3) Attachment H – Laboratory Results, Dioxins and Furans Attachment I – Laboratory Results, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Attachment J – Laboratory Results, Heavy Metals Attachment K – Laboratory Results, Asbestos Fibers ii Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EE&G Disaster Response, LLC (EE&G) has been retained by the World Bank (the “Client”) to perform a preliminary screening of smoke from subsurface fires at the Pond Island municipal waste disposal site and temporary debris site (collectively referred to as the “debris and disposal sites”), in support of the Hurricane Irma Restoration, Recovery and Resilience Program in Sint Maarten. The intent of this screening was to provide information that can be used in scoping activities for World Bank financing, in particular related to the general types and scale of activities to be included in the proposed fire suppression at the municipal waste disposal site and temporary debris site. EE&G performed air testing at the debris and disposal sites over three consecutive days between August 28 and 30, 2018. Each day the testing was focused on a specific portion of the debris and disposal sites, testing locations were as follows:  Day 01 (August 28, 2018) – The northwest portion of the municipal waste disposal site.  Day 02 (August 29, 2018) – The south portion of municipal waste disposal site, located to the northwest of the settlement.  Day 03 (August 30, 2018) – The southeast portion of the temporary debris site. The objective of the screening activities was to obtain a general understanding of what chemicals (or ‘constituents’) of concern (COCs) were present in the smoke plumes emanating from cracks/fissures on the surfaces of the debris and disposal sites. The tests were performed in the following locations:  Upwind of smoke plumes (“upwind” samples), to establish background levels of the COCs in the air prior to reaching the areas where smoke was visibly emanating.  From the smoke plumes (“smoke” samples), to obtain “worst-case” scenario levels of the COCs at their originating source.  In the cabs of equipment performing normal operations at the active face of the municipal waste disposal site (MWDS) and on the temporary disposal site (TDS) that were reported to be part of a typical work day (“personnel” samples), to gauge COC levels relative to occupational limits. Four samples were collected from the smoke plumes and one upwind sample was collected each day. Personnel samples were collected on days 2 and 3. Determination of the COCs to be tested was based upon a general knowledge of which byproducts of incineration can be found in a landfill setting and common components that make up landfill gasses, and the input of other World Bank consultants. The COCs that were tested for included the following: 1 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018  Landfill gases, which include methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO). These gasses are produced when bacteria break down organic waste.  Lower Explosive Limit (LEL), the concentration level at which gas has the potential to explode.  Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), other gasses besides landfill gasses (listed above) that can be produced by the breaking down/decomposition of waste.  Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a gas that can be the source of most landfill odors.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), compounds found in coal and tar and produced by burning of organic matter.  Respirable particulates (PM 2.5), solid particles generated by mechanical action or burning. Composition depends on the parent material. Can be non-organic (silica, asbestos, metals or plastics) or organic (cellulose, mold or bacteria). PM 2.5 are ‘fine’ or ‘tiny’ particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in size.  Ozone (O3), a COC that may be formed by landfill gasses.  Dioxins and Furans, byproducts of combustion of plastic waste and other materials, particularly those containing chlorine.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), man-made chemicals that can be released into the environment through burning of waste. PCBs typically are associated with electronics.  Heavy metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver), environmental pollutants that can be released into the environment through burning of waste.  Asbestos fibers, carcinogens associated with the disturbance or incineration of building materials The air testing results were compared to the most stringent of the threshold levels established by the American Council of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), the European Union (EU) Occupational Exposure Levels (OELs), United States (US) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) or the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs). Prior to discussing the testing results, it is important to note that monitoring data collected directly from the smoke plumes, near the ground surface does not accurately reflect the levels of airborne concentrations at which the general public or workers at the site will be exposed. However, these data provide a preliminary understanding of what exposure risks may be anticipated during fire suppression activities. Air quality testing that will be performed during fire suppression activities can be focused on “indicator” parameters based on what was detected in the smoke samples. The below table shows locations where concentrations of COCs exceeded exposure limits. 2 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Smoke - Smoke - Northwest South Smoke - Municipal Municipal Temporary COC Upwind Personnel Waste Waste Disposal Disposal Disposal Site Site Site Carbon X X X - - Monoxide Respirable Particulates (PM X X X X X 2.5) Volatile Organic Compounds - X X X - - Benzene Hydrogen X - - - - Sulfide PAH (All) X X X - - Acenapthylene - X X - - Benzo(a)pyrene X X - - - Ozone X X - - - Dioxin/Furans X X X - - (TCDD TEQ) X – Denotes locations with results that exceed the exposure limits - Denotes concentrations not exceeding exposure limits The above table shows that concentrations of the COCs were highest within the smoke plumes this was supported by the number of locations where results were above exposure limits. Exceptions were respirable particulates which were found in upwind and personnel samples. Although there were some similarities in the test results collected from the debris and disposal sites, the findings showed that more COCs were at concentrations greater than threshold levels in the samples collected at the municipal waste disposal site than the temporary debris site. This may be due to the age and thickness of debris of the municipal waste disposal site, reported duration of the fires at the municipal waste disposal site or different mix of debris types at the two locations. Results of the upwind and personnel samples showed significantly lower concentrations of the COCs when compared to the smoke samples and exceedances were not found in these samples, with the exception of respirable particulates. This suggested that the COCs identified in the samples were primarily associated with the smoke/vapor sources and likely did not originate from other offsite sources. Potential routes of exposure to COCs resulting from the smoke would primarily be through inhalation. However, exposure through skin contact or ingestion from residues around smoke sources (fissures) or around/near active or inactive areas of smoldering or burning may also be 3 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 possible. Risks of potential exposure may likely be increased during fire suppression activities, when the fires are excavated and burning waste is exposed. Based upon the findings and conclusions of the air testing, EE&G has developed an air monitoring plan and provided recommendations for training, personal protective equipment, safe work practices, and decontamination which are described in the Recommendations section of this document. The air monitoring plan will be delivered under separate cover. These results and conclusions presented in this report do not contain reference to or discussion of potential for offsite migration of COCs, or the potential for impacting surrounding populations. Perimeter air monitoring of the debris and disposal sites and potential impacts to the surrounding areas from emissions is recommended to be performed as part of the fire suppression activities to be protective of human health and the environment. This sampling and analysis event was performed to assess the “worse case” exposure scenarios for workers (without excavating waste) that will be performing fire suppression and working within active combustion and smoke impacted areas. These data should not be used for other purposes, in particular speculation as to what offsite concerns may or may not be occurring. 4 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION EE&G Disaster Response, LLC (EE&G) has been retained by the World Bank (the “Client”) to perform a preliminary screening of smoke from subsurface fires at the Pond Island municipal waste disposal site and temporary debris site (collectively referred to as the “debris and disposal sites”), in support of the Hurricane Irma Restoration, Recovery and Resilience Program in Sint Maarten. EE&G’s testing services described herein was provided in accordance with EE&G’s Technical Proposal Contract 7187552, Modification “B”, issued by the World Bank on August 22, 2018 (hereafter referred to as “the Contract”). The objectives of EE&G’s advisory services were as follows:  To perform a preliminary screening for chemical constituents of concern (COCs) identified by EE&G and other third party consultants retained by the Client, that may be in the smoke emanating from smoldering waste and debris through fissures at the debris and disposal sites. The purpose of the screening was to assess for COCs that may be present during upcoming fire suppression activities.  To develop an air monitoring plan to be followed during upcoming fire suppression activities. This plan will be based upon the results of the preliminary screening activities summarized in this document and will be provided as a separate document.  To make recommendations for the appropriate level of respiratory protection for landfill workers and fire suppression workers based on the data collected. The intent of this screening was to provide information that can be used in scoping activities for World Bank financing, in particular related to the general types and scale of activities to be included in the proposed fire suppression at the municipal waste disposal site and temporary debris site. It can be used by Government of Sint Maarten as a reference in the development and implementation of these activities; however, the results are strictly advisory, and the contents are not ready or endorsed for use under World Bank financing. Any recommendations are provided by EE&G to the World Bank as advice and do not represent the views of the World Bank, and its Executive Directors or the Government of Sint Maarten. While every reasonable effort was made to ensure the information is accurate, any use of the information by third parties is not the responsibility of the World Bank, the Government of Sint Maarten or EE&G and should be done by professionals qualified in the field and in the context of the time, method and scope of the analysis with due consideration of any limitations it may present. The Government of Sint Maarten is responsible for doing the necessary analysis to comply with environmental and social safeguards policies of the World Bank and local regulations, develop an associated documentation and the mitigation measures therein and for obtaining World Bank clearance and approval for those activities financed under World Bank administered financing as per World Bank Policies and the terms of the associated financing. 5 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 1.2 LIMITATIONS The intent of this work is to provide advice in helping scoping activities for World Bank financing. The work is strictly advisory, and the contents do not represent an endorsement for financing or implementation. This report has been prepared by EE&G in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. EE&G's interpretations and recommendations are based upon the results of sample analyses, as well as investigative work conducted on August 28, 29 and 30, 2018. Other conditions elsewhere at the site may differ from those in the sampled locations and such conditions are unknown, may change over time and have not been considered. Adverse weather, consisting of intermittent rainstorms and strong wind gusts were experienced during the testing. In some cases these conditions resulted in sample stations being washed out or knocked over, damage to sample media and equipment and shortened sampling intervals. The affect that these conditions had on the results was unclear, as the laboratory was able to read the majority of the samples. It is possible that data collected during favorable weather may show slightly different results that those presented in this report. EE&G and the World Bank will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed pursuant to the compilation of this report. This report reflects conditions, operations, and practices as observed on the dates and times of the site testing. The interpretations and recommendations, stated in this report, are based on previous environmental studies and research conclusions. EE&G and the World Bank do not warrant the use of segregated portions of this report. EE&G and the World Bank will not be responsible for the interpretation or use by others of data developed pursuant to the compilation of this report. It is recommended that any implementing party should have a qualified industrial hygienist interpret the applicability of the information for implementation. Furthermore, a qualified occupational physician should interpret the information in this report before any clinical conclusions are drawn. 6 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS The primary objective of the air testing was to screen for COCs that may be associated with smoke and vapor emission plumes at the points of emanation from surface fissures located on the debris and disposal sites. Data was also collected upwind of the smoke samples and within two heavy equipment cabs that were operating at the debris and disposal sites. 2.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION The sampling was accomplished by collecting instantaneous and analytical air samples. These methods are described below:  Instantaneous samples were collected using direct read meters that provide real time data in the field.  Analytical air samples were collected using various types of filtration cassettes and media which were shipped off-island to laboratories for analysis. Analytical air samples were collected by setting up sampling stations, each with multiple vacuum pumps drawing air through various different forms of test media, including evacuated grab sampling canisters. Instantaneous and analytical samples were collected at fixed locations on the debris and disposal sites. The locations were designated as smoke, upwind and personnel, which are defined below:  Smoke sampling – Smoke samples were collected to screen for COCs at the emissions points at the surface of the debris and dump sites. The points of air intake of the sampling media, meters and grab canisters were positioned within approximately one foot above the ground directly in visible smoke plumes emanating from surface fissures on the debris and disposal sites. It was widely reported to and also observed by EE&G that the winds in the area blow consistently from the eastward direction to the west, making the flow of smoke from the ground fissures across the sampling media reasonably predictable.  Upwind sampling – Upwind samples were placed in locations where smoke and other visible emissions were not observed, to evaluate the analytical air entering into the subject site for the tested COCs prior to mixing with the smoke sources. The points of air intake of the sampling media, meters and grab canisters were positioned within approximately one foot above the ground upwind of the smoke samples described above. It was reported to and also observed by EE&G that the winds in the area blow consistently from the eastward direction to the west. The wind direction was visually confirmed by EE&G prior to placing the sampling equipment.  Personnel sampling – Personnel samples were placed in track hoes while operators performed activities that were reported to be typical of a work day managing incoming municipal solid waste and hurricane related debris. Test stations were set up in the cabs of heavy equipment behind the operator’s chair, with the intakes of the sampling media drawing air from head levels near the 7 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 breathing zone (approximately one foot from the operator’s face). Instantaneous readings were not collected as part of the personnel sampling. The air testing was performed over a period of three days from August 28 through August 30, 2018. The testing was conducted on a different general area of debris and disposal sites each day. A summary of the sample areas are as follows:  Day 01 (August 28, 2018) – Smoke and upwind were collected from the northwest portion of the municipal waste disposal site. Personnel sampling was not collected this day.  Day 02 (August 29, 2018) – Smoke and upwind were collected from the south portion of municipal waste disposal site, in the vicinity of fissures associated with the unstable slope located to the northwest of the settlement. Personnel samples were collected from heavy equipment operating in the active face of the municipal waste disposal site and Temporary debris site.  Day 03 (August 30, 2018) – Smoke and upwind were collected from the southeast portion of the temporary debris site. Personnel samples also collected from heavy equipment operating in the active face of the municipal waste disposal site and on the temporary debris site. Instantaneous and analytical test locations were designated using a project specific identification system where each location was marked with a 5-digit number. The first two numbers noted the day the sampling was performed (Days 01-03, corresponding to dates of August 28-30, 2018), followed by the last three numbers that noted the testing station (location) at the site. For example, sample #02-005 was collected on Day 2 (August 29, 2018) at sampling location 005, and each different COC tested for may have a sample numbered 02- 005. Samples were collected from fixed locations each day; which are shown on the sample location diagram that is provided in Figure 1. Below is a summary of the sampling activities:  Smoke sampling – Instantaneous and analytical testing was performed at a total of 12 locations, with sampling performed at locations 001-004 each day.  Upwind sampling – Instantaneous and analytical testing was performed at a total of 3 locations, with sampling performed at location 005 each day.  Personnel sampling – Analytical testing was performed on August 29 and 30, 2018 (days 02 and 03). A total of 4 personnel samples were collected over the two days, with 1 sample collected from the track hoe working on the active face of the municipal waste disposal site (sample 006) and 1 sample collected from the track hoe working on the temporary debris site (sample 007) each day. Representative photographs of the sampling stations and test locations are included in Attachment A. 8 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 2.2 CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN Determination of which COCs to be tested for was based upon a general knowledge of which byproducts of waste burning or incineration are typically found in a landfill setting, observations of types of waste at the debris and disposal sites, common components contained within landfill gasses, and the input of other World Bank consultants. The COCs that were tested for included the following:  Landfill gases1, specifically methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO)  Lower Explosive Limit (LEL)  Volatile Organic Compounds1 (VOCs)  Hydrogen sulfide1 (H2S)  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons1 (PAHs)  Respirable particulates2 (PM 2.5)  Ozone2 (O3)  Dioxins and Furans2  Polychlorinated biphenyls2 (PCBs)  Heavy metals2 (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver)  Asbestos fibers2 1 The COCs were sampled both by methods requiring lab analysis and to the greatest extent feasible by direct read meters, which provide instantaneous results. 2 The COCs were sampled only by methods requiring lab analysis and sampling with direct read meters was not feasible. Attachment B contains a list of the above COCs that contains a link to NIOSH website that contains information regarding each chemical, including types of hazard, acute symptoms, routes of exposure and occupational exposure limits. 2.3 DETERMINATION OF INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA In 2008, the UN Economic & Social Council published the following remark: “A number of environmental health rules and regulations are in place in the Netherlands Antilles but they are insufficient, a fact which is recognized by the Government. Environmental standards have been drawn up for priority areas (refineries, utility companies, waste-disposal companies) but have not yet come into force, pending the entry into force of the National Ordinance on Environmental Principles. In addition, a number of general island ordinances (e.g. the Waste Ordinance, Pollution Ordinance and the Police Ordinance), which allow the island authorities to act when there is a threat to public health or the environment, are already in force. The former Netherlands Antilles had reportedly begun the process of establishing environmental norms and standards, but this was never concluded prior to establishing of the new countries within the Dutch Kingdom, including St. Maarten. Because of this, it was not clear which norms and standards would apply to the interpretation of the air testing data. The Environmental Legislation of Bonaire, Saba and Statia was proposed as an applicable reference standard, https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-32473-3.html however it does not address air testing (Section 2.2 Environment and Environmental Regulations, Part d Other Environmental Issues – “The air quality also deserves attention. At the moment there is no regulation in this 9 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 area yet”). Given that there are no specific guidelines for environmental air testing established by the Government of St. Maarten, there can be some flexibility in determination of applicable standards. For the purpose of the screening activities, the following standards were used to evaluate the data that was collected, when different values were found for a COC, the most stringent or lowest value was used.  American Council of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) time weighted average (TWA) - threshold limit values (TLVs) as required by The World Bank Group, International Finance Corporation Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines for Occupational Health and Safety dated April 30, 2007.  European Union (EU) Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) – since the subject site was located in Sint Maarten, a country that is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the data collected was compared to regulatory exposure limits applicable to the Netherlands or the European Union when possible. In Europe, there are two types of occupational exposure limits for chemical agents: EU community exposure limits and national exposure limits. The community limits are set by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. The EU Member States are required to establish national occupational exposure limit values for listed chemical agents, taking into account the community values. National exposure limit values may be different from the community values. Exposure limits that are specific to The Netherlands are noted with “NL”.  US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) – these are the legal limits in the United States for employee exposures to chemical substances or physical agents. PELs are typically expressed as an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) concentration.  US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) – these are occupational exposure limits that have been recommended to OSHA for adoption as regulatory PELs. RELs are generally considered as recommended updates to the OSHA exposure regulations. 2.4 SAMPLING METHODS, DEVICES AND MEDIA The methods used for instantaneous, smoke and personnel sampling are described in Table 1 below. The collection periods for the samples described in Table 1 varied depending on circumstances at the site and may have been longer or shorter than the intended run time. Site conditions may have dictated that deviations to the below sampling methods were necessary. In these situations the condition and associated change in collection methodology will be discussed in the Findings Section of this report. 10 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Table 1: Sampling Methods, Devices and Media Used for Suspected COCs. Sampling Materials and Media Approximate Sample Collection † Constituents ( smoke/personnel Periods, Flow Rates and Total Lab Analyses: of Concern samples, *direct Volume (liters [L] and liters per read/instantaneous minute [LPM]): meters): EPA TO-15 Method with Evacuated summa Methane via TO-3 plus CO2 and 8-hour draw period canister† CO via CMS Method Landfill gas (CH4, CO2, CO) plus VOCs GEM 2000 meter (CH4 and CO2) and ppbRAE -- n/a 3000 Photo-ionizing Detector (TVOCs)* Coconut shell solid sorbent 2.5 hours at flow rate of 0.25 LPM for a NIOSH 6013 Method tubes† total of 37.5 L H2S GEM 2000 meter (H2S)* -- n/a Multi-RAE 6228 multi-gas CO, O2, LEL, H2S -- n/a meter* NIOSH 5506 Method (samples XAD-2 sorbent tubes with 8 hours at flow rate of 2 LPM for a total were wrapped in aluminum foil PAH's (semi- PTFE pre-filter† of 960L and shipped to lab on ice) VOCs) ppbRAE 3000 Photo- -- n/a ionizing Detector* Dust-Trak 2 -- n/a PM 2.5 (data logging)† (Respirable Particulates) TSI Sidepack AM 520 -- n/a (data logging)† Nitrate-impregnated glass 2.5 hours at flow rate of 0.25 LPM for a Ozone (O3) OSHA ID214 Method fiber filter† total of 37.5 L Method TO-9A modified Dioxins and 8 hours at flow rate of 5 LPM for a total Polyurethane foam tube† (samples were shipped to lab on Furans of 2400 L ice) Florisil sorbent tube with 2.5 hours at flow rate of 0.25 LPM for a PCBs glass fiber Swinnex pre- NIOSH 5503 modified Method total of 37.5 L filter† Heavy Metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, 5.0 pre-weighed PVC filter RCRA 8 NIOSH 7300 modified 6 hours at flow rate of 4 LPM for a total chromium, lead, cassette† Method of 1440L selenium, and silver) 100 minutes at flow rate of 4 LPM for a Asbestos TEM CEM cassette† NIOSH 7402 Method (TEM) total of 400L 11 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 2.5 COC COMPARISON CRITERIA The results of the smoke, upwind and personnel testing were compared to the criteria of comparison presented in this section. Landfill Gases – Methane (CH4), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) Instantaneous and analytical air testing were performed to screen for Methane, CO2 and CO. The analytical results were compared to the exposure limits shown below (the “criteria for comparison”). The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures. EU OEL Constituent OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV (Netherlands) 1,800 mg/m3 Methane N/A N/A N/A (1,000 ppm) 9,000 mg/m3 9,000 mg/m3 9,000 mg/m3 9,000 mg/m3 Carbon dioxide (5,000 ppm) (5,000 ppm) (5,000 ppm) (5,000 ppm) 29 mg/m3 55 mg/m3 40 mg/m3 29 mg/m3 Carbon monoxide (25 ppm) (50 ppm) (35 ppm) (25 ppm) Lower Explosive Level (LEL) Instantaneous testing was performed to screen for LEL. Results were compared to the OSHA action level of 10%. Analytical sampling for LEL was not performed. Oxygen (O2) Instantaneous testing was performed to screen for O2. Results were compared to OSHA minimum levels of 195,000 ppm, or 19.5%. Analytical sampling for O2 was not performed. Respirable Particulates (PM 2.5) Instantaneous testing was performed to screen for particles of less than 2.5 micrometers in size (“respirable particles”). Results were reported in milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) and compared to the EU OEL of 5 mg/m3 (France) and OSHA PEL of 5 mg/m3 based upon 8-hour time weighted average exposures. NIOSH and ACGIH have not established RELs or TLVs for respirable particulates. Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV Respirable 5 mg/m3 5 mg/m3 N/A N/A Particulates (PM 2.5) (France) (20 ppm) 12 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Instantaneous and analytical testing was performed to screen for VOCs, results were interpreted accordingly:  Instantaneous testing - A screening was performed using a photoionization detector (PID) to assess for the presence of total VOCs (TVOCs), to support the analytical sampling described below. The use of a PID allowed for the collection of multiple readings from different locations over the sampling periods. This analysis did not provide the composition of the gases that were being measured.  Analytical sampling - Results were compared to the exposure limits shown in the below table (the “criteria for comparison). The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures. VOC Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 240 mg/m3 1,190 mg/m3 Propylene *N/A N/A (100 ppm) (500 ppm) 268 mg/m3 207 mg/m3 104 mg/m3 Chloromethane **LFC (130 ppm) (100 ppm) (50 ppm) 1,900 mg/m3 2,400 mg/m3 n-Butane N/A N/A (800 ppm) (1,000 ppm) 4.6 mg/m3 2.2 mg/m3 4.4 mg/m3 1,3-Butadiene LFC (2 ppm) (1 ppm) (2 ppm) 268 mg/m3 2,600 mg/m3 264 mg/m3 Chloroethane LFC (100 ppm) (1,000 ppm) (100 ppm) 260 mg/m3 1,900 mg/m3 1,900 mg/m3 1,900 mg/m3 Ethanol (500 ppm) (1,000 ppm) (1,000 ppm) (1,000 ppm) 980 mg/m3 980 mg/m3 490 mg/m3 Isopropyl alcohol N/A (400 ppm) (400 ppm) (200 ppm) 1,210 mg/m3 2,400 mg/m3 590 mg/m3 1,200 mg/m3 Acetone (505 ppm) (1,000 ppm) (250 ppm) (500 ppm) 34 mg/m3 68 mg/m3 34 mg/m3 34 mg/m3 Acetonitrile (20 ppm) (40 ppm) (20 ppm) (20 ppm) 4.4 mg/m3 2.2 mg/m3 4.4 mg/m3 Acrylonitrile N/A (2 ppm) (1 ppm) (2 ppm) 13 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 VOC Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 72 mg/m3 1,800 mg/m3 180 mg/m3 180 mg/m3 n-Hexane (20 ppm) (500 ppm) (50 ppm) (50 ppm) 590 mg/m3 590 mg/m3 590 mg/m3 2-Butanone N/A (200 ppm) (200 ppm) (200 ppm) 1,400 mg/m3 1,400 mg/m3 1,400 mg/m3 Ethyl acetate N/A (400 ppm) (400 ppm) (400 ppm) 300 mg/m3 590 mg/m3 590 mg/m3 150 mg/m3 Tetrahydrofuran (101 ppm) (200 ppm) (200 ppm) (50 ppm) 700 mg/m3 1,050 mg/m3 1,050 mg/m3 350 mg/m3 Cyclohexane (200 ppm) (300 ppm) (300 ppm) (100 ppm) 1,200 mg/m3 2,000 mg/m3 350 mg/m3 1,600 mg/m3 n-Heptane (300 ppm) (500 ppm) (85 ppm) (400 ppm) 3.2 mg/m3 3.2 mg/m3 0.3 mg/m3 1.6 mg/m3 Benzene (1 ppm) (1 ppm) (0.1 ppm) (0.5 ppm) 205 mg/m3 410 mg/m3 410 mg/m3 205 mg/m3 Methyl Methacrylate (50 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) (50 ppm) 20 mg/m3 360 mg/m3 3.6 mg/m3 72 mg/m3 1,4-Dioxane (5 ppm) (100 ppm) (1 ppm) (20 ppm) 4-Methyl-2- 104 mg/m3 410 mg/m3 200 mg/m3 200 mg/m3 pentanone (25 ppm) (100 ppm) (50 ppm) (50 ppm) 150 mg/m3 750 mg/m3 375 mg/m3 190 mg/m3 Toluene (40 ppm) (200 ppm) (100 ppm) (50 ppm) 410 mg/m3 4.1 mg/m3 21 mg/m3 2-Hexanone N/A (100 ppm) (1 ppm) (5 ppm) 23 mg/m3 350 mg/m3 45 mg/m3 Chlorobenzene N/A (5 ppm) (75 ppm) (10 ppm) 215 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 Ethylbenzene (50 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) 210 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 Xylene (p,m) (50 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) 14 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 VOC Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 210 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 435 mg/m3 Xylene (Ortho) (50 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) (100 ppm) 430 mg/m3 210 mg/m3 86 mg/m3 Styrene N/A (100 ppm) (50 ppm) (20 ppm) Isopropylbenzene 100 mg/m3 250 mg/m3 250 mg/m3 250 mg/m3 (cumene) (25 ppm) (50 ppm) (50 ppm) (50 ppm) 4-Ethyltoluene N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,3,5- 100 mg/m3 120 mg/m3 120 mg/m3 120 mg/m3 Trimethylbenzene (21 ppm) (25 ppm) (25 ppm) (25 ppm) 1,2,4- 100 mg/m3 120 mg/m3 120 mg/m3 120 mg/m3 Trimethylbenzene (21 ppm) (25 ppm) (25 ppm) (25 ppm) 50 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 Naphthalene (10 ppm) (10 ppm) (10 ppm) (10 ppm) *N/A – Not Applicable **LFC – Lowest Feasible Concentration Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Instantaneous and analytical sampling was performed to screen for H2S. Results were compared to the following exposure limits (the “criteria for comparison”). The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures unless otherwise noted: Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 28 mg/m3 14 mg/m3 (20 ppm) (10 ppm) 1.4 mg/m3 H2S 1.65 ppm 10-minute 10-minute (1 ppm) ceiling ceiling Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Analytical sampling was performed to screen for PAHs. The PAH sampling results were compared to the regulatory and recommended exposure limits summarized in the table below (the “criteria for comparison”). Only criteria for comparison of constituents that were identified above detectable levels are listed. The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures. 15 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 PAH Constituent EU OEL (NL) OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV Naphthalene 50 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 Acenaphthylene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Acenaphthene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Fluorene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 800 Phenanthrene 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 (Latvia) Anthracene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Fluoranthene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Pyrene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Chrysene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Benzo(e)pyrene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Benzo(b)fluoranthene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene N/A 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 0.00055 mg/m3 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 (Netherlands) 16 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Ozone (O3) Analytical sampling was performed to screen for O3. Results were compared to the following exposure limits (the “criteria for comparison”). The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures. Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 0.12 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 Ozone (0.05 ppm) (0.1 ppm) (0.1 ppm) (0.1 ppm) Dioxins and Furans Analytical sampling was performed to screen for dioxins/furans. Results were reported in picograms per cubic meter of air (pg/m3), which were given for 8-hour time weighed average exposures. The results were normalized by toxicity equivalence factors to a toxicity equivalence (TEQ) value based on the dioxin compound tetra-chloro-dibenzo-dioxin (TCDD). The TEQ was calculated by the laboratory as prediction of the potency of the mixture of dioxins and furans present in a sample and expressed as a concentration of 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin or TCDD alone. TCDD is commonly regarded as the most toxic compound (congener) in the dioxin group of chemicals and is used as a general measure of dioxin toxicity for the samples. The TEQ was compared to exposure limits (the “criteria for comparison”) presented below: Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 10 pg/m3 TCDD *LFC LFC LFC (Germany) *LFC – Lowest Feasible Concentration Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB’s) Analytical sampling was performed to screen for PCBs. Results were compared to the following exposure limits (the “criteria for comparison”). The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures. Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 0.01 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 PCB’s 0.001 mg/m3 (Denmark) (skin) (skin) 17 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Heavy Metals (Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Selenium, and Silver) Analytical sampling was performed to screen for the following heavy metals: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium and silver. Results were reported in mg/m3 and compared to the following exposure limits (the “criteria for comparison”). The values given are for 8-hour time weighted average exposures. Constituent EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV 0.2 mg/m3 Arsenic (As) 0.01 mg/m3 N/A 0.01 mg/m3 (Israel) 0.15 mg/m3 Lead (Pb) 0.05 mg/m3 0.05 mg/m3 0.05 mg/m3 (EU) 0.5 mg/m3 Barium (Ba) 0.5 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 (Finland) 2.0 mg/m3 Chromium (Cr) 0.5 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 (EU) 0.004 mg/m3 Cadmium (Cd) 0.005 mg/m3 *LFC 0.002 mg/m3 (Finland) 0.01 mg/m3 Silver (Ag) 0.01 mg/m3 0.01 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 (Germany) 0.1 mg/m3 Selenium (Se) 0.2 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 0.2 mg/m3 (Finland) *N/A – Not Applicable **LFC – Lowest Feasible Concentration Asbestos Fibers Analytical sampling was performed to screen for airborne asbestos fibers. Asbestos sample results were reported in Structures per square millimeter (S/mm2). The TEM analytical method allows for identification of asbestos fibers. Therefore the interpretive criteria for this constituent were based upon the presence/absence of asbestos fibers in the samples, with detectable concentrations being deemed significant. 18 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 SECTION 3.0 – FINDINGS 3.1 SCREENING RESULTS Instantaneous and analytical samples were collected from upwind, smoke and personnel locations shown on sample location diagram that is provided in Figure 1.  Instantaneous sampling was performed at the smoke and upwind locations. The readings were observed to fluctuate with changes in wind speed, wind direction and in the density of the smoke plumes. The data was collected from 13 test locations (11 smoke and 2 upwind control samples) and shown in Table 2 which is attached to this report. The values for CO, H2S, and particulates were higher when sampling equipment was placed directly in the smoke plumes. The instantaneous meters typically displayed no readings (zeroes) or near zeroes for the above COCs when not placed in visible smoke plumes which also are associated with landfill gasses. One exception was O2, which did not show zero readings outside of the smoke plumes.  Analytical sampling consisted of 12 smoke, 3 upwind and 4 personnel samples. This Section contains a summary of the data collected during the testing. Results will be presented by constituent and grouped by test location (smoke, upwind and personnel). Instantaneous and analytical sampling was not performed for each constituent; only information was provided for the testing performed. Landfill Gases – Methane (CH4), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) A summary of testing for landfill gasses, which include Methane, Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide is presented below. Methane Methane screening results were compared to 1,000 ppm. Instantaneous testing results are shown on Table 2 and analytical testing results are provided in Table 3 and Attachment C. A summary of findings is presented below: Smoke Sampling Analytical sampling results were below the limit values presented in the comparison criteria of 1,000 ppm, with smoke and upwind control samples ranging from 8.7 to 160 ppm. Instantaneous readings ranged from 0 to 28,000 ppm. The locations with the highest values were limited to the temporary debris site, which was sampled on Day 3. Detectable concentrations of methane were not identified in the other test locations. Upwind Sampling The results of the analytical sampling were below the comparison criteria of 1,000 ppm. Analytical sampling results showed that methane was not detected in the test locations with reported concentrations ranging from 2.6 to 5.0 ppm. 19 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Personnel Sampling The analytical sampling showed that methane was not detected in the test locations, with reported concentrations ranging from 2.6 to 5.0 ppm. Carbon Dioxide Carbon dioxide instantaneous testing results are shown on Table 2 and analytical testing results are provided in Table 3 and Attachment C. Analytical readings were compared to 5,000 ppm. Smoke Sampling Analytical CO2 results were below the limit values presented in the comparison criteria of 5,000 ppm, with results ranging from 480 to 1,900 ppm. Instantaneous CO2 readings ranged from 1,000 to 6,000 ppm. Upwind Sampling Analytical CO2 readings were below the criteria for comparison of 5,000 ppm. Instantaneous results ranged from 0 to 1,000 ppm and analytical results ranged from 550 to 600 ppm. Personnel Sampling The results of the analytical sampling were below the comparison criteria of 5,000 ppm with results ranging from 650 to 1,500 ppm. Carbon Monoxide Carbon monoxide analytical testing results are shown on Table 3 and Figure 2 with laboratory reports provided in Attachment C. Analytical readings were compared to 25 ppm. Instantaneous testing results are shown on Table 2. Smoke Sampling Analytical CO results exceeded comparison criteria of 25 ppm in 4 of 12 smoke samples (1 on northwest municipal waste disposal site, 2 on south municipal waste disposal site and 1 on the temporary debris site), with results ranging from below detection limits (BDL) to 130 ppm. Instantaneous CO readings ranged from 5 to 500 ppm. Upwind Sampling CO was not detected in the analytical samples. Instantaneous CO readings were 0 and 24 ppm. Personnel Sampling CO was not detected in the personnel samples. 20 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Lower Explosive Limit Instantaneous testing for LEL was performed. The results were compared to an action level of 10%. A summary of LEL readings is presented in Table 2. Smoke Sampling Explosive environment testing or LEL did not exceed the 10% action level. Results ranged from 0 to 9%, with 2 samples collected from the south municipal waste disposal site that were just below the action level of 10% with readings of 9%. Upwind Sampling Explosive environment testing or LEL did not exceed the 10% action level. Results in the test locations were 0%. Personnel Sampling LEL testing was not performed in these locations. Oxygen (O2) Instantaneous testing was performed for O2. Readings were compared to OSHA minimum levels of 195,000 ppm or 19.5%. A summary of O2 readings is presented in Table 2. Smoke Sampling Oxygen gas readings exceeded the minimum levels in the smoke samples with results ranging from 196,000 to 209,000 ppm (19.5-20.9%). Upwind Sampling Oxygen gas readings exceeded the minimum levels in the upwind samples with results of 204,000 to 209,000 ppm (20.4-20.9%). Personnel Sampling Oxygen gas testing was not performed in these locations. Respirable Particulates (PM 2.5) Instantaneous testing was performed to screen for particles of less than 2.5 micrometers in size (“respirable particles”). The sampling was performed over approximate 8-hour periods; averages of the particulate concentrations and peak concentrations at the types of test locations (smoke, personnel and upwind control) for respirable particulate readings were recorded and compared to 5 mg/m3. A summary of the results is presented in Table 4 and Figure 3. 21 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Smoke Sampling Average results of the instantaneous smoke tests exceeded the 5.0 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in 9 of 12 sample locations (3 on northwest municipal waste disposal site, 3 on south municipal waste disposal site and 3 on the temporary debris site). Averages at the test locations ranged from 0 to 161 mg/m3 and peaks ranged from 15 to 400 mg/m3. Upwind Sampling Average results of instantaneous tests of upwind control locations exceeded the 5.0 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in 2 of 3 samples (1 on northwest municipal waste disposal site and 1 on south municipal waste disposal site). Averages at the test locations ranged from 05 to 78 mg/m3 and peaks ranged from 31 to 218 mg/m3. Personnel Sampling Average results of the instantaneous tests of personnel sample locations exceeded the 5.0 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in all four samples. Averages at the test locations ranged from 12 to 43 mg/m3 and peaks ranged from 77 to 428 mg/m3. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – Instantaneous testing was performed for total TVOCs and the results were used to determine the presence of these constituents at the test locations. The analytical testing allowed for analysis for specific compounds and results were compared to the lowest exposure limit presented in the criteria for comparison. Instantaneous testing results are shown on Table 2 and analytical testing results are shown on Table 5 and Figure 4 (Benzene only) with laboratory reports provided in Attachment D. Smoke Sampling Instantaneous TVOC results showed the presence of these constituents at the test locations (3 on northwest municipal waste disposal site, 4 on south municipal waste disposal site and 4 on the temporary debris site), with results ranging from 0 to 850 ppm. Analytical sample results were as follows:  Benzene exceeded the criteria for comparison of 0.3 mg/m3 (NIOSH REL) in 11 of 12 smoke samples (4 on northwest municipal waste disposal site, 4 on south municipal waste disposal site and 3 on the temporary debris site), with results ranging from 0.2 to 13.0 mg/m3.  Concentrations of other VOCs were either below the criteria for comparison or BDL. Upwind Sampling Instantaneous TVOC results showed the presence of these constituents at the upwind test locations on the south municipal waste disposal site and the temporary debris site, with results of 100 and 7,000 ppm. 22 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Analytical sample results showed that concentrations of VOCs, including Benzene were either below the criteria for comparison or BDL. Personnel Sampling VOC and Benzene concentrations were below the criteria for comparison or BDL. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) – Hydrogen Sulfide readings were compared to 1 ppm. Instantaneous testing results are shown on Table 2 and analytical testing results are shown on Table 6 and Figure 5 with laboratory reports provided in Attachment E. Smoke Sampling Analytical H2S results showed concentrations that exceeded the 1 ppm criteria for comparison (ACGIH TLV) in one smoke sample collected from the northwest municipal waste disposal site. Twelve smoke samples were collected with results ranging from BDL to 3.1 ppm. Instantaneous H2S readings ranged from 0 to 8.8 ppm. Upwind Sampling Instantaneous H2S readings were 0 ppm and analytical testing results were either BDL or below exposure limits. Personnel Sampling H2S levels in personnel samples were either BDL or below exposure limits. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) – The analytical testing provided analysis for specific PAH compounds. Results were compared to the lowest exposure limit presented in the criteria for comparison for each constituent. Results are shown on Table 7 and laboratory reports are provided in Attachment F. The following is a summary of the PAH sampling results: Smoke Sampling Acenaphthylene were found above the NIOSH REL of 0.1 mg/m3 in 3 of 12 smoke samples (2 on south municipal waste disposal site and 1 on the temporary debris site), with results ranging from BDL to 0.6 mg/m3. The sample locations and results are shown on Figure 6. Benzo(a)pyrene were found above the EU OEL (NL) of 0.00055 mg/m3 in 3 of 12 (1 on northwest municipal waste disposal site and 2 on south municipal waste disposal site) smoke samples, with results ranging from BDL to 0.0044 mg/m3. The sample locations and results are shown on Figure 7. Concentrations of other PAHs were either BDL or below the criteria for comparison. 23 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Upwind Sampling Concentrations of PAHs, including Acenaphthylene and Benzo(a)pyrene were either BDL or below the criteria for comparison. Personnel Sampling Concentrations of PAHs, including Acenaphthylene and Benzo(a)pyrene were either BDL or below the criteria for comparison. Ozone (O3) – Ozone readings were compared to 0.12 mg/m3. Results are shown on Table 8 and Figure 8 with laboratory reports are provided in Attachment G. The limit of detection for the O3 samples ranged from 0.20 to 0.31 mg/m3, which is at or above the criteria for comparison. This was because the samples were collected at a lower volume than recommended in the standard. Although the lower sample collection volume resulted in a higher limit of detection on the laboratory results, useful data was obtained. Some sample results were reported by the laboratory above the limits of detection and above the criteria for comparison. These data were useful in concluding that this constituent has the potential to cause overexposures and should be monitored during the fire suppression activities. Smoke Sampling Three of 14 smoke samples showed O3 levels at or above the 0.12 mg/m3 criteria of comparison (EU OEL, NL), with results of 0.91 on the northwest municipal waste disposal site and 0.26 and 0.20 mg/m3 on the south municipal waste disposal site. O3 was not detected in the remaining smoke samples. Only 3 smoke samples were collected on Day 3, at the temporary debris site. The O3 sampling media was damaged due to weather impacts (location #001). Upwind Sampling O3 was not detected in the upwind samples. An upwind sample was not collected during the testing of the temporary debris site, the sampling station Personnel Sampling O3 was not detected in the personnel samples. Dioxins and Furans – Dioxin results were compared to the TCDD TEQ of 10 pg/m3. Results are shown on Table 9 and Figure 9, with laboratory reports provided in Attachment H. Smoke Sampling Concentrations of dioxin/furan constituents were above the TCDD TEQ of 10 pg/m3 in 9 of 11 smoke samples (2 on northwest municipal waste disposal site, 4 on south municipal waste 24 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 disposal site and 3 on the temporary debris site). TCDD TEQ of the samples values ranged from 1.0 to 590 pg/m3. Only 3 smoke samples were collected on Day 3, at the temporary debris site, the sampling media was reported by the laboratory to be damaged and not analyzed Upwind Sampling TCDD TEQ values were below the comparison criteria of 10 pg/m3, with results ranging from 1.1 to 4.4 pg/m3. Personnel Sampling TCDD TEQ values were below the comparison criteria of 10 pg/m3 and ranged from 0.0016 to 0.33 pq/m3. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) – Polychlorinated Biphenyl results were compared to 0.001 mg/m3. The laboratory report is provided in Attachment I. Smoke Sampling Detectable concentrations of PCBs were not found within the smoke samples. Upwind Sampling Detectable concentrations of PCBs were not found within the upwind samples. Personnel Sampling Detectable concentrations of PCBs were not found within the personnel samples. The limit of detection, or minimum concentration detectable by the analytical method used, was reported by the laboratory as ranging from 0.0028 – 0.00062 mg/m3, which was above the criteria for comparison, but less than other exposure limits (EU OEL – 0.01 mg/m3, OSHA PEL – 0.5 mg/m3 and ACGIH TLV of 0.5 mg/m3). Since detectable concentrations of PCBs were not identified and the results were significantly lower than other exposure limits this should not pose a significant concern. The samples were collected at a flowrate of 0.25 liters per minute, which is slightly higher than the flowrate 0.20 liters per minute, which is recommended in the NIOSH 5503 Method. It is the opinion of EE&G that this difference did not have a significant impact on the validity or usefulness of the results. Heavy Metals (Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Selenium, and Silver) Heavy metal samples were compared to the lowest established exposure limit for each constituent. The results are presented in Table 10 and the laboratory results are provided in Attachment J. 25 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Smoke Sampling The following metals were identified in smoke test samples at concentrations above the limits of detection reported by the laboratory:  Arsenic was not found in concentrations above the 0.2 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in the samples, with results ranging from 0.000073 to 0.0013 mg/m3.  Barium was not detected in the samples.  Lead was not found in concentrations above the 0.15 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in the samples, with results ranging from 0.000038 to 0.0023 mg/m3.  Chromium was not found in concentrations above the 2.0 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in the samples, with results ranging from 0.00068 to 0.00083 mg/m3.  Cadmium was detected in 1 of 15 smoke samples (1 on south municipal waste disposal site) and not found in upwind control or personnel samples. The result was 0.000071 mg/m3, which is below the EU OEL (Finland) of 0.004 mg/m3 and OSHA PEL of 0.005 mg/m3, but above the NIOSH REL of lowest feasible concentration. It is the opinion of EE&G that a result at this concentration is not statistically significant.  Selenium was not found in concentrations above the 0.1 mg/m3 criteria for comparison in the samples, with results ranging from 0.000047 to 0.00014 mg/m3.  Silver was not detected in the samples. Upwind Sampling Metals were not detected in the upwind samples, with exception of a 0.00073 mg/m3 concentration of chromium identified in sample 01-005, which was collected on the south municipal waste site. This result was below the comparison criteria of 2.0 mg/m3. Personnel Sampling Metals were not detected in the personnel samples, with exception of a 0.00083 mg/m3 concentration of chromium identified in sample 02-007, which was collected from the track hoe working on the temporary debris site. This result was below the comparison criteria of 2.0 mg/m3. Asbestos Fibers – Asbestos fiber samples were compared to 70 S/mm2, laboratory results are provided in Attachment K. Below is a summary of the asbestos sampling results: 26 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Smoke Sampling Asbestos fibers were not detected in the smoke samples. Sample 02-001, collected from the south municipal waste disposal site was not analyzed by the laboratory and was reported to be too heavily loaded with particulates. Upwind Sampling Asbestos fibers were not detected in the upwind samples. Personnel Sampling Asbestos fibers were not detected in the personnel samples. 3.2 DATA INTERPRETATION Below is a discussion of significant findings of sampling data described in the above section. Upwind and personnel sampling did not identify COCs that were not also found in the smoke samples. Therefore, the information presented in this Section will focus on the COCs that were found to have concentrations above exposure limits in the smoke and compare them to the results of the upwind and personnel samples. Smoke Sampling Constituents of concern were found above exposure limits in the smoke testing. Below is a table showing these COCs, the number of samples, their average concentration, range, comparison value and number of exceedances. Number Exposure Number of COC of Average Range Limit Exceedances Samples Carbon <5.6 – 130 Monoxide 12 31 ppm 25 ppm 4 ppm (Analytical) Respirable 0.0 – 161 Particulates (PM 12 45 mg/m3 5 mg/m3 9 mg/m3 2.5) Volatile Organic 0.2 – 13.0 Compounds - 12 4.2 mg/m3 0.3 mg/m3 11 mg/3 Benzene Hydrogen <0.24 – 3.1 Sulfide 12 0.51 ppm 1 ppm 1 ppm (Analytical) Acenapthylene BDL – 0.6 12 0.1 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 3 (Analytical) mg/m3 BDL – Benzo(a)pyrene 0.00061 0.00055 12 0.0044 3 (Analytical) mg/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 Ozone BDL – 0.91 12 0.11 mg/m3 0.12 mg/m3 3 (Analytical) mg/m3 27 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Number Exposure Number of COC of Average Range Limit Exceedances Samples Dioxin/Furans 1 – 590 (TCDD TEQ) 11 149 pg/m3 10 pg/m3 9 pg/m3 (Analytical) Upwind Sampling Below is a table showing the COCs, the number of samples, their average concentration, range, comparison value and number of exceedances for upwind samples. Number Exposure Number of COC of Average Range Limit Exceedances Samples Carbon Monoxide 3 6 ppm <5 – <6 ppm 25 ppm 0 (Analytical) Respirable 5 – 78 Particulates (PM 3 32 mg/m3 5 mg/m3 2 mg/m3 2.5) Volatile Organic 0.02 – 0.08 Compounds - 3 0.04 mg/m3 0.3 mg/m3 0 mg/3 Benzene Hydrogen 0.29 ppm <0.25 – Sulfide 3 (Not 1 ppm 0 <0.35 ppm (Analytical) Detected) Acenapthylene BDL – 0.005 3 0.004 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0 (Analytical) mg/m3 0.00033 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.31 - 0.00055 3 mg/m3 (Not 0 (Analytical) <0.35 mg/m3 mg/m3 Detected) 0.21 mg/m3 Ozone <.020 – 0 3 (Not 0.12 mg/m3 (Analytical) <0.23 mg/m3 (Not Detected) Detected) Dioxin/Furans 0 – 4.4 (TCDD TEQ) 3 1.8 pg/m3 10 pg/m3 0 pg/m3 (Analytical) Detectable concentrations (below exposure limits) of other COCs were identified in the upwind samples, which included: - Carbon Dioxide - Carbon Monoxide - VOCs - PAHs - Dioxin/Furans - Metals 28 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 Personnel Sampling Below is a table showing COCs, the number of samples, their average concentration, range, comparison value and number of exceedances for personnel samples. Number Exposure Number of COC of Average Range Limit Exceedances Samples Carbon Monoxide 4 6 ppm <5 – <6 ppm 25 ppm 0 (Analytical) Respirable 12 – 43 Particulates (PM 4 22 mg/m3 5 mg/m3 4 mg/m3 2.5) Volatile Organic 0.02 – 0.08 Compounds - 4 0.05 mg/m3 0.3 mg/m3 0 mg/3 Benzene Hydrogen <0.24 – 0.81 Sulfide 4 0.40 ppm 1 ppm 0 ppm (Analytical) Acenapthylene BDL – 0.004 4 0.002 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 0 (Analytical) mg/m3 0.00034 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.31 - 0.00055 4 mg/m3 (Not 0 (Analytical) <0.35 mg/m3 mg/m3 Detected) 0.24 mg/m3 Ozone <.020 – 0 4 (Not 0.12 mg/m3 (Analytical) <0.31 mg/m3 (Not Detected) Detected) Dioxin/Furans 0.00 – 0.33 (TCDD TEQ) 4 0.1 pg/m3 10 pg/m3 0 pg/m3 (Analytical) Detectable concentrations (below exposure limits) of other COCs were identified in the personnel samples, which included: - Hydrogen Sulfide Gas - VOCs - PAHs - Dioxin/Furans - Metals The above information shows the following:  Smoke samples contained more COCs, with higher peak and average concentrations than the upwind and personnel samples.  Respirable Particulates were found to exceed exposure limits in smoke, upwind and personnel samples. 29 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018  TVOCs were found in smoke and upwind samples. Personnel sampling was not performed, so the possibility exists that VOCs also may be a concern for operators.  COC exceedances were not found in upwind and personnel samples that were not also found in the smoke samples. However concentrations of several COCs were found at the debris sites, outside of the smoke plumes. 30 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 SECTION 4.0 – CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of the preliminary screening activities, EE&G presents the following specific conclusions related to the air sampling data. 4.1 SMOKE SAMPLING The smoke samples showed that concentrations of the following COCs were found to be at or above exposure limits. Figures 10a, 10b and 10c show locations of these samples for the northwest municipal waste disposal site, south municipal waste disposal site and the temporary debris site respectively: Smoke - Smoke - South Smoke - Northwest COC Municipal Waste Temporary Municipal Waste Disposal Site Disposal Site Disposal Site Carbon Monoxide X X X Respirable Particulates (PM X X X 2.5) Volatile Organic Compounds - X X X Benzene Hydrogen Sulfide X - - PAH (all) X X X Acenapthylene - X X Benzo(a)pyrene X X - Ozone X X - Dioxin/Furans X X X (TCDD TEQ) X – Denotes location where concentrations exceeded exposure limits. Given the location of the samples (collected from within the smoke plumes, within 1 foot of the surfaces of the debris and disposal sites), these results do not necessarily mean that the debris and disposal site employees or the general public are being exposed to these COCs at these concentrations. The results support that these COCs were present and that personnel performing work directly in the smoke at the debris and disposal sites have potential for exposure to these constituents at some level. The instantaneous instrument testing supported the conclusion that the concentrations of the COCs were greater near the fissures/smoke sources. The potential exists that some COCs may originate from different locations other than where smoke was observed or in soils surrounding the fissures/smoke sources. Testing in these areas was outside of the scope of this screening. 31 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 The municipal waste disposal site had exceedances for 3 more COCs than the temporary debris site. This supported the understanding that the trash and waste smoldering beneath the surface at the sites may have different chemical compositions at different times. Also, fires have been burning deeper within the waste and for many more years at the municipal waste disposal site versus the more recently developed temporary debris site. The fact that several of COCs with exceedances were found at both sites suggested that there were some similarities in the smoke composition, with similar potential for exposure to firefighting crews and employees at the site. The potential routes of exposure would primarily be through inhalation. However, exposure through dermal contact or ingestion from precipitated residues around smoke sources (fissures) or around/near active or inactive areas of smoldering or burning may also be possible. The risk of potential exposure may likely be increased once the fires are excavated and burning waste is exposed. 4.2 UPWIND SAMPLING The results of the upwind control samples showed significantly lower concentrations of the COCs tested for when compared to the smoke test samples and with the exception of respirable particulates, showed no exceedances. This suggested that the COCs identified in the test samples primarily originated from the smoke/vapor sources evaluated at the site and likely did not originate from other offsite sources. Detectable concentrations (below exposure limits) of other COCs were identified in the upwind samples, which included: - Carbon Dioxide - Carbon Monoxide - VOCs - PAHs - Dioxin/Furans - Metals These results support that these COCs were present and that personnel working at the debris and disposal sites have potential for exposure to these constituents at some level, even when not working in visible smoke. Particulate sample results were above the criteria for comparison in the upwind samples. These results were not likely due to the smoke, but to the lack of dust control at the debris and disposal sites. 32 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 4.3 PERSONNEL SAMPLING The results of the personnel sampling performed in the equipment cabs did not identify concentrations of COCs above the referenced exposure limits, with the exception of particulates. Detectable concentrations (below exposure limits) of other COCs were identified in the personnel samples, which included: - Hydrogen Sulfide Gas - VOCs - PAHs - Dioxin/Furans - Metals These results support that these COCs were present and that there is potential for exposure to these constituents at some level. The particulate sampling results were significant for the following reasons:  Some COCs can bind to dust particles which can be inhaled, ingested or contaminate clothing.  The results support the need for implementation of dust control at the debris and disposal sites. The equipment operators were performing normal solid waste landfilling activities near the active face and temporary debris site; therefore, these data are not representative of what the conditions may be for operators performing fire suppression activities, who will presumably be within close proximity to active fire and associated smoke and landfill gas vapors. 33 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 SECTION 5.0 – RECOMMENDATIONS This Section contains recommendations for the purpose of scoping the fire suppression activity. The implementation of the recommendations presented herein will need to be considered by the fire suppression contractor and other on-site operators. This will need to be confirmed at the time of mobilization and included in a final environmental and social safeguards instrument, duly cleared by the relevant authorities and in the case of World Bank financing, the World Bank. These recommendations should be revisited after the fires are suppressed and normal municipal waste disposal site activities are resumed. EE&G’s recommendations are based upon the understanding that the following personnel may be at the debris and disposal sites during fire suppression activities:  Fire suppression crews and related staff – personnel that are expected to be working in the immediate vicinity of the fires.  Landfill workers and contractors – personnel that are expected to spend the majority of their shifts working at the debris and disposal sites, but not in the immediate vicinity of the fires.  Government employees, site visitors and waste haulers – personnel that are expected to spend a limited amount of time at the debris and disposal sites, but not in the immediate vicinity of the fires.  Salvagers – individuals that are not employees of the Government, landfill operator or Government-authorized contractor. Salvagers work on the debris and disposal sites removing metal and other items of scrap value from waste that has been discarded. EE&G’s recommendations are presented below:  The Government, authorized contractors and fire suppression contractors that work at the debris and disposal sites should have a health and safety plan developed that is specific to their on-site activities. Among other things, these plans should address hazard communication, use of personal protective equipment and smoke/fire safety.  All personnel should be instructed to avoid working near fissures and downwind of smoke or areas where pungent landfill gas odors are observed. Workers operating directly in the visible smoke sources or in areas where smoke migration may be anticipated at the site should employ respiratory protection consisting of atmosphere supplying respirators (airline, self-contained breathing apparatus, or combination of the two). Air purifying respirators should not be allowed for such work. In addition to this level of respiratory protection, additional personal protection for high heat, fire and hot surfaces may also be required, depending on the nature of the work near the smoke sources.  All personnel working on the debris and disposal sites should be provided with respiratory protection, at a minimum consisting of half-face respirators equipped with high efficiency particulate air (P100)/multi-gas/organic vapor cartridges. Prior 34 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 to being outfitted with a negative pressure respirator, employees should pass a basic physical. The physical should be performed by an occupational physician or equivalent health care professional and may include a medical history review, spirometry to assess lung capacity and any other assessment deemed necessary by the health care professional to determine fitness to wear a respirator. Furthermore, fit testing and respiratory use training should be conducted before any person is outfitted and asked to work/salvage on the debris and disposal sites.  Consideration should be made to improve site security to reduce potential for unauthorized site visitors to access areas near fissures, smoke sources, fires or fire suppression exclusion zones. Unauthorized personnel should not be allowed inside fire suppression exclusion or contamination reduction zones.  Fire suppression and government employees working on the debris and disposal sites, should be equipped with direct-read monitors to test for the presence of CO, H2S, LEL, O2, Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN), VOCs and other potentially harmful landfill gas components. These monitoring devices should be set to sound an alarm when the concentrations of the COCs reach the PEL, and workers instructed to immediately vacate any area where the alarm activates and move upwind. Equipment cabs should also be outfitted with these monitors. In addition, periodic analytical sampling for the original list of target COCs (at a minimum) referenced in Section 2.2 should be performed during fire suppression activities to monitor for changes in concentration and presence of airborne hazards. Work practices and personal protective equipment should be modified accordingly based on the results of this testing.  Authorized visitors and salvagers, should be equipped with CO monitors as an indicator of the presence of CO, H2S, VOCs and other potentially harmful landfill gas components. These monitoring devices should be set to sound an alarm when the concentrations of CO reach 1 ppm.  Employees and salvagers working on the debris and disposal sites should be provided with disposable suits to wear over their work clothes, or alternatively, be provided uniforms, that are donned when reporting to work and removed following completion of their shift and laundered professionally. Employees should have a decontamination area with showers and lockers where uniforms are donned and doffed each day. The residue from the smoke was observed to contain oils and particulates that should not be taken back in personal vehicles to worker’s/salvager’s homes where exposure to children and others is possible in a residential scenario.  Employees/Salvagers should be outfitted with rubber boots than can be decontaminated and are not taken to their house. Foot wear used on the debris and disposal sites also will potentially be impacted with oils and particulates that may represent a concern in a residential exposure scenario.  Employees/Salvagers should be provided awareness training about the COCs and associated landfill gasses, monitoring devices, personal protective equipment use and decontamination processes. An 8 hour mini “HAZWOPER” 35 Air Screening Report DRAFT – For Discussion Only December 13, 2018 type awareness training is recommended by a qualified company, with certificates issued to document the training. These results and conclusions contained herein DO NOT contain reference to or discussion of potential for offsite migration of COCs, or the potential for impacting surrounding populations. Perimeter air monitoring of the debris and disposal sites and potential impacts to the surrounding areas from emissions is recommended to be performed as part of the fire suppression activities to be protective of human health and the environment. This sampling and analysis event was performed to assess the “worse case” exposure scenarios for workers (without excavating waste) that will be performing fire suppression and working within active combustion and smoke impacted areas. These data should not be used for other purposes, in particular speculation as to what offsite concerns may or may not be occurring. 36 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 TABLES Table 2 – Instantaneous Testing Results Table 3 – Landfill Gas Testing Results Table 4 – Particulate (PM 2.5) Results Table 5 – VOC Analytical Testing Results Table 6 – H2S Analytical Testing Results Table 7 – PAH Testing Results Table 8 – Ozone (O3) Testing Results Tables 9a, 9b and 9c – Dioxin/Furan Testing Results Table 10 – Heavy Metal Testing Results Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 2 - Instantaneous Testing Results Constituents of Concern Sample ID O2 (ppm) - TVOC Range (ppm) Zone Sample Type CO2 (ppm) CO (ppm) H2S (ppm) LEL (%) CH4 (ppm) (Day-Location) Minimum Low High 01-001 5,000 136 1.7 ND 20,100 ND 160 200 01-002 6,000 9.0 ND ND 20,900 ND 30 40 Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 6,000 5.0 ND ND 20,900 ND 16 17 01-004 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Upwind 01-005 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 02-001 1,000 499 9.0 9.0 20,400 ND 300 600 02-002 1,000 19 2.5 4.0 20,100 ND 150 250 Smoke 02-003 1,000 500 8.8 4.0 20,100 ND 250 350 South - MWDS 02-004 1,000 11 ND ND 20,300 ND 250 350 Upwind 02-005 1,000 24 ND ND 20,400 ND ND 7000 02-006 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Personnel 02-007 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 03-001 ND 499 2.5 ND 20,500 ND 750 850 03-002 6,000 500 7.0 ND 19,600 ND 250 300 Smoke 03-003 5,000 200 2.5 2.0 19,800 28,000 350 400 Temporary Debris Site 03-004 3,000 40 1.2 ND 20,900 1,000 200 300 Upwind 03-005 ND ND ND ND 20,900 ND ND 100 03-006 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Personnel 03-007 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- EU OEL -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- OSHA PEL -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL -- -- -- 10 195,000 -- -- -- ACGIH TLV -- -- -- -- 180,000 -- -- -- Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria (Except O2) ppm: parts per million ND: None Detected --: Data not available EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 3 - Landfill Gas Testing Results Constituents of Concern (ppm) Methane * Carbon dioxide Carbon monoxide Sample ID Zone Sample Type Detection Sample Detection Sample Detection Sample (Day-Location) Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result 01-001 1,000 22 260 760 6.6 26 01-002 1,000 13 200 560 5.0 6.7 Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 1,000 16 250 680 6.2 13 01-004 1,000 35 300 740 7.5 18 Upwind 01-005 1,000 4.0 220 600 5.6 <5.6 02-001 1,000 160 210 1,400 5.4 92 02-002 1,000 69 240 870 6.0 130 Smoke 02-003 1,000 8.7 250 730 6.2 9.5 South - MWDS 02-004 1,000 39 240 1,900 6.0 15 Upwind 02-005 1,000 2.6 250 550 6.2 <6.2 02-006 (P) 1,000 3.0 270 1,100 6.6 <6.6 Personnel 02-007 (P) 1,000 2.7 220 650 5.6 <5.6 03-001 1,000 12 400 480 10 26 03-002 1,000 7.9 210 710 5.4 15 Smoke 03-003 1,000 4.3 220 670 5.6 <5.6 Temporary Debris Site 03-004 1,000 13 590 810 15 18 Upwind 03-005 1,000 2.6 210 600 5.3 <5.3 03-006 (P) 1,000 3.1 260 1,500 6.4 <6.4 Personnel 03-007 (P) 1,000 3.7 270 650 6.8 <6.8 EU OEL -- 5,000 ppm (NL) 25 ppm (NL) OSHA PEL -- 5,000 ppm 50 ppm Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL -- 5,000 ppm 35 ppm ACGIH TLV 1,000 ppm 5,000 ppm 25 ppm * Methane was compared to the ACGIH TLV of 1,000 ppm. Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria ppm: parts per million NL: Netherlands Specific --: Data not avalaible EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 4 - Particulate (PM 2.5) Testing Results Sampling ID Zone Sample Type Average (mg/m3) Minimum (mg/m3) Maximum (mg/m3) (Day-Location) 01-001 0.14 0.04 0.76 01-002 16.81 0.01 46.00 Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 45.70 0.81 97.30 01-004 40.30 4.37 97.00 Upwind 01-005 13.10 1.82 30.80 02-001 0.04 0.01 0.13 02-002 112.00 2.96 349.00 Smoke 02-003 161.00 1.24 400.00 South - MWDS 02-004 19.60 0.61 176.00 Upwind 02-005 78.30 8.47 218.00 02-006 11.61 0.04 76.67 Personnel 02-007 16.70 3.78 134.82 03-001 0.01 0.01 0.02 03-002 44.90 6.96 153.00 Smoke 03-003 97.40 0.04 356.00 Temporary Debris Site 03-004 6.72 0.05 39.70 Upwind 03-005 4.81 0.99 14.50 03-006 42.77 0.00 427.64 Personnel 03-007 15.36 2.54 105.99 EU OEL 5.00 mg/m3 (France) OSHA PEL 5.00 mg/m3 Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL -- ACGIH TLV -- Bold - Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria mg/m3: Milligrams per cubic meter of air --: Data not avaliable EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 5 - VOC Testing Results Sample Types Comparison Criteria 3 Upwind Samples Personnel Samples Smoke Sample Range (mg/m ) 3 3 EU OEL OSHA PEL NIOSH REL ACGIH TLV Constituent of Concern (mg/m ) (mg/m ) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) Low High Low High Low High Propylene 0.12 4.4 ND 0.026 0.029 0.04 -- 240 -- 1,190 Chloromethane 0.11 1.7 ND 0.024 0.017 0.025 268 (NL) 210 LFC 104 n-Butane ND ND ND ND 0.026 0.076 -- 1,900 1,900 2,400 1,3-Butadiene 0.012 0.31 ND ND ND ND 46.2 (NL) 2.2 LFC 4.4 Chloroethane 0.022 0.077 ND ND ND ND 268 (NL) 2,600 LFC 264 Ethanol 0.087 40 0.35 2.2 0.57 10 260 (NL) 1,900 1,900 1,900 Isopropyl alcohol 0.015 0.072 ND 0.013 0.021 0.026 -- 980 980 490 Acetone 0.26 4.3 0.015 0.03 0.021 0.081 1,210 (NL) 2,400 590 1,200 Acetonitrile 0.038 1.1 ND ND ND ND 34 (NL) 67 34 34 Acrylonitrile 0.013 0.018 ND ND ND ND -- 4.3 2.2 4.4 n-Hexane ND 1 ND ND ND ND 72 1,800 180 180 2-Butanone 0.065 1.4 ND ND 0.02 ND -- 590 590 590 Ethyl acetate 0.019 0.068 ND 0.018 0.022 0.026 -- 1,400 1,400 1,400 Tetrahydrofuran 0.022 0.72 ND ND ND ND 300 (NL) 590 590 150 Cyclohexane 0.019 0.025 ND ND ND ND 700 (NL) 1,000 1,000 350 n-Heptane 0.05 0.75 ND ND ND ND 1,200 (NL) 2,000 350 1,600 Benzene 0.21 13 0.025 0.075 0.052 0.076 3.25 (NL) 3.2 0.32 1.6 Methyl Methacrylate ND 0.083 ND - ND ND 205 (NL) 410 410 205 1,4-Dioxane 0.021 0.6 ND - ND ND 20 (NL) 360 3.6 72 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 0.024 0.041 ND - ND ND 104 (NL) 410 200 200 Toluene 0.11 7.1 ND 0.033 0.028 0.085 150 (NL) 750 380 190 2-Hexanone 0.049 0.17 ND ND ND ND -- 410 4.1 21 Chlorobenzene 0.025 0.048 ND ND ND ND 23 (NL) 350 -- 45 Ethylbenzene 0.077 7.2 ND 0.035 0.023 0.045 215 (NL) 430 430 435 Xylene (p,m) 0.058 1.0 ND ND ND 0.064 210 (NL) 430 430 435 Xylene (Ortho) 0.035 0.74 ND ND ND 0.025 221 430 430 435 Styrene 0.023 1.6 ND 0.023 ND ND -- 430 210 86 Isopropylbenzene 0.094 2.1 ND ND ND ND 100 (NL) 250 250 250 4-Ethyltoluene 0.029 0.39 ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.03 0.38 ND ND ND ND 100 (NL) 120 120 120 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.03 0.27 ND ND ND ND 100 (NL) 120 120 120 Naphthalene 0.026 0.62 ND ND ND ND 50 (NL) 52 52 50 Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria --: Data Not Available LFC: Lowest Feasible Concentration ND: None Detected 3 mg/m : Milligrams per cubic meter of air NL: Netherlands Specific EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDP) and Temporary Debris Site Table 6 - H2S Testing Results Sample ID (Day- Reporting Limit Zone Sample Type Result (µg/tube) Result (ppm) Location) (µg/tube) 01-001 14 170 3.1 01-002 14 <14 <0.28 Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 14 <14 <0.30 01-004 14 <14 <0.33 Upwind 01-005 14 <14 <0.35 02-001 14 <14 <0.24 02-002 14 <14 <0.24 Smoke 02-003 14 <14 <0.24 South - MWDS 02-004 14 <14 <0.25 Upwind 02-005 14 <14 <0.25 02-006 14 <14 <0.24 Personnel 02-007 14 <14 <0.25 03-001 14 <14 <0.26 03-002 14 <14 <0.27 Smoke 03-003 14 <14 <0.27 Temporary Debris Site 03-004 14 <14 <0.28 Upwind 03-005 14 <14 <0.26 03-006 14 <14 <0.28 Personnel 03-007 14 38 0.81 EU OEL -- 1.65 ppm OSHA PEL (10 minute Ceiling) -- 20.00 ppm Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL (10 minute Ceiling) -- 10.00 ppm ACGIH TLV -- 1.00 ppm Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria µg: micrograms ppm: parts per million --: data not available NL: Netherlands Specific EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 7 - PAH Testing Results Constituent of Concern (mg/m3) Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Phenanthrene Fluoranthene fluoranthene fluoranthene Naphthalene Anthracene Benzo (b) Benzo (e) Benzo (a) Benzo (k) Chrysene Fluorene pyrene Pyrene pyrene Sample ID (Day- Zone Sample Type Location) 01-001 0.029 0.083 0.02 0.013 0.0048 0.0028 0.0021 0.0033 ND ND ND ND 0.00056 01-002 ND 0.025 ND 0.013 0.017 ND 0.0035 0.0045 ND ND ND ND 0.00044 Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 0.009 0.027 ND 0.003 ND ND 0.0054 0.00037 ND ND ND ND 0.00039 01-004 0.012 0.028 0.0026 ND ND ND ND ND 0.013 0.0068 0.00073 0.00063 ND Upwind 01-005 ND 0.0048 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 02-001 ND 0.05 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 02-002 ND 0.21 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.00053 0.0015 Smoke 02-003 ND 0.025 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND South - MWDS 02-004 ND 0.55 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0044 Upwind 02-005 ND 0.00093 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 02-006 0.002 0.0044 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Personnel 02-007 ND 0.001 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 03-001 ND 0.169 ND ND ND ND 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND ND 03-002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Smoke 03-003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Temporary Debris 03-004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Site Upwind 03-005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 03-006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Personnel 03-007 ND 0.003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND EU OEL 50 (NL) -- -- -- 0.8 (Latvia) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.00055 (NL) OSHA PEL 50 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL 50 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 ACGIH TLV 50 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter of air ND: None Detected --: Data not available NL: Netherlands Specific EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 8 - Ozone (O3) Testing Results Sample ID Results Zone Sample type (Day-Location) (mg/m3) 01-001 0.91 01-002 ND Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 ND 01-004 ND Upwind 01-005 ND 02-001 ND 02-002 0.26 Smoke 02-003 ND South - MWDS 02-004 0.20 Upwind 02-005 ND 02-006 ND Personnel 02-007 ND 03-002 ND Smoke 03-003 ND Temporary Debris Site Upwind 03-005 ND 03-006 ND Personnel 03-007 ND EU OEL 0.12 (NL) OSHA PEL 0.20 Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL 0.20 ACGIH TLV 0.20 Bold - Value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria ND: None Detected (possible from reduced volume of air collected) 3 mg/m : Milligrams per cubic meter of air NL: Netherlands Specific EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Wast Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 9a - Dioxin/Furan Testing Results Northwest - MWDS Constituent of Concern Smoke (pg/m3) 3 Upwind (pg/m ) Personnel (pg/m3) 01-001 01-002 01-003 01-004 01-005 -- -- 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ND 1.6 79 ND -- -- Total TCDF 11,000 200 120 5,600 160 -- -- 2,3,7,8-TCDD 16 ND ND 35 ND -- -- Total TCDD 3,900 150 83 11,000 310 -- -- 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 110 1.5 1.0 ND 1.4 -- -- 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 130 3.8 1.5 8.4 ND -- -- Total PeCDF 2,000 36 19 1,500 40 -- -- 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 33 2.0 ND 96 4.2 -- -- Total PeCDD 2,000 47 17 6,100 120 -- -- 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 30 ND ND 39 ND -- -- 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 62 1.6 ND 47 ND -- -- 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 75 ND ND ND ND -- -- 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 13 1.2 ND ND ND -- -- Total HxCDF 720 16 4.1 410 2.4 -- -- 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 23 ND ND 58 ND -- -- 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 39 1.1 ND 100 3.7 -- -- 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 27 ND ND 96 2.8 -- -- Total HxCDD 1,500 45 20 3,200 63 -- -- 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 94 3.4 ----- 43 ND -- -- 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ND ND ND ND -- -- Total HpCDF 94 3.4 ND 43 ND -- -- 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 120 6.6 ND 280 ND -- -- Total HpCDD 500 22 ND 830 9.3 -- -- OCDF ND ND ND 36 ND -- -- OCDD 53 13 3.4 230 ND -- -- Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalence: 150 3.9 1.00 140 4.4 -- -- EU OEL 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) -- -- OSHA PEL LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC -- -- Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC -- -- ACGIH TLV LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC -- -- Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria pg/m3: picograms per cubic meter of air ND: None Detected --: Data not available LFC: Lowest Feasible Concentration EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 9b - Dioxin/Furan Testing Results South - MWDS Constituent of Concern Upwind Smoke (pg/m3 ) Personnel (pg/m3) (pg/m3) 02-001 02-002 02-003 02-004 02-005 02-006 02-007 2,3,7,8-TCDF 27 79 28 ND ND ND ND Total TCDF 1700 3700 2100 17000 110 16 9.2 2,3,7,8-TCDD 7.2 15 5.2 150 ND ND ND Total TCDD 1100 820 990 25000 280 34 11 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 27 ND 23 170 ND ND ND 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 18 28 280 ND ND ND Total PeCDF 450 410 620 4000 22 6.2 1.9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 7.2 9.7 10 270 ND ND ND Total PeCDD 300 220 430 9300 110 13 ND 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 7.7 ND 16 120 0.56 ND ND 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ND 16 150 ND ND ND 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ND 18 ND 0.49 ND ND 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ND 3.7 19 ND ND ND Total HxCDF 63 26 200 1400 2.4 1.1 ND 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ND 6.0 140 ND ND ND 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 5.2 ND 8.2 300 1.4 ND ND 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 6.3 ND 6.6 240 0.87 ND ND Total HxCDD 160 160 210 5700 64 9.9 1.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 5.7 ND 23 400 ND 0.65 ND 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ND ND 17 ND ND ND Total HpCDF 5.7 ND 23 510 ND 0.65 ND 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 17 16 22 720 2.8 ND ND Total HpCDD 38 40 61 2200 8.0 2.6 ND OCDF ND ND ND 27 ND ND ND OCDD ND 22 34 480 ND 3.0 1.6 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalence: 23 40 36 590 1.1 0.021 0.0016 EU OEL 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) OSHA PEL LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC ACGIH TLV LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria 3 pg/m : picograms per cubic meter of air ND: None Detected --: Data not available LFC: Lowest Feasible Concentration EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Wast Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 9c - Dioxin/Furan Testing Results Temporary Debris Site Upwind Constituent of Concern Smoke (pg/m3) Personnel (pg/m3) (pg/m3) 03-001 03-003 03-004 03-005 03-006 03-007 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 33 ND ND ND ND Total TCDF 42,000 1,900 2,500 0.97 14 19 2,3,7,8-TCDD 180 15 15 ND ND ND Total TCDD 54,000 4,400 3,300 ND 19 28 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 200 15 19 ND ND ND 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 300 23 34 ND ND ND Total PeCDF 6,700 580 740 ND ND 2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 200 24 23 ND ND ND Total PeCDD 21,000 2,400 1,300 ND ND 10 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 82 6.3 14 ND ND ND 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 75 6.1 13 ND ND ND 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 90 6.7 13 ND ND ND 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 10 ND ND ND ND ND Total HxCDF 1,100 58 150 ND ND ND 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 76 7.3 12 ND ND ND 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 130 13 17 ND ND ND 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 100 12 15 ND ND ND Total HxCDD 8,700 780 620 ND 5.8 7.8 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 64 5.0 19 ND 3.1 ND 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ND ND ND ND ND Total HpCDF 64 5.0 19 ND 8.4 ND 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 200 17 43 ND 12 ND Total HpCDD 790 87 210 ND 24 1.8 OCDF ND ND ND ND 9.3 ND OCDD 54 ND 43 ND 160 1.6 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalence: 550 48 58 0.00 0.33 0.0016 EU OEL 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) 10 (Germany) OSHA PEL LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC ACGIH TLV LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC LFC Bold: Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria pg/m3: picograms per cubic meter of air ND: None Detected --: Data not available LFC: Lowest Feasible Concentration EU OEL: European Union Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Environmental Air Sampling Results - Pond Island Municipal Waste and Disposal Site (MWDS) and Temporary Debris Site Table 10 - Heavy Metal Testing Results Sample ID (Day- Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Selenium Silver Zone Sample Type Arsenic (mg/m3) Location) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) (mg/m3) 01-001 0.000077 ND ND ND ND ND ND 01-002 0.00016 ND ND ND 0.000088 ND ND Smoke Northwest - MWDS 01-003 0.00018 ND ND 0.00076 0.000047 ND ND 01-004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Upwind 01-005 ND ND ND 0.00073 ND ND ND 02-001 0.000073 ND ND ND ND ND ND 02-002 0.00020 ND ND ND ND ND ND Smoke 02-003 0.00016 ND ND 0.00068 0.000038 ND ND South - MWDS 02-004 0.00050 ND 0.000071 ND 0.0017 0.000047 ND Upwind 02-005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 02-006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Personnel 02-007 ND ND ND 0.00083 ND ND ND 03-001 0.00065 ND ND ND 0.0023 0.00014 ND 03-002 0.00015 ND ND 0.00080 ND ND ND Smoke 03-003 0.00018 ND ND 0.00070 ND ND ND Temporary Debris Site 03-004 0.0013 ND ND ND ND 0.00014 ND Upwind 03-005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 03-006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Personnel 03-007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND EU OEL 0.2 (Israel) 0.5 (Finland) 0.004 (Finland) 2.0 (EU) 0.15 (EU) 0.1 (Finland) 0.01 (Germany AGS) OSHA PEL 0.5 0.5 0.005 0.5 0.05 0.2 0.01 Comparison Criteria NIOSH REL -- 0.5 LFC 0.5 0.05 0.2 0.01 ACGIH TLV 0.01 0.5 0.002 0.5 0.05 0.2 0.1 Bold - Indicates that value was equal to or greater than one or more of the Comparison Criteria mg/m3: Milligrams per cubic meter of air --: Data not avaliable ND: None Detected LFC: Lowest Feasible Concentration EU OEL: Occupational Exposure Limit OSHA PEL: Permissible Exposure Limit NIOSH REL: Recommended Exposure Limit ACGIH TLV: Threshold Limit Value Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 FIGURES Figure 1 – Site Sampling Plan Figure 2 – Locations of CO Analytical Sampling Results Figure 3 – Locations of Instantaneous Particulate (PM 2.5) Results Figure 4 – Locations of Benzene Sampling Results Figure 5 – Locations of H2S Sampling Results Figure 6 – Locations of Acenaphthylene Sampling Results Figure 7 – Locations of Benzo(a)pyrene Sampling Results Figure 8 – Locations of Ozone Sample Results Figure 9 – Locations of Dioxin and Furan Results Figure 10A – Locations with Results Above COCs – NW Municipal Waste Disposal Site Figure 10B – Locations with Results Above COCs – South Municipal Waste Disposal Site Figure 10C – Locations with Results Above COCs – Temporary Debris Site Personal Personal Observed Wind Direction 02-007 xxxxxx 03-007 xxxxxx N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 xxxxxx Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 xxxxxx Personal 03-007 xxxxxx Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personal xxxxxx 02-005 02-007 xxxxxx xxxxxx Upwind 01-005 xxxxxxx Upwind 03-005 xxxxxx Smoke 01-004 xxxxxx Smoke 03-001 Smoke xxxxxx 02-004 xxxxxx Smoke Smoke Smoke 02-001 03-002 Smoke xxxxxx 02-003 xxxxxx 02-002 xxxxxx xxxxxx Smoke Smoke 03-004 03-003 xxxxxx xxxxxx Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, Date: 11/16/2018 Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface Project # 2018-4191 Site Sampling Drawn by: MD FIGURE Plan Cad File: Fig 1 1 Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personal Personal Observed Wind Direction 02-006 03-006 <7 ppm <6 ppm N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 13 ppm Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 Personal 7 ppm 03-007 <7 ppm Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personal 26 ppm 02-005 02-007 <6 ppm <6 ppm Upwind 01-005 <6 ppm Upwind 03-005 <5 ppm Smoke 01-004 18 ppm Smoke 03-001 Smoke 26 ppm 02-004 15 ppm Smoke Smoke 03-002 Smoke 02-003 15 ppm 02-002 10 ppm 130 ppm Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface 92 ppm 03-004 03-003 18 ppm <6 ppm Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits = 25 ppm LOCATIONS OF Date: 11/16/2018 NR = No Reading Project # 2018-4191 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 50 ppm CO Drawn by: MD FIGURE ND = Not Detected National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = 35 ppm ANALYTICAL Cad File: Fig 5 2 BOLD = Exceeds Criteria American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = 25 ppm RESULTS Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel 02-006 Personnel 03-006 Observed Wind Direction Average 12 mg/m3 Average 43 mg/m3 N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 Average 46 mg/m3 Scale in meters Personnel 02-007 Smoke 01-002 Average Personnel 03-007 Average 17 mg/m3 Average 17 mg/m3 15 mg/m3 Upwind 02-005 Average 78 mg/m3 Smoke 01-001 Average 0 mg/m3 Upwind 03-005 Average Upwind 01-005 5 mg/m3 Average 13 mg/m3 Smoke 01-004 Average 40 mg/m3 Smoke 03-001 Average Smoke 02-004 0 mg/m3 Average 20 mg/m3 Smoke 02-003 Average 161 mg/m3 Smoke 02-002 Average 112 mg/m3 Smoke 03-004 Average Smoke 03-002 Average 7 mg/m3 Smoke 02-001 45 mg/m3 Average Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 0 mg/m3 Smoke 03-003 Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface Average 97 mg/m3 Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits (FRA) = 5 mg/m3 LOCATIONS OF Date: 11/16/2018 NR = No Reading RESPIRABLE Project # 2018-4191 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 5 mg/m3 FIGURE PARTICULATE Drawn by: MD ND = Not Detected National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = Not Available TESTING Cad File: Fig 6 3 BOLD = Exceeds Criteria RESULTS American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = Not Available Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel Personnel Observed Wind Direction 02-006 03-006 0.1 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 1.0 mg/m3 Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 Personnel 1.0 mg/m3 03-007 0.1 mg/m3 Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personnel 6.0 mg/m3 02-005 02-007 0.0 mg/m3 ND Upwind 01-005 0.1 mg/m3 Upwind 03-005 ND Smoke 01-004 8.5 mg/m3 Smoke 03-001 Smoke 1.9 mg/m3 02-004 5.7 mg/m3 Smoke Smoke 03-002 Smoke 3 02-003 1.0 mg/m 02-002 1.1 mg/m3 13.0 mg/m3 Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface 9.2 mg/m3 03-004 03-003 3 3 1.6 mg/m 0.2 mg/m Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits = 3.2 mg/m3 Date: 11/16/2018 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 3.2 mg/m3 NR = No Reading LOCATIONS OF Project # 2018-4191 Drawn by: MD FIGURE National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = 0.3 mg/m3 ND = Not Detected BENZENE 4 Cad File: Fig 8 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = 1.6 mg/m3 BOLD = Exceeds Criteria RESULTS Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel Personnel Observed Wind Direction 02-006 03-006 <0.24 ppm <0.28 ppm N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 <0.30 ppm Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 Personnel <0.28 ppm 03-007 0.81 ppm Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personnel 3.1 ppm 02-005 02-007 0.03 mg/m3 <0.27 ppm Upwind 01-005 <0.35 ppm Upwind 03-005 <0.26 ppm Smoke 01-004 <0.33 ppm Smoke 03-001 Smoke <0.26 ppm 02-004 <0.25 ppm Smoke Smoke 03-002 Smoke 02-003 <0.27 ppm 02-002 <0.24 ppm <0.24 ppm Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface <0.24 ppm 03-004 03-003 <0.28 ppm <0.27 ppm Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits = 1.65 ppm Date: 11/16/2018 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 20 ppm NR = No Reading LOCATIONS OF Project # 2018-4191 Drawn by: MD FIGURE National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = 10 ppm ND = Not Detected H2S 5 Cad File: Fig 10 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = 1 ppm BOLD = Exceeds Criteria RESULTS Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel Personnel Observed Wind Direction 02-006 0.00 mg/m3 03-006 NR N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 0.03mg/m3 Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 0.03 mg/m3 Personnel 03-007 NR Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personnel 0.08 mg/m3 02-005 02-007 0.00 mg/m3 0.00 mg/m3 Upwind 01-005 0.01 mg/m3 Upwind 03-005 NR Smoke 01-004 0.03 mg/m3 Smoke 03-001 Smoke 0.17 mg/m3 02-004 0.55 mg/m3 Smoke Smoke 03-002 Smoke 02-003 NR 02-002 0.03 mg/m3 0.21 mg/m3 Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface 0.05 mg/m3 03-004 03-003 NR NR Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits = Not Available Date: 11/16/2018 NR = No Reading LOCATIONS OF Project # 2018-4191 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 0.20 mg/m3 FIGURE ACENAPHTHYLENE Drawn by: MD ND = Not Detected National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = 0.10 mg/m3 RESULTS Cad File: Fig 11 6 BOLD = Exceeds Criteria American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = 0.20 mg/m3 Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personal Personal Observed Wind Direction 02-006 NR 03-006 NR N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 0.00039 mg/m3 Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 Personal 0.00044 mg/m3 03-007 NR Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personal 0.00056 mg/m3 02-005 02-007 NR NR Upwind 01-005 NR Upwind 03-005 NR Smoke 01-004 NR Smoke 03-001 Smoke NR 02-004 0.00440 mg/m3 Smoke Smoke Smoke 03-002 02-003 02-002 NR NR 0.00150 mg/m3 Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface NR 03-003 03-004 NR NR Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits (NED) = 0.00055 mg/m3 Date: 11/16/2018 NR = No Reading LOCATIONS OF Project # 2018-4191 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 0.2 mg/m3 BENZO(A)PYRENE FIGURE Drawn by: MD ND = Not Detected EQUIVALENT National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = 0.1 mg/m3 Cad File: Fig 12 7 BOLD = Exceeds Criteria RESULTS American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = 0.2 mg/m3 Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel Personnel Observed Wind Direction 02-006 ND 03-006 ND N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 Scale in meters ND Smoke 01-002 Personnel ND 03-007 ND Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personnel 0.91 ppm 02-005 02-007 ND ND Upwind 01-005 ND Upwind 03-005 ND Smoke 01-004 ND Smoke 03-001 Smoke ND 02-004 0.20 ppm Smoke Smoke Smoke 03-002 02-003 02-002 ND ND 0.26 ppm Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface ND 03-003 03-004 ND ND Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits = 0.05 ppm Date: 11/16/2018 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = 0.1 ppm NR = No Reading LOCATIONS OF Project # 2018-4191 Drawn by: MD FIGURE National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = 0.1 ppm ND = Not Detected OZONE 8 Cad File: Fig 13 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = 0.1 ppm BOLD = Exceeds Criteria RESULTS Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel Personnel Observed Wind Direction 02-006 03-006 0. pg/m3 0 pg/m3 N Smoke 01-003 0 25 50 1 pg/m3 Scale in meters Smoke 01-002 Personnel 4 pg/m3 03-007 0 pg/m3 Smoke 01-001 Upwind Personnel 150 pg/m3 02-005 02-007 1 pg/m3 0 pg/m3 Upwind 01-005 4 pg/m3 Upwind 03-005 0 pg/m3 Smoke 01-004 140 pg/m3 Smoke 03-001 Smoke 550 pg/m3 02-004 590 pg/m3 Smoke Smoke 03-002 Smoke 02-003 NR 02-002 36 pg/m3 40 pg/m3 Smoke Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, 02-001 Smoke Smoke Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface 23 pg/m3 03-004 03-003 3 58 pg/m3 48 pg/m Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone Occupational Exposure Limits (GER) = 10 pg/m3 LOCATIONS OF Date: 11/16/2018 NR = No Reading TOTAL Project # 2018-4191 Occupational Safety & Health Administration = Not Available FIGURE 2,3,7,8-TCDD Drawn by: MD ND = Not Detected National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health = Not Available EQUIVALENCE Cad File: Fig 13 9 BOLD = Exceeds Criteria American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists = Not Available RESULTS Dwg. Scale: As Noted Smoke 01-002 Constituent of Smoke 01-003 Observed Wind Direction Concern Concentration Criteria Constituent of Concern Concentration Criteria CO (Direct Read) H2S (Direct Read) 9 NA NA N CO (Direct Read) NA 0 5 NA CH4 0 NA H2S (Direct Read) 0 TVOCs 40 NA CH4 0 NA 0 25 50 CO2 6000 NA TVOCs 17 NA Scale in meters Particulates 46 5 mg/m3 CO2 6000 NA CO 6.7 25 ppm Particulates 97 5 mg/m3 Benzene 1.0 0.3 mg/m3 CO 13 25 ppm H2S <0.28 1 ppm Benzene 1.0 0.3 mg/m3 Acenaphthylene ND 0.1 mg/m3 H2S <0.30 1 ppm Benzo(a)Pyrene Acenaphthylene ND 0.1 mg/m3 0.44000 0.00055 mg/m3 Equivalent Benzo(a)Pyrene 0.00039 0.00055 mg/m3 Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Equivalent Dioxin/ Furans 4 10 pg/m3 Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 1 10 pg/m3 Smoke 01-001 Constituent of Concentration Criteria Concern CO (Direct Read) 136 NA H2S (Direct Read) 2 NA CH4 0 NA TVOCs 200 NA CO2 5000 NA Particulates 1 5 mg/m3 CO 26 25 ppm Benzene 6.0 0.3 mg/m3 H2S 3.10 1 ppm Acenaphthylene 0.1 0.1 mg/m3 Upwind 01-005 Benzo(a)Pyrene Constituent of 0.00056 0.00055 mg/m3 Equivalent Concentration Criteria Concern Ozone 0.91 0.05 ppm CO (Direct Read) ND NA Dioxin/ Furans 10 pg/m3 150 H2S (Direct Read) ND NA CH4 ND NA TVOCs ND NA CO2 ND NA Smoke 01-004 Particulates 31 5 mg/m3 Constituent of CO <6 25 ppm Concentration Criteria Concern Benzene 0.1 0.3 mg/m3 CO (Direct Read) ND NA H2S <0.35 1 ppm H2S (Direct Read) ND NA Acenaphthylene ND 0.1 mg/m3 CH4 ND NA Benzo(a)Pyrene NA NR 0.00055 mg/m3 TVOCs ND Equivalent CO2 ND NA Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Particulates 97 5 mg/m3 Dioxin/ Furans 4 10 pg/m3 CO 18 25 ppm Benzene 8.4 0.3 mg/m3 H2S <0.33 1 ppm Acenaphthylene ND 0.1 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Equivalent Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 140 10 pg/m3 Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, NR = No Reading Date: 11/16/2018 Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface NA = Not Applicable NW MUNICIPAL WASTE Project # 2018-4191 Drawn by: MD FIGURE ND = Not Detected DISPOSAL SITE RESULTS Cad File: Fig 15A 10A Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone BOLD = Exceeds Criteria Dwg. Scale: As Noted NR = No Reading Personnel 02-006 Observed Wind Direction Constituent of 0 25 50 Concentration Criteria Concern CO (Direct Read) H2S (Direct Read) NR NR NA NA Scale in meters N CH4 NR NA TVOCs NR NA Personnel 02-007 CO2 NR NA Upwind 02-005 Constituent of Concentration Criteria Particulates 77 5 mg/m3 Constituent of Concern Concentration Criteria CO (Direct Read) NR NA CO <7 25 ppm Concern Benzene 0.1 0.3 mg/m3 CO (Direct Read) 24 NA H2S (Direct Read) NR NA H2S <0.24 1 ppm H2S (Direct Read) 0 NA CH4 NR NA Acenaphthylene 0.0 0.1 mg/m3 CH4 0 NA TVOCs NR NA Benzo(a)Pyrene TVOCs 7000 NA CO2 NR NA NR 0.00055 mg/m3 CO2 1000 NA Particulates 135 5 mg/m3 Equivalent Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Particulates 218 5 mg/m3 CO <6 25 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 0 10 pg/m3 CO <6 25 ppm Benzene ND 0.3 mg/m3 Benzene 0.0 0.3 mg/m3 H2S <0.25 1 ppm H2S <0.25 1 ppm Acenaphthylene 0.0 0.1 mg/m3 Acenaphthylene 0.0 0.1 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene Smoke 02-003 NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene Equivalent Constituent of NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Concentration Criteria Equivalent Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Concern Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 0 10 pg/m3 CO (Direct Read) 500 NA H2S (Direct Read) 9 NA Dioxin/ Furans 1 10 pg/m3 CH4 0 NA TVOCs 350 NA CO2 1000 NA Particulates 400 5 mg/m3 CO 10 25 ppm Benzene 1.1 0.3 mg/m3 H2S <0.24 1 ppm Acenaphthylene 0.1 0.1 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Equivalent Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 36 10 pg/m3 Smoke 02-001 Smoke 02-002 Smoke 02-004 Constituent of Constituent of Constituent of Concentration Criteria Concentration Criteria Concentration Criteria Concern Concern Concern CO (Direct Read) 499 NA CO (Direct Read) 19 NA CO (Direct Read) 11 NA H2S (Direct Read) NA H2S (Direct Read) 3 NA H2S (Direct Read) 0 NA 9 CH4 0 NA CH4 0 NA CH4 0 NA NA TVOCs 250 NA TVOCs 350 NA TVOCs 600 CO2 1000 NA CO2 1000 NA CO2 1000 NA Particulates 1 5 mg/m3 Particulates 349 5 mg/m3 Particulates 176 5 mg/m3 CO 92 25 ppm CO 130 25 ppm CO 15 25 ppm 0.3 mg/m3 Benzene 13.0 0.3 mg/m3 Benzene 5.7 0.3 mg/m3 Benzene 9.2 H2S <0.24 1 ppm H2S <0.24 1 ppm H2S <0.25 1 ppm Acenaphthylene 0.1 0.1 mg/m3 Acenaphthylene 0.2 0.1 mg/m3 Acenaphthylene 0.1 0.1 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene Benzo(a)Pyrene Benzo(a)Pyrene NR 0.00150 0.00055 mg/m3 0.00440 0.00055 mg/m3 Equivalent 0.00055 mg/m3 Equivalent Equivalent Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Ozone 0.26 0.05 ppm Ozone 0.20 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 23 10 pg/m3 Dioxin/ Furans 40 10 pg/m3 Dioxin/ Furans 590 10 pg/m3 Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, NA = Not Applicable Date: 11/16/2018 Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface NR = No Reading SOUTH MUNICIPAL Project # 2018-4191 Drawn by: MD FIGURE ND = Not Detected DISPOSAL SITE RESULTS Cad File: Fig 15B 10B Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone BOLD = Exceeds Criteria Dwg. Scale: As Noted Personnel 03-006 Constituent of Upwind 03-005 Observed Wind Direction Concentration Criteria Constituent of Concern CO (Direct Read) NR NA Concern CO (Direct Read) Concentration 0 Criteria NA N H2S (Direct Read) NR NA CH4 H2S (Direct Read) 0 NA NR NA NA CH4 0 NA TVOCs NR 0 25 50 CO2 Personnel 03-007 TVOCs 100 NA NR NA Constituent of CO2 0 NA Scale in meters Particulates 428 5 mg/m3 Concentration Criteria 25 ppm Concern Particulates 15 5 mg/m3 CO <6 0.3 mg/m3 CO (Direct Read) NR NA CO <5 25 ppm Benzene 0.1 H2S (Direct Read) NR NA Benzene ND 0.3 mg/m3 Smoke 03-001 H2S <0.28 1 ppm Acenaphthylene 0.1 mg/m3 CH4 NR NA H2S <0.26 1 ppm Constituent of NR Concentration Criteria TVOCs NR NA Acenaphthylene NR 0.1 mg/m3 Concern Benzo(a)Pyrene Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 CO2 NR NA Benzo(a)Pyrene CO (Direct Read) 499 NA Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Particulates 106 5 mg/m3 H2S (Direct Read) 2.5 NA 10 pg/m3 CO <6.8 25 ppm Ozone ND 0.05 ppm CH4 0 NA Dioxin/ Furans 0 Benzene 0.1 0.3 mg/m3 Dioxin/ Furans 0 10 pg/m3 TVOCs 850 NA H2S 0.81 1 ppm CO2 0 NA Acenaphthylene 0.0 0.1 mg/m3 Particulates 0 5 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene CO 26 25 ppm Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Benzene 1.9 0.3 mg/m3 Smoke 03-002 Ozone ND 0.05 ppm H2S <0.26 1 ppm Constituent of Concentration Criteria Dioxin/ Furans 0 10 pg/m3 Acenaphthylene 0.2 0.1 mg/m3 Concern CO (Direct Read) 500 NA Benzo(a)Pyrene Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 H2S (Direct Read) 7 NA CH4 0 Ozone NR 0.05 ppm NA Dioxin/ Furans 550 10 pg/m3 TVOCs 300 NA CO2 6000 NA Particulates 153 5 mg/m3 CO 15 25 ppm Benzene 1.0 0.3 mg/m3 H2S <0.27 1 ppm Acenaphthylene NR 0.1 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans NR 10 pg/m3 Smoke 03-004 Constituent of Concentration Criteria Concern CO (Direct Read) 40 NA H2S (Direct Read) 1 NA CH4 1000 NA TVOCs 300 NA CO2 3000 NA Smoke 03-003 Particulates 40 5 mg/m3 Constituent of CO 18 25 ppm Concentration Criteria Concern Benzene 1.6 0.3 mg/m3 CO (Direct Read) 200 NA H2S <0.28 1 ppm H2S (Direct Read) 3 NA Acenaphthylene NR 0.1 mg/m3 CH4 28000 NA Benzo(a)Pyrene TVOCs 400 NA Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 CO2 5000 NA Ozone NR 0.05 ppm Particulates 356 5 mg/m3 Dioxin/ Furans 58 10 pg/m3 CO <6 25 ppm Benzene 0.2 0.3 mg/m3 H2S <0.27 1 ppm Acenaphthylene NR 0.1 mg/m3 Benzo(a)Pyrene Equivalent NR 0.00055 mg/m3 Ozone ND 0.05 ppm Dioxin/ Furans 48 10 pg/m3 Evidence of Sub-Surface Smoldering, NA = Not Applicable Date: 11/16/2018 Smoke, Or Thermal Vent at Surface TEMPORARY DEBRIS Project # 2018-4191 NR = No Reading FIGURE SITE Drawn by: MD ND = Not Detected 10C RESULTS Cad File: Fig 15C Heavy Equipment Active Work Zone BOLD = Exceeds Criteria Dwg. Scale: As Noted Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT A PHOTO PAGES : Environmental Air Sampling Results December 13, 2018 Draft – For Discussion Only Photo 1 – Typical Area Sampling Station Placement Photo 2 – Typical Area Sampling Station Placement : Environmental Air Sampling Results December 13, 2018 Draft – For Discussion Only Photo 3 – Typical Personnel Sample Placement Photo 4 - Typical Personnel Sample Placement Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT B COCS AND NIOSH LINKS Methane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0291.html Carbon Dioxide https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0021.html Carbon Monoxide https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0023.html Propylene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0559.html Chloromethane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0419.html n-Butane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0232.html 1,3-Butadiene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0017.html Chloroethane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0132.html Ethanol https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0044.html Isopropyl alcohol https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0554.html Acetone https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0087.html Acetonitrile https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0088.html Acrylonitrile https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0092.html n-Hexane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0279.html 2-Butanone https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0179.html Ethyl acetate https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0367.html Tetrahydrofuran https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0578.html Cyclohexane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0242.html n-Heptane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0657.html Benzene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0015.html Methyl Methacrylate https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0300.html 1,4-Dioxane https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0041.html 4-Methyl-2-pentanone https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0511.html Toluene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0078.html 2-Hexanone https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0489.html Chlorobenzene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0642.html Ethylbenzene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0268.html Xylene (p,m) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0086.html https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0085.html Xylene (Ortho) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0084.html Styrene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0073.html Isopropylbenzene (cumene) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0170.html 4-Ethyltoluene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1155.html 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1433.html Naphthalene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0667.html Hydrogen Sulfide https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0165.html Acenaphthylene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5506.pdf Acenaphthene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1674.html Fluorene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5506.pdf Phenanthrene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5506.pdf Anthracene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0825.html Fluoranthene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5506.pdf Pyrene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1474.html Chrysene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1672.html Benzo(e)pyrene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0104.html Benzo(b)fluoranthene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0720.html Benzo(k)fluoranthene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0721.html Benzo(a)pyrene https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0104.html Respirable Particulates Ozone https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0068.html 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1467.html PCBs https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0939.html Arsenic (As) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0013.html Lead (Pb) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0052.html Barium (Ba) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1052.html Chromium (Cr) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0029.html Cadmium (Cd) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0020.html Silver (Ag) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0810.html Selenium (Se) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0072.html Asbestos https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/asbestos/ Hydrogen Cyanide https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0492.html https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0333.html Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT C LABORATORY RESULTS, LANDFILL GASES (CH4, CO2, AND CO) EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 USEPA TO-3 Modified Laboratory Report- Sample Summary EMSL Sample ID. Client Sample ID. Start Sampling Date Start Sampling Time 491800829-0001 03-006 (P) 8/30/2018 9:25 AM 491800829-0002 01-005 8/28/2018 10:00 AM 491800829-0003 03-002 8/30/2018 8:50 AM 491800829-0004 03-003 8/30/2018 8:55 AM 491800829-0005 03-005 8/30/2018 9:05 AM 491800829-0006 03-004 8/30/2018 9:00 AM 491800829-0007 02-003 8/29/2018 8:25 AM 491800829-0008 02-005 8/29/2018 8:44 AM 491800829-0009 03-001 8/30/2018 8:45 AM 491800829-0010 02-001 8/29/2018 8:15 AM 491800829-0011 01-003 8/28/2018 9:45 AM 491800829-0012 03-007 (P) 8/30/2018 9:45 AM 491800829-0013 02-007 (P) 8/29/2018 9:15 AM 491800829-0014 02-004 8/29/2018 8:37 AM 491800829-0015 02-006 (P) 8/29/2018 8:55 AM 491800829-0016 01-002 8/28/2018 9:30 AM 491800829-0017 02-002 8/29/2018 8:20 AM 491800829-0018 01-001 8/28/2018 9:15 AM 491800829-0019 01-004 8/28/2018 10:00 AM If "Preliminary Report" is displayed in the signature box; this indicates that there are samples that have not yet been analyzed, that are in a preliminary state, or that analysis is in progress but not completed at the time of report issue. Report Date: Report Revision Revision Comments 9/12/2018 R0 Initial Report 10/2/2018 R1 Wrong results reported for Sample 2. Marjorie Howley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test results meet all NELAP requirements unless otherwise specified. The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. 491800829-1_R1_methane V11 Page 1 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Case Narrative Method Reference USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 Column Varian CP-Sil 5 CB, 50m x 0.53mm ID x 5um Concentrator Traps: 0.4cc Loop Gas Standards: Certified Gas standards were used for all analyses. Sample Volumes: Sample volume aliquots for this procedure is 0.4cc by loop injection. Other volumes for sample dilutions are reflected on each result page. Holding Times: Standard holding times of 30 days (Summa Canister) and 72 hours (Tedlar Bag) were met for all samples. Sampling Pressures: All samples (Summa Canister) were received at acceptable pressure/vacuum unless listed below. Sample Dilutions: Diluitions reported are designated by the sample # with a "DL" suffix resulting from initial analysis having compounds exceeding calibration as reported with an "E" qualifier. Methane for 491800829-10 was reported with an E qualifier. A dilution could not be run due to instrument failure. QA/QC criteria outside method specifications are listed below (if applicable). Initial Calibration All Initial Calibratiion criteria met method specification. Initial Calibration Verification Standard (ICVS)- Second Source ICVS met method specification with 70-130% recovery for 100% of compounds. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) LCS met method specification with 70-130% recovery for 100% of compounds.(If the LCS does not meet criteria but any compounds which have recoveries >130% are not found in the samples, samples may be reported) Continuing Calibration Verification Standard (CCVS) CCVS met method specification with all compounds within 30% deviation. Ending Calibration Verification Standard (ECVS) ECVS met method specification with all compounds within 30% deviation. Method Blanks (MB) Method Blank met method specification. Sample Duplicate (DUP) Sample Duplicate met method specification with all hits within 25% Relative Standard Deviation (RPD). 491800829-1_R0_methane.xlsm V113 Page 2 of 24 Page 2 of 4 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Case Narrative Manual Integration : -Listed below if applicable. Before and after documentation provided in extended deliverable packages. The following data qualifiers that may have been reported with the data, ND- Non Detect. This notation would be used in the results column in lieu of a "U" qualifier. U- Compound was analyzed for but not detected at a listed and appropriately adjusted reporting level. J- Estimated value reported below adjusted reporting limit for target compounds or estimating a concentration for TICs where a 1:1 response is assumed B- Compound found in associated method blank as well as in the sample. E- Estimated value exceeding upper calibration range of instrument. Ethanol and isopropyl alcohol are not specifically targeted to dilute within calibration range. D- Compound reported from additional diluted analysis. N- indicates presumptive evidence of a compound based on library search match. EMSL Analytical, Inc. certifies that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of this contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer –readable data submitted on diskette has been authorized by the laboratory manager or his/her designee, as verified by the following signature. Report Date Report Revision Revision Comments 07/18/2018 R0 Initial Report Marjorie Howley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test results meet all NELAP requirements unless otherwise specified. 491800829-1_R0_methane.xlsm V113 Page 3 of 24 Page 3 of 4 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-1 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1494.D HD0183 1 cc 1.29 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 3.1 2.6 2.1 1.7 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-1_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 4 of 24 Page 4 of 4 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-2 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1496.D HD2155 1 cc 1.11 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 4.0 2.2 2.6 1.5 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-2_R0_methane V11 Page 5 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-3 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1497.D HD2275 1 cc 1.07 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 7.9 2.1 5.2 1.4 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-3_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 6 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-4 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1498.D HD2282 1 cc 1.12 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 4.3 2.2 2.8 1.5 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-4_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 7 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-5 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1499.D HD2291 1 cc 1.06 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.4 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-5_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 8 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-6 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1500.D HD2298 1 cc 2.94 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 13 5.9 8.5 3.9 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-6_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 9 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-7 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1501.D HD2300 1 cc 1.23 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 8.7 2.5 5.7 1.6 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-7_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 10 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-8 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1502.D HD2303 1 cc 1.23 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.6 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-8_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 11 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-9 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1503.D HD2702 1 cc 2.01 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 12 4.0 7.8 2.6 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-9_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 12 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-10 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1505.D HD2705 1 cc 1.07 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 160 2.1 E 100 1.4 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-10_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 13 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-11 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1506.D HD2727 1 cc 1.23 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 16 2.5 11 1.6 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-11_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 14 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-12 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1507.D HD2733 1 cc 1.36 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 3.7 2.7 2.4 1.8 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-12_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 15 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-13 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1508.D HD2743 1 cc 1.12 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.5 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-13_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 16 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-14 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1509.D HD2752 1 cc 1.2 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 39 2.4 26 1.6 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-14_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 17 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-15 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1510.D HD2768 1 cc 1.33 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 3.0 2.7 2.0 1.7 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-15_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 18 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-16 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1511.D HD2786 1 cc 1 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 13 2.0 8.3 1.3 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-16_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 19 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-17 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1512.D HD2787 1 cc 1.24 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 69 2.5 46 1.6 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-17_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 20 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-18 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1513.D HD2802 1 cc 1.31 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 22 2.6 15 1.7 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-18_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 21 of 24 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-19 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/06/2018 TP F1514.D HD2831 1 cc 1.5 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppmv ppmv Q mg/m3 mg/m3 Comments Methane 74-82-8 16.04 35 3.0 23 2.0 Qualifier Definitions B = Compound also found in method blank. ND = Non Detect E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Threshold References Typical Atmospheric Typical Indoor Air Background Analyte OSHA PEL Hazard Background Levels Levels Methane 1.8 ppm 2-5 ppm n/a Simple asphyxiant, flammable Agency Definitions OSHA= Occupational Safety and Health Administration Exposure Limit Definitions PEL= Permissable Exposure Limit Method Reference r USEPA TO-3 Modified, Method for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector. Rev 1.0, April 1984 NJDEP Certification #: 03036 491800829-19_R0_methane.xlsm V11 Page 22 of 24 Page 1 of 1 Page 23 of 24 Page 24 of 24 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Fixed Gas Analysis by Using The Draeger CMS (Chip Measurement System) Laboratory Report- Sample Summary EMSL Sample ID. Client Sample ID. Compound Detection Limit (ppmV) Sample Result (ppmV) 491800829-0001 03-006 (P) Carbon dioxide 260 1500 491800829-0002 01-005 Carbon dioxide 220 600 491800829-0003 03-002 Carbon dioxide 210 710 491800829-0004 03-003 Carbon dioxide 220 670 491800829-0005 03-005 Carbon dioxide 210 600 491800829-0006 03-004 Carbon dioxide 590 810 491800829-0007 02-003 Carbon dioxide 250 730 491800829-0008 02-005 Carbon dioxide 250 550 491800829-0009 03-001 Carbon dioxide 400 480 491800829-0010 02-001 Carbon dioxide 210 1400 491800829-0011 01-003 Carbon dioxide 250 680 491800829-0012 03-007 (P) Carbon dioxide 270 650 491800829-0013 02-007 (P) Carbon dioxide 220 650 491800829-0014 02-004 Carbon dioxide 240 1900 491800829-0015 02-006 (P) Carbon dioxide 270 1100 491800829-0016 01-002 Carbon dioxide 200 560 491800829-0017 02-002 Carbon dioxide 240 870 491800829-0018 01-001 Carbon dioxide 260 760 491800829-0019 01-004 Carbon dioxide 300 740 If "Preliminary Report" is displayed in the signature box; this indicates that there are samples that have not yet been analyzed, that are in a preliminary state, or that analysis is in progress but not completed at the time of report issue. Report Date: Report Revision Revision Comments 9/12/2018 R0 Initial Report Marjorie Howley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test results meet all NELAP requirements unless otherwise specified. The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. CO2_491800829_R0 V3 Page 1 of 1 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Fixed Gas Analysis by Using The Draeger CMS (Chip Measurement System) Laboratory Report- Sample Summary EMSL Sample ID. Client Sample ID. Compound Detection Limit (ppmV) Sample Result (ppmV) 491800829-0001 03-006 (P) Carbon monoxide 6.4 <6.4 491800829-0002 01-005 Carbon monoxide 5.6 <5.6 491800829-0003 03-002 Carbon monoxide 5.4 15 491800829-0004 03-003 Carbon monoxide 5.6 <5.6 491800829-0005 03-005 Carbon monoxide 5.3 <5.3 491800829-0006 03-004 Carbon monoxide 15 18 491800829-0007 02-003 Carbon monoxide 6.2 9.5 491800829-0008 02-005 Carbon monoxide 6.2 <6.2 491800829-0009 03-001 Carbon monoxide 10 26 491800829-0010 02-001 Carbon monoxide 5.4 92 491800829-0011 01-003 Carbon monoxide 6.2 13 491800829-0012 03-007 (P) Carbon monoxide 6.8 <6.8 491800829-0013 02-007 (P) Carbon monoxide 5.6 <5.6 491800829-0014 02-004 Carbon monoxide 6.0 15 491800829-0015 02-006 (P) Carbon monoxide 6.6 <6.6 491800829-0016 01-002 Carbon monoxide 5.0 6.7 491800829-0017 02-002 Carbon monoxide 6.0 130 491800829-0018 01-001 Carbon monoxide 6.6 26 491800829-0019 01-004 Carbon monoxide 7.5 18 If "Preliminary Report" is displayed in the signature box; this indicates that there are samples that have not yet been analyzed, that are in a preliminary state, or that analysis is in progress but not completed at the time of report issue. Report Date: Report Revision Revision Comments 9/12/2018 R0 Initial Report Marjorie Howley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test results meet all NELAP requirements unless otherwise specified. The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. CO_491800829_R0 V3 Page 1 of 1 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT D LABORATORY RESULTS, VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCS) EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Laboratory Report- Sample Summary EMSL Sample ID. Client Sample ID. Start Sampling Date Start Sampling Time 491800829-0001 03-006 (P) 8/30/2018 9:25 AM 491800829-0002 01-005 8/28/2018 10:00 AM 491800829-0003 03-002 8/30/2018 8:50 AM 491800829-0004 03-003 8/30/2018 8:55 AM 491800829-0005 03-005 8/30/2018 9:05 AM 491800829-0006 03-004 8/30/2018 9:00 AM 491800829-0007 02-003 8/29/2018 8:25 AM 491800829-0008 02-005 8/29/2018 8:44 AM 491800829-0009 03-001 8/30/2018 8:45 AM 491800829-0010 02-001 8/29/2018 8:15 AM 491800829-0011 01-003 8/28/2018 9:45 AM 491800829-0012 03-007 (P) 8/30/2018 9:45 AM 491800829-0013 02-007 (P) 8/29/2018 9:15 AM 491800829-0014 02-004 8/29/2018 8:37 AM 491800829-0015 02-006 (P) 8/29/2018 8:55 AM 491800829-0016 01-002 8/28/2018 9:30 AM 491800829-0017 02-002 8/29/2018 8:20 AM 491800829-0018 01-001 8/28/2018 9:15 AM 491800829-0019 01-004 8/28/2018 10:00 AM If "Preliminary Report" is displayed in the signature box; this indicates that there are samples that have not yet been analyzed, that are in a preliminary state, or that analysis is in progress but not completed at the time of report issue. Report Date Report Revision Revision Comments 9/12/2018 R0 Initial Report Marjorie Howley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test results meet all NELAP requirements unless otherwise specified. NJDEP Certification #: 03036 The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. 491800829-1_R0.xlsm V114 Page 1 of 62 Page 1 of 6 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Case Narrative Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). Column Restek RTX-502.2, 60m, 0.25mm ID, 1.4um Concentrator Traps: Entech Dual Cold Traps: (1) 1/8” No Packing, (2) 1/8” Tenax. Gas Standards: Certified Gas standards were used for all analyses. Sample Volumes: Sample volume aliquots for this procedure are 250cc for indoor/ ambient air and 25cc for soil gas. Other volumes for sample dilutions are reflected on each result page. Holding Times: Standard holding times of 30 days were met for all samples. Sampling Pressures: All samples were received at acceptable pressure/vacuum unless listed below. Sample Dilutions: Diluitions reported are designated by the sample # with a "DL" suffix resulting from initial analysis having compounds exceeding calibration as reported with an "E" qualifier. Ethanol and Isopropanol are not diluted for and may be reported with an "E" qualifier on the final result. QA/QC criteria outside method specifications are listed below (if applicable). Initial Calibration All Initial Calibratiion criteria met method specification. Initial Calibration Verification Standard (ICVS)- Second Source ICVS met method specification with 70-130% recovery for 100% of compounds. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) LCS met method specification with 70-130% recovery for 100% of compounds.(If the LCS does not meet criteria but any compounds which have recoveries >130% are not found in the samples, samples may be reported) Continuing Calibration Verification Standard (CCVS) CCVS met method specification with all compounds within 30% deviation. Ending Calibration Verification Standard (ECVS) ECVS met method specification with all compounds within 30% deviation. Method Blanks (MB) Method Blank met method specification. Reporting Limit Laboratory Control Samples (RLLCS) RLLCS met method specification with 90% of compounds within the 60-140% recovery range. Individual compounds outside of the recovery range may be listed below. 491800829-1_R0.xlsm V114 Page 2 of 62 Page 2 of 6 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer ID: EEG50 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Project: SXM Debris Date Received: 9/4/2018 Case Narrative Manual Integration : -Listed below if applicable. Before and after documentation provided in extended deliverable packages. 491800829-9 - acetonitrile, chloromethane, ethanol and propene were manually integrated as the software did not fully integrate the peak. 491800829-12 - acetonitrile was manually integrated because the software chose the wrong peak. Ethanol was manually integrated because the software did not fully integrate the The following data qualifiers that may have been reported with the data, ND- Non Detect. This notation would be used in the results column in lieu of a "U" qualifier. U- Compound was analyzed for but not detected at a listed and appropriately adjusted reporting level. J- Estimated value reported below adjusted reporting limit for target compounds or estimating a concentration for TICs where a 1:1 response is assumed B- Compound found in associated method blank as well as in the sample. E- Estimated value exceeding upper calibration range of instrument. Ethanol and isopropyl alcohol are not specifically targeted to dilute within calibration range. D- Compound reported from additional diluted analysis. N- indicates presumptive evidence of a compound based on library search match. EMSL Analytical, Inc. certifies that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of this contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer –readable data submitted on diskette has been authorized by the laboratory manager or his/her designee, as verified by the following signature. Report Date Report Revision Revision Comments 9/12/2018 R0 Initial Report Marjorie Howley, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory Test results meet all NELAP requirements unless otherwise specified. 491800829-1_R0.xlsm V114 Page 3 of 62 Page 3 of 6 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-1 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17169.D HD0183 32.2 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 21 10 37 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 12 5.0 25 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 24 5.0 56 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 300 5.0 570 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 8.8 5.0 22 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 28 5.0 65 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 ND 5.0 ND 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 24 5.0 76 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-1_R0.xlsm V114 Page 4 of 62 Page 4 of 6 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-1 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17169.D HD0183 32.2 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 16 5.0 60 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 8.9 5.0 39 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 ND 5.0 ND 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 440 ppbv 1000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-1_R0.xlsm V114 Page 5 of 62 Page 5 of 6 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-1 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17169.D HD0183 32.2 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 15 JN 34 6.01 Total TIC Concentrations: 15 ppbv 34 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-1_R0.xlsm V114 Page 6 of 62 Page 6 of 6 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-2 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17171.D HD2155 27.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 15 10 26 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 11 5.0 24 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 1200 5.0 E 2200 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 5.4 5.0 13 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 13 5.0 30 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 ND 5.0 ND 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 23 5.0 75 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-2_R0.xlsm V114 Page 7 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-2 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17171.D HD2155 27.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 8.7 5.0 33 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 8.1 5.0 35 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 5.3 5.0 23 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 1300 ppbv 2500 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-2_R0.xlsm V114 Page 8 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-2 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17171.D HD2155 27.8 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments unknown 92 61 JN 230 25.19 Total TIC Concentrations: 61 ppbv 230 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-2_R0.xlsm V114 Page 9 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-3 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17172.D HD2275 26.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 290 10 500 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 140 5.0 290 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 470 5.0 E 890 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 9.1 5.0 22 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 260 5.0 610 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 66 5.0 110 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 16 5.0 56 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 46 5.0 140 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 26 5.0 77 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 14 5.0 59 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 320 5.0 1000 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-3_R0.xlsm V114 Page 10 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-3 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17172.D HD2275 26.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 92 5.0 350 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 5.4 5.0 25 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 68 5.0 290 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 14 10 61 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 8.0 5.0 35 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 13 5.0 55 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 19 5.0 94 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 1900 ppbv 4700 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-3_R0.xlsm V114 Page 11 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-3 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 TP K17172.D HD2275 26.8 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 13 JN 31 6.01 unknown hydrocarbon 92 80 JN 300 6.46 unknown hydrocarbon 92 11 JN 40 6.79 Acetaldehyde 000075-07-0 44 21 JN 39 6.96 unknown hydrocarbon 92 11 JN 43 7.13 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 50 JN 150 9.02 Furan 000110-00-9 68 44 JN 120 10.47 Pentane, 2-methyl- 000107-83-5 86 10 JN 35 12.55 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 41 JN 120 12.71 unknown hydrocarbon 92 14 JN 51 14.24 unknown 92 45 JN 170 16.19 unknown hydrocarbon 92 19 JN 70 22.37 unknown hydrocarbon 92 12 JN 45 23.77 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 14 JN 74 25.09 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 15 JN 64 25.19 Decane 000124-18-5 142 11 JN 64 27.39 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 12 JN 56 28.54 unknown hydrocarbon 92 14 JN 52 29.43 Total TIC Concentrations: 440 ppbv 1500 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-3_R0.xlsm V114 Page 12 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-4 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17174.D HD2282 28 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 67 10 120 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 53 5.0 110 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 2200 5.0 E 4100 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 6.0 5.0 15 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 110 5.0 260 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 32 5.0 54 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 22 5.0 65 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 7.3 5.0 22 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 66 5.0 210 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-4_R0.xlsm V114 Page 13 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-4 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17174.D HD2282 28 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 31 5.0 110 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 18 5.0 77 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 5.5 5.0 23 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 2600 ppbv 5200 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-4_R0.xlsm V114 Page 14 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-4 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17174.D HD2282 28 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments unknown hydrocarbon 92 24 JN 89 6.47 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 13 JN 39 9.03 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 18 JN 54 12.71 unknown 92 16 JN 62 16.18 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 110 JN 460 25.19 Total TIC Concentrations: 180 ppbv 700 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-4_R0.xlsm V114 Page 15 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-5 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17175.D HD2291 26.5 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 ND 10 ND 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 ND 5.0 ND 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 180 5.0 350 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 ND 5.0 ND 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 ND 5.0 ND 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 5.0 5.0 18 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 ND 5.0 ND 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-5_R0.xlsm V114 Page 16 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-5 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17175.D HD2291 26.5 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 ND 5.0 ND 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 ND 5.0 ND 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 190 ppbv 370 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11 10 110% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-5_R0.xlsm V114 Page 17 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-5 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17175.D HD2291 26.5 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments No TICs to Report Total TIC Concentrations: 0.0 ppbv 0.0 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-5_R0.xlsm V114 Page 18 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-6 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17176.D HD2298 73.5 cc 10 Dilution1 09/11/2018 TP K17186.D HD2298 33.2 cc 25 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 380 10 650 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 260 5.0 530 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 7.6 5.0 17 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 6300 13 DE 12000 24 Reported Dilution #1 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 29 5.0 72 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 330 5.0 780 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 150 5.0 240 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 18 5.0 63 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 65 5.0 190 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 9.4 5.0 34 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 24 5.0 72 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 15 5.0 62 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 490 13 D 1600 40 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 20 5.0 83 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 5.8 5.0 21 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-6_R0.xlsm V114 Page 19 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-6 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17176.D HD2298 73.5 cc 10 Dilution1 09/11/2018 TP K17186.D HD2298 33.2 cc 25 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 190 5.0 720 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 100 5.0 440 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 31 10 130 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 16 5.0 68 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 37 5.0 160 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 24 5.0 120 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 7.6 5.0 37 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 8.1 5.0 40 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 6.1 5.0 30 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 10 5.0 54 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 8500 ppbv 18000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-6_R0.xlsm V114 Page 20 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-6 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17176.D HD2298 73.5 cc 10 Dilution1 09/11/2018 TP K17186.D HD2298 33.2 cc 25 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 21 JN 49 6.01 unknown hydrocarbon 92 120 JN 450 6.47 unknown hydrocarbon 92 17 JN 64 6.79 Acetaldehyde 000075-07-0 44 20 JN 37 6.95 unknown hydrocarbon 92 18 JN 67 7.13 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 72 JN 210 9.03 unknown hydrocarbon 92 16 JN 58 9.76 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 56 JN 170 12.71 Cyclopentene 000142-29-0 68 23 JN 65 13.15 Silanol, trimethyl- 001066-40-6 90 43 JN 160 13.55 unknown hydrocarbon 92 21 JN 79 14.24 unknown hydrocarbon 92 16 JN 61 15.21 unknown 92 67 JN 250 16.19 Octane 000111-65-9 114 20 JN 92 22.37 unknown hydrocarbon 92 23 JN 86 23.77 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 20 JN 100 25.08 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 420 JN 1700 25.20 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 21 JN 100 28.54 unknown hydrocarbon 92 19 JN 70 29.43 Total TIC Concentrations: 1000 ppbv 3900 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-6_R0.xlsm V114 Page 21 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-7 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17177.D HD2300 30.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 260 10 450 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 99 5.0 200 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 11 5.0 23 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 390 5.0 730 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 7.6 5.0 19 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 120 5.0 300 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 31 5.0 52 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 15 5.0 52 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 28 5.0 83 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 15 5.0 43 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 13 5.0 54 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 330 5.0 1100 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-7_R0.xlsm V114 Page 22 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-7 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17177.D HD2300 30.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 140 5.0 530 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 130 5.0 540 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 15 10 64 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 9.5 5.0 41 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 46 5.0 190 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 24 5.0 120 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 1700 ppbv 4600 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-7_R0.xlsm V114 Page 23 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-7 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17177.D HD2300 30.8 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments unknown hydrocarbon 92 78 JN 300 6.47 Acetaldehyde 000075-07-0 44 11 JN 19 6.96 unknown hydrocarbon 92 12 JN 44 7.13 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 60 JN 180 9.03 unknown hydrocarbon 92 11 JN 42 9.77 Furan 000110-00-9 68 22 JN 62 10.46 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 17 JN 51 12.71 unknown hydrocarbon 92 28 JN 110 14.25 unknown hydrocarbon 92 12 JN 46 15.21 unknown 92 40 JN 150 16.19 Octane 000111-65-9 114 23 JN 110 22.36 unknown 92 11 JN 40 23.49 unknown 92 22 JN 82 23.77 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 21 JN 110 25.08 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 24 JN 100 25.20 unknown hydrocarbon 92 16 JN 58 27.38 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 20 JN 98 28.54 unknown hydrocarbon 92 20 JN 75 29.43 unknown hydrocarbon 92 11 JN 41 31.34 Total TIC Concentrations: 460 ppbv 1700 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-7_R0.xlsm V114 Page 24 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-8 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17179.D HD2303 30.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 ND 10 ND 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 ND 5.0 ND 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 320 5.0 610 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 6.2 5.0 15 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 ND 5.0 ND 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 7.8 5.0 25 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-8_R0.xlsm V114 Page 25 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-8 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17179.D HD2303 30.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 ND 5.0 ND 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 ND 5.0 ND 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 330 ppbv 650 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-8_R0.xlsm V114 Page 26 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-8 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-005 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17179.D HD2303 30.8 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments No TICs to Report Total TIC Concentrations: 0.0 ppbv 0.0 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-8_R0.xlsm V114 Page 27 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-9 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17187.D HD2702 58.8 cc 10 Dilution1 09/11/2018 TP K17180.D HD2702 20.1 cc 25 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 440 25 D 770 43 Reported Dilution #1 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 120 5.0 240 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 15 5.0 33 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 1600 13 DE 2900 24 Reported Dilution #1 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 12 5.0 29 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 250 5.0 590 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 110 5.0 190 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 8.4 5.0 18 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 22 5.0 77 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 40 5.0 120 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 5.4 5.0 19 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 32 5.0 100 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 18 5.0 73 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 590 13 D 1900 40 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-9_R0.xlsm V114 Page 28 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-9 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17187.D HD2702 58.8 cc 10 Dilution1 09/11/2018 TP K17180.D HD2702 20.1 cc 25 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 130 5.0 500 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 10 5.0 48 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 86 5.0 380 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 18 10 77 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 10 5.0 45 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 30 5.0 130 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 25 5.0 120 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 6.0 5.0 30 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 6.4 5.0 34 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 3600 ppbv 8400 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11 10 110% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-9_R0.xlsm V114 Page 29 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-9 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17187.D HD2702 58.8 cc 10 Dilution1 09/11/2018 TP K17180.D HD2702 20.1 cc 25 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 15 JN 36 6.01 unknown hydrocarbon 92 99 JN 370 6.47 Acetaldehyde 000075-07-0 44 30 JN 55 6.94 unknown hydrocarbon 92 15 JN 57 7.12 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 72 JN 210 9.03 unknown hydrocarbon 92 14 JN 51 9.76 Furan 000110-00-9 68 53 JN 150 10.47 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 21 JN 62 12.71 Cyclopentene 000142-29-0 68 11 JN 30 13.16 unknown hydrocarbon 92 20 JN 75 14.25 unknown hydrocarbon 92 12 JN 47 15.22 unknown 92 60 JN 220 16.19 Octane 000111-65-9 114 23 JN 110 22.37 unknown hydrocarbon 92 17 JN 62 23.77 unknown hydrocarbon 92 20 JN 75 25.09 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 53 JN 220 25.20 Decane 000124-18-5 142 15 JN 87 27.39 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 16 JN 76 28.54 unknown hydrocarbon 92 24 JN 91 29.43 Total TIC Concentrations: 590 ppbv 2100 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-9_R0.xlsm V114 Page 30 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-10 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17183.D HD2705 26.8 cc 10 Dilution2 09/12/2018 TP K17212.D HD2705 29.5 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 2600 90 D 4400 150 Reported Dilution #1 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 830 45 D 1700 93 Reported Dilution #1 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 67 5.0 150 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 22 5.0 58 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 490 45 D 920 85 Reported Dilution #1 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 12 5.0 30 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 1800 45 D 4300 110 Reported Dilution #1 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 250 5.0 410 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 200 5.0 720 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 480 45 D 1400 130 Reported Dilution #1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 240 5.0 720 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 7.2 5.0 25 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 180 5.0 750 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 2900 45 D 9200 140 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 170 5.0 600 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 10 5.0 41 20 491800829-10_R0.xlsm V114 Page 31 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-10 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17183.D HD2705 26.8 cc 10 Dilution2 09/12/2018 TP K17212.D HD2705 29.5 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 1700 45 D 6300 170 Reported Dilution #1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 42 5.0 170 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 5.4 5.0 25 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 1700 45 D 7200 200 Reported Dilution #1 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 230 10 1000 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 170 5.0 720 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 370 5.0 1600 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 420 45 D 2100 220 Reported Dilution #1 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 79 5.0 390 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 78 5.0 380 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 55 5.0 270 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 120 5.0 620 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 15000 ppbv 46000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 12 10 120% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-10_R0.xlsm V114 Page 32 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-10 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17183.D HD2705 26.8 cc 10 Dilution2 09/12/2018 TP K17212.D HD2705 29.5 cc 90 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments unknown hydrocarbon 92 650 JN 2400 6.46 unknown hydrocarbon 92 130 JN 480 6.79 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 470 JN 1400 9.02 Furan 000110-00-9 68 220 JN 620 10.45 Pentane, 2-methyl- 000107-83-5 86 120 JN 420 12.55 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 170 JN 500 12.70 unknown hydrocarbon 92 190 JN 730 14.25 unknown hydrocarbon 92 130 JN 500 15.21 unknown 92 470 JN 1800 16.19 Furan, 2,5-dimethyl- 000625-86-5 96 110 JN 430 20.48 Octane 000111-65-9 114 210 JN 960 22.37 unknown hydrocarbon 92 140 JN 520 23.50 unknown hydrocarbon 92 170 JN 650 23.78 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 200 JN 1100 25.09 Decane 000124-18-5 142 160 JN 930 27.39 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 220 JN 1100 28.54 Undecane 001120-21-4 156 200 JN 1300 29.44 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 140 JN 690 31.04 unknown hydrocarbon 92 140 JN 540 31.33 unknown hydrocarbon 92 110 JN 430 33.42 Total TIC Concentrations: 4400 ppbv 18000 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-10_R0.xlsm V114 Page 33 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-11 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17184.D HD2727 30.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 130 10 230 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 71 5.0 150 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 110 5.0 210 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 130 5.0 310 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 23 5.0 38 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 13 5.0 44 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 33 5.0 100 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 6.4 5.0 23 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 14 5.0 42 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 12 5.0 50 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 310 5.0 1000 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 6.3 5.0 23 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-11_R0.xlsm V114 Page 34 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-11 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17184.D HD2727 30.8 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 88 5.0 330 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 78 5.0 340 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 13 10 58 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 9.5 5.0 41 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 21 5.0 90 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 26 5.0 130 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 5.0 5.0 26 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 1100 ppbv 3200 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-11_R0.xlsm V114 Page 35 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-11 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-003 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 TP K17184.D HD2727 30.8 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 11 JN 25 6.01 1-Propene, 2-methyl- 000115-11-7 56 54 JN 120 6.46 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 42 JN 120 9.02 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 16 JN 50 12.71 1-Pentene, 2-methyl- 000763-29-1 84 14 JN 49 14.24 unknown 92 34 JN 130 16.18 unknown hydrocarbon 92 19 JN 71 22.37 unknown hydrocarbon 92 71 JN 270 23.50 unknown hydrocarbon 92 14 JN 51 23.78 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 20 JN 100 25.08 Decane 000124-18-5 142 16 JN 93 27.38 Unknown Substituted Naphthalene 92 40 JN 150 28.15 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 22 JN 110 28.54 Undecane 001120-21-4 156 21 JN 130 29.43 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 19 JN 95 31.03 unknown hydrocarbon 92 20 JN 75 31.33 unknown hydrocarbon 92 24 JN 90 33.43 unknown hydrocarbon 92 11 JN 40 33.74 Total TIC Concentrations: 470 ppbv 1800 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-11_R0.xlsm V114 Page 36 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-12 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4324.D HD2733 34 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 17 10 29 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 8.0 5.0 17 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 11 5.0 26 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 5200 5.0 E 10000 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 21 5.0 49 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 ND 5.0 ND 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 6.2 5.0 22 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 16 5.0 52 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-12_R0 V114 Page 37 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-12 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4324.D HD2733 34 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 7.4 5.0 28 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 5.4 5.0 23 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 ND 5.0 ND 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 5300 ppbv 10000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9.0 10 90% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-12_R0 V114 Page 38 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-12 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/30/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 03-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4324.D HD2733 34 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 100 JN 420 23.83 Total TIC Concentrations: 100 ppbv 420 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-12_R0 V114 Page 39 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-13 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4325.D HD2743 28 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 ND 10 ND 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 ND 5.0 ND 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 650 5.0 E 1200 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 8.5 5.0 21 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 9.0 5.0 21 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 ND 5.0 ND 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 ND 5.0 ND 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-13_R0 V114 Page 40 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-13 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4325.D HD2743 28 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 ND 5.0 ND 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 ND 10 ND 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 ND 5.0 ND 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 ND 5.0 ND 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 670 ppbv 1200 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9.5 10 95% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-13_R0 V114 Page 41 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-13 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-007 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4325.D HD2743 28 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments No TICs to Report Total TIC Concentrations: 0.0 ppbv 0.0 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-13_R0 V114 Page 42 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-14 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4326.D HD2752 30 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4366.D HD2752 30 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 1500 90 D 2700 150 Reported Dilution #1 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 130 5.0 270 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 140 5.0 310 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 8.4 5.0 22 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 750 45 D 1400 85 Reported Dilution #1 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 530 45 D 1300 110 Reported Dilution #1 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 240 5.0 400 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 83 5.0 290 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 140 5.0 420 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 ND 5.0 ND 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 55 5.0 160 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 84 5.0 340 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 1800 45 D 5700 140 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 12 5.0 42 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-14_R0 V114 Page 43 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-14 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4326.D HD2752 30 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4366.D HD2752 30 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 710 45 D 2700 170 Reported Dilution #1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 12 5.0 49 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 640 45 D 2800 200 Reported Dilution #1 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 95 10 410 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 62 5.0 270 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 340 45 D 1500 190 Reported Dilution #1 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 120 5.0 590 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 25 5.0 120 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 24 5.0 120 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 17 5.0 84 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 59 5.0 310 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 7600 ppbv 22000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 12 10 120% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-14_R0 V114 Page 44 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-14 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4326.D HD2752 30 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4366.D HD2752 30 cc 90 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments 1-Propene, 2-methyl- 000115-11-7 56 330 JN 750 6.66 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 44 JN 170 7.03 Acetaldehyde 000075-07-0 44 52 JN 93 7.24 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 190 JN 550 9.21 2-Pentene 000109-68-2 70 35 JN 100 9.80 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 39 JN 150 10.15 Furan 000110-00-9 68 67 JN 190 10.36 1-Pentene, 2-methyl- 000763-29-1 84 160 JN 560 13.04 Unknown 92 120 JN 440 14.64 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 89 JN 330 20.52 Unknown 92 94 JN 350 22.07 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 81 JN 420 23.51 Unknown 92 65 JN 250 26.14 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 140 JN 680 27.52 Benzaldehyde 000100-52-7 106 69 JN 300 27.85 Unknown 92 81 JN 300 28.55 Unknown Substituted Benzene 92 63 JN 240 28.62 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 71 JN 350 30.47 Unknown 92 71 JN 270 30.74 Unknown 92 65 JN 250 32.82 Total TIC Concentrations: 1900 ppbv 6700 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-14_R0 V114 Page 45 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-15 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4328.D HD2768 33 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 23 10 40 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 9.1 5.0 19 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 32 5.0 76 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 ND 5.0 ND 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 770 5.0 E 1400 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 11 5.0 26 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 34 5.0 81 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 ND 5.0 ND 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 ND 5.0 ND 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 6.8 5.0 20 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 7.2 5.0 26 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 ND 5.0 ND 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 21 5.0 67 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-15_R0 V114 Page 46 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-15 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4328.D HD2768 33 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 23 5.0 85 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 10 5.0 45 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 15 10 64 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 5.7 5.0 25 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 ND 5.0 ND 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 ND 5.0 ND 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 ND 5.0 ND 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 1000 ppbv 2000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9.8 10 98% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-15_R0 V114 Page 47 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-15 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-006 (P) Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4328.D HD2768 33 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 13 JN 31 6.16 Total TIC Concentrations: 13 ppbv 31 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-15_R0 V114 Page 48 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-16 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4329.D HD2786 25 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4367.D HD2786 25 cc 20 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 180 10 310 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 78 5.0 160 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 5.3 5.0 12 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 98 5.0 180 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 7.5 5.0 19 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 360 5.0 850 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 74 5.0 120 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 19 5.0 66 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 67 5.0 200 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 8.8 5.0 32 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 24 5.0 70 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 17 5.0 71 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 310 10 D 1000 32 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 ND 5.0 ND 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-16_R0 V114 Page 49 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-16 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4329.D HD2786 25 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4367.D HD2786 25 cc 20 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 130 5.0 500 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 160 5.0 680 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 17 10 73 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 13 5.0 54 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 32 5.0 140 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 47 5.0 230 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 5.9 5.0 29 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 7.9 5.0 39 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 ND 5.0 ND 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 5.5 5.0 29 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 1700 ppbv 4900 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10 10 100% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-16_R0 V114 Page 50 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-16 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/10/2018 KW J4329.D HD2786 25 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4367.D HD2786 25 cc 20 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments 1-Propene, 2-methyl- 000115-11-7 56 60 JN 140 6.66 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 36 JN 110 9.21 Furan 000110-00-9 68 15 JN 42 10.34 Pentane, 2-methyl- 000107-83-5 86 11 JN 40 11.77 Acetic acid, methyl ester 000079-20-9 74 34 JN 100 11.89 1-Pentene, 2-methyl- 000763-29-1 84 16 JN 54 13.02 Unknown 92 30 JN 110 14.63 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 22 JN 82 20.52 Cyclohexane, propyl- 001678-92-8 126 17 JN 88 21.76 Unknown 92 16 JN 60 22.07 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 22 JN 120 23.52 Decane 000124-18-5 142 17 JN 100 26.15 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 26 JN 130 27.52 Undecane 001120-21-4 156 18 JN 120 28.53 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 16 JN 76 30.49 Dodecane 000112-40-3 170 20 JN 140 30.75 Tridecane 000629-50-5 184 27 JN 200 32.82 Tetradecane 000629-59-4 198 16 JN 130 35.09 Total TIC Concentrations: 420 ppbv 1800 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-16_R0 V114 Page 51 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-17 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 KW J4350.D HD2787 279 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4351.D HD2787 31 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 1100 90 D 1900 150 Reported Dilution #1 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 180 5.0 380 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 69 5.0 150 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 12 5.0 30 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 46 5.0 87 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 1500 45 D 3600 110 Reported Dilution #1 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 650 45 D 1100 75 Reported Dilution #1 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 170 5.0 610 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 310 5.0 900 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 15 5.0 54 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 72 5.0 210 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 5.5 5.0 19 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 160 5.0 660 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 4100 45 DE 13000 140 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 19 5.0 68 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 5.9 5.0 24 20 491800829-17_R0 V114 Page 52 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-17 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 KW J4350.D HD2787 279 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4351.D HD2787 31 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 1900 45 D 7100 170 Reported Dilution #1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 26 5.0 110 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 1700 45 D 7200 200 Reported Dilution #1 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 200 10 890 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 170 5.0 740 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 240 5.0 1000 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 290 5.0 1400 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 67 5.0 330 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 68 5.0 340 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 47 5.0 230 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 110 5.0 590 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 13000 ppbv 43000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 12 10 120% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-17_R0 V114 Page 53 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-17 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/29/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 02-002 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 KW J4350.D HD2787 279 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4351.D HD2787 31 cc 90 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments 1-Propene, 2-methyl- 000115-11-7 56 440 JN 1000 6.66 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 77 JN 290 7.01 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 240 JN 710 9.20 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 79 JN 300 10.30 1-Pentene, 2-methyl- 000763-29-1 84 110 JN 390 13.02 Unknown 92 120 JN 440 14.62 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 120 JN 460 20.51 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 120 JN 470 22.06 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 170 JN 860 23.51 Decane 000124-18-5 142 140 JN 800 26.14 Benzene, propyl- 000103-65-1 120 74 JN 360 26.58 Unknown Substituted Benzene 92 80 JN 300 27.43 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 130 JN 640 27.52 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 150 JN 570 28.53 Unknown 92 150 JN 560 28.62 Unknown Substituted Benzene 92 61 JN 230 29.10 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 250 JN 1200 30.46 Dodecane 000112-40-3 170 190 JN 1300 30.73 Tridecane 000629-50-5 184 92 JN 690 32.82 Total TIC Concentrations: 2800 ppbv 12000 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-17_R0 V114 Page 54 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-18 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 KW J4333.D HD2802 33 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 1100 10 E 1800 17 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 350 5.0 730 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 26 5.0 57 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 29 5.0 77 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 860 5.0 E 1600 9.4 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 680 5.0 E 1600 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 160 5.0 270 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 5.9 5.0 13 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 120 5.0 420 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 170 5.0 490 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 19 5.0 68 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 75 5.0 220 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 120 5.0 510 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 1900 5.0 E 6000 16 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 19 5.0 67 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 5.8 5.0 24 20 491800829-18_R0 V114 Page 55 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-18 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 KW J4333.D HD2802 33 cc 10 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 830 5.0 E 3100 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 980 5.0 E 4200 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 89 10 390 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 79 5.0 340 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 330 5.0 1400 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 250 5.0 1200 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 31 5.0 150 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 40 5.0 200 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 21 5.0 100 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 39 5.0 210 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 8300 ppbv 25000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 12 10 120% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-18_R0 V114 Page 56 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-18 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-001 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/11/2018 KW J4333.D HD2802 33 cc 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Acetaldehyde 000075-07-0 44 62 JN 110 7.22 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 250 JN 740 9.21 Furan 000110-00-9 68 72 JN 200 10.34 Pentane, 2-methyl- 000107-83-5 86 55 JN 190 11.77 1-Pentene, 2-methyl- 000763-29-1 84 130 JN 450 13.02 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 65 JN 250 13.79 Unknown 92 130 JN 480 14.64 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 48 JN 180 19.45 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 110 JN 400 20.53 Unknown 92 87 JN 330 21.74 Unknown 92 140 JN 530 22.07 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 120 JN 610 23.51 Decane 000124-18-5 142 81 JN 470 26.15 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 160 JN 790 27.52 Benzaldehyde 000100-52-7 106 45 JN 190 27.85 Undecane 001120-21-4 156 100 JN 650 28.53 Unknown Substituted Benzene 92 93 JN 350 28.62 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 87 JN 430 30.47 Dodecane 000112-40-3 170 130 JN 900 30.75 Tridecane 000629-50-5 184 99 JN 740 32.82 Total TIC Concentrations: 2100 ppbv 9000 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-18_R0 V114 Page 57 of 62 Page 3 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-19 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/12/2018 KW J4354.D HD2831 112 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4355.D HD2831 37 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments Propylene 115-07-1 42.08 1300 90 D 2200 150 Reported Dilution #1 Freon 12(Dichlorodifluoromethane) 75-71-8 120.9 ND 5.0 ND 25 Freon 114(1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethan 76-14-2 170.9 ND 5.0 ND 35 Chloromethane 74-87-3 50.49 56 5.0 120 10 n-Butane 106-97-8 58.12 ND 5.0 ND 12 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 62.50 ND 5.0 ND 13 1,3-Butadiene 106-99-0 54.09 9.1 5.0 20 11 Bromomethane 74-83-9 94.94 ND 5.0 ND 19 Chloroethane 75-00-3 64.52 ND 5.0 ND 13 Ethanol 64-17-5 46.07 21000 45 DE 40000 85 Reported Dilution #1 Bromoethene(Vinyl bromide) 593-60-2 106.9 ND 5.0 ND 22 Freon 11(Trichlorofluoromethane) 75-69-4 137.4 ND 5.0 ND 28 Isopropyl alcohol(2-Propanol) 67-63-0 60.10 ND 5.0 ND 12 Freon 113(1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethan 76-13-1 187.4 ND 5.0 ND 38 Acetone 67-64-1 58.08 340 5.0 800 12 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Acetonitrile 75-05-8 41.00 56 5.0 94 8.4 Tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA) 75-65-0 74.12 ND 5.0 ND 15 Bromoethane(Ethyl bromide) 74-96-4 108.0 ND 5.0 ND 22 3-Chloropropene(Allyl chloride) 107-05-1 76.53 ND 5.0 ND 16 Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 76.14 ND 5.0 ND 16 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 84.94 ND 5.0 ND 17 Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 53.00 ND 5.0 ND 11 Methyl-tert-butyl ether(MTBE) 1634-04-4 88.15 ND 5.0 ND 18 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 n-Hexane 110-54-3 86.17 34 5.0 120 18 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Vinyl acetate 108-05-4 86.00 ND 5.0 ND 18 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 72.10 62 5.0 180 15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 96.94 ND 5.0 ND 20 Ethyl acetate 141-78-6 88.10 8.1 5.0 29 18 Chloroform 67-66-3 119.4 ND 5.0 ND 24 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 72.11 19 5.0 56 15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 84.16 ND 5.0 ND 17 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(Isooctane) 540-84-1 114.2 ND 5.0 ND 23 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 153.8 ND 5.0 ND 31 n-Heptane 142-82-5 100.2 30 5.0 120 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 98.96 ND 5.0 ND 20 Benzene 71-43-2 78.11 2700 45 D 8500 140 Reported Dilution #1 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 131.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 113.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 100.12 ND 5.0 ND 20 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 163.8 ND 5.0 ND 33 1,4-Dioxane 123-91-1 88.12 6.0 5.0 22 18 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 100.2 ND 5.0 ND 20 491800829-19_R0 V114 Page 58 of 62 Page 1 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-19 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/12/2018 KW J4354.D HD2831 112 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4355.D HD2831 37 cc 90 Target Compound Results Summary Result RL Result RL Target Compounds CAS# MW ppbv ppbv Q ug/m3 ug/m3 Comments cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 Toluene 108-88-3 92.14 300 5.0 1100 19 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 111.0 ND 5.0 ND 23 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 133.4 ND 5.0 ND 27 2-Hexanone(MBK) 591-78-6 100.1 ND 5.0 ND 20 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 165.8 ND 5.0 ND 34 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 208.3 ND 5.0 ND 43 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 187.8 ND 5.0 ND 38 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 112.6 ND 5.0 ND 23 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 106.2 280 5.0 1200 22 Xylene (p,m) 1330-20-7 106.2 37 10 160 43 Xylene (Ortho) 95-47-6 106.2 28 5.0 120 22 Styrene 100-42-5 104.1 44 5.0 190 21 Isopropylbenzene (cumene) 98-82-8 120.19 62 5.0 310 25 Bromoform 75-25-2 252.8 ND 5.0 ND 52 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 167.9 ND 5.0 ND 34 4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8 120.2 11 5.0 53 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 120.2 13 5.0 66 25 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 126.6 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 120.2 7.9 5.0 39 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 Benzyl chloride 100-44-7 126.0 ND 5.0 ND 26 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 147.0 ND 5.0 ND 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 181.5 ND 5.0 ND 37 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 87-68-3 260.8 ND 5.0 ND 53 Naphthalene 91-20-3 128.17 17 5.0 89 26 Total Target Compound Concentrations: 26000 ppbv 56000 ug/m3 Surrogate Result Spike Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11 10 110% Qualifier Definitions ND = Non Detect B = Compound also found in method blank. E= Estimated concentration exceeding upper calibration range. D= Result reported from diluted analysis. Method Reference r USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-19_R0 V114 Page 59 of 62 Page 2 of 3 EMSL Analytical EMSL Order #: 491800829 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 EMSL Sample #: 491800829-19 Phone/Fax: (856)858-4800 / (856)858-4571 Customer ID: EEG50 http://www.EMSL.com to15lab@EMSL.com Customer PO: 20184191DEBRIS Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: 305-374-8300 EE & G Fax: 305-374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Collected: 8/28/2018 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Date Received: 9/4/2018 Project: SXM Debris Sample ID: 01-004 Analysis Analysis Date Analyst Init. Lab File ID Canister ID Sample Vol. Dil. Factor Initial 09/12/2018 KW J4354.D HD2831 112 cc 10 Dilution1 09/12/2018 KW J4355.D HD2831 37 cc 90 Tentatively Identified Compound Results Summary Result Result Retention Tentatively Identified Compounds CAS# MW(1) ppbv Q ug/m3 Time Comments Isobutane 000075-28-5 58 17 JN 40 6.14 1-Propene, 2-methyl- 000115-11-7 56 110 JN 260 6.64 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 22 JN 82 6.99 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 16 JN 60 7.36 Pentane 000109-66-0 72 71 JN 210 9.19 2-Butene, 2-methyl- 000513-35-9 70 16 JN 47 9.78 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 29 JN 110 10.29 1-Pentene, 2-methyl- 000763-29-1 84 26 JN 89 13.00 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 17 JN 64 13.77 Unknown 92 37 JN 140 14.62 Unknown hydrocarbon 92 32 JN 120 20.51 Nonane 000111-84-2 128 15 JN 80 23.49 1-Hexanol 000111-27-3 102 210 JN 870 23.76 .alpha.-Methylstyrene 000098-83-9 118 15 JN 71 27.50 Acetophenone 000098-86-2 120 16 JN 79 30.45 Dodecane 000112-40-3 170 16 JN 110 30.73 Tridecane 000629-50-5 184 18 JN 140 32.80 Total TIC Concentrations: 680 ppbv 2600 ug/m3 Qualifier Definitions (1) = If unknown, MW is assigned as equivalent Toluene (92) for ug/m3 conversion purposes. B = Compound also found in method blank. J= Estimated value based on a 1:1 response to internal standard. N= Presumptive evidence of compound based on library match. Method Reference USEPA: Compendium Method TO-15, “Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air…" Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), January 1999, (EPA/625/R-96/010b). 491800829-19_R0 V114 Page 60 of 62 Page 3 of 3 Page 61 of 62 Page 62 of 62 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT E LABORATORY RESULTS, HYDROGEN SULFIDE (H2S) LA Testing 5431 Industrial Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Order ID: 331817900 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Environmental Customer PO: 2018-4191 5751 Miami Lakes Dr. Date Received: 09/07/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 LA Testing Order: 331817900 Fax: (305) 374-8301 Project: SXM Landfill Phone: (305) 984-3218 E-mail: amavrelis@eeandg.com Report Date: 09/12/18 Date Analyzed: 09/04/18 HYDROGEN SULFIDE via NIOSH 6013M SKC 226-09 LA Testing Sample ID Air Volume Test µg/tube ppm Reporting Limit Sample ID (L) µg/tube 331817900-0001 01-001 39.5 Hydrogen Sulfide 170* 3.1 14 331817900-0002 01-002 36.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.28 14 331817900-0003 01-003 33.5 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.30 14 331817900-0004 01-004 31 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.33 14 331817900-0005 01-005 29.25 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.35 14 331817900-0006 02-001 43 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.24 14 331817900-0007 02-002 42.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.24 14 331817900-0008 02-003 42.5 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.24 14 331817900-0009 02-004 41.5 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.25 14 331817900-0010 02-005 40.25 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.25 14 Sample received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without written approval by LA Testing. Unless otherwise noted, the results in this report have been blank corrected. Quality Control Data associated with this sample set is within acceptable limits, unless otherwise noted. Tube front and tube back analyzed separately, tube backs are ND unless otherwise indicated. *Note: tube back was detected and added to the result. CD Analyst Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager AIHA-LAP, LLC Accredited - Laboratory ID #101650 Page 1 of 2 LA Testing 5431 Industrial Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Order ID: 331817900 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Environmental Customer PO: 2018-4191 5751 Miami Lakes Dr. Date Received: 09/07/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 LA Testing Order: 331817900 Fax: (305) 374-8301 Project: SXM Landfill Phone: (305) 984-3218 E-mail: amavrelis@eeandg.com Report Date: 09/12/18 Date Analyzed: 09/04/18 HYDROGEN SULFIDE via NIOSH 6013M SKC 226-09 LA Testing Sample ID Air Volume Test µg/tube ppm Reporting Limit Sample ID (L) µg/tube 331817900-0011 02-006 41.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.24 14 331817900-0012 02-007 40.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.25 14 331817900-0013 03-001 38.5 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.26 14 331817900-0014 03-002 38 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.27 14 331817900-0015 03-003 37.25 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.27 14 331817900-0016 03-004 36.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.28 14 331817900-0017 03-005 38.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.26 14 331817900-0018 03-006 35.75 Hydrogen Sulfide <14 <0.28 14 331817900-0019 03-007 33.75 Hydrogen Sulfide 38 0.81 14 331817900-0020 FB001 - Hydrogen Sulfide <14 NA 14 Sample received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without written approval by LA Testing. Unless otherwise noted, the results in this report have been blank corrected. Quality Control Data associated with this sample set is within acceptable limits, unless otherwise noted. Tube front and tube back analyzed separately, tube backs are ND unless otherwise indicated. *Note: tube back was detected and added to the result. CD Analyst Michael Chapman, Laboratory Manager AIHA-LAP, LLC Accredited - Laboratory ID #101650 Page 2 of 2 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT F LABORATORY RESULTS, PAHS EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Order ID: 281803937 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Customer PO: 2018-4191 (Tio) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Received: 08/30/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 EMSL Order: 281803937 Project: SXM Landfill Report Date: 09/11/18 Date Analyzed: 09/10/18 Test Report – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis by HPLC/FLD/UV of Air Samples via mod. NIOSH 5506, Issue 3, 1/15/98 EMSL ID 281803937-0001 281803937-0002 281803937-0003 Sample ID 01-001 01-002 01-003 Sample Volume (L) 970 958 936 Tube Tube Tube 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 Sample Media Filter Filter Filter 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 Compound Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Naphthalene 29 <0.65 9.0 Acenaphthylene 83 25 27 Acenaphthene 20 <0.65 <0.67 Fluorene 13 13 3.0 Phenanthrene 4.8 17 <0.33 Anthracene 2.8 <0.65 <0.67 Fluoranthene 2.1 3.5 0.54 Pyrene 3.3 4.5 0.37 Benzo(a)anthracene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Chrysene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(e)pyrene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.56 0.44 0.39 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene <0.32 <0.33 <0.33 Notes: 1. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. 2. These results relate only to the samples tested. 3. Sample results are media blank corrected. 4. Discernible blank submitted with samples if listed. KFoster Scott VanEtten, CIH- Lab Manager Analyst Or other approved signatory AIHA-LAP, LLC – IHLAP Lab#100194 Page 1 of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Order ID: 281803937 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Customer PO: 2018-4191 (Tio) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Received: 08/30/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 EMSL Order: 281803937 Project: SXM Landfill Report Date: 09/11/18 Date Analyzed: 09/10/18 Test Report – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis by HPLC/FLD/UV of Air Samples via mod. NIOSH 5506, Issue 3, 1/15/98 EMSL ID 281803937-0004 281803937-0005 Sample ID 01-004 01-005 Media Blank Sample Volume (L) 920 904 Analytical Tube Tube Tube Sensitivity 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 Sample Media Filter Filter Filter 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 Compound Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg) Conc. (µg) Naphthalene 12 <0.69 <0.62 0.62 Acenaphthylene 28 4.8 <0.62 0.62 Acenaphthene 2.6 <0.69 <0.62 0.62 Fluorene <0.68 <0.69 <0.62 0.62 Phenanthrene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Anthracene <0.68 <0.69 <0.62 0.62 Fluoranthene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Pyrene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(a)anthracene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Chrysene 13 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(e)pyrene 6.8 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.73 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.63 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene <0.34 <0.35 <0.31 0.31 Notes: 1. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. 2. These results relate only to the samples tested. 3. Sample results are media blank corrected. 4. Discernible blank submitted with samples if listed. KFoster Scott VanEtten, CIH- Lab Manager Analyst Or other approved signatory AIHA-LAP, LLC – IHLAP Lab#100194 Page 2 of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Order ID: 281803982 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Customer PO: 2018-4191 (Tio) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Received: 09/04/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 EMSL Order: 281803982 Project: SXM Landfill Report Date: 09/11/18 Date Analyzed: 09/10/18 Test Report – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis by HPLC/FLD/UV of Air Samples via mod. NIOSH 5506, Issue 3, 1/15/98 EMSL ID 281803982-0001 281803982-0002 281803982-0003 281803982-0004 Sample ID 02-001 02-002 02-003 02-004 Sample Volume (L) 105 980 982 103 Tube Tube Tube Tube 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 Sample Media Filter Filter Filter Filter 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 Compound Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Naphthalene <6.0 <0.64 <0.64 <6.1 Acenaphthylene 50 210 25 550 Acenaphthene <6.0 <0.64 <0.64 <6.1 Fluorene <6.0 <0.64 <0.64 <6.1 Phenanthrene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Anthracene <6.0 <0.64 <0.64 <6.1 Fluoranthene <6.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Pyrene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Benzo(a)anthracene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Chrysene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Benzo(e)pyrene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <3.0 0.53 <0.32 <3.0 Benzo(a)pyrene <3.0 1.5 <0.32 4.4 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene <3.0 <0.32 <0.32 <3.0 Notes: 1. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. 2. These results relate only to the samples tested. 3. Sample results are media blank corrected. 4. Discernible blank submitted with samples if listed. KFoster Scott VanEtten, CIH- Lab Manager Analyst Or other approved signatory AIHA-LAP, LLC – IHLAP Lab#100194 Page 1 of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Order ID: 281803982 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Customer PO: 2018-4191 (Tio) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Received: 09/04/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 EMSL Order: 281803982 Project: SXM Landfill Report Date: 09/11/18 Date Analyzed: 09/10/18 Test Report – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis by HPLC/FLD/UV of Air Samples via mod. NIOSH 5506, Issue 3, 1/15/98 EMSL ID 281803982-0005 281803982-0006 281803982-0007 Sample ID 02-005 02-006 02-007 Media Blank Sample Volume (L) 1004 890 974 Analytical Tube Tube Tube Tube Sensitivity 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 Sample Media Filter Filter Filter Filter 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 Compound Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg) Conc. (µg) Naphthalene <0.62 2.0 <0.64 <0.62 0.62 Acenaphthylene 0.93 4.4 1.0 <0.62 0.62 Acenaphthene <0.62 <0.70 <0.64 <0.62 0.62 Fluorene <0.62 <0.70 <0.64 <0.62 0.62 Phenanthrene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Anthracene <0.62 <0.70 <0.64 <0.62 0.62 Fluoranthene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Pyrene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(a)anthracene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Chrysene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(e)pyrene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene <0.31 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 0.31 Notes: 1. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. 2. These results relate only to the samples tested. 3. Sample results are media blank corrected. 4. Discernible blank submitted with samples if listed. KFoster Scott VanEtten, CIH- Lab Manager Analyst Or other approved signatory AIHA-LAP, LLC – IHLAP Lab#100194 Page 2 of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Order ID: 281804001 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Customer PO: 2018-4191 (Tio) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Received: 09/04/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 EMSL Order: 281804001 Project: SXM Landfill Report Date: 09/06/18 Date Analyzed: 09/05/18 Test Report – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis by HPLC/FLD/UV of Air Samples via mod. NIOSH 5506, Issue 3, 1/15/98 EMSL ID 281804001-0001 281804001-0002 281804001-0003 281804001-0004 Sample ID 03-001 03-002 03-003 03-004 Sample Volume (L) 270 960 960 257 Tube Tube Tube Tube 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 Sample Media Filter Filter Filter Filter 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 Compound Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Naphthalene <2.3 <0.65 <0.65 <2.4 Acenaphthylene 169 <0.65 <0.65 <2.4 Acenaphthene <2.3 <0.65 <0.65 <2.4 Fluorene <2.3 <0.65 <0.65 <2.4 Phenanthrene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Anthracene <2.3 <0.65 <0.65 <2.4 Fluoranthene 10 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Pyrene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Benzo(a)anthracene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Chrysene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Benzo(e)pyrene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Benzo(a)pyrene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene <1.2 <0.33 <0.33 <1.2 Note: 1. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. 2. These results relate only to the samples tested. 3. Sample results are media blank corrected. 4. Discernable field blank(s) submitted with sample if listed above. KF Scott VanEtten, CIH- Lab Manager Analyst Or other approved signatory AIHA-LAP, LLC – IHLAP Lab#100194 Page 1 of 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Order ID: 281804001 Attn: Alex Mavrelis Customer ID: EEG50 EE & G Customer PO: 2018-4191 (Tio) 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Date Received: 09/04/18 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 EMSL Order: 281804001 Project: SXM Landfill Report Date: 09/06/18 Date Analyzed: 09/05/18 Test Report – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon Analysis by HPLC/FLD/UV of Air Samples via mod. NIOSH 5506, Issue 3, 1/15/98 EMSL ID 281804001-0005 281804001-0006 281804001-0007 Sample ID 03-005 03-006 03-007 Media Blank Sample Volume (L) 960 910 940 Analytical Tube Tube Tube Tube Sensitivity 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 226-30-04 Sample Media Filter Filter Filter Filter 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 225-1713 Compound Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg/m3) Conc. (µg) Conc. (µg) Naphthalene <0.65 <0.69 <0.66 <0.62 0.62 Acenaphthylene <0.65 <0.69 3 <0.62 0.62 Acenaphthene <0.65 <0.69 <0.66 <0.62 0.62 Fluorene <0.65 <0.69 <0.66 <0.62 0.62 Phenanthrene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Anthracene <0.65 <0.69 <0.66 <0.62 0.62 Fluoranthene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Pyrene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(a)anthracene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Chrysene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(e)pyrene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(a)pyrene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene <0.33 <0.34 <0.33 <0.31 0.31 Note: 1. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. 2. These results relate only to the samples tested. 3. Sample results are media blank corrected. 4. Discernable field blank(s) submitted with sample if listed above. KF Scott VanEtten, CIH- Lab Manager Analyst Or other approved signatory AIHA-LAP, LLC – IHLAP Lab#100194 Page 2 of 2 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT G LABORATORY RESULTS, OZONE (O3) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone: (856) 303-2500 Fax: (856) 858-4571 Email: EnvChemistry2@emsl.com Attn: Alex Mavrelis 9/17/2018 EE & G 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 The following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. on 9/6/2018. The results are tabulated on the attached data pages for the following client designated project: SXM Landfill The reference number for these samples is EMSL Order #011807128. Please use this reference when calling about these samples. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (856) 303-2500. Approved By: Phillip Worby, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory Director AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab # 100194 NELAP Certification: NJ 03036; NY 10872 The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The QC data associated with the sample results meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated. The final results are not blank corrected unless specifically indicated. The laboratory is not responsible for final results calculated using air volumes that have been provided by non-laboratory personnel. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Page 1 of 5 EMSL Order: 011807128 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 20185-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 11:55 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 01-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0001 D1-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone 0.91 0.21 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 01-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0002 D1-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.21 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 01-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0003 D1-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.20 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 01-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0004 D1-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.20 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 01-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0005 D1-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.20 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-001 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0006 D2-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/17/2018 6:11:37 PM Page 2 of 5 EMSL Order: 011807128 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 20185-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 11:55 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-001 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0006 D2-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.23 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-002 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0007 D2-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone 0.26 0.24 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-003 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0008 D2-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.22 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-004 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0009 D2-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone 0.20 0.20 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-005 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0010 D2-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.21 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-006 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0011 D2-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/17/2018 6:11:37 PM Page 3 of 5 EMSL Order: 011807128 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 20185-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 11:55 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-006 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0011 D2-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.31 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 02-007 Collected: 8/29/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0012 D2-Site 007 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.21 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 03-002 Collected: 8/30/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0013 D3-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.23 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 03-003 Collected: 8/30/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0014 D3-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.23 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/12/2018 MM Client Sample Description 03-005 Collected: 8/30/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0015 D3-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.24 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/13/2018 MM Client Sample Description 03-006 Collected: 8/30/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0016 D3-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/17/2018 6:11:37 PM Page 4 of 5 EMSL Order: 011807128 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 20185-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 11:55 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-006 Collected: 8/30/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0016 D3-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.20 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/13/2018 MM Client Sample Description 03-007 Collected: 8/30/2018 Lab ID: 011807128-0017 D3-Site 007 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.22 mg/m³ 9/11/2018 MM 9/13/2018 MM Client Sample Description FB001 Collected: Lab ID: 011807128-0018 Field Blank Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst WET ID-214 Ozone ND 0.0086 mg/filter 9/11/2018 MM 9/13/2018 MM Definitions: ND - indicates that the analyte was not detected at the reporting limit RL - Reporting Limit (Analytical) D - Dilution ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/17/2018 6:11:37 PM Page 5 of 5 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT H LABORATORY RESULTS, DIOXINS AND FURANS Pace Analytical Services, LLC. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 Fax: 612.607.6444 www.pacelabs.com Report Prepared for: Report Information: Alex Mavrelis Pace Project #: 10445726 EE&G Environmental Sample Receipt Date: 08/30/2018 5751 Miami Lakes Dr. Client Project #: 2018-4191 Miami Lakes FL 33014 Client Sub PO #: 2018-4191.Debris.T10 State Cert #: E87605 Invoicing & Reporting Options: REPORT OF The report provided has been invoiced as a Level 2 LABORATORY PCDD/PCDF Report. If an upgrade of this report package is requested, an additional charge may be ANALYSIS FOR applied. PCDD/PCDF Please review the attached invoice for accuracy and forward any questions to Scott Unze, your Pace Project Manager. This report has been reviewed by: September 14, 2018 Scott Unze, Project Manager (612) 607-6383 (612) 607-6444 (fax) scott.unze@pacelabs.com Report of Laboratory Analysis Report Prepared Date: Thisreportshouldn o tbereproduced,exceptinfull, September 14, 2018 withoutthewrittenconsento fPaceAnalyticalServices,Inc. T h eresultsrelateonlyt othesamplesincludedinthisreport. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 1 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 Fax: 612.607.6444 DISCUSSION This report presents the results from the analyses performed on five samples submitted by a representative of EE&G Environmental. The samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDFs) using a modified version of USEPA Method TO9A. The reporting limits were based on signal-to-noise measurements. Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration (EMPC) values were treated as positives in the toxic equivalence calculations. The samples were received above the laboratory-recommended temperature range of 0-6 degrees Celsius. Second column confirmation analyses of 2,3,7,8-TCDF values obtained from the primary (DB5-MS) column are performed only when specifically requested for a project and only when the values are above the concentration of the lowest calibration standard. Typical resolution for this isomer using the DB5-MS column ranges from 25-30%. The recoveries of the isotopically labeled PCDD/PCDF internal standards in the sample extracts ranged from 32-108%. Except for two low values, which were flagged "R" on the results tables, the labeled internal standard recoveries obtained for this project were within the target ranges for the method. Also, since the internal standards were added to the sample prior to the extraction step, the data were automatically corrected for recovery and accurate values were obtained. Since the field samples did not include PUF cartridge components, surrogates were not present in the field sample extracts. Values were flagged "I" where incorrect isotope ratios were obtained or "P" where polychlorinated diphenyl ethers were present. Concentrations below the calibration range were flagged "J" and should be regarded as estimates. Concentrations above the calibration range were flagged "E" and should also be regarded as estimates. A laboratory method blank was prepared and analyzed with the sample batch as part of our routine quality control procedures. The results show the blank to contain a trace level of OCDD. This level was below the calibration range of the method. Sample levels similar to the corresponding blank level were flagged "B" on the results tables and may be, at least partially, attributed to the background. It should be noted that levels less than ten times the background are not generally considered to be statistically different from the background. Laboratory quality control PCDD/PCDF spike samples were also prepared with the sample batch using clean PUF cartridges that had been fortified with native standard materials. The results show that the spiked native compounds were recovered at 93-130% with relative percent differences of 0.0-7.7%. These results were within the target ranges for the method. Matrix spikes were not prepared with the sample batch. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 2 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Minnesota Laboratory Certifications Authority Certificate # Authority Certificate # A2LA 2926.01 Minnesota - Pet 1240 Alabama 40770 Mississippi MN00064 Alaska - DW MN00064 Missouri - DW 10100 Alaska - UST 17-009 Montana CERT0092 Arizona AZ0014 Nebraska NE-OS-18-06 Arkansas - DW MN00064 Nevada MN00064 Arkansas - WW 88-0680 New Hampshire 2081 CNMI Saipan MP0003 New Jersey (NE MN002 California 2929 New York 11647 Colorado MN00064 North Carolina 27700 Connecticut PH-0256 North Carolina - 27700 EPA Region 8+ via MN 027-053 North Carolina - 530 Florida (NELAP E87605 North Dakota R-036 Georgia 959 Ohio - DW 41244 Guam 17-001r Ohio - VAP CL101 Hawaii MN00064 Oklahoma 9507 Idaho MN00064 Oregon - Primar MN300001 Illinois 200011 Oregon - Secon MN200001 Indiana C-MN-01 Pennsylvania 68-00563 Iowa 368 Puerto Rico MN00064 Kansas E-10167 South Carolina 74003 Kentucky - DW 90062 South Dakota NA Kentucky - WW 90062 Tennessee TN02818 Louisiana - DE 03086 Texas T104704192 Louisiana - DW MN00064 Utah (NELAP) MN00064 Maine MN00064 Virginia 460163 Maryland 322 Washington C486 Massachusetts M-MN064 West Virginia - 382 Michigan 9909 West Virginia - 9952C Minnesota 027-053-137 Wisconsin 999407970 Minnesota - De via MN 027-053 Wyoming - UST 2926.01 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 3 of 17 Appendix A Sample Management Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 4 of 17 Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 5 of 17 Alex M. 08/30/18 Waived temp req 08/31/18 Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 6 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Reporting Flags A = Reporting Limit based on signal to noise B = Less than 10x higher than method blank level C = Result obtained from confirmation analysis D = Result obtained from analysis of diluted sample E = Exceeds calibration range I = Interferencepresent J = Estimated value L= Suppressive interference, analyte may be biased low Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis P = PCDEInterference R = Recovery outside target range S = Peak saturated U = Analyte not detected V = Result verified by confirmation analysis X = %D Exceeds limits Y = Calculated using average of daily RFs * = SeeDiscussion REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 7 of 17 Appendix B Sample Analysis Summary Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 8 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 01-001 Lab Sample ID 10445726001 Filename U180907A_05 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.42 m3 Collected 08/28/2018 17:20 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/30/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 12:01 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ----- 170 2.2 P 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 87 Total TCDF 11000 ----- 2.2 E 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 93 2,3,7,8-TCDD 16 ----- 3.8 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 82 Total TCDD 3900 ----- 3.8 E 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 62 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 70 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 110 ----- 1.9 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 70 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 130 ----- 1.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 34 R Total PeCDF 2000 ----- 1.8 OCDD-13C 4.00 80 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 33 ----- 2.5 Recovery Total PeCDD 2000 ----- 2.5 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 30 ----- 4.0 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 62 ----- 2.8 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 75 ----- 1.6 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 13 ----- 3.0 J 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 720 ----- 2.9 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 23 ----- 2.8 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 39 ----- 2.3 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 27 ----- 2.3 Total HxCDD 1500 ----- 2.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 94 ----- 3.5 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 6.3 Equivalence: 150 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 94 ----- 4.9 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 120 ----- 5.9 Total HpCDD 500 ----- 5.9 OCDF ----- 6.8 5.5 IJ OCDD 53 ----- 1.8 Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 9 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 01-002 Lab Sample ID 10445726002 Filename U180907A_06 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.40 m3 Collected 08/28/2018 17:29 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/30/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 12:48 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 2.5 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 93 Total TCDF 200 ----- 2.5 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 82 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 108 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 2.4 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 96 Total TCDD 150 ----- 2.4 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 63 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 71 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.5 ----- 1.0 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 64 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 3.8 ----- 0.96 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 32 R Total PeCDF 36 ----- 0.99 OCDD-13C 4.00 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 2.0 ----- 1.3 J Recovery Total PeCDD 47 ----- 1.3 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ----- 2.0 1.3 IJ 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.6 ----- 0.97 J 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 1.7 1.1 IJ Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.2 ----- 0.71 J 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 16 ----- 1.0 J 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.2 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.1 ----- 0.82 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ----- 0.53 0.45 IJ Total HxCDD 45 ----- 0.82 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 3.4 ----- 0.66 J Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.79 Equivalence: 3.9 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 3.4 ----- 0.73 J (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 6.6 ----- 2.9 J Total HpCDD 22 ----- 2.9 OCDF ND ----- 1.3 OCDD 13 ----- 1.9 BJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 10 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 01-003 Lab Sample ID 10445726003 Filename U180907A_07 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.34 m3 Collected 08/28/2018 17:33 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/30/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 13:36 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1.6 ----- 1.1 J 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 106 Total TCDF 120 ----- 1.1 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 90 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 103 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 0.62 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 89 Total TCDD 83 ----- 0.62 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 79 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 83 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.99 ----- 0.39 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 80 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.5 ----- 0.46 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 43 Total PeCDF 19 ----- 0.42 J OCDD-13C 4.00 105 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 0.94 Recovery Total PeCDD 17 ----- 0.94 J Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.98 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.73 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.91 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.83 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 4.1 ----- 0.86 J 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.1 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.86 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 0.99 Total HxCDD 20 ----- 0.98 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ----- 1.2 0.61 IJ Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.1 Equivalence: 1.00 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.84 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 2.7 Total HpCDD ND ----- 2.7 OCDF ND ----- 1.8 OCDD 3.4 ----- 1.2 BJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 11 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 01-004 Lab Sample ID 10445726004 Filename U180907A_08 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.30 m3 Collected 08/28/2018 17:40 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/30/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 14:23 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 79 ----- 1.8 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 97 Total TCDF 5600 ----- 1.8 E 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 74 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 94 2,3,7,8-TCDD 35 ----- 1.9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 82 Total TCDD 11000 ----- 1.9 E 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 65 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 62 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ----- 70 0.56 P 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 64 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 8.4 ----- 0.68 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 69 Total PeCDF 1500 ----- 0.62 OCDD-13C 4.00 97 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 96 ----- 0.97 Recovery Total PeCDD 6100 ----- 0.97 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 39 ----- 0.86 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 47 ----- 1.2 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 70 1.1 P Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 410 ----- 1.1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 58 ----- 3.0 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 100 ----- 2.8 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 96 ----- 2.6 Total HxCDD 3200 ----- 2.8 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 43 ----- 1.0 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.0 Equivalence: 140 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 43 ----- 1.0 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 280 ----- 1.7 Total HpCDD 830 ----- 1.7 OCDF 36 ----- 2.4 J OCDD 230 ----- 1.5 Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 12 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 01-005 Lab Sample ID 10445726005 Filename U180907A_09 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.26 m3 Collected 08/28/2018 17:42 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/30/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 15:10 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 2.2 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 94 Total TCDF 160 ----- 2.2 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 79 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 87 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 2.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 72 Total TCDD 310 ----- 2.0 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 76 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.4 ----- 0.77 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 69 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ----- 2.6 1.1 IJ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 72 Total PeCDF 40 ----- 0.92 OCDD-13C 4.00 92 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 4.2 ----- 1.6 J Recovery Total PeCDD 120 ----- 1.6 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ----- 1.9 1.6 IJ 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.80 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 1.4 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 2.0 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 2.4 ----- 1.4 J 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 3.7 ----- 1.0 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 2.8 ----- 1.9 J Total HxCDD 63 ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 1.3 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.7 Equivalence: 4.4 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 1.5 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ----- 6.5 1.0 IJ Total HpCDD 9.3 ----- 1.0 J OCDF ND ----- 2.8 OCDD ----- 8.6 2.4 IJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 13 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Blank Analysis Results Lab Sample ID BLANK-64437 Matrix XAD/PUF Filename U180907A_04 Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.26 m3 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 ICAL ID U180508 Analyzed 09/07/2018 11:13 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Injected By ZMS Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 91 Total TCDF ND ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 77 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 106 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 1.8 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 100 Total TCDD ND ----- 1.8 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 101 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 89 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.46 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 71 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.46 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 70 Total PeCDF ND ----- 0.46 OCDD-13C 4.00 65 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 0.57 Recovery Total PeCDD ND ----- 0.57 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.41 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.39 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 0.64 0.42 IJ Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ----- 0.71 0.51 IJ 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 104 Total HxCDF ND ----- 0.43 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 105 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 79 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.63 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 95 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.61 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 93 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 0.51 Total HxCDD ND ----- 0.58 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 0.45 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.71 Equivalence: 0.14 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.58 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 0.94 Total HpCDD ND ----- 0.94 OCDF ND ----- 1.3 OCDD 1.4 ----- 1.4 J Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit ND = Not Detected J = Estimated value NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis NC = Not Calculated A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise R = Recovery outside o f target range REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 14 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Laboratory Control Spike Results Lab Sample ID LCS-64438 Filename U180914A_02 Matrix XAD/PUF Total Amount Extracted 1.00 Sample Dilution NA ICAL ID U180508 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 CCal Filename(s) U180914A_01 Analyzed 09/13/2018 23:55 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Injected By SMT Native Qs Qm % Internal ng's Percent Isomers (ng) (ng) Rec. Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.20 0.20 100 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.0 88 Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.0 97 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 87 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.20 0.23 115 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.0 102 Total TCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 69 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 96 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 0.94 94 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.0 98 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.1 109 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.0 114 Total PeCDF OCDD-13C 4.0 99 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.0 1.1 105 Recovery Total PeCDD Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 106 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 104 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 105 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 105 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.0 97 Total HxCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 101 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 100 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.1 108 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 106 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.2 116 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.0 108 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1.0 1.00 100 Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.0 1.3 129 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.0 1.3 130 Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1.0 1.2 120 Total HpCDD OCDF 2.0 1.9 93 OCDD 2.0 2.5 123 Qs = Quantity Spiked Qm = Quantity Measured Rec. = Recovery (Expressed a s Percent) R = Outside the method specified target recovery range NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 15 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Laboratory Control Spike Results Lab Sample ID LCSD-64439 Filename U180914A_03 Matrix XAD/PUF Total Amount Extracted 1.00 Sample Dilution NA ICAL ID U180508 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 CCal Filename(s) U180914A_01 Analyzed 09/14/2018 00:43 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Injected By SMT Native Qs Qm % Internal ng's Percent Isomers (ng) (ng) Rec. Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.20 0.21 104 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.0 71 Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.0 79 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 72 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.20 0.23 113 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.0 85 Total TCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 59 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 77 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 0.99 99 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.0 77 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.1 112 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.0 89 Total PeCDF OCDD-13C 4.0 79 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.0 1.0 105 Recovery Total PeCDD Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 105 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 101 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 106 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.0 1.00 100 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.0 94 Total HxCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 102 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 99 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.1 115 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 110 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.2 120 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.0 108 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1.0 1.1 108 Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.0 1.3 130 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.0 1.2 124 Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1.0 1.2 122 Total HpCDD OCDF 2.0 1.9 94 OCDD 2.0 2.4 122 Qs = Quantity Spiked Qm = Quantity Measured Rec. = Recovery (Expressed a s Percent) R = Outside the method specified target recovery range NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 16 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Spike Recovery Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Results Client EE&G Environmental Spike 1 ID LCS-64438 Spike 2 ID LCSD-64439 Spike 1 Filename U180914A_02 Spike 2 Filename U180914A_03 Spike 1 Spike 2 Compound %REC %REC %RPD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 100 104 3.9 2,3,7,8-TCDD 115 113 1.8 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 94 99 5.2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 109 112 2.7 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 105 105 0.0 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 106 105 0.9 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 104 101 2.9 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 105 106 0.9 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 105 100 4.9 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 108 115 6.3 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 116 120 3.4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 100 108 7.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 129 130 0.8 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 130 124 4.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 120 122 1.7 OCDF 93 94 1.1 OCDD 123 122 0.8 %REC = Percent Recovered RPD = The difference between the t w o values divided by the mean value REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445726_TO9_DFR Page 17 of 17 Pace Analytical Services, LLC. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 Fax: 612.607.6444 www.pacelabs.com Report Prepared for: Report Information: Alex Mavrelis Pace Project #: 10445797 EE&G Environmental Sample Receipt Date: 08/31/2018 5751 Miami Lakes Dr. Client Project #: 2018-4191 Miami Lakes FL 33014 Client Sub PO #: 2018-4191.Debris.T10 State Cert #: E87605 Invoicing & Reporting Options: REPORT OF The report provided has been invoiced as a Level 2 LABORATORY PCDD/PCDF Report. If an upgrade of this report package is requested, an additional charge may be ANALYSIS FOR applied. PCDD/PCDF Please review the attached invoice for accuracy and forward any questions to Scott Unze, your Pace Project Manager. This report has been reviewed by: September 17, 2018 Nathan Boberg, Project Manager 612-360-0728 (612) 607-6444 (fax) nathan.boberg@pacelabs.com Report of Laboratory Analysis Report Prepared Date: Thisreportshouldn o tbereproduced,exceptinfull, September 17, 2018 withoutthewrittenconsento fPaceAnalyticalServices,Inc. T h eresultsrelateonlyt othesamplesincludedinthisreport. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 1 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 Fax: 612.607.6444 DISCUSSION This report presents the results from the analyses performed on seven samples submitted by a representative of EE&G Environmental. The samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDFs) using a modified version of USEPA Method TO9A. The reporting limits were based on signal-to-noise measurements. Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration (EMPC) values were treated as positives in the toxic equivalence calculations. The samples were received above the laboratory-recommended temperature range of 0-6 degrees Celsius. Second column confirmation analyses of 2,3,7,8-TCDF values obtained from the primary (DB5-MS) column are performed only when specifically requested for a project and only when the values are above the concentration of the lowest calibration standard. Typical resolution for this isomer using the DB5-MS column ranges from 25-30%. The recoveries of the isotopically labeled PCDD/PCDF internal standards in the sample extracts ranged from 50-141%. Except for six elevated values, which were flagged "R" on the results tables, the labeled internal standard recoveries obtained for this project were within the target ranges for the method. Also, since the internal standards were added to the sample prior to the extraction step, the data were automatically corrected for recovery and accurate values were obtained. Since the field samples did not include PUF cartridge components, surrogates were not present in the field sample extracts. Values were flagged "I" where incorrect isotope ratios were obtained or "P" where polychlorinated diphenyl ethers were present. Concentrations below the calibration range were flagged "J" and should be regarded as estimates. Concentrations above the calibration range were flagged "E" and should also be regarded as estimates. Values obtained from the analysis of a diluted extract were flagged "D". A laboratory method blank was prepared and analyzed with the sample batch as part of our routine quality control procedures. The results show the blank to contain a trace level of OCDD. This level was below the calibration range of the method. Sample levels similar to the corresponding blank level were flagged "B" on the results tables and may be, at least partially, attributed to the background. It should be noted that levels less than ten times the background are not generally considered to be statistically different from the background. Laboratory quality control PCDD/PCDF spike samples were also prepared with the sample batch using clean PUF cartridges that had been fortified with native standard materials. The results show that the spiked native compounds were recovered at 93-130% with relative percent differences of 0.0-7.7%. These results were within the target ranges for the method. Matrix spikes were not prepared with the sample batch. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 2 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Minnesota Laboratory Certifications Authority Certificate # Authority Certificate # A2LA 2926.01 Minnesota - Pet 1240 Alabama 40770 Mississippi MN00064 Alaska - DW MN00064 Missouri - DW 10100 Alaska - UST 17-009 Montana CERT0092 Arizona AZ0014 Nebraska NE-OS-18-06 Arkansas - DW MN00064 Nevada MN00064 Arkansas - WW 88-0680 New Hampshire 2081 CNMI Saipan MP0003 New Jersey (NE MN002 California 2929 New York 11647 Colorado MN00064 North Carolina 27700 Connecticut PH-0256 North Carolina - 27700 EPA Region 8+ via MN 027-053 North Carolina - 530 Florida (NELAP E87605 North Dakota R-036 Georgia 959 Ohio - DW 41244 Guam 17-001r Ohio - VAP CL101 Hawaii MN00064 Oklahoma 9507 Idaho MN00064 Oregon - Primar MN300001 Illinois 200011 Oregon - Secon MN200001 Indiana C-MN-01 Pennsylvania 68-00563 Iowa 368 Puerto Rico MN00064 Kansas E-10167 South Carolina 74003 Kentucky - DW 90062 South Dakota NA Kentucky - WW 90062 Tennessee TN02818 Louisiana - DE 03086 Texas T104704192 Louisiana - DW MN00064 Utah (NELAP) MN00064 Maine MN00064 Virginia 460163 Maryland 322 Washington C486 Massachusetts M-MN064 West Virginia - 382 Michigan 9909 West Virginia - 9952C Minnesota 027-053-137 Wisconsin 999407970 Minnesota - De via MN 027-053 Wyoming - UST 2926.01 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 3 of 19 Appendix A Sample Management Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 4 of 19 Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 5 of 19 Alex M 08/30/18 Previously waived temp. 08/31/18 Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 6 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Reporting Flags A = Reporting Limit based on signal to noise B = Less than 10x higher than method blank level C = Result obtained from confirmation analysis D = Result obtained from analysis of diluted sample E = Exceeds calibration range I = Interferencepresent J = Estimated value L= Suppressive interference, analyte may be biased low Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis P = PCDEInterference R = Recovery outside target range S = Peak saturated U = Analyte not detected V = Result verified by confirmation analysis X = %D Exceeds limits Y = Calculated using average of daily RFs * = SeeDiscussion REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 7 of 19 Appendix B Sample Analysis Summary Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 8 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-001 Lab Sample ID 10445797001 Filename U180907A_10 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.48 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 16:31 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 15:58 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 27 ----- 1.4 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 96 Total TCDF 1700 ----- 1.4 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 76 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 75 2,3,7,8-TCDD 7.2 ----- 2.1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 77 Total TCDD 1100 ----- 2.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 90 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 85 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 27 ----- 0.95 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 84 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ----- 10 1.0 PJ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 83 Total PeCDF 450 ----- 0.98 OCDD-13C 4.00 110 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 7.2 ----- 0.96 J Recovery Total PeCDD 300 ----- 0.96 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 7.7 ----- 0.92 J 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 7.3 0.79 IJ 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 3.0 0.90 IJ Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 2.0 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 63 ----- 1.2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ----- 2.5 1.9 IJ 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 5.2 ----- 2.0 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 6.3 ----- 2.2 J Total HxCDD 160 ----- 2.0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 5.7 ----- 1.4 J Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.8 Equivalence: 23 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 5.7 ----- 1.6 J (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 17 ----- 1.8 J Total HpCDD 38 ----- 1.8 OCDF ND ----- 2.7 OCDD ----- 19 3.2 IJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 9 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-002 Lab Sample ID 10445797002 Filename Y180913A_13 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution 5 Amount Extracted 2.45 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 16:30 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/13/2018 11:38 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 79 ----- 7.7 D 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 105 D Total TCDF 3700 ----- 7.7 D 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 95 D 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 130 RD 2,3,7,8-TCDD 15 ----- 7.0 JD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 126 RD Total TCDD 820 ----- 7.0 D 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 116 D 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 91 D 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ----- 22 6.2 IJD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 91 D 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 18 ----- 5.7 JD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 84 D Total PeCDF 410 ----- 5.9 D OCDD-13C 4.00 70 D 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 9.7 ----- 3.0 JD Recovery Total PeCDD 220 ----- 3.0 D Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 5.1 D 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 3.2 D 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 4.0 D Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ----- 8.5 4.2 IJD 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 26 ----- 4.1 JD 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 6.4 D 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 4.1 D 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ----- 4.8 3.6 IJD Total HxCDD 160 ----- 4.7 D 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ----- 3.6 3.0 IJD Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 3.8 D Equivalence: 40 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 3.4 D (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 16 ----- 2.6 JD Total HpCDD 40 ----- 2.6 JD OCDF ND ----- 5.6 D OCDD 22 ----- 5.5 JD Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 10 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-003 Lab Sample ID 10445797003 Filename U180907A_12 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.46 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 16:35 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 17:33 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 28 ----- 2.0 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 75 Total TCDF 2100 ----- 2.0 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 64 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 70 2,3,7,8-TCDD 5.2 ----- 3.6 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 60 Total TCDD 990 ----- 3.6 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 60 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 53 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 23 ----- 0.89 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 50 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 28 ----- 0.96 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 57 Total PeCDF 620 ----- 0.92 OCDD-13C 4.00 80 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 10 ----- 1.1 J Recovery Total PeCDD 430 ----- 1.1 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 16 ----- 1.4 J 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 16 ----- 1.2 J 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 18 ----- 1.3 J Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 3.7 ----- 1.6 J 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 200 ----- 1.4 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 6.0 ----- 2.0 J 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 8.2 ----- 0.96 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 6.6 ----- 1.1 J Total HxCDD 210 ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 23 ----- 2.4 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 3.5 Equivalence: 36 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 23 ----- 3.0 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 22 ----- 1.3 Total HpCDD 61 ----- 1.3 OCDF ND ----- 1.7 OCDD 34 ----- 1.6 J Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 11 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-004 Lab Sample ID 10445797004 Filename U180907A_13 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.54 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 17:05 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 18:20 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ----- 350 2.0 P 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 133 R Total TCDF 17000 ----- 2.0 E 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 97 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 141 R 2,3,7,8-TCDD 150 ----- 2.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 124 R Total TCDD 25000 ----- 2.0 E 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 81 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 67 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 170 ----- 1.0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 70 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 280 ----- 1.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 62 Total PeCDF 4000 ----- 1.1 OCDD-13C 4.00 96 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 270 ----- 1.1 Recovery Total PeCDD 9300 ----- 1.1 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 120 ----- 2.2 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 150 ----- 0.84 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 96 1.8 P Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 19 ----- 0.90 J 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 1400 ----- 1.4 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 140 ----- 3.4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 300 ----- 2.6 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 240 ----- 2.8 Total HxCDD 5700 ----- 2.9 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 400 ----- 1.3 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 17 ----- 2.4 J Equivalence: 590 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 510 ----- 1.9 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 720 ----- 2.2 Total HpCDD 2200 ----- 2.2 OCDF 27 ----- 2.0 J OCDD 480 ----- 2.1 Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 12 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-005 Lab Sample ID 10445797005 Filename Y180913A_06 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.51 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 17:06 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/13/2018 06:05 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ----- 0.66 0.54 IJ 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 81 Total TCDF 110 ----- 0.54 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 74 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 87 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 0.60 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 75 Total TCDD 280 ----- 0.60 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 76 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 63 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.61 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 69 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ----- 1.0 0.58 IJ 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 66 Total PeCDF 22 ----- 0.60 OCDD-13C 4.00 71 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 1.1 Recovery Total PeCDD 110 ----- 1.1 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.56 ----- 0.29 J 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 0.33 0.23 IJ 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.49 ----- 0.25 J Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.24 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 2.4 ----- 0.25 J 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ----- 0.84 0.59 IJ 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.4 ----- 0.30 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.87 ----- 0.32 J Total HxCDD 64 ----- 0.40 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ----- 0.55 0.15 IJ Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.29 Equivalence: 1.1 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.22 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2.8 ----- 0.61 J Total HpCDD 8.0 ----- 0.61 J OCDF ND ----- 0.39 OCDD ----- 1.7 0.33 IJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 13 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-006 Lab Sample ID 10445797006 Filename U180907A_15 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.22 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 16:20 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 19:55 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 0.74 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 108 Total TCDF 16 ----- 0.74 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 89 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 121 R 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 1.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 109 Total TCDD 34 ----- 1.0 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 88 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 80 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.69 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 75 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.90 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 77 Total PeCDF 6.2 ----- 0.79 J OCDD-13C 4.00 88 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 0.98 Recovery Total PeCDD 13 ----- 0.98 J Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.77 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.48 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.66 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.83 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 1.1 ----- 0.68 J 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.1 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 0.94 Total HxCDD 9.9 ----- 1.2 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.65 ----- 0.54 J Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.81 Equivalence: 0.021 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 0.65 ----- 0.68 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ----- 1.1 0.60 IJ Total HpCDD 2.6 ----- 0.60 J OCDF ND ----- 0.87 OCDD 3.0 ----- 1.2 BJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 14 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 02-007 Lab Sample ID 10445797007 Filename U180907A_16 Matrix Filter Injected By ZMS Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.44 m3 Collected 08/29/2018 17:22 ICAL ID U180508 Received 08/31/2018 10:15 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Analyzed 09/07/2018 20:42 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 0.44 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 91 Total TCDF 9.2 ----- 0.44 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 78 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 104 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 0.86 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 92 Total TCDD 11 ----- 0.86 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 73 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 68 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.25 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 65 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.27 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 65 Total PeCDF 1.9 ----- 0.26 J OCDD-13C 4.00 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 0.42 Recovery Total PeCDD ND ----- 0.42 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.41 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.35 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.40 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.50 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF ND ----- 0.41 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.64 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.65 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 0.50 Total HxCDD 1.7 ----- 0.60 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 0.58 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.66 Equivalence: 0.0016 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.62 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 0.59 Total HpCDD ND ----- 0.59 OCDF ND ----- 0.78 OCDD 1.6 ----- 1.0 BJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 15 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Blank Analysis Results Lab Sample ID BLANK-64437 Matrix XAD/PUF Filename U180907A_04 Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.22 m3 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 ICAL ID U180508 Analyzed 09/07/2018 11:13 CCal Filename(s) U180907A_01 Injected By ZMS Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 91 Total TCDF ND ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 77 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 106 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 1.9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 100 Total TCDD ND ----- 1.9 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 101 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 89 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.46 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 71 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.47 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 70 Total PeCDF ND ----- 0.47 OCDD-13C 4.00 65 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 0.58 Recovery Total PeCDD ND ----- 0.58 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.41 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.40 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ----- 0.65 0.43 IJ Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ----- 0.72 0.52 IJ 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 104 Total HxCDF ND ----- 0.44 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 105 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 79 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.64 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 95 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.61 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 93 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 0.52 Total HxCDD ND ----- 0.59 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 0.46 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.72 Equivalence: 0.14 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.59 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 0.95 Total HpCDD ND ----- 0.95 OCDF ND ----- 1.3 OCDD 1.4 ----- 1.4 J Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit ND = Not Detected J = Estimated value NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis NC = Not Calculated A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise R = Recovery outside o f target range REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 16 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Laboratory Control Spike Results Lab Sample ID LCS-64438 Filename U180914A_02 Matrix XAD/PUF Total Amount Extracted 1.00 Sample Dilution NA ICAL ID U180508 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 CCal Filename(s) U180914A_01 Analyzed 09/13/2018 23:55 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Injected By SMT Native Qs Qm % Internal ng's Percent Isomers (ng) (ng) Rec. Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.20 0.20 100 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.0 88 Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.0 97 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 87 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.20 0.23 115 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.0 102 Total TCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 69 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 96 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 0.94 94 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.0 98 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.1 109 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.0 114 Total PeCDF OCDD-13C 4.0 99 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.0 1.1 105 Recovery Total PeCDD Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 106 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 104 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 105 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 105 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.0 97 Total HxCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 101 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 100 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.1 108 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 106 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.2 116 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.0 108 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1.0 1.00 100 Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.0 1.3 129 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.0 1.3 130 Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1.0 1.2 120 Total HpCDD OCDF 2.0 1.9 93 OCDD 2.0 2.5 123 Qs = Quantity Spiked Qm = Quantity Measured Rec. = Recovery (Expressed a s Percent) R = Outside the method specified target recovery range NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 17 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Laboratory Control Spike Results Lab Sample ID LCSD-64439 Filename U180914A_03 Matrix XAD/PUF Total Amount Extracted 1.00 Sample Dilution NA ICAL ID U180508 Extracted 08/31/2018 18:00 CCal Filename(s) U180914A_01 Analyzed 09/14/2018 00:43 Method Blank ID BLANK-64437 Injected By SMT Native Qs Qm % Internal ng's Percent Isomers (ng) (ng) Rec. Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.20 0.21 104 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.0 71 Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.0 79 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 72 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.20 0.23 113 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.0 85 Total TCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 59 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 77 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 0.99 99 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.0 77 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.1 112 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.0 89 Total PeCDF OCDD-13C 4.0 79 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.0 1.0 105 Recovery Total PeCDD Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 105 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 101 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 106 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.0 1.00 100 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.0 94 Total HxCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 102 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 99 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.1 115 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 110 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.2 120 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.0 108 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1.0 1.1 108 Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.0 1.3 130 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.0 1.2 124 Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1.0 1.2 122 Total HpCDD OCDF 2.0 1.9 94 OCDD 2.0 2.4 122 Qs = Quantity Spiked Qm = Quantity Measured Rec. = Recovery (Expressed a s Percent) R = Outside the method specified target recovery range NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 18 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Spike Recovery Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Results Client EE&G Environmental Spike 1 ID LCS-64438 Spike 2 ID LCSD-64439 Spike 1 Filename U180914A_02 Spike 2 Filename U180914A_03 Spike 1 Spike 2 Compound %REC %REC %RPD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 100 104 3.9 2,3,7,8-TCDD 115 113 1.8 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 94 99 5.2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 109 112 2.7 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 105 105 0.0 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 106 105 0.9 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 104 101 2.9 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 105 106 0.9 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 105 100 4.9 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 108 115 6.3 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 116 120 3.4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 100 108 7.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 129 130 0.8 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 130 124 4.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 120 122 1.7 OCDF 93 94 1.1 OCDD 123 122 0.8 %REC = Percent Recovered RPD = The difference between the t w o values divided by the mean value REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10445797_TO9_DFR Page 19 of 19 Pace Analytical Services, LLC. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 Fax: 612.607.6444 www.pacelabs.com Report Prepared for: Report Information: Alex Mavrelis Pace Project #: 10446080 EE&G Environmental Sample Receipt Date: 09/04/2018 5751 Miami Lakes Dr. Client Project #: 2018-4191 Miami Lakes FL 33014 Client Sub PO #: 2018-4191.Debris.T10 State Cert #: E87605 Invoicing & Reporting Options: REPORT OF The report provided has been invoiced as a Level 2 LABORATORY PCDD/PCDF Report. If an upgrade of this report package is requested, an additional charge may be ANALYSIS FOR applied. PCDD/PCDF Please review the attached invoice for accuracy and forward any questions to Scott Unze, your Pace Project Manager. This report has been reviewed by: September 19, 2018 Scott Unze, Project Manager (612) 607-6383 (612) 607-6444 (fax) scott.unze@pacelabs.com Report of Laboratory Analysis Report Prepared Date: Thisreportshouldn o tbereproduced,exceptinfull, September 18, 2018 withoutthewrittenconsento fPaceAnalyticalServices,Inc. T h eresultsrelateonlyt othesamplesincludedinthisreport. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 1 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Phone: 612.607.1700 Fax: 612.607.6444 DISCUSSION This report presents the results from the analyses performed on six of seven samples submitted by a representative of EE&G Environmental. The samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDFs) using a modified version of USEPA Method TO9A. The reporting limits were based on signal-to-noise measurements. Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration (EMPC) values were treated as positives in the toxic equivalence calculations. The samples were received above the laboratory-recommended temperature range of 0-6 degrees Celsius. One sample, 03-002, was received broken. Second column confirmation analyses of 2,3,7,8-TCDF values obtained from the primary (DB5-MS) column are performed only when specifically requested for a project and only when the values are above the concentration of the lowest calibration standard. Typical resolution for this isomer using the DB5-MS column ranges from 25-30%. The recoveries of the isotopically labeled PCDD/PCDF internal standards in the sample extracts ranged from 26-91%. Except for three low values, which were flagged "R" on the results tables, the labeled internal standard recoveries obtained for this project were within the target ranges for the method. Also, since the internal standards were added to the sample prior to the extraction step, the data were automatically corrected for recovery and accurate values were obtained. Since the field samples did not include PUF cartridge components, surrogates were not present in the field sample extracts. One surrogate in the method blank was recovered above the target range and flagged "R". Values were flagged "I" where incorrect isotope ratios were obtained or "P" where polychlorinated diphenyl ethers were present. Concentrations below the calibration range were flagged "J" and should be regarded as estimates. Concentrations above the calibration range were flagged "E" and should also be regarded as estimates. A laboratory method blank was prepared and analyzed with the sample batch as part of our routine quality control procedures. The results show that PCDDs and PCDFs were not detected. Laboratory quality control PCDD/PCDF spike samples were also prepared with the sample batch using clean PUF cartridges that had been fortified with native standard materials. The results show that the spiked native compounds were recovered at 104-141% with relative percent differences of 0.0-8.1%. Three recovery values obtained for spiked native HxCDD isomers were above the 70-130% target range and may indicate high biases for these isomers in these determinations. Matrix spikes were not prepared with the sample batch. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 2 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Minnesota Laboratory Certifications Authority Certificate # Authority Certificate # A2LA 2926.01 Minnesota - Pet 1240 Alabama 40770 Mississippi MN00064 Alaska - DW MN00064 Missouri - DW 10100 Alaska - UST 17-009 Montana CERT0092 Arizona AZ0014 Nebraska NE-OS-18-06 Arkansas - DW MN00064 Nevada MN00064 Arkansas - WW 88-0680 New Hampshire 2081 CNMI Saipan MP0003 New Jersey (NE MN002 California 2929 New York 11647 Colorado MN00064 North Carolina 27700 Connecticut PH-0256 North Carolina - 27700 EPA Region 8+ via MN 027-053 North Carolina - 530 Florida (NELAP E87605 North Dakota R-036 Georgia 959 Ohio - DW 41244 Guam 17-001r Ohio - VAP CL101 Hawaii MN00064 Oklahoma 9507 Idaho MN00064 Oregon - Primar MN300001 Illinois 200011 Oregon - Secon MN200001 Indiana C-MN-01 Pennsylvania 68-00563 Iowa 368 Puerto Rico MN00064 Kansas E-10167 South Carolina 74003 Kentucky - DW 90062 South Dakota NA Kentucky - WW 90062 Tennessee TN02818 Louisiana - DE 03086 Texas T104704192 Louisiana - DW MN00064 Utah (NELAP) MN00064 Maine MN00064 Virginia 460163 Maryland 322 Washington C486 Massachusetts M-MN064 West Virginia - 382 Michigan 9909 West Virginia - 9952C Minnesota 027-053-137 Wisconsin 999407970 Minnesota - De via MN 027-053 Wyoming - UST 2926.01 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080 Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 3 of 18 Appendix A Sample Management Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 4 of 18 Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 5 of 18 Previously waived temp. 09/04/18 Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 6 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Reporting Flags A = Reporting Limit based on signal to noise B = Less than 10x higher than method blank level C = Result obtained from confirmation analysis D = Result obtained from analysis of diluted sample E = Exceeds calibration range I = Interferencepresent J = Estimated value L= Suppressive interference, analyte may be biased low Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis P = PCDEInterference R = Recovery outside target range S = Peak saturated U = Analyte not detected V = Result verified by confirmation analysis X = %D Exceeds limits Y = Calculated using average of daily RFs * = SeeDiscussion REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Report No.....10446080 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 7 of 18 Appendix B Sample Analysis Summary Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 8 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 03-001 Lab Sample ID 10446080001 Filename Y180913A_07 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 1.35 m3 Collected 08/30/2018 14:15 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 09/04/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Analyzed 09/13/2018 06:52 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ----- 520 3.5 P 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 79 Total TCDF 42000 ----- 3.5 E 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 74 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 91 2,3,7,8-TCDD 180 ----- 3.2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 85 Total TCDD 54000 ----- 3.2 E 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 68 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 63 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 200 ----- 5.4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 65 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 300 ----- 5.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 39 R Total PeCDF 6700 ----- 5.4 OCDD-13C 4.00 66 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 200 ----- 3.5 Recovery Total PeCDD 21000 ----- 3.5 E Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 82 ----- 2.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 75 ----- 1.8 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 90 ----- 2.4 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 10 ----- 2.4 J 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 1100 ----- 2.2 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 76 ----- 2.7 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 130 ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 100 ----- 1.9 Total HxCDD 8700 ----- 2.0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 64 ----- 1.7 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 2.1 Equivalence: 550 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 64 ----- 1.9 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 200 ----- 4.5 Total HpCDD 790 ----- 4.5 OCDF ND ----- 4.4 OCDD 54 ----- 2.1 J Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 9 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 03-003 Lab Sample ID 10446080003 Filename Y180913A_08 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.40 m3 Collected 08/30/2018 16:55 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 09/04/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Analyzed 09/13/2018 07:40 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 33 ----- 3.0 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 68 Total TCDF 1900 ----- 3.0 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 63 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 80 2,3,7,8-TCDD 15 ----- 1.3 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 73 Total TCDD 4400 ----- 1.3 E 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 66 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 55 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 15 ----- 1.5 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 60 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 23 ----- 2.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 32 R Total PeCDF 580 ----- 1.8 OCDD-13C 4.00 60 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 24 ----- 3.8 Recovery Total PeCDD 2400 ----- 3.8 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 6.3 ----- 0.86 J 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 6.1 ----- 0.89 J 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 6.7 ----- 0.97 J Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.71 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 58 ----- 0.86 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 7.3 ----- 1.8 J 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 13 ----- 1.1 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 12 ----- 0.99 J Total HxCDD 780 ----- 1.3 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 5.0 ----- 0.58 J Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.93 Equivalence: 48 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 5.0 ----- 0.75 J (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 17 ----- 2.8 J Total HpCDD 87 ----- 2.8 OCDF ND ----- 1.7 OCDD ----- 7.1 3.3 IJ Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 10 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 03-004 Lab Sample ID 10446080004 Filename Y180918A_07 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 1.28 m3 Collected 08/30/2018 14:14 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 09/04/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) Y180918A_02 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Analyzed 09/18/2018 13:46 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ----- 39 1.3 P 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 78 Total TCDF 2500 ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 69 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 87 2,3,7,8-TCDD 15 ----- 1.2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 83 Total TCDD 3300 ----- 1.2 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 68 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 60 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 19 ----- 3.3 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 61 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 34 ----- 3.0 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 26 R Total PeCDF 740 ----- 3.2 OCDD-13C 4.00 53 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 23 ----- 4.0 J Recovery Total PeCDD 1300 ----- 4.0 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 14 ----- 1.2 J 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 13 ----- 0.95 J 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 13 ----- 1.5 J Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 1.6 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF 150 ----- 1.3 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 12 ----- 1.4 J 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 17 ----- 1.2 J 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 15 ----- 1.4 J Total HxCDD 620 ----- 1.3 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 19 ----- 1.1 J Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.5 Equivalence: 58 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 19 ----- 1.3 J (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 43 ----- 3.9 Total HpCDD 210 ----- 3.9 OCDF ND ----- 3.7 OCDD 43 ----- 3.8 J Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 11 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 03-005 Lab Sample ID 10446080005 Filename Y180913A_10 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.40 m3 Collected 08/30/2018 17:05 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 09/04/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Analyzed 09/13/2018 09:15 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 0.63 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 80 Total TCDF 0.97 ----- 0.63 J 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 74 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 86 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 0.80 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 72 Total TCDD ND ----- 0.80 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 67 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 52 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.88 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 52 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 0.72 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 48 Total PeCDF ND ----- 0.80 OCDD-13C 4.00 44 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 1.2 Recovery Total PeCDD ND ----- 1.2 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.44 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.42 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.40 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.46 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF ND ----- 0.43 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.83 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 0.70 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 0.75 Total HxCDD ND ----- 0.76 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 0.51 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.0 Equivalence: 0.00 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.76 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 1.5 Total HpCDD ND ----- 1.5 OCDF ND ----- 1.2 OCDD ND ----- 1.2 Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 12 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 03-006 Lab Sample ID 10446080006 Filename Y180913A_11 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.28 m3 Collected 08/30/2018 17:20 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 09/04/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Analyzed 09/13/2018 10:03 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 81 Total TCDF 14 ----- 1.3 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 70 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 86 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 1.9 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 78 Total TCDD 19 ----- 1.9 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 76 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 64 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 2.3 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 65 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 2.8 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 62 Total PeCDF ND ----- 2.5 OCDD-13C 4.00 63 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 2.7 Recovery Total PeCDD ND ----- 2.7 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 1.8 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 1.8 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 2.0 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 2.1 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF ND ----- 1.9 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 2.9 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.9 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 1.7 Total HxCDD 5.8 ----- 2.1 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 3.1 ----- 1.2 J Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.9 Equivalence: 0.33 pg/m3 Total HpCDF 8.4 ----- 1.6 J (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 12 ----- 1.8 J Total HpCDD 24 ----- 1.8 OCDF 9.3 ----- 3.7 J OCDD 160 ----- 5.6 Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 13 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Sample Analysis Results Client - EE&G Environmental Client's Sample ID 03-007 Lab Sample ID 10446080007 Filename Y180913A_12 Matrix Filter Injected By SMT Dilution NA Amount Extracted 2.35 m3 Collected 08/30/2018 17:15 ICAL ID Y180827 Received 09/04/2018 09:50 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Analyzed 09/13/2018 10:50 Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND ----- 0.96 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 81 Total TCDF 19 ----- 0.96 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 73 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 86 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 1.5 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 75 Total TCDD 28 ----- 1.5 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 78 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 64 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 68 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 1.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 64 Total PeCDF 2.0 ----- 1.4 J OCDD-13C 4.00 66 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 1.7 Recovery Total PeCDD 10 ----- 1.7 J Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.64 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.60 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 0.47 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 0.68 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 NC Total HxCDF ND ----- 0.60 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.4 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.3 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 NC 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 1.1 Total HxCDD 7.8 ----- 1.3 J 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 0.56 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 0.65 Equivalence: 0.0016 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 0.60 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 0.92 Total HpCDD 1.8 ----- 0.92 J OCDF ND ----- 1.1 OCDD 1.6 ----- 1.1 J Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit S = Saturated signal J = Estimated value ND = Not Detected B = Less than 10 times higher than method blank level NA = Not Applicable R = Recovery outside o f target range NC = Not Calculated Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 14 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Blank Analysis Results Lab Sample ID BLANK-64463 Matrix PUF Filename Y180913A_05 Dilution NA Amount Extracted 1.28 m3 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 ICAL ID Y180827 Analyzed 09/13/2018 05:17 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Injected By SMT Native Conc EMPC LRL Internal ng's Percent Isomers pg/m3 pg/m3 pg/m3 Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF ----- 2.2 1.7 IJ 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.00 81 Total TCDF ND ----- 1.7 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.00 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 86 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND ----- 2.2 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.00 76 Total TCDD ND ----- 2.2 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 87 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 71 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 3.0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.00 70 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND ----- 1.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.00 68 Total PeCDF ND ----- 2.4 OCDD-13C 4.00 68 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND ----- 3.3 Recovery Total PeCDD ND ----- 3.3 Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 1.2 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.00 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 1.0 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND ----- 1.0 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND ----- 1.1 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.00 108 Total HxCDF ND ----- 1.1 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.00 106 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.00 110 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.00 125 R 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND ----- 1.1 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.00 117 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ----- 1.2 Total HxCDD ND ----- 1.3 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND ----- 0.86 Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND ----- 1.6 Equivalence: 0.22 pg/m3 Total HpCDF ND ----- 1.2 (Lower-bound - Using ITE Factors) 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND ----- 2.3 Total HpCDD ND ----- 2.3 OCDF ND ----- 3.3 OCDD ND ----- 3.7 Conc = Concentration (Totals include 2,3,7,8-substituted isomers). I = Interference EMPC = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration P = PCDE Interference LRL = Lower Reporting Limit ND = Not Detected J = Estimated value NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis NC = Not Calculated A = Detection Limit based on signal to noise R = Recovery outside o f target range REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 15 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Laboratory Control Spike Results Lab Sample ID LCS-64464 Filename Y180913A_02 Matrix PUF Total Amount Extracted 1.00 Sample Dilution NA ICAL ID Y180827 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Analyzed 09/13/2018 02:54 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Injected By SMT Native Qs Qm % Internal ng's Percent Isomers (ng) (ng) Rec. Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.20 0.23 115 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.0 78 Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.0 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 86 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.20 0.21 107 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.0 79 Total TCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 83 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 71 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.1 107 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.0 66 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.2 120 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.0 66 Total PeCDF OCDD-13C 4.0 65 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.0 1.1 107 Recovery Total PeCDD Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 112 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 104 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 108 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.0 1.0 104 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.0 99 Total HxCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 98 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 103 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.3 132 R 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 108 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.3 130 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.0 104 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1.0 1.2 116 Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.0 1.1 112 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.0 1.2 116 Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1.0 1.1 107 Total HpCDD OCDF 2.0 2.2 112 OCDD 2.0 2.2 110 Qs = Quantity Spiked Qm = Quantity Measured Rec. = Recovery (Expressed a s Percent) R = Outside the method specified target recovery range NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 16 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Laboratory Control Spike Results Lab Sample ID LCSD-64465 Filename Y180913A_03 Matrix PUF Total Amount Extracted 1.00 Sample Dilution NA ICAL ID Y180827 Extracted 09/05/2018 15:10 CCal Filename(s) Y180913A_01 Analyzed 09/13/2018 03:42 Method Blank ID BLANK-64463 Injected By SMT Native Qs Qm % Internal ng's Percent Isomers (ng) (ng) Rec. Standards Added Recovery 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.20 0.24 120 2,3,7,8-TCDF-13C 2.0 80 Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDD-13C 2.0 72 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 87 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.20 0.23 113 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-13C 2.0 78 Total TCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 85 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 71 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.1 109 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF-13C 2.0 68 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1.0 1.2 120 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-13C 2.0 68 Total PeCDF OCDD-13C 4.0 70 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1.0 1.1 112 Recovery Total PeCDD Standards 1,2,3,4-TCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.2 115 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-13C 2.0 NA 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 108 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 114 Surrogates 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1.0 1.1 111 2,3,7,8-TCDD-37Cl4 2.0 98 Total HxCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-13C 2.0 97 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-13C 2.0 100 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.4 141 R 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-13C 2.0 111 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1.0 1.3 134 R 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-13C 2.0 108 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1.0 1.2 124 Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.0 1.2 116 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.0 1.2 123 Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1.0 1.2 116 Total HpCDD OCDF 2.0 2.4 119 OCDD 2.0 2.2 111 Qs = Quantity Spiked Qm = Quantity Measured Rec. = Recovery (Expressed a s Percent) R = Outside the method specified target recovery range NA = Not Applicable Nn = Value obtained from additional analysis REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 17 of 18 Pace Analytical Services, LLC 1700 Elm Street - Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 Tel: 612-607-1700 Fax: 612- 607-6444 Method TO9 Spike Recovery Relative Percent Difference (RPD) Results Client EE&G Environmental Spike 1 ID LCS-64464 Spike 2 ID LCSD-64465 Spike 1 Filename Y180913A_02 Spike 2 Filename Y180913A_03 Spike 1 Spike 2 Compound %REC %REC %RPD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 115 120 4.3 2,3,7,8-TCDD 107 113 5.5 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 107 109 1.9 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 120 120 0.0 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 107 112 4.6 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 112 115 2.6 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 104 108 3.8 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 108 114 5.4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 104 111 6.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 132 141 6.6 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 130 134 3.0 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 116 124 6.7 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 112 116 3.5 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 116 123 5.9 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 107 116 8.1 OCDF 112 119 6.1 OCDD 110 111 0.9 %REC = Percent Recovered RPD = The difference between the t w o values divided by the mean value REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent o f Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Report No.....10446080_TO9_DFR Page 18 of 18 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT I LABORATORY RESULTS, POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone: (856) 303-2500 Fax: (856) 858-4571 Email: EnvChemistry2@emsl.com Attn: Alex Mavrelis 9/13/2018 EE & G 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 The following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. on 9/6/2018. The results are tabulated on the attached data pages for the following client designated project: SXM Landfill The reference number for these samples is EMSL Order #011807122. Please use this reference when calling about these samples. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (856) 303-2500. Approved By: Phillip Worby, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory Director AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab # 100194 NELAP Certification: NJ 03036; NY 10872 A filter was not received with the florisil tube for sample -0006. The reporting limits for sample -0013 are elevated for one or more Aroclors due to matrix interference. The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The QC data associated with the sample results meet the recovery and precision requirements established by the AIHA, unless specifically indicated. The final results are not field blank corrected. The laboratory is not responsible for final results calculated using air volumes that have been provided by non-laboratory personnel. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Page 1 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 01-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0001 D1-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 01-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0002 D1-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH Client Sample Description 01-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0003 D1-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 2 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 01-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0003 D1-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH Client Sample Description 01-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0004 D1-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 01-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0005 D1-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/6/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 3 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0006 D2-001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH Client Sample Description 02-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0007 D2-002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 02-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0008 DS-003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 4 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0008 DS-003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 02-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0009 D2-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 02-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0010 D2-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00057 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 5 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-006 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0011 D2-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH Client Sample Description 02-007 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0012 D2-Site 007 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00062 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 AC 9/7/2018 EH Client Sample Description 03-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0013 D3-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 6 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0013 D3-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND D 0.0028 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 03-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0014 D3-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH Client Sample Description 03-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0015 D3-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00055 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 7 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0016 D3-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00059 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/12/2018 EH Client Sample Description 03-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0017 D3-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00060 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH Client Sample Description 03-006 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0018 D3-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 8 of 9 EMSL Order: 011807122 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191(T10) Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-006 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0018 D3-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00061 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH Client Sample Description 03-007 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807122-0019 D3-Site 007 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst GC-SVOA 5503 Modified Aroclor-1016 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1221 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1232 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1242 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1248 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1254 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1260 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1262 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH 5503 Modified Aroclor-1268 ND 0.00064 mg/m³ 9/6/2018 SM 9/7/2018 EH Definitions: ND - indicates that the analyte was not detected at the reporting limit RL - Reporting Limit (Analytical) D - Dilution ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/13/2018 10:52:49 AM Page 9 of 9 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT J LABORATORY RESULTS, HEAVY METALS EMSL Analytical, Inc. 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone: (856) 303-2500 Fax: (856) 858-4571 Email: EnvChemistry2@emsl.com Attn: Alex Mavrelis 9/12/2018 EE & G 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 The following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. on 9/6/2018. The results are tabulated on the attached data pages for the following client designated project: SXM Landfill The reference number for these samples is EMSL Order #011807125. Please use this reference when calling about these samples. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (856) 303-2500. Approved By: Phillip Worby, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory Director AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab # 100194 NELAP Certification: NJ 03036; NY 10872 The filters received were PVC which does not completely dissolve during digestion. The results may be biased low. The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The QC data associated with the sample results meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated. The final results are not blank corrected unless specifically indicated. The laboratory is not responsible for final results calculated using air volumes that have been provided by non-laboratory personnel. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Page 1 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 01-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0001 D1-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.000077 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00068 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 01-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0002 D1-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00016 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00068 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead 0.000088 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 01-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0003 D1-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00018 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium 0.00076 0.00068 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead 0.000047 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 2 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 01-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0004 D1-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00067 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 01-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0005 D1-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium 0.00073 0.00067 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 02-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0006 D2-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.000073 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00076 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 3 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0007 D2-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00020 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00067 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 02-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0008 D2-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00016 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium 0.00068 0.00066 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead 0.000038 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00033 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 02-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0009 D2-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00050 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium 0.000071 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00063 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead 0.0017 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium 0.000047 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 4 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 02-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0010 D2-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00063 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00031 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 02-006 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0011 D2-Site 006 Pers. Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000044 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00044 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000044 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00088 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000044 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000044 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00044 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 02-007 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0012 D2-Site 007 Pers. Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium 0.00083 0.00076 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 5 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0013 D3-Site 001 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00065 0.000053 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00053 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000053 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.0011 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead 0.0023 0.000053 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium 0.00014 0.000053 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00053 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 03-002 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0014 D3-Site 002 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00015 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium 0.00080 0.00065 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW Client Sample Description 03-003 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0015 D3-Site 003 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.00018 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium 0.00070 0.00065 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00032 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 6 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-004 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0016 D3-Site 004 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic 0.0013 0.000056 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000056 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.0011 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000056 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium 0.00014 0.000056 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00056 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/7/2018 JW Client Sample Description 03-005 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0017 D3-Site 005 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00068 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00034 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW Client Sample Description 03-006 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0018 D3-Site 006 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00075 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00038 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 7 of 8 EMSL Order: 011807125 EMSL Analytical, Inc. CustomerID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 CustomerPO: 2018-4191T010 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com ProjectID: Attn: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 Fax: (305) 374-8301 EE & G Received: 09/06/18 9:30 AM 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Project: SXM Landfill Analytical Results Client Sample Description 03-007 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0019 D3-Site 007 Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000040 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00040 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000040 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.00079 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000040 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000040 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00040 mg/m³ 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW Client Sample Description FB001 Collected: 8/28/2018 Lab ID: 011807125-0020 Field Blank Prep Analysis Method Parameter Result RL Units Date Analyst Date Analyst METALS 7300 Modified Arsenic ND 0.000050 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Barium ND 0.00050 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Cadmium ND 0.000050 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Chromium ND 0.0010 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Lead ND 0.000050 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Selenium ND 0.000050 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW 7300 Modified Silver ND 0.00050 mg/filter 9/7/2018 KB 9/10/2018 JW Definitions: ND - indicates that the analyte was not detected at the reporting limit RL - Reporting Limit (Analytical) D - Dilution ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.52.0 Printed: 9/12/2018 3:54:58 PM Page 8 of 8 Pond Island Air Monitoring Plan, St. Maarten December 13, 2018 ATTACHMENT K LABORATORY RESULTS, ASBESTOS FIBERS EMSL Order: 041827066 EMSL Analytical, Inc. Customer ID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer PO: Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / Project ID: http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com Attention: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 EE & G Fax: (305) 374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Received Date: 09/06/2018 09:30 AM Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Analysis Date: 09/11/2018 - 09/12/2018 Collected Date: Project: SXM Landfill Test Report: Asbestos Fiber Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Performed by EPA 40 CFR Part 763 Appendix A to Subpart E Area Analytical Asbestos Volume Analyzed Non Asbestos #Structures Sensitivity Concentration Sample Location (Liters) (mm²) Asb Type(s) ≥0.5μ < 5μ ≥5μ (S/cc) (S/mm²) (S/cc) 01-001 D1- Site 001 480.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0062 <7.80 <0.0062 041827066-0001 01-002 D1- Site 002 220.00 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0135 <7.70 <0.0130 041827066-0002 01-003 D1- Site 003 352.80 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0084 <7.70 <0.0084 041827066-0003 01-004 D1- Site 004 356.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0084 <7.80 <0.0084 041827066-0004 01-005 D1- Site 005 291.60 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0102 <7.70 <0.0100 041827066-0005 02-001 D2- Site 001 306.80 Not Analyzed N/A 041827066-0006 Sample muddy. Particulate loading greater than 10%. 02-002 D2- Site 002 460.00 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0064 <7.70 <0.0064 041827066-0007 02-003 D2- Site 003 387.60 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0077 <7.80 <0.0077 041827066-0008 02-004 D2- Site 004 333.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0090 <7.80 <0.0090 041827066-0009 02-005 D2- Site 005 346.50 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0086 <7.80 <0.0086 041827066-0010 02-006 D2- Site 006 282.80 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0106 <7.80 <0.0110 041827066-0011 02-007 D2- Site 007 474.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0063 <7.80 <0.0063 041827066-0012 03-001 D3- Site 001 304.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0098 <7.80 <0.0098 041827066-0013 03-002 D3- Site 002 247.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0121 <7.80 <0.0120 041827066-0014 03-003 D3- Site 003 304.00 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0097 <7.70 <0.0097 041827066-0015 03-004 D3- Site 004 285.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0105 <7.80 <0.0100 041827066-0016 03-005 D3- Site 005 304.00 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0097 <7.70 <0.0097 041827066-0017 03-006 D3- Site 006 457.60 0.1300 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0065 <7.70 <0.0065 041827066-0018 03-007 D3- Site 007 459.00 0.1290 0 None Detected 0 0 0.0065 <7.80 <0.0065 041827066-0019 Initial report from: 09/12/2018 08:58 AM ASB_TEMAHERA_0004_0001 Printed: 9/12/2018 8:58:53AM Page 1 of 2 EMSL Order: 041827066 EMSL Analytical, Inc. Customer ID: EEG50 200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Customer PO: Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / Project ID: http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com Attention: Alex Mavrelis Phone: (305) 374-8300 EE & G Fax: (305) 374-8301 5751 Miami Lakes Drive East Received Date: 09/06/2018 09:30 AM Miami Lakes, FL 33014 Analysis Date: 09/11/2018 - 09/12/2018 Collected Date: Project: SXM Landfill Test Report: Asbestos Fiber Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Performed by EPA 40 CFR Part 763 Appendix A to Subpart E Area Analytical Asbestos Volume Analyzed Non Asbestos #Structures Sensitivity Concentration Sample Location (Liters) (mm²) Asb Type(s) ≥0.5μ < 5μ ≥5μ (S/cc) (S/mm²) (S/cc) Analyst(s) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager Garret Vliet (18) or other approved signatory EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMSL is not responsible for data reported in structures /cc, which is dependent on volume collected by non-laboratory personnel. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. The test results meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367 Initial report from: 09/12/2018 08:58 AM ASB_TEMAHERA_0004_0001 Printed: 9/12/2018 8:58:53AM Page 2 of 2