Flood Risk Management in Dhaka A Case for Eco-Engineering Approaches and Institutional Reform People’s Republic of Bangladesh disclaimer This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. copyright statement The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750- 4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail pubrights@worldbank.org. • III contents Acknowledgements VII Acronyms and abbreviations IX Executive Summary X 1· Introduction 2 Objective 6 Approach 8 Process 9 Organization of the report 9 2 · Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka 10 Demographic changes 13 River systems 13 Monsoonal rain and intense short-duration rainfall 17 Major flood events and underlying factors 20 Topography, soil, and land use 20 Decline of groundwater levels in Dhaka 27 Impact of climate vulnerability on flood hazards in Dhaka 28 Flood vulnerability and poverty 29 Summary 33 3 · Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective 34 Early efforts: Flood events in the 1950s and the national public sector response 37 Major flood events of the 1980’s and ensuing public sector response 38 The current situation in major areas of the city 40 Investments in urban weather forecasting and early warning systems 44 Summary 46 IV • 4 · Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform 48 The Town Improvement Act, 1953, and emergence of urban planning 51 Urban planning and the first Detailed Area Plan 51 The Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK) 54 Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) 59 Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA) 60 DNCC and DSCC: Dhaka’s main city corporations 64 The Union Parishads, the DND area, and cantonment boards 70 Other institutions and the private sector 71 Summary 74 5 · Conclusion and Recommendations 78 Recommendations for institutional and organizational reform 83 Recommendations for eco-engineering approaches to flood risk mitigation 87 References 100 appendix a Eco-Engineering for Flood Risk Management: Profile of Selected Case Studies 105 · The eco-engineering approach to water management in delta regionss 105 · Case Studies 105 appendix b Organogram of Key Agencies 118 appendix c Excavation of Khals 119 • V Boxes box 2.1. The Dhaka Metropolitan Area and Greater Dhaka 15 box 4.1 Policies and legislation affecting flood management in Greater Dhaka 52 box 4.2. Solid-waste management in Dhaka 66 box 4.3. Hatirjheel Lake: A case study in interinstitutional cooperation 68 box 5.1. Singapore’s urban reform 82 Box a.1. Defining eco-engineering approaches to water management 106 Figures figure 2.1. Growth of the Dhaka Metropolitan Area and environs 14 figure 2.2. Urban expansion of Dhaka, 1600–2002 18 figure 2.3. Major river systems around Dhaka 18 figure 2.4. Average monthly total rainfall in Dhaka, 1961–2013 19 figure 2.5. Temporal variation of rainfall during July–September 2004 in Dhaka 19 figure 2.6. Areas vulnerable to flooding, as seen in 2004 21 figure 2.7. Elevation of Dhaka and surrounding areas 22 figure 2.8. Agro-ecological regions in Greater Dhaka 23 figure 2.9. Soil texture map of Greater Dhaka 24 figure 2.10. Historical changes in land use from 1967 to 2010, derived from Landsat5 TM 26 figure 2.11. Forecasted changes in peak river levels around Dhaka due to climate change: Two scenarios 30 figure 2.12. Changes in return periods of daily rainfall events at BWDB Dhaka station 30 figure 2.13. Slums and areas vulnerable to flooding 31 figure 2.14. Key assets vulnerable to flooding 32 figure 3.1. The Dhaka-Narayanganj-Demra (DND ) area 42 figure 3.2. Existing khals, pumping stations, and wetlands in Dhaka West 43 figure 3.3. Existing khals, pumping stations, and wetlands in Dhaka East 45 figure 4.1. Organization of RAJUK 54 figure 4.2. Map of RAJUK ’s Detailed Area Plan, 2010–15 56 figure 4.3. Poorly maintained regulators in Dhaka West 60 figure 4.4. DWASA ’s drainage network in the Dhaka Metropolitan Area 62 figure 4.5. Areas under the jurisdiction of the two city corporations since May 2016 63 VI • figure 4.6. Organization of Dhaka North City Corporation 64 figure 4.7a. Ongoing filling of lowlands in Dhaka East 67 figure 4.7b. Sand mining for construction activities in Dhaka East 67 figure 5.1. Hydrology of land covered by the Detailed Area Plan 89 figure 5.2. Proposed khals to be excavated and revitalized in Dhaka West 90 figure 5.3. Proposed khals to be excavated and revitalized in Dhaka East 92 figure 5.4. Using a low embankment as a buffer zone along rivers 94 figure 5.6. Proposed measures for the Dhaka-Narayanganj-Demra area 96 figure 5.7. Proposed buffer zone for major rivers of Greater Dhaka 98 figure a.1. Recommended public policy and infrastructure actions, New Orleans water plan 108 figure a.2. Section of design for bioretention swales in walkways 111 figure a.3. Two sections showing an existing canal wall (left) and proposed canal wall with gabions (right) 111 figure a.4. A bioengineering stabilization technique applied in figure a1.5. Old sewerage system (left) and separated sewerage system (right) 112 Tables table es.1. Summary of key reforms and investments XXI table 2.1. Historical population growth in Dhaka, 1608–2011 16 table 2.2. Characteristics of the rivers of Greater Dhaka 16 table 2.3. Peak flood levels (m PWD ) in Dhaka’s rivers during four flood years 17 table 2.4. Trends in land use in Dhaka, 1960–2014 28 table 2.5. Changes in land use in low-lying areas, 1967–2010 (hectares) 28 table 4.1. RAJUK ’s five wings and their staff strength 55 Table 4.2 Revenue income and expenditure, in $ millions (BDT crores), fiscal years 2010–14 61 table 4.3a. Budget for Dhaka North City Corporation (BDT crores), fiscal years 2012–15 65 table 4.3b. Budget for Dhaka South City Corporation (BDT crores), fiscal years 2012–15 65 table 5.1. Summary of key reforms and investments 83 table c.1. Required minimum width of proposed natural khals to be reexcavated in Dhaka West 119 table c.2. Required minimum width of buffer zone for peripheral rivers of Dhaka 119 table c.3. Estimated minimum width of natural khals to be reexcavated in Dhaka East 120 • VII acknowledgements T his report was prepared in response to a request from the Government of Bangladesh to provide technical advice on options for addressing flood risk in Greater Dhaka. It was prepared in close collaboration with national and municipal agencies in Bangladesh, including: Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB); Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC); Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC); Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK); Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA); and the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF). The team is grateful to the many officials and individuals who generously gave their time and expertise. In particular, we would like to thank: Annisul Huq, Honorable Mayor, DNCC; Dr. Nurul Quadir, Additional Secretary, MOEF; Jahangir Kabir, Director General, BWDB; Md. Mahfuzur Rahman, Director General, BWDB; Md. Saiful Hossain, Superintending Engineer, Processing, and Flood Forecasting and Warning Circle (FFWC), BWDB; Abul Kalam Azad, Additional Chief Engineer, BWDB; H.S.M. Faruque, former Director- General, Water Resources Planning Organization, and Adviser, Water Resources Planning, CEGIS; Ripon Karmaker, Assistant Engineer, Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre, FFWC, BWDB; Md. Azizul Haque, former Director-General, BWDB, and Adviser, CEGIS; Amirul Hossain, Executive Engineer, FFWC; Shamsuddin Ahmed, Director, Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD); S. M. Quamrul Hassan, Meteorologist, Storm Warning Center, BMD; Md. Atikul Islam, Water Resources Planning, Institute of Water Modelling; Md. Anisur Rahman, Resilient Cities and Urban Risk Management Division, Asian Disaster Preparedness Center; Netai Sarker, Disaster Management Specialist, Department of Disaster Management; G.C. Sutradhar, former Chief of Planning, BWDB; Md. Masud Ahmed, former Director General, BWDB; Tawhid Ibn Akram, Assistant Engineer, DNCC; Tariq Bin Yousuf, Superintendent Engineer, DNCC; Md. Asaduzzaman, Superintending Engineer, DSCC; Md. Nurullah, Chief Engineer, DSCC; Engr. Taqsem A. Khan, Managing Director, DWASA; S.D.M. Quamrul Alam Chowdhury, earlier Deputy Managing Director, Operations and Maintenance, DWASA; Md. Shahadat Hossain, Flood Modeler, DWASA; Anwar Hossain, Chief Engineer, Project and Design, RAJUK; Md. Aminul Quaium, Assistant Director, Town Planning, RAJUK; Ridwan Saeed Rana, Assistant Director for Land Use, RAJUK; Dr. Sultan Ahmed, Director NRM & Research, Department of Environment, Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund; Md. Emdadul Islam, Chief Engineer, RAJUK; Md. Sirajul Islam, Chief Urban Planner, DSSC; Sarazina Mumu, Senior Professional, CEGIS; Giasuddin Chowdhury, Deputy Team Leader, Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100; Michael De Boer, Assistant to the Team Leader, Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100; Dr. Md. Liakath Ali, Climate Change and Environment Adviser, U.K. Department for International Development; Dr. Umme Kulsum Navera, Professor, Department of Water Resources and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology; Dr. Anwar Zahid, Deputy Director, Hydrology, Bangladesh Water Development Board; Syed Shahidun Nabi, Senior Engineer for Planning and Organizing, Roads and Highways Department; Shariful A. Chowdhury, Project Coordinator and Researcher, Institute of Water Modeling; A.F.M. Abdul Aziz, Project Director, DWASA; Kazi Habib Ullah, Department of Public Health Engineering; Mir Sajjad Hossain, Transboundary Water Resources Management Adviser, CEGIS.; Kazi Kamrull Hassan, Urban Planner; Ahmed Zulfiqar Rahman, Hydrologist; Md. Monowar-ul-Huq, Hydrologist. The report was prepared by a team led by: Poonam Pillai, Task Team Leader, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, GSURR; Malik Fida Abdullah Khan, Senior Water Resources Engineer, Consultant, Center for Environmental and Geographic Information, Services (CEGIS); Guillermo Siercke, Disaster Risk Management Specialist, GFDRR; Hanne van den Berg, Urban Planner, Deltares, Consultant; Marcel Marchand, Flood Risk Management Expert, Deltares, Consultant; Mark de Bel, VIII • Economist, Deltares, Consultant; Maaike van Aalst, Economist, Deltares; Lydia Cumiskey, Early Warning Systems, Deltares; Ruben Dahm, Hydrologist, Deltares; Robert Belk, Editor, Deltares; Herman Mondeel, Civil Engineer, Witteveen+Bos; Farhana Ahmed, Urban and Regional Planner, CEGIS; Kamrul Hassan, Urban Planner, CEGIS; Tahmina Tamanna, Junior Specialist, CEGIS; Arati Belle, Disaster Risk Management Specialist, GSURR; Swarna Kazi, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, GSURR; Diana Cubas, Consultant, GSURR; Angie Harney, Program Assistant, SACBD; Zahin Takrim Hussain, Program Assistant, SACBD; and Marie Florence Elvie, Program Assistant, GSURR. Peer reviewers for the report included: Diego Juan Rodriquez, Senior Water Economist, GWAGS; Yue Li, Senior Economist, SARCE; Christopher Pablo, Senior Urban Specialist, GSURR. We sincerely thank them for their comments and feedback. For their continued support in the preparation of this report, the team is grateful to: Bernice K. Van Bronkhorst, earlier Practice Manager, South Asia DRM and Climate Unit, GSURR; Christoph Pusch, Practice Manager, South Asia DRM and Climate Unit, GSURR; Lia Carol Sieghart, Program Leader, SACBN; Shahpar Selim, Environmental Specialist, GSURR. We are especially grateful to: Qimiao Fan, Country Director, Bangladesh, Nepal and Bhutan; Martin Rama, Chief Economist, SAR; Rajshree Paralkar, Operations Advisor, SASBN for their support and guidance. Finally, the team acknowledges the generous financial support of the Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund, European Union, Water Partnership Program and GFDRR, without which this report would not have been possible. • IX acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank A1F1 IPCC scenario based on fossil fuel-intensive development BMD Bangladesh Meteorological Department BWDB Bangladesh Water Development Board B1 IPCC scenario indicating a relatively high level of environmental consciousness CEGIS Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services DAP Detailed Area Plan DCC Dhaka City Corporation DMA Dhaka Metropolitan Area DMDP Dhaka Metropolitan Development Plan DND Dhaka-Narayanagn-Demra DNCC Dhaka North City Corporation DSCC Dhaka South City Corporation DWASA Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority FFWC Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change RAJUK Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha Executive Summary Executive Summary • XIII Rationale less measures to ensure resilience are put in place. During the 1998 floods, most of eastern Dhaka and some parts D haka is the cultural, political, and financial center of western Dhaka were inundated for almost 65 days. The of Bangladesh. It is one of the largest and most impact of flooding is widespread: it compromises the sew- densely populated cities in South Asia, with a pop- erage system, degrades drinking water, disrupts traffic, ulation of approximately 17.5 million people in 2015 and and increases the incidence of water-borne diseases. While growing at the rate of over 3 percent per year (World Bank city-level cost estimates of the damage from extreme 2015). By 2025, the United Nations (UN) predicts Dhaka will floods are scarce, one study estimates the damage from be home to more than 20 million people—a population the 1998 floods at approximately $171 million.2 3 larger than that of Mexico City, Beijing, or Shanghai. It is estimated that almost 34,000 people inhabit each square At present, Dhaka is at a crossroads of development. The kilometer of the city, yielding a population density that main planning agency, Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha is among the highest in the world (Dasgupta et al. 2015). (Capital Development Authority, RAJUK) is drafting a Struc- The city contributes about 34 percent of the country’s ture Plan (2016–35) for the next 20 years. The design and gross domestic product (GDP), indicating its economic and implementation of this plan will shape infrastructure de- strategic importance. velopment and the pattern of urbanization in the city for decades to come. The emerging plans and their implemen- Dhaka is highly prone to water-related hazards such as tation will also affect management of the city’s water and urban and river flooding, owing to its location, topogra- ecological resources, influx of rural migrants into the city, phy, climate, and proximity to rivers. It experiences major supply of jobs and affordable housing, and adaptation to floods regularly, as in 1954, 1955, 1962, 1966, 1974, 1987, climate risks. 1988, 1998, 2004, and 2009. Situated in the lower reaches of the Ganga delta, the Dhaka Metropolitan Area (DMA) is Management of flood risks is a critical part of this story. surrounded by rivers and tributaries: the Buriganga to the As the city urbanizes, it is imperative that it builds on south, Turag to the west, Tongi Khal to the north, and the lessons of the past so that flood risks are fully integrated Balu-Shitalakhya to the east. The city is low lying, with an into urban planning and managed effectively. Although elevation that varies from 0.8 to 14 meters above mean sea level, and is drained by numerous natural waterways 2. Estimate is developed from data cited in Alam and Rabbani and canals. (2007). Costs used include damages to residential and institutional buildings of approximately $51 million (Bangladeshi Taka, BDT 4 billion) and about $5.1 million Dhaka is also among the most climate-vulnerable megac- (BDT 400 million) respectively, shelter units of about $29 million (BDT 2.3 billion), losses to large-scale industry of ities in the world (Maplecroft 2013).1 Climate variability $30 million, to small and medium size industry of $36 and change are expected to intensify the city’s exposure million, and damages to urban services (water, sewerages, to environmental risk and heighten the extent and du- electricity, gas, and telephone) of about $20 million. This is based on a partial estimate and does not include health ration of urban flooding and inundation. With rapid and impacts and other costs, which would make the actual unplanned urbanization, the vulnerability of the city, and costs much more substantial. Exchange rate used is 1 BDT = $0.013 (Jan. 2017). particularly of its poorest residents is likely to increase un- 3. National-level estimates are more easily available. For instance, the National Strategy for Accelerated Poverty Reduction (FY2009–11) notes that losses of income and 1. Dhaka ranks first on Maplecroft’s Climate Vulnerability assets due to flooding events were $330 million in 1988, index. See http://www.preventionweb.net/english/profes- $2 billion in 1998, $2.2 billion in 2004, and $1.06 billion in sional/maps/v.php?id=29649. 2007. XIV • Executive Summary Executive Summary • XV there is an extensive literature on Dhaka’s urbanization, undertaken by Bangladesh’s Planning Commission and flood risk management, and poverty, few studies have as- the Netherlands. Further, it is consistent with the Ban- sessed the historical drivers of the city’s decision making gladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan 2009, with respect to flood risk management, linkages between which highlights the urgency of strengthening resilience urban planning and flood risk, or the political-economic to urban flood risks. and institutional issues constraining improved flood and urban resilience. This study aims to fill this gap. Approach Objective The study is based on extensive fieldwork, documentary research, and consultations with government and other The main objective of this study is to propose recom- stakeholders. It has the following focus areas: First, to mendations for addressing flood risks in Greater Dhaka. set the stage, an analysis of flood risks facing Dhaka city This is based on an analysis of flood risks facing the city, is undertaken. Using publicly accessible satellite imagery, historical analysis of decision-making about flood risk geographic information system (GIS)-based mapping tools, management, and institutional and political economy and available satellite-based analysis, the study assesses analysis. Looking ahead, the study also considers how spatial changes in urbanization and urban ecosystems relatively new approaches to managing flood risk—green that are shaping flood risk in the city. defense, eco-engineering, or ecosystem–based approach- es4—might inform the management of flood risk in Dhaka Second, a historical analysis of flood management city. interventions in Dhaka and the sequence in which they occurred is undertaken. The analysis shows how planning The study was initiated at the request of the Government for flood management evolved historically; the drivers of Bangladesh and carried out in close consultation with of decision making; the importance and limitations the Ministry of Environment and Forests—the focal agen- of the measures undertaken, both infrastructural and cy for the Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund non-infrastructural; and how decisions regarding flood (BCCRF), with the Dhaka North and South City Corpora- vulnerability have informed spatial planning and zoning. tions and RAJUK. It contributes to the goals of the Country This historical analysis is critical for understanding op- Partnership Framework 2016–20 prepared in collaboration tions available currently and charting pathways for the by the Government of Bangladesh and the World Bank future. (World Bank 2016). At present, the World Bank is under- taking an analysis of options to engage in eastern Dhaka Third, an institutional and organizational capacity assess- and also developing a broader platform for engagement in ment for urban planning and flood risk management is the city. The study also informs these endeavors. It is fully undertaken. This includes analysis of relevant plans and aligned with the preparation of the Bangladesh Delta Plan policies, mandates, and capacity of key organizations 2100, a collaborative long-term planning initiative being such as RAJUK, the Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC), the Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC), the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), and the Dhaka Water 4. See, for instance, Hulsman et al. (2011); EU (2012); EPA Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA) in shaping flood (2013); Li, Turner, and Jiang (2012). See also https://www. resilience. The assessment does not include a broader huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/em/winter15/highlight3_ sidebar.html. organizational analysis of these agencies but is limited XVI • Executive Summary to shedding light on their roles in flood risk management F LO OD R I S KS FAC I N G · in the city. Emphasis is on political economy aspects D H AKA C I T Y and institutional constraints that need to be addressed. Areas vulnerable to flooding. Based on data from past Based on the above analysis, the study provides recom- extreme events, areas most vulnerable to flooding are mendations for strengthening flood risk as a core element Dhaka East and the low-lying Dhaka-Narayanagn-Dem- of strengthening urban resilience in Dhaka. This includes ra (DND) area. However, Dhaka West continues to recommendations for institutional and organizational experience waterlogging and drainage congestion. reforms, and structural and nonstructural measures that The DND area is expected to be the most vulnerable could be undertaken. In proposing these recommenda- under future climate scenarios (Dasgupta et. al. 2015). tions, an extensive review of international experience Some of the slum settlements most prone to flooding using green defense/eco-engineering approaches was un- are Mohammadpur, Kamrangir Char, Rampura, and dertaken. A brief version is included in appendix A.5 Khilgaon—all high-priority areas for efforts to improve urban resilience. Process · Different types of hazards affect different areas of the city. Dhaka West which is embanked, is chiefly vul- The study has been prepared in close collaboration with nerable to intense rainfall resulting in waterlogging. RAJUK, the Dhaka North and South City Corporations, The DND area is embanked from all sides, has limited DWASA, and BWDB. It builds on extensive review of existing drainage and is also mainly affected by intense rain re- literature on urbanization and flood management in sulting in waterlogging. Dhaka East is not embanked Dhaka, fieldwork, and consultations with government and and hence vulnerable to both river flooding and other stakeholders. Three consultation workshops were intense rainfall. Thus, tailored early warning systems organized during preparation of this study—among them are needed for major areas in the city that take into a workshop on international experiences with eco-en- account the specific nature of the hazard. · gineering approaches to flood risk management and another to develop options for flood risk management us- Urbanization is accompanied by a decline of urban ing nature based approaches. In May 2016, a stakeholder wetlands and groundwater resources. Urbanization consultation chaired by the Mayor, DNCC was organized to and increase in population growth in Dhaka is accom- discuss preliminary findings from the study. Participants panied by a steady decline in urban wetlands and in these workshops included representatives of numerous increase in built-up area. Moreover, approximately 78 national and municipal government agencies, ward-level to 87 percent of Dhaka’s drinking water comes from officials, and development partners. groundwater resources. However, according to the Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and Institute of Water Modeling, the groundwater level Key findings of Dhaka City is declining by about three meters each year and the city faces serious water shortages in the Key findings of this study are summarized here and pre- dry season. The decline of green spaces has also cut re- sented in more detail in the report. charge capacity, and supporting measures such as the protection of green spaces and rainwater harvesting are needed to help meet rising demand for water and 5. A detailed review has also been prepared and is available upon request. slow the decline of groundwater resources. Executive Summary • XVII PUBL IC SECTO R RES P O N S E T O embankments, flood walls, pumping stations, box · MANAGING F LO O D RIS K S culverts, and regulators), with much less attention Public sector response to flood risk management has given to nonstructural measures such as planning, primarily been in reaction to extreme events and not zoning, weather and flood forecasting- or risk-based as an integral part of urban planning. Analysis carried information services: critical “nonstructural” tools out in this report shows that many of the major that can help the city manage urbanization, land, and flood-control infrastructure measures undertaken in resources in a more balanced way. Dhaka have been initiated as a reaction to major flood events, not as part of the planned urban expansion of the Dhaka area. The embankments in the DND area I N S T I T U T I O N AL AN D were a response to the devastating floods in 1954 and O R G AN I Z AT I O N AL · 1955 and the western embankment was constructed C H AL L E N G E S in response to extreme flood events of the 1980s. Institutional analysis carried out in this report shows Moreover, in the low-lying DND area, flood-control that for Dhaka, there is no integrated flood risk man- infrastructure has contributed to the urbanization of agement plan. The Structure Plan (1995–2015) and the area by encouraging people to settle there even in the Detailed Area Plan (gazetted in 2010 and valid till the absence of an adequate drainage system or ade- 2016 with a one-year extension) have de facto been quate provision of municipal services. If flood control used to make decisions about land use, but without infrastructure is contributing to urbanization, then it a comprehensive implementation plan or a coordi- is important that it be considered as an integral part nated approach to managing flood risk. The Town of urban planning and not initiated in response to Improvement Act (1953) was prepared over 60 years extreme events. ago; it bestows enormous powers to RAJUK with little · accountability to the public and needs to be revised. Efforts to maintain connectivity between inland wa- Incorporation of flood risk issues into the implemen- terways and outer river system have been limited. The tation of the Detailed Area Plan happens on an ad hoc construction of embankments in the west and DND basis. · area, combined with poor maintenance of rivers and other urban water bodies, have delinked the city’s in- Disconnect between planning and municipal service ternal waterways and canals from the peripheral river delivery. Contrary to good practice, where planning system. Parts of the city’s internal waterways, particu- offices and functions typically fall under the purview larly in the western and southern parts of the city, are of the mayor,6 in Dhaka, planning is carried out by disconnected from the outer river system. As a result, RAJUK with limited systematic contribution from the both the Dhaka West and DND areas now must be planning offices of the DNCC and DSCC. The agencies drained using a large number of pumps, capacity for involved in urban planning and municipal service de- which is at present, inadequate. livery lie within different ministries and have different · accountability structures. RAJUK reports to the Min- Prioritization of structural measures compared to istry of Housing and Public Works. On the other hand, non-structural measures as instruments for rain and DNCC, DSCC, DWASA, and the Union Parishads report river flood management. The primary solution for addressing waterlogging and managing river flooding 6. One example of this is Washington D.C. where the Office of in Dhaka has been structural interventions (such as Planning is under the mayor. XVIII • Executive Summary to the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Develop- sponsible for managing and protecting Dhaka’s lakes, ment, and Cooperatives (MLGRDC). BWDB falls under water bodies, and canals; maintaining (not just mon- the Ministry of Water Resources. RAJUK has no direct itoring) water quality; and preventing encroachment accountability to the MLGRDC even though it makes and dumping. Regular maintenance is essential for important decisions about land use, water bodies, and these lakes to effectively function as retention areas housing that directly affect the citizenry on a regular and if water is to drain adequately during monsoon basis. Moreover, there is a contradiction between RA- season. Likewise, regular dredging of the surrounding JUK’s regulatory and development roles. RAJUK issues river system, a BWDB mandate, is not sufficiently licenses for land use and building construction to addressed. · private land developers, but it also develops land on its own account with no clear oversight. Current drainage provided by DWASA covers approx- · imately 38 percent of the DMA. Although DWASA Unplanned urbanization well underway before falling does a noteworthy task of providing water supply, under Municipal jurisdiction. Until May 2016, the two sewerage, and drainage services, its drainage services city corporations DNCC and DSCC together had juris- cover only 38 percent of the DMA and are absent diction over only some of the Dhaka Metropolitan from most of Greater Dhaka and the DND area. Area (DMA). Significant parts of DMA, the DND area, Responsibility for drainage is split between multi- and Greater Dhaka (outside the DMA area) were not ple agencies. In Dhaka, some pumping stations are under any municipal jurisdiction. Outer parts of the operated by DWASA, others by BWDB. Storm water Greater Dhaka and DND areas are even now gov- drainage is provided by DWASA, while DNCC and erned by Union Parishads. If indeed Dhaka’s spatial DSCC manage surface-water drains. However, there is expansion is to be better managed, it would make a need for greater coordination between DWASA and sense to bring the entire Greater Dhaka area under the two city corporations on drainage maintenance. one or more municipal corporations. The boundar- No overarching agency is presently responsible for ies—and service responsibilities—of the two city the provision of drainage, sewerage, or wastewater corporations have expanded without adequate treatment in those parts of Greater Dhaka where planning or additional resource allocations. The two DWASA does not operate. Drainage coverage needs city corporations have planning departments but to be expanded, especially in Dhaka East, before fur- have limited human resources and technical skills ther urbanization occurs. · needed for planning. Neither city corporation has a long-term strategic plan for drainage or flood risk Capacity for weather early warning systems limited. management. The Union Parishads that provide The Flood Forecasting and Warning Center (FFWC, services in the rest of Greater Dhaka also have very under BWDB) is set up to address river floods. But limited capacity for flood risk management. because Dhaka is also vulnerable to intense rainfall, · BMD’s capacity for precipitation forecasting needs to There is no clear ownership of urban water bodies, and be strengthened, as does FFWC’s capacity to under- the maintenance of natural canals and river systems take impact-based forecasting to reach communities has been neglected. While DWASA maintains some at risk. khals and waterways that are part of its drainage network, it is unclear which agency is ultimately re- Executive Summary • XIX XX • Executive Summary Recommendations take into account the current realities, level of urban- Going forward, three issues are critical to strengthening ization, institutional arrangements, and challenges flood risk management in Dhaka. First, it is important facing Dhaka. The act should be revised to address that investments in flood infrastructure take place as the conflicting powers bestowed to RAJUK and sim- part of a comprehensive, integrated, and participato- ilar planning agencies in other major urban areas ry urban planning and flood risk management process, in Bangladesh. Revision of this act could also offer rather than in reaction to extreme weather and flood a blueprint for addressing the disconnect between events, as has been the case in the past. This means, that urban planning and municipal service delivery in other significant attention will need to be put in strengthen- major cities in Bangladesh. Risk informed planning ing urban planning and preparedness and considering should be an integral part of the revised TIA. · flood risk management as a key part of this process. Second, a major shift is needed from a primarily infra- Reform RAJUK by clarifying planning functions and structure based approach to flood risk management moving its monitoring and development functions to to an approach that considers nature based infrastruc- city corporations. RAJUK presently plays the triple ture, the city’s river systems, wetlands and land use as role of planner, developer, and regulator—a built-in integral parts of managing flood risk. The connectivity conflict of interest. Moreover, planning and city man- between the internal natural drainage network of the agement functions are divorced. Planning is done by city and surrounding river system needs to be revitalized RAJUK, while municipal services are provided by DNCC and maintained—and is a key aspect of a nature based and DSCC. To address this disconnect, it is recom- solution to managing flood risk in Greater Dhaka. Thus, mended that RAJUK be mainly responsible for overall future investments to address flood risk should look at Structural Planning and zoning. The city corporations the city in an integrated way and not just focus on one will be responsible for more detailed planning, zoning area (for example, Dhaka East) in an isolated way. Finally, and enforcement within their areas of jurisdiction. and most notably, important institutional and organiza- Moreover, development and monitoring functions tional reforms are needed to strengthen urban resilience should be moved out of RAJUK and undertaken by in Dhaka. These require an array of measures including the municipal corporations. Private entities can also updating outdated regulations, undertaking difficult be engaged in provision of housing. RAJUK’s main agency reforms, strengthening flood risk and land use in- mandate would be to undertake comprehensive risk formation systems, and strengthening planning capacity. informed planning for Greater Dhaka in an integrat- These recommendations are summarized in table es.1 and ed way, in coordination with the city corporations, elaborated below. upazilas, and communities. The realigned RAJUK should prepare a zoning policy for the Greater Dhaka area which currently does not exist. It would also be R E C O M M E N D AT I O N S F O R IN S T IT UT IO NAL responsible for coordinating with the existing (and · AND POL ICY REF O RM S future) city corporations to ensure that all zoning Revise outdated Town Improvement Act (1953). One laws prepared by the city corporations are consis- of the priority actions going forward is to reform the tent with the overall plan for Greater Dhaka. RAJUK outdated Town Improvement Act (TIA). The TIA was should become a hub of public information on land approved over 60 years ago and should be revised to use and spatial plans, including databases, risk maps and maps of water bodies for the entire Detailed Area Plan. Executive Summary • XXI · Establish an interministerial committee on Dhaka’s taining urban water bodies (notably lakes) through rivers, urban wetlands, waterways, and drainage. One issuance of land-use plans and zoning ordinances. This of the main challenges in land and flood management committee would report to the prime minister’s office in Greater Dhaka is maintaining the urban wetlands, and work closely with RAJUK and the city corpora- water bodies, khals, and drainage facilities within Dha- tions. It would comprise representatives of BWDB; the ka, as well as the river system surrounding the city. To city corporations; the Ministry of Housing and Public address this issue, an interministerial committee on Works; MLGRDC; the Ministry of Water Resources; rivers, urban wetlands, and waterways is recommend- DWASA; the Department of Environment, and Upazila ed. The committee would provide oversight on the Parishads. It would meet on a quarterly basis and be activities of relevant agencies. The BWDB would con- responsible for ensuring that high priority and over- tinue to be responsible for river dredging and DWASA sight be placed on the management of the urban river for maintenance of canals and storm water drainage. system, wetlands, and ecology, in support of sustain- The city corporations would be responsible for main- able urbanization. TABLE ES.1 S UMMARY O F KE Y RE FO RMS AND I NVEST MENT S Enact Eco-Engineering measures Policy and institutional reforms Organizational strengthening in Greater Dhaka • Bring DMA (including DND area) fully • Establish inter-ministerial • Revitalize khals, lakes, and under municipal management steering committee on wetL ands water bodies • Revise outdated Town Improvement and rivers • Dredge surrounding river Act (1953); Resolve RAJUK’s • Substantially improve planning system regularly (BWDB) Development and Regulatory capacity in City Corporations to improve connectivity of functions through policy reform urban wetlands and river • Strengthen DNCC and DSCC system across DAP area • Clarify planning functions of RAJUK capacity for monitoring and and City Corporations with the enforcement of development • Strengthen early warning former responsible for broader activities systems and flood structural planning and the City management information Corporations responsible for more • Strengthen RAJUK’s monitoring systems detailed planning, control and capacity • Modernize/improve design zoning of flood infrastructure • Prepare zoning policy, laws and • Extend drainage to entire regulations DMA • Clarify City Corporations’ mandate • Improve solid waste for oversight of urban water bodies management and waterways • Undertake targeted eco- • With new Structure Plan, prepare engineering investments updated DAP without time lag, to (for example, maintenance accompany new Structure including of buffer zone) in designing zoning policies, regulations, and new infrastructure with integrated flood risk management ecosystems functions plan for DAP area • Consolidate drainage under DWASA Source: Authors’ compilation. XXII • Executive Summary · Bring the DND area and Dhaka East under municipal and resources allocated to the planning departments management. Until May 2016, Dhaka East and DND should be strengthened. The two departments should area were not under the jurisdiction of any municipal work in close collaboration in the interest of consis- agency and were urbanizing haphazardly. Instead of tency. This approach would allow the city corporations an ad hoc approach to urbanization, East Dhaka and to have more discretion over planning and land use the DND area should be brought fully under municipal within their areas of jurisdiction. Monitoring of land control to ensure systematic management of land, development, oversight of water bodies, and monitor- resources, and services. ing of filling functions should also be placed under the · city corporations, as they are best placed to monitor Consolidate drainage under DWASA. At present, the activities within their jurisdiction. Because mayors are Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWA- elected officials, this option would introduce a signif- SA) provides drainage services to 38 percent of the icant measure of accountability into the planning and DMA. This should be expanded to the entire DMA at zoning system. Staff capacity for monitoring land use a minimum and eventually to all of Greater Dhaka— and water bodies in their areas of jurisdiction should that is, to the entire area covered by RAJUK’s Detailed also be enhanced. · Area Plan. A basic drainage network should be in place as land is being prepared and serviced for housing Prepare new Detailed Area Plan informed by risk construction. Responsibility for the construction mapping, based on a participatory process and accom- and maintenance of drainage should be consolidated panied by zoning policies and regulations. RAJUK has under DWASA, which has much more experience pro- prepared a Structure Plan, a draft of which is avail- viding the services. able. A new Detailed Area Plan (to succeed the earlier · one) is apparently under preparation. Given past Task the city corporations with management and problems in implementation, and the time lag be- oversight of urban lakes, wetlands, and water bod- tween the preparation of the Structure Plan and the ies. At present, no agency is clearly responsible for past Detailed Area Plan, this process should be expe- ownership, management, and maintenance of urban dited. Further, the new Detailed Area Plan should be wetlands and waterways. This responsibility should prepared for the entire area to be covered, and with be clearly assigned to the city corporations. Since the public consultation and input. Risk mapping should mayors are elected officials, it will enable greater com- be embedded and an integral part of urban planning. mitment to this vital urban resource. Moreover, the new plan should be accompanied by clear zoning polices and regulations. REC OMMEN D AT I O N S F O R · Demarcate areas into zones and prepare local area · ORGANIZATIO NA L REF O RM S plans and zoning regulations. The entire area covered Strengthen the human resource and planning capacity by the Detailed Area Plan should be divided into zones of the city corporations. The capacity of the plan- and the city corporations should prepare local area ning departments of the DNCC and DSCC should be plans and zoning laws/ordinances for each zone based strengthened. The city corporations should be respon- on a participatory process in accordance with the up- sible for preparing—and able to prepare—detailed dated plan. In the past, even though the Detailed Area land-use plans and zoning ordinances consistent with Plan was gazetted, RAJUK or the city corporations did Greater Dhaka plans. To support this, staff capacity not prepare a zoning policy or regulations. Without Executive Summary • XXIII XXIV • Executive Summary these, it was extremely challenging to implement or long term but routine investments in maintenance. enforce the plan and manage densification, housing While it was difficult to determine the amounts development, or urban growth. Going forward, this allocated for maintenance by BWDB and the city will be essential. corporations, it was evident that given the state of · the river system in urban waterways, the investments Enhance investments in early warning systems and in maintenance are not sufficient. This needs to be develop systems that are tailored to the hazards facing enhanced. · specific areas of Dhaka. Different areas of Dhaka face different types of hydro-meteorological hazards— Strengthen engagement and partnership with private Dhaka East and the fringe area are mainly exposed developers. At present, private developers are openly to river floods and rainfall; DND and Dhaka West are filling up land and developing low-lying areas. There mainly vulnerable to rain-induced waterlogging. These is no mechanism between public and private sector require tailored early warning systems. The capacity agencies and developers to address the problems of of the Bangladesh Meteorology Department (BMD) to urbanization, including flooding. Such a mechanism provide short duration rain alerts and early warnings needs to be developed. should be strengthened through improving rainfall monitoring and radar systems.7 This will particu- larly support users such as BWDB and DWASA and R E C OM M E N D AT I O N S F O R I N T E G R AT E D F LO OD residents of the Dhaka West and DND areas. Further, R I S K M AN AG E M E N T W I T H PR I O R I T Y AC T I ON S BWDB’s Hydrology Unit should set up a Flood Risk In many of the world’s cities, flood risk mitigation has Information System for developers and the public.8 mainly relied on infrastructure-based solutions. However, Flood risk maps can support preparation of flood zon- there is a growing realization that while these are needed ing regulations for the entire area and help identify in many instances, they are not necessarily the optimal areas more or less prone to flooding. These flood maps solution and may increase flood risk.10 Eco-engineer- should be made available to the public and to plan- ing complements and can in many cases replace costly ning agencies in Dhaka to inform planning and zoning. infrastructure investments (appendix A). Application of The Hydrology Division of BWDB should strengthen eco-engineering solutions in the context of Dhaka implies its capacity for location specific forecasts for Dhaka, consideration of the overall connectivity of the hydrologi- specifically Dhaka East, including impact-based fore- cal system across the city’s urban catchment, ensuring the casting. These measures would greatly help to manage connectivity of the internal waterways with the surround- flood risk in Dhaka.9 ing river system, and balancing structural and nonstructural · interventions. The focus should be to revitalize the natural Allocate sufficient funding to maintenance. Extensive urban canals and water bodies, dredge the peripheral investments in infrastructure require proportionate river system, expand the storm water drainage network, promote innovative infrastructure design, prioritize maintenance, and maintain links between the internal 7. This is being underpinned by the World Bank–supported waterways and peripheral river system. Application of Weather and Climate Services Regional project. 8. For an example of such a system, see http://fris.nc.gov/fris/ eco-engineering approaches also implies that the institu- Home.aspx?ST=NC 9. A recently effective (May 2017) World Bank project is ex- pected to support BMD’s and BWDB’s forecasting services 10. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/role- for Dhaka. of-flood-risk-management.pdf. Executive Summary • XXV tional and organizational reforms proposed above would the area is being used for haphazard landfilling and urban- need to be undertaken to ensure the success of these mea- ization. Recommended measures include (i) revitalizing sures. Within this broader framework, specific measures and protecting natural khals, which are degraded and could be supported in major areas of Greater Dhaka, as should be reexcavated on a priority basis; (ii) protecting described below. canals and rivers through eco-engineering measures such as protective green strips bordering canals, as buffer Dhaka West. The western part of the DMA has devel- zones for rivers with low embankments to store flood oped as an unplanned urban area since the 1960s. Flood water to a certain limit during monsoon season and to infrastructure has depreciated over time and illegal prevent encroachment; (iii) developing the floodplain encroachment of natural canals and wetlands has ex- inside the embankment for multiuse purposes (eco-tour- acerbated flooding problems. Recommended measures istic public spaces, water retention during flood peaks); include (i) revitalizing silted up or encroached khals, and (iv) dredging peripheral rivers to allow interconnectivity reclaiming and revitalizing lakes (Dhanmondi, Banani, and smooth discharges; (v) promoting eco-tourism by and Uttara); (ii) ensuring that agencies maintain the protecting wetlands; (vi) deploying innovative eco-en- connectivity of the storm water drainage network and gineering measures such as planted drainage channels, the natural canal and river systems with a strong com- plaza planters, rainwater harvesting, permeable paving, mitment to maintenance and a very strong monitoring and so on; and (vii) integrating the installation of a storm mechanism in place; (iii) introducing eco-engineering op- water drainage network with overall spatial planning and tions to protect the khals, deter encroachment, and raise connecting it with natural khals, with regular mainte- the recreational value of public spaces. Options include nance of such a network. Any consideration of the eastern building perforated sidewalks and 2–3 meter green strips bypass should be preceded by institutional and organiza- on both sides of the canals; (iv) dredging peripheral rivers tional reforms and reforms related to planning and zoning to maintain their conveying capacity, environmental flow discussed above. rates, and connectivity with khals; (v) creating multiuse buffer zones to protect rivers and facilitate the smooth DND Area. The low-lying DND area lies in the flood plain of passage of flood flows; (vi) expanding storm water drain- the Meghna River. Most of the former agricultural lands age with regular maintenance, to cover all of Dhaka West, have become unplanned residential and industrial areas, including regular cleaning of all box culverts; (vii) pre- disrupting the natural runoff to the canals. The DND serving water retention areas for pumping stations and area is encircled by embankments and floodwalls with converting them into permanent wetlands, which can act roads topping the embankments. Drainage canals built as eco-touristic public spaces and attenuate flood peaks; by BWDB to carry water toward the pumping station are (viii) improving solid waste management systems to badly dilapidated and clogged owing to unauthorized include ecological options such as conversion into green encroachment and solid waste. About 87 percent of the fertilizer; and (ix) improving infrastructure design (for area becomes affected by waterlogging and inundation example, of sluice gates and their placement). with a depth of 1–3 meters during moderate storms, mak- ing it the area most at risk to inundation under climate Dhaka East. At present, the eastern part of the DMA is change. Recommended measures include (i) re-excavating not yet protected against river flooding, nor does it have and maintaining major drainage canals, as well as other a storm water drainage system. In the absence of any primary and secondary drainage canals and protecting municipal organization to provide services to this area, them against encroachment; (ii) building green strips and limited land-use zoning, and limited oversight by RAJUK, fencing on both sides of the canals to infiltrate water XXVI • Executive Summary Executive Summary • XXVII into the ground, prevent erosion, dissipate wave energy, Dhaka’s, shows that transformative solutions are possi- and discourage encroachment and use for recreational ble and can provide insight into improving livability and purposes; (iii) practicing land-use zoning and enforce- resilience in Dhaka, which lies at the cusp of such a trans- ment, particularly in non-built-up areas to ensure that any formation. • future development of these areas would be subject to risk zoning and enforcement; (iv) ensuring preservation of a minimum wetland area, with at least 20 percent of the area declared as permanent wetland for water-retention purposes (and emphasized in the draft structural plan); (v) establishing a storm water drainage network for the area to be maintained by DWASA; (vi) increasing pumping capacity and locations of stations; (vii) maintaining the existing embankment (31 kilometers of embankment topped by a road)—to be done by BWDB; (viii) improving the design of existing infrastructure (hydraulic structures to be remodeled and renovated using an eco-engineering approach, regulators and sluices to be automated, and so on); and (ix) creating buffer zones on the Lakhya River to increase carrying capacity and discourage encroachment of the riverbank. Outer Fringes of Greater Dhaka. This area extends over 1,130 square kilometers, to mostly suburbs and semi-de- veloped areas but includes lowlands, rivers, floodplains, and agricultural lands. No storm water drainage network exists in this area. Flooding of the area is controlled by flows into the major rivers and their tributaries. The expansion of Dhaka poses an immense threat to the risk profile and ecology of this area. Recommended measures include (i) dredging peripheral rivers regularly by BWDB; (ii) maintaining the existing canals and using eco-engineering concepts such as buffers and green strips; (iii) protect- ing the area’s wetlands; and (iv) developing integrated drainage management investments to enhance water retention and improve drainage for the future expanded Dhaka, thus reducing drainage congestion. It would also expand ecosystem services in the area (recreational, cul- tural), encourage eco-tourism, and beautify the city. In conclusion, the experience of other cities, such as Singapore, that decades ago faced a situation similar to 1 · Introduction 1. Introduction • 5 D haka is the cultural, political, and financial center as to urban services) is approximately $171 million.13 14 of Bangladesh. It is also one of the largest and With rapid and unplanned urbanization, the vulnerability most densely populated cities in South Asia, with of the city and particularly of its poorest residents is likely a population of approximately 17.5 million people in 2015 to increase unless measures to ensure resilience are put and growing at the rate of almost 3 percent per year.11 in place. Situated in the lower reaches of the Ganges delta, the Dhaka Metropolitan Area (DMA) is surrounded by Turag At present, Dhaka does not have an integrated long-term to the west, Tongi Khal to the north, Balu-Shitalakhya to flood risk management plan or a wetland management the east, and Buriganga to the south. In addition, the city plan. Urban expansion is increasing rapidly in low-lying is drained by numerous natural waterways and canals. flood flow zones outside the core city. One of the biggest Dhaka is low lying, with its elevation varying from 0.8 to 14 challenges for city officials is how to develop new areas meters above mean sea level. outside the urban center in a planned way. A large number of agencies are involved in urban planning and activities Owing to its location, topography, climate, and proximity related to flood risk management, with often overlapping to rivers, Dhaka is highly prone to water-related hazards institutional mandates, contributing to inefficiencies such as urban and river flooding. During the 1998 floods, in the delivery of public services. Historically, the main most of eastern Dhaka and some parts of western Dhaka focus of flood management has been to use a range of were flooded due to spillover from surrounding rivers, infrastructural measures. While the emphasis on infra- with inundation lasting for almost 65 days. Waterlogging structural interventions for flood risk management is not compromises the sewerage system, degrades drinking unique to Dhaka, international good practice suggests water, disrupts traffic, and increases the incidence of wa- an integration of structural with nonstructural measures ter-borne diseases. for managing flood risk (Jha, Bloch, and Lamond, 2012). However, in the case of Dhaka, it is unclear the extent to Dhaka is also among the most climate-vulnerable meg- which the city is balancing these tools. Further, there is a acities in the world.12 Climate variability and change are growing awareness of more hybrid alternatives referred expected to intensify the city’s exposure to increased heat to variously as “green water defense” or “eco-engineering” waves, intense rainfall, and heighten the extent and dura- tion of urban flooding and inundation. The high economic losses caused by floods include direct losses (for example, 13. Estimate is developed from data cited in Alam and Rabba- ni (2007). Costs used include damages to residential and damage to infrastructure, property and assets) and indi- institutional buildings (approximately $51 million or BDT 4 rect losses (such as impact on incomes and livelihoods). billion and about $5.1 million or BDT 400 million respec- tively), shelter units (about $29 million or BDT 2.3 billion), While city-level damage cost estimates for extreme flood large-scale industries ($30 million), small and medium size events are scarce, one estimate for the 1998 floods (cov- industries ($36 million), and urban services (water, sewer- ering damages to residential and institutional buildings, ages, electricity, gas, and telephone—$20 million). This is based on is a partial estimate and does not include health shelter units, losses to industry and enterprises, as well impacts and other costs, which would make the actual costs much more substantial. Exchange rate used—1 BDT = $0.013 (Jan 2017). 14. National-level estimates are more easily available. For instance, the National Strategy for Accelerated Poverty 11. World Development Indicators (WDI) (World Bank 2015). Reduction (FY2009–11) notes that losses of income and 12. http://eprints.whiterose.c.uk/74383/2/10.1007_s11069- assets due to flooding events were $330 million in 1988, 012-0234-1.pdf; https://maplecroft.com/about/news/ $2 billion in 1998, $2.2 billion in 2004, and $1.06 billion in ccvi_2013.html. 2007. 6 • 1. Introduction approaches to flood and water management (appen- canals, waterways and rivers. It has to do with choices and dix A) (World Bank 2012). Instead of relying primarily on decision making about infrastructure, groundwater man- infrastructural interventions such as construction of agement, and drainage. Most importantly, it has to do embankments, eco-engineering approaches combine with the capability of institutions and leaders in address- structural and nonstructural interventions, making exten- ing these issues. As the city embarks on its next phase of sive use of eco-systems services to reduce flood hazard urbanization, it is critical to learn lessons from the past to and strengthen resilience to climate risks. Ecosystems, plan for the future. While there is extensive literature on as is well documented, play a crucial role in regulating Dhaka’s urbanization, flood risk management, and urban hydrological and meteorological processes and thus poverty, few studies have assessed the drivers of decision shape the potential impact of floods and storms. Services making regarding flood management in the city histor- provided by ecosystems can include managing surface ically, linkages between urban planning and flood risk and subsurface flow regimes, modifying wave dynamics in management, or the political-economic and institutional coastal areas, provision of barriers to flooding (for exam- constraints for improving flood risk in the city. Recent ple, by natural terrain elevation, dunes), and reduction of studies (Dasgupta et. al., 2015) have assessed the impact waterlogging (through improved filtration and drainage, of climate change on future flooding and inundation and improved use of green space, conservation of wetland ar- associated damage costs, but there is a dearth of research eas, and construction of multipurpose infrastructure that on how the city came to be in its current predicament, its maximizes ecosystems services). Such an approach rec- current institutional and infrastructure challenges, and ognizes the multiscale nature of biophysical and human how to better link flood risk management as a key part of systems and considers flood risks and climate adaptation urban planning. This study aims to address this gap. at multiple scales and through the interaction between different spatial levels. While use of eco-engineering or green defense approaches has been successfully tried Objective elsewhere (for instance, in the Netherlands, the United States, and Japan), it is unclear how they could be imple- The main objective of this study is to propose recommen- mented to address flood risks in a highly dense megacity dations for strengthening flood risk in Greater Dhaka. such as Dhaka. Building on existing literature, the study assesses the drivers of decision making about flood risk management At present, Dhaka is at the crossroads for planning its in the city and its focus on infrastructural measures, and future development pathway. The main planning agency, makes a case for balancing both infrastructural and non- Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK, or “capital de- infrastructural solutions for managing flood risk. Further, velopment authority”), is in the process of preparing its based on a detailed review of international experience Structure Plan and associated implementation plans for with innovative eco-engineering approaches to flood risk the greater Dhaka area. How these plans are designed and mitigation (appendix A), the study suggests how these ap- implemented will likely have a long-lasting impact not proaches might inform flood risk management in Dhaka. just on how urbanization unfolds over the next several At present, RAJUK has prepared a draft structure plan for decades, but also on how the city manages its resources, the next 20 years and is in the process of consulting and addresses rural- urban migration, provides job opportuni- finalizing it. Findings from this study are also expected to ties for people, and adapts to climate risks. Management inform implementation of the structure plan. of flood risks and resilience is a critical part of this story. It relates to how the city manages its land, urban ecology, 1. Introduction • 7 8 • 1. Introduction Approach Second, the history and sequence of flood management interventions in Dhaka are presented. The analysis shows The study is based on extensive fieldwork, documentary how planning for flood management evolved historical- research, and consultations with government and other ly; the drivers of decision making; the importance and stakeholders. It has the following main focus areas: limitations of the measures undertaken, both infrastruc- tural and noninfrastructural; and how decisions regarding First, to provide necessary context, the study provides an flood vulnerability have informed spatial planning and analysis of flood risks facing Dhaka city. Using publicly ac- zoning. This analysis is critical for understanding the cessible satellite imagery, geographic information system options available currently and designing a road map for (GIS)-based mapping tools, and available satellite-based the future. research, the study assesses spatial changes in urbaniza- tion and urban ecosystems that are shaping flood risk in Third, the study assesses the institutional and orga- the city. nizational capacity for urban planning and flood risk 1. Introduction • 9 management. This includes analysis of relevant plans these workshops included representatives of numerous and policies, mandates and capacity of key organizations national and municipal government agencies, ward-level such as RAJUK, Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC), officials, and development partners. Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC), the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), and the Dhaka Water The study is fully aligned with the preparation of the Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA) in shaping flood Bangladesh Delta Plan 2100, a collaborative long-term resilience. The assessment does not include a broader planning initiative being undertaken by Bangladesh’s organizational analysis of these agencies but is limited Planning Commission and the Netherlands. It is also fully to shedding light on their roles in flood risk management consistent with the Bangladesh Climate Change Strate- in the city. Emphasis is on political economy aspects gy and Action Plan 2009, and the World Bank’s Country and institutional constraints that need to be addressed. Partnership Framework 2016–20 (World Bank 2016), both Based on the above analysis, the study provides recom- of which emphasize the need for efforts to increase the mendations for strengthening flood resilience in Dhaka. resilience of urban populations to natural disasters. At This includes recommendations for institutional reforms, present, the World Bank is undertaking an analysis of and structural and nonstructural measures that could options for engagement in eastern Dhaka and also devel- be undertaken. In proposing these recommendations, an oping a broader engagement platform for the Dhaka area. extensive review of international experience using green The study also contributes to these endeavors. defense/eco-engineering approaches was undertaken. A brief version is included in appendix A.15 Organization of the report Process The report is organized as follows. Following the introduction, chapter 2 provides an analysis of flood The study was initiated at the request of the Govern- risks facing Dhaka city. Chapter 3 provides an historical ment of Bangladesh, and has been prepared in close analysis of flood management interventions and the collaboration with RAJUK, Dhaka’s North and South City sequence in which they occurred. The analysis reveals how Corporations, DWASA, and BWDB. Extensive fieldwork, data decisions about flood vulnerability shaped urbanization collection, and consultations with government and other and options available at present for addressing flood risk. stakeholders were undertaken as part of this study. Three Chapter 4 assesses the institutional and organizational consultation workshops were organized during the course capacity for urban planning and flood risk management. of preparation—among them a workshop on international Chapter 5 presents recommendations for strengthening experiences with eco-engineering approaches to flood risk flood risk in the city. • management and another to develop options for flood risk management. In May 2016, a stakeholder consulta- tion was organized to discuss preliminary findings from the study chaired by the Mayor, DNCC. Participants in 15. A detailed review has also been prepared and is available upon request. 2 · Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 13 T o set the stage, it is important to understand the (UN-Habitat 2008/2009, cited in Alam [2014]). Between 1997 patterns of urbanization and land use in Dhaka, as and 2014, slum populations increased by 60 percent (BBS well as the hydrological and physical characteristics 2014). The increase in the populations of slum settlements that affect flood risks in the city. This chapter addresses (bastees) can be traced to rural-urban migration and to the these issues, examining factors contributing to flooding. rising cost of housing in Dhaka. Migration for economic The chapter also highlights areas that are more or less reasons is the biggest factor, however 8 percent of slum vulnerable to flood risk currently and over the long term. dwellers indicated river flooding and erosion, and natural Many different terms have come to define Dhaka. How we disasters as their primary reasons for migration. Accord- use these terms in this report, is clarified in box 2.1 and ing to some estimates, almost 34,000 people inhabit further illustrated in figure 2.1 . each square kilometer of the city, yielding a population density that is among the highest in the world (Dasgupta et al. 2015). Historically, urbanization has occurred from Demographic changes south to north, with the city expanding gradually from the banks of the Buriganga northwards and eastwards While largely rural, Bangladesh is rapidly urbanizing, with (figure 2.2). 34.3 percent of its population residing in urban areas (World Bank 2015). This is expected to rise to an estimated 55.7 percent by 2050 (UN Urbanization Prospects 2014). River systems The single-largest urban area in the country, Dhaka, accounts for 32 percent of the country’s population, and Bangladesh is located in a vast deltaic plain at the con- with an estimated growth rate of 3.4 percent (World Bank fluence of the Brahmaputra, Ganga, and Meghna basins 2015). Dhaka alone contributes about 34 percent of the and their tributaries. The country is divided into eight hy- country’s gross domestic product (GDP), indicating the drological regions of varying natural features that reflect economic importance of the city. the geohydrological and morphological influence of their basins. The North Central region in which Greater Dhaka Since the 1950s, the population within the Dhaka Met- lies is defined by the Jamuna (Brahmaputra), Old Brah- ropolitan Area (DMA) has steadily increased; it is one of maputra, Padma, and Meghna rivers. The river system is the fastest-growing megacities in the world (table 2.1). interconnected and interdependent, with the rivers being Between 2001 and 2015, its population rose from 10 million both a source of flooding from overbank spillage during to 17.6 million and is expected to reach over 27 million by periods of high discharge and a restriction on the outflow 2030 (Ahmed 2014; World Bank 2012; UN-Habitat 2010, UN of drainage water to the Meghna River during dry periods. Urbanization Prospects 2014). A defining feature of the metropolis is the intricately There are about 3,394 slum areas with approximately woven network of rivers and canals that crisscross Greater 176,000 households in Dhaka North and South (BBS 2014). Dhaka. This forms the ecological and hydrological back- The Human Development Report: Urbanization Challenges bone of the city and its natural drainage system. Dhaka and Opportunities 201416 estimates that approximately 40 is immediately surrounded by the Turag-Buriganga river percent of Dhaka’s population live in slums, and about 60 system to the west, the Balu and Shitalakhya rivers to the percent of city residents are prone to frequent flooding east, and the Tongi khal (canal) to the north (figure 2.3) and (table 2.2). Because these waterways are distributar- 16. Mahbub ul Haq Human Development Center 2014. ies of the Brahmaputra, water levels and rainfall runoff 14 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka FIGURE 2.1. GRO W TH O F TH E DH AKA M E TROPOL I TAN AR EA AND ENVI R ONS Source: Study team, based on RAJUK data. Note: The blue-tinted areas are outside the Dhaka Metropolitan Area but still covered by the Detailed Area Plan. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 15 BOX 2.1. The Dhaka Metropolitan Area and Greater Dhaka This report uses the term Dhaka Metropolitan Area (DMA) to refer to the inner 350 square kilo- meters (sq km) of the city. The term “Greater Dhaka” is used to refer to the broader area defined in Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha’s (RAJUK’s) Dhaka Metropolitan Development Plan (DMDP) and Detailed Area Plan (DAP). Greater Dhaka includes the outer area of the city, which consists of a mixture of rural and urban landscapes interlaced with wetlands and rivers. It covers approx- imately 1,528 sq km. Specific areas of the city mentioned in the report are: • Low-lying areas, referred to as Dhaka-Narayanganj-Demra (DND, approximately 57 sq km) • Dhaka East (approximately 121 sq km) • Dhaka West (approximately 143 sq km) • Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC) • Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC) Dhaka East and Dhaka West are roughly divided by the Mymensingh–Dhaka Highway, which runs north to south. The DAP/DMDP area also includes the partial township areas of Narayan- ganj, Savar, Gazipur, and Tongi. The boundaries of DNCC and DSCC are not fixed (they changed during the course of writing this report, with new wards coming under their oversight). As such, the demarcations and area cov- erage indicated here should be considered not as fixed boundaries but as close approximations. Source: Study team. 16 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka TABLE 2.1. H I STORI CA L POPULATI ON G ROWTH IN DH A KA , 1 6 0 8–201 1 Area YEAR Periods Population (square kilometers) 1608 Pre-Mughal 30,000 2 1700 Mughal 900,000 40 1800 British 200,000 4.5 1867 British 51,636 10 1872 British 69,212 20 1881 British 80,358 20 1891 British 83,358 20 1901 British 104,385 20 1931 British 161,922 20 1941 British 239,728 25 1951 Pakistan 411,279 85 1961 Pakistan 718,766 125 1974 Bangladesh 2,068,353 336 1981 Bangladesh 3,440,147 510 1991 Bangladesh 6,887,459 1,353 2001 Bangladesh 10,712,206 1,528 More than 2011 Bangladesh 1,528 14 million Source: Taylor 1840; BBS 1977, 1997, 2001; and table drawn from Hossain (2008) and then adapted to add 2011 figures based on BBS (2012). 2.2. C TABLE TABLE 2.2. CH RISTICS H ARACTE ARACTERIS OF TICS O THE F TH RIVERS E RIVER OF GR S OF EATER GREAT D HAKA ER DHAK A Length Length Width Width River River Tidal Tidal effect effect Slope Slope Embankment Embankment (Km) (Km) (Meters) (Meters) Buriganga Buriganga 29 29 302 302 Yes Yes 1 1 cm/km cm/km 5.75 km 5.75 (on left km (on bank) left bank) Turag Turag 70 70 82 82 No No 2 2 cm/km cm/km 12.5 km 12.5 (left bank) km (left bank) Tongi Khal Tongi Khal 15 15 55 55 -- No No Balu Balu 44 44 79 79 Yes Yes -- No No Shitalakhya Shitalakhya 108 108 228 228 Yes Yes -- 1.4 km 1.4 km Source: CEGIS Source: 2016. CEGIS 2016. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 17 TABLE 2.3. PE AK F LO O D LE V E LS (m PW D) IN DHAK A’S R IVER S D U R IN G F O UR FLO O D Y E ARS Peak flood level in major flood years Station 1988 1998 2004 2007 Tongi (Tongi Khal) 7.84 7.54 7.13 6.87 Mirpur (Turag River) 8.35 7.97 7.29 6.62 Mill Barak 7.58 7.24 6.68 6.01 (Buriganga River) Demra (Balu River) 7.09 6.97 6.98 6.27 Source: CEGIS estimate based on NWRD data. in the broader basin also affect the drainage system in Monsoonal rain and intense the city. The depressions, channels, wetlands, and other short-duration rainfall low-lying areas within Greater Dhaka serve as retaining basins for the overflow of rivers and storm water. Like the rest of Bangladesh, Dhaka receives more than 70 percent of its annual rainfall during the monsoon months Over the past few decades, high population growth, un- that extend from June to September (figure 2.4).Histor- planned urbanization, the encroachment of waterways ical rainfall patterns in Dhaka (1961–2013) show that the and canals, dumping of untreated sewage and industrial highest rainfall (about 375 millimeters, mm) occurs in July effluents, and poor pollution control have worsened the (figure 2.5).Dhaka is also exposed to precipitation in the conveyance capacity, navigability, and water quality of pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Average annual rainfall the river system. Many of the khals, lakes, and canals that in the city is about 2,050 mm, somewhat less than the had been connected with peripheral waterways have ei- country average of approximately 2,300 mm. But rainfall ther been closed or disconnected through encroachment varies from year to year, and, as would be expected, higher or other physical interventions. Other morphological rainfall increases the risk of flooding. and anthropogenic changes to the wider river system have also contributed to gradual sedimentation in the Although monthly rainfall averages provide some sense Buriganga, Turag, Balu, and Shitalakhya rivers, resulting of urban flood risk, more important are heavy downpours in reduced conveyance capacity and limited flow during of the sort that brought the city to a grinding halt in July the dry season. As such, pollution of the river water has 2009, when about 333 mm of rain fell over a 24-hour peri- become a chronic ecological problem. Pollution, drainage od—the highest in 53 years.17 Some 250 pumps had to be congestion, and poor water quality now pose a serious deployed to drain out the water. On September 13, 2004, threat to public health and local ecosystems. They also 151 mm of rain fell, with 334 mm more on the following impose costs and enhance unsustainable use of ground- day, both deviating from the daily norm for the period water. 1961–1990 (figure 2.5).The excessive rainfall was the major cause of flooding that month. Such short-duration High river stages usually occur in July, August, and Sep- rainfalls contribute to waterlogging (or urban flood- tember and are triggered by the monsoon rainfall in the ing), aggravated by the city’s limited drainage capacity upper catchments of the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna rivers. 17. http://www.independent-bangladesh.com/environ- ment-news/cloud-burst-breaks-53year-record.html. FIGURE 2.2. U RB AN E XPAN S IO N O F DH AKA, 1 600–2002 River Urbanized area 1 6 00 17 50 1850 1960 1 980 1 990 2002 FIGURE 2.3. MAJO R RIV E R S Y S TE M S ARO UND D HAK A Source: Study team. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 19 FIGURE 2.4. AVER AGE MONT HLY T OTAL R AI NFAL L I N D HAK A, 1 961 –201 3 JA N FEB MAR APR M AY JUN JUL A UG SEP OCT N OV DEC 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 TOTAL RAINFALL (mm) AVE R AG E M O NT HLY T O TAL R AINFAL L (m m ) Source: Study team, based on BMD data. FIGURE 2.5. TEMPOR AL VAR I AT I ON OF R AI NFAL L DUR I NG JULY– S E PT EMBER 2004 I N DHAK A 400 350 300 RA IN FAL L ( mm ) 250 200 150 100 50 0 1 jul 11 jul 21 jul 31 jul 10 aug 20 aug 30 aug 9 sep 19 sep 29 sep Source: Study team, based on BMD data. 20 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka (Dasgupta et al. 2015). High water in the surrounding river disappeared entirely (Faisal, Kabir, and Nishat 1999; see system can further obstruct and delay the discharge of also Hasnat 2006). In central Dhaka, approximately 66 kms rainwater. The coincidence of extreme local rainfall events of khals and 80 kms of storm water drains were impaired and high river stages poses the greatest flood risk. (Huq and Alam 2003; Dasgupta et al. 2015). The 2004 flood event was another catastrophe for the city, Major flood events and affecting nearly 5 million people. The city received almost underlying factors 315 mm of rainfall over a 24-hour period. Residents faced a severe shortage of drinking water, and the sewerage Dhaka has experienced major floods regularly including system failed across a wide area. While the duration of in 1954, 1955, 1962, 1966, 1974, 1987, 1988, 1998, 2004, and the 2004 floods was shorter than that of the 1988 and 1998 2009. Historically, the key factors behind flooding are high floods, it took longer for the water to drain out. Of the water in the surrounding rivers and heavy rainfall during city’s 22 thanas, 18 were inundated (Dasgupta et al. 2015). the monsoon season (Faisal, Kabir, and Nishat 1999). While the eastern part of the city was most affected, Among the most severe events were the 1988 and the 1998 many parts of Dhaka West also endured waterlogging floods. The 1988 floods stemmed chiefly from excessive (figure 2.6). transboundary inflow from the surrounding rivers. (Dhaka received less than average rainfall during these floods.) The 2009 flood resulted from an erratic rainfall pattern. At that time, there was no flood protection embankment Although the year’s monsoons involved 20 percent less on the western side of Dhaka, and 85 percent of the area rainfall than normal (Flood report 2009), higher-than-nor- within Dhaka City was inundated (World Bank 2003). The mal rainfall on July 26–27 (76.57 mm and 324.75 mm) 1988 floods peaked early and lasted for about three weeks, caused an unprecedented flood. Even though the water setting records for some of the highest water levels level of the surrounding five rivers was below the danger (table 2.3).18 levels, excessive rainfall within a short duration, com- bined with an inadequate drainage system, caused the Unlike the 1988 floods, the 1998 flood resulted from very city’s inundation (CEGIS 2009). high rainfall in the entire catchment area (43 percent more rainfall in July and 67 percent more in August than the averages for those months), coinciding with spring tide Topography, soil, in the bay. The 1998 flood lasted more than two months, the longest in the city’s history. Most of eastern Dhaka and land use was extensively flooded, and 20 percent of the western Dhaka has an elevation of between 0.8 and 14 meters part of the city, which had already been embanked at (Ahmed and Bramley 2015). Most of the built-up area, the time, was also flooded, showing that despite flood particularly Dhaka West, has an elevation of 6–8 meters embankment in the west, the flooding problem had not (figure 2.7). Agriculture is still a viable source of living in Greater Dhaka (figure 2.8). Parts of Dhaka and surrounding 18. There are four metering stations in Greater Dhaka that areas are spread over the old Meghna estuarine floodplain have recorded water levels since 1981: (i) Dhaka (Mill (11 percent), Jamuna floodplains (22 percent), and the old Barak) station on the Buriganga, (ii) Demra station on the Balu, (iii) Mirpur station on the Turag, and (iv) Tongi Brahmaputra floodplain (8 percent). The rest (59 percent) station on the Tongi khal. lies on the terraces of the Madhupur Tract, which consist 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 21 FIGURE 2.6. A RE AS V ULN E RABLE TO FLO O DI NG, AS SEEN I N 2004 Source: Sudy team. 22 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka FIGURE 2.7. EL E VATIO N O F DH AKA AN D S U RR OUND I NG AR EAS Source: CEGIS, based on data collected from Bangladesh Agriculture Research Council. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 23 FIGURE 2.8. AG RO -E CO LO G ICAL RE G IO N S I N GR EAT ER DHAK A Source: CEGIS, 2016 (based on data collected from Bangladesh Agriculture Research Council). 24 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka FIGURE 2.9. SO IL TE XTURE M AP O F G RE AT ER DHAK A Source: CEGIS, 2016 (based on data collected from Bangladesh Agriculture Research Council). 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 25 mainly of red clay soil mixed with silt (Hossain 2001). With- Other recent analysis based on Landsat images from 1960 in Greater Dhaka, four layers of soil are visible: clay loam to 2014 confirms that urban wetlands and water bodies (43.2 percent), silty loam (40.8 percent), silty clay loam (10.7 that are a vital part of Dhaka’s ecosystem have steadily percent), and sandy clay loam (5.3 percent) (figure 2.9). The declined (table 2.4).19 While built-up area has increased, metropolitan area has a mixture of mostly clay and silty cultivated area, water bodies, and urban wetlands have soils. In the low-lying Dhaka-Narayanganj-Derma (DND) all steadily diminished. The analysis shows that approx- area, the soil is a combination of silty clay loam and silty imately 8,888 hectares of the urbanized area in Dhaka in loam, which can be characterized as largely impervious. The 2000 had been cultivated areas, wet/lowlands, or water imperviousness of much of the Dhaka region’s soil contrib- bodies (Uddin et al. 2014). Further, during 2000–14 and utes to flood hazards. Most rainwater infiltrates unpaved 1960–2014, 7,399 and 16,287 hectares, respectively, of the areas when precipitation starts, but once the soil is satu- newly urbanized areas were developed by converting rated rainwater no longer sinks in but runs off and causes cultivated area, vegetation, water bodies, and wet/low- ponding in low-lying areas. lands.In the DND area, where there has been substantial urbanization, there has also been a substantial decline in Land use is an important determinant of the patterns and wetland and agricultural area (table 2.5). pathways of flooding. It affects the infiltration capacity of the soil, the transitory storage capacity of wetlands A significant number of natural channels and wetlands and depressions, and the conveyance capacity of rivers that help Dhaka cope with storm water have been filled and khals. Land development and urbanization shrink in and restricted owing to accumulations of solid waste, natural storage areas and aggravate the imperviousness particularly in slum areas where wastes are frequent- of the soil, thus slowing storm runoff during flood peaks ly thrown into nearby canals. Uncollected solid waste and making waterlogging a common phenomenon in the often clogs storm water drains and manholes, slowing rainy season. Urban growth over the past decades has led the evacuation of rainwater from the affected areas and to a considerable increase of impervious surfaces and a causing localized flooding. Greater Dhaka’s khals have reduction of the natural drainage system (Dewan and Ya- deteriorated owing to the dumping of solid waste, the maguchi 2009; Sultana, Islam, and Islam 2009; Ahmed et al. encroachment of development, and poor maintenance. 2012; Dewan 2013), aggravated by the city’s aging drainage Currently, only 26 of 43 khals in the city are in a functional infrastructure (Dasgupta et al. 2015). state.20 Analysis of Landsat satellite images shows a gradual The decline of urban khals and wetlands has import- reduction of natural water-retaining areas and an expan- ant implications beyond flood risk management. Since sion of built-up area (CEGIS 2012). Between 1967 and 2010, wetlands play an important role in carbon sequestration, settled areas of Greater Dhaka increased from 37 percent their decline also has a bearing on mitigating the effects to 47 percent and were accompanied by a significant of climate change. Further, given Dhaka’s vulnerability shrinkage of wetlands (figure 2.10). With ongoing land- to seismic risks, the decline of wetlands and associated filling and development, the villages at the periphery of Greater Dhaka are slowly morphing into urban built-up 19. http://www.banglajol.info/index.php/JESNR/article/ areas, and many rural settlers are gradually leaving their view/22217. home ground. 20. Poor waste management also impedes effective flood modeling in Dhaka because the presence of unpredictable impediments compromises the accuracy of the mathemati- cal model used to compute drainage rates. FIGURE 2.10. H IS TO RICAL CH AN G E S IN LA ND USE F R OM 19 67 TO 2 0 10 , DE RIV E D FRO M LA NDSAT 5 T M Source: CEGIS 2012. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 27 landfilling is alarming as the filled lands are highly prone to liquefaction21 effects (Mowla and Islam 2013). Decline of groundwater levels in Dhaka Most of Dhaka’s drinking water comes from groundwater. Estimates vary from approximately 87 percent (Sumon and Abdul Kalam 2014) to about 78 percent (DWASA 2015a). Approximately 546 deep tube wells operate across the city. According to a study by the Groundwater Monitoring Sur- vey Report of the Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and Institute of Water Modeling, the ground- water level of Dhaka city is declining by about three meters each year. Between 1996 and 2009, groundwater lev- els of the deep aquifers regressed from about 27.6 meters to about 67 meters. Tube wells are drilled at increasingly deep levels, as 15 percent of existing tube wells become de- funct each year (Sumon and Abdul Kalam 2014). In the dry season, the city faces serious water shortages. The decline of green spaces has also cut recharge capacity. Supporting measures such as the protection of green spaces and rain- water harvesting can help meet rising demand for water and slow the decline of groundwater resources. Impact of climate vulnerability on flood hazards in Dhaka According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5 2014), the frequency and intensity of extreme events is likely to increase with climate change.22 21. Liquefaction refers to a process under which soil under certain conditions, such as earthquakes, exhibits the characteristics of liquids. Landfilling is understood as in- creasing Dhaka’s exposure to seismic risk. Impacts include collapsing of buildings and infrastructure. See http://lib. buet.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/463/ Full%20%20Thesis.pdf?sequence=1. 22. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-Inte- 28 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka 2.4. T TABLE TABLE 2.4. TRRE EN DS IN NDS LAND IN LAN D US USEE IN IN DH AKA, 1 DHAKA, 960–2014 1960–201 4 L LA ND AN D-US -US E E 1960 1960 2000 2000 1960–2000 1960–2000 % of % of 2014 2014 2000–14 2000–14 % of % of 1960–2014 1960–2014 % of % of Area Area Area Area Changed Changed Changed Changed Area Area Changed Changed Changed Changed Changed Changed Changed Changed CATEGOR C IES ATEGORIES (ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) Area (ha) Area (ha) Area Area (ha) (ha) Area Area (ha) (ha) Area Area Area (ha) Area (ha) Area Area Built-up Built-up 7,742 7,742 16,630 16,630 8,888 8,888 114.80 114.80 24,029 24,029 7,399 7,399 44.49 44.49 16,287 16,287 210.37 210.37 Cultivated Cultivated 13,404 13,404 10,395 10,395 -3009 -3009 -22.45 -22.45 8,050 8,050 -2,345 -2,345 -22.56 -22.56 -5,354 -5,354 -39.94 -39.94 Vegetation Vegetation 7,615 7,615 5,418 5,418 -2,197 -2,197 -28.85 -28.85 2,589 2,589 -2,829 -2,829 -52.21 -52.21 -5,026 -5,026 -66.00 -66.00 Water bodies Water bodies 3,725 3,725 3,196 3,196 -529 -529 -14.20 -14.20 2,068 2,068 -1128 -1128 -35.29 -35.29 -1,657 -1,657 -44.48 -44.48 Wet/ Wet/ 8,982 8,982 5,829 5,829 -3,153 -3,153 -35.10 -35.10 4,732 4,732 -1097 -1097 -18.82 -18.82 -4,250 -4,250 -47.32 -47.32 lowlands lowlands Source: Uddin Source: et. al. Uddin et. 2014. al. 2014. Note: ha Note: = hectares. ha = hectares. TABLE 2.5. C H AN G E S IN LAN D US E IN LO W-LYI NG AR EAS, 1 967 –201 0 (HECTAR ES) Agricultural land, Settlement and urban Year Permanent wetlands vegetation, fallow, development area or bare land 1967 251 2,780 3,022 1977 541 2,772 2,741 1989 322 2,853 2,879 1999 232 3,904 1,918 2010 70 4,157 1,827 Source: CEGIS 2012. Note: Data are for the Dhaka-Narayanganj-Derma (DND) area. All models under all scenarios project an increase in mean analysis indicates that the Ganga, Meghna, and Brahma- and extreme precipitation within the South Asian mon- putra basins are likely to experience erratic rainfall for the soon system.23 The frequency of extreme precipitation is rest of the century due to climate change. Average mon- on the rise, whereas mild rain events are decreasing.24 In soon flows are expected to increase 13.6 percent by 2050 Asia, this is expected to contribute to increased riverine, under the high-emissions scenario (a1f1). The water level coastal, and urban flooding, and widespread damage of the peripheral rivers around Dhaka is also expected to to infrastructure, livelihoods, and settlements. Using rise under this scenario compared with 2004 (figure 2.11). scenarios from the IPCC 4th assessment report (A1Fl and Frequency analysis of rainfall data showed that the B125), Dasgupta et al. (2015) reached similar findings. Their return period of intense rainfall events is decreasing (figure 2.12), implying that, with climate change, extreme events are occurring more frequently than they did histor- grationBrochure_FINAL.pdf ; http://cdkn.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/04/CDKN-IPCC-Whats-in-it-for-South-Asia- ically (Dasgupta et al. 2015: 213). AR5.pdf. 23. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WGIIAR5-PARTB_ FINAL.pdf. 24. Ibid. 25. A1Fl: IPPC scenario with future based on fossil-fuel-inten- sive development; B1: IPPC scenario with future based on combined with a globally coherent approach to more a high level of environmental and social consciousness sustainable development. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 29 However, despite increased rainfall and higher river levels, Flood vulnerability the Dasgupta et al. (2015: 200) study suggests that the and poverty area of Greater Dhaka that is prone to flooding under future climate scenarios will shrink. The main reason is With an estimated 300,000–400,000 people migrating to that the study assumes that land levels will continue to Dhaka each year from rural areas, and the conversion rise with ongoing landfilling and also suggests that this of agricultural and wetland areas, Dhaka has developed should be accelerated to manage future flooding.26 With some 3,394 slum settlements, or bastees (RBS 2014). As pre- planned investments, the analysis shows that the city viously noted, about 40 percent of the city’s population will be able to manage medium rainfall events (200–250 resides in slum areas. More than 90 percent of the poor mm/day), but additional investments in drainage will be lack secure tenure of their homes, but a large percentage needed to manage events exceeding 300 mm/day. Despite (approximately 80 percent) pay rent. figure 2.13 shows this, some areas, the study suggests, such as the low-ly- the prevalence of slum areas within Greater Dhaka and ing DND area, will be more vulnerable than they are now. the area prone to flooding based on 2004 floods. Some For example, with a 16 percent increase in rainfall in 2050, areas, such as Mohammadpur, Kamrangir Char, Rampura, flooding in the DND area would increase by about 12 per- and Khilgaon are among the worst affected owing to lim- cent, while other areas would experience no more than a ited or poor drainage. Not all slum areas are prone to flood 3 percent increase. (Dasgupta et al. 2015: 160). It is to be inundation due to moderate floods (such as, for instance, noted that during the flood of 2004, almost 17.5 percent of Korail, as it is located on relatively higher land). Floods in Dhaka West and 94.2 percent of Dhaka East were inundat- dense, poorly serviced settlements can breed water-borne ed. Interestingly, Dasgupta et. al. (2015: 200) found that by diseases, such as diarrhea, cholera, dysentery, and ty- 2050, with planned and additional investments, including phoid—in addition to other hazards. During floods, water an increase in land levels from urbanization, flooding in supplies are at risk of becoming contaminated, as poorly both western and eastern Dhaka would decrease. The maintained pipes in slum areas are likely to be damaged study makes various assumptions that should be pointed or leak. Most of the people living in the DND area belong to out. It assumes that Dhaka East will be embanked along lower-income groups and are vulnerable to waterlogging. the right bank of the Balu River, though it remains un- certain that this will actually occur. In assessing future Overlaying slum areas and critical assets with flood vul- flood impact, the study also assumes that improvements nerable areas also indicates areas that could reasonably identified in RAJUK’s Detailed Area Plan (DAP 2010–15) will be targeted by efforts to reduce poverty, flood vulnerabil- be implemented (Dasgupta et al. 2015: 31). However, the ity, and provide urban services (see figures 2.13 and 2.14). DAP expired in 2015, was extended until December 2016, figure 2.13 shows that are slums are located in areas that and a new one is being prepared that may have different are prone to flooding and inundataion but also in areas implications for future flood risk. that are embanked and less exposed to riverine flooding. These latter slum areas face rainfall induced water logging resulting from the congested drainage system. The slums that fall within the flooded zone lie primarily in two loca- tions. One is adjacent to the Balu river on the eastern side 26. This recommendation is questionable because, as indi- which is not embankment. The other is a pocket towards cated in chapter 4 of this report, landfilling is ongoing the north-western side which primarily falls within the in Dhaka with little oversight, often without clearances Ashulia depression zone. These area experiences a com- and adherence to existing laws by both public and private sector entities. bination of both riverine and rainfall induced flooding on 30 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka a regular basis. figure 2.14 illustrates key assets (edu- cational institutions, industries) exposed to flooding. It shows that even flood control structures are in a vulner- able state due to various anthropogenic factors such as unplanned settlements, limited solid waste collection that clog up both natural and constructed drainage during flood events. • 2.11 FIGURE 2.11. FOR ECAST ED CHANGES I N PEAK R I VER L EVEL S AR OUND DHAK A DUE T O CL I MAT E CHANGE: T WO SCENA RI O S PUBAIL MIRPUR B A S E S C E NAR IO 2 0 5 0 A 1F 1 M I LL BARRACK DEMRA 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 M E TE R S ( P WD ) Source: Dasgupta et al. 2015. FIGURE 2.12. CHANGES I N R ET UR N PER I ODS OF DAI LY 2. 12 R AI NFAL L EVENT S AT BWDB D HAK A STAT I ON 1000 500 100 RETORN PERIOD (YEARS) 50 UP T0 1999 (JICA 2 000) UP TO 2009 25 10 5 2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 ONE DAY RAIN FALL (MM/DAY) Source: Dasgupta et al. 2015. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 31 FIGURE 2.13. S LUM S AN D ARE AS V ULN E RA BL E T O FLOOD I NG Source: CEGIS 2016. 32 • 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka FIGURE 2.14. K E Y AS S E TS V ULN E RABLE TO FLOOD I NG Source: CEGIS 2016. 2. Understanding Flood Risk in Greater Dhaka • 33 SUMMARY • Rapid Increase in urban population. Dhaka’s population is increasing rapidly, in part owing to rapid rural- urban migration. • Climatic and nonclimatic factors related to flooding. Several weather-related factors contribute to flooding in Dhaka, including increased inflow from upstream rivers, intense rainfall, and increases in water levels from surrounding rivers. With climate change, all three factors are expected to grow in importance. Investments in solid- waste management and drain maintenance measures are also needed to manage urban waterlogging. • Decline of urban wetlands. Satellite imagery reveals a steady decline in Dhaka’s water bodies and wetlands and an increase in built-up areas. • Decline of groundwater resources. Urban water supply is largely based on groundwater resources resulting in rapid depletion of this resource. • Areas vulnerable to flooding. Based on data from past extreme events, the areas most vulnerable to flooding are Dhaka East and the low-lying DND area. However, Dhaka West continues to experience urban flooding because of drainage congestion. • Different types of hazards affect different areas of the city. Because the waterways in Dhaka West are embanked, the area is chiefly vulnerable to intense rainfall resulting in waterlogging. The DND area is embanked from all sides, has limited drainage, and is also mainly affected by intense rain, resulting in waterlogging. Dhaka East is not embanked and hence vulnerable to both river flooding and intense rainfall. Thus the solutions for addressing flood risk need to be tailored to each area. • Poverty and flood vulnerability. There are more than 3,300 slum settlements (bastees) in Dhaka. Some of the slum settlements most prone to flooding are Mohammadpur, Kamrangir Char, Rampura, and Khilgaon—all high-priority areas for a poverty-focused urban resilience strategy. tive 3 · Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective 36 • 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective • 37 Perspective Development Board. In 1964, the International Engineer- Bangladesh has long-standing experience in addressing ing Company Ltd. (IEC) commissioned by the EPWPDA, flood risk in the greater Dhaka area. An understanding prepared a master plan that proposed large-scale flood of this history, evolution of flood management efforts, control, drainage, and irrigation programs for the country and the sequence in which they occurred is important for (World Bank 1989; Dewan et al. 2003). This master plan for understanding how the city arrived at its current predica- water resources development marks the beginning of ef- ment, identifying actions that can be taken to reduce risk forts to develop an integrated plan for flood control and at present and providing options for what could be done water resources development for the country. The plan in the future. Flood risk mitigation in Dhaka is closely was based on the experience gained with flood protec- linked with flood management efforts at the national tion in the Mississippi River and included infrastructure level. As such, this chapter starts with an analysis of na- such as flood embankments with gravity drainage, sluice tional-level initiatives followed by public sector responses gates, and pump drainage (Dewan et al. 2003). However, to flood management (both structural and nonstructural) the chief focus of the Krug mission was to increase agri- in Dhaka city, and the complexity of the current scenario. cultural production. The plan did not deliver the desired The chapter shows the drivers of public sector response, benefits because the infrastructure it promoted suffered the types of solutions the city has prioritized, and pro- from poor maintenance and delays in implementation vides a rationale for why a eco-engineering approach is (Dewan et al. 2003). important for a megacity such as Dhaka. The 1954 and 1955 floods contributed to identification and genesis of the first major flood control project in the Early efforts: Flood events Dhaka area, specifically in the Dhaka-Narayanganj-Dem- in the 1950s and the ra (DND) area. In the 1950s and 1960s, in what comprises the major portion of Dhaka today, there was little de- national public velopment in the region. In the DND area, flood control sector response measures were initiated in 1962. DND was a low-lying rural area of about 60 square kilometers (sq km) and important Until the early 1950s, flood management in Bangladesh from an agricultural perspective. Given its location close was not a national government priority. However, in 1954 to the Sitalakhya River, it was highly prone to flooding. and 1955, Bangladesh faced devastating floods. These Since it was an agriculturally important area, it was select- caused severe damage to life and resources, affecting ed for physical interventions and embanked on all sides to around 35–40 percent of the country. The government sustain agricultural production. of what was then East Pakistan sought the help of the United Nations to confront the enormous problem of The DND project implemented by the EWAPDA, initiated flooding, protect agricultural lands, and attain self-suf- in response to the 1950s floods, was one of the first flood ficiency in food production. The importance of flood management projects in the greater Dhaka area. It was control for agricultural production was recognized from implemented during 1962–68 as a flood control, drainage, the outset. The Krug Mission, headed by J. A. Krug, a and irrigation (FCDI) project primarily to protect Dhaka former U.S. Interior Secretary, was organized in 1955. city and the town of Narayanganj from floods and to As a result of its recommendations, the East Pakistan save croplands from overflowing rivers. Initial physical Water and Power Development Authority (EPWPDA) was works that had a bearing on flood risk management formed in 1959, now known as the Bangladesh Water were introduced primarily for irrigation purposes and 38 • 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective to enhance agricultural production. A flood wall and other users—industry, transport, and fisheries. The NWP, embankment along the trunk road surround most of the initiated under the Master Plan Organization (MPO), area and provide protection from fluvial flooding. continued the emphasis on minor irrigation schemes in the short term but also focused on managing rivers using Through the early 1970s, the focus of most of the coun- barrages and other infrastructure (World Bank 1989). The try’s water-sector development schemes was almost NWP proposed raising the country’s flood-protected area exclusively on achieving national self-sufficiency through from approximately 32 percent to 73 percent by providing increased agricultural production. The emphasis was flood control and drainage facilities over a 20-year period on large schemes that included components for flood (1991–2010). control, drainage, and irrigation. A 1972 World Bank study contributed to a significant shift away from large-scale embankments to minor irrigation schemes, low-lift Major flood events of pumps, and shallow tube wells to improve agricultural production (World Bank 1989; Dewan et al. 2003).27 These the 1980’s and ensuing spread rapidly, but before long conflicts among various public sector response water users surfaced. Low-lift pump irrigation interfered In 1987 and 1988, Bangladesh faced another set of devas- with fishing, and irrigation using shallow tube wells con- tating floods. The flood of 1987 inundated more than 40 flicted with household tube wells. Sustainable flood risk percent of the country. The 1988 flood, considered one mitigation remained elusive. of the most devastating in recorded history, inundated nearly 61 percent of the country. In contrast to the 1987 In 1983, with the help of the World Bank, the Government event, its primary cause was heavy rainfall in the upper of Bangladesh initiated the National Water Plan (NWP, catchments of the basins of the Ganges, the Brahmapu- 1985–2005) with the objective of maximizing agricultur- tra, and the Meghna. The situation became catastrophic al production while meeting the basic water needs of when flooding in all three basins peaked simultaneously. Approximately 85 percent of Dhaka was submerged in up 27. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/2802_multipage.pdf. to 4.5 meters of water; 60 percent of the city’s residents 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective • 39 were affected. Entire eastern sections of Dhaka as well as physical measures to improve the drainage system, such the low-lying areas of the western part were flooded. as improved pumping capacity and dredging of khals, and nonstructural measures, such as flood forecasting and In response to these severe floods, the Flood Action Plan evacuation systems, land regulation, and zoning. FAP 8B, (FAP, 1990–95) was conceived by the country’s develop- conducted by Louis Berger International and funded by ment partners. The effort was to develop a flood plan as a the Asian Development Bank, focused on flood mitigation durable solution to the recurrent flood problems. The FAP and storm water drainage plans for the core city area. emphasized year-round water management, a high degree These studies led to recommendations to construct major of protection for urban areas, the integration of river flood interventions such as the western embankment. management in water development projects, and a com- bination of structural and nonstructural interventions. The extreme events of 1987 and 1988 thus induced the gov- On behalf of the government, the FAP was coordinated by ernment to undertake major flood-control interventions, the Flood Plan Coordination Organization (FPCO), which starting with densely populated Dhaka West. The Dhaka eventually became the Water Resources Planning Organi- Integrated Flood Protection Project (DIFPP) supported zation. flood protection works carried out by the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), notably construction The FAP marked the first time that flood management of the western embankment; drainage improvements for Dhaka was comprehensively addressed. Among the carried out by the Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage 26 studies conducted, two action plans (FAP 8A and 8B) Authority (DWASA); and an environmental improvement focused specifically on addressing flood risk in Dhaka. program carried out by the former Dhaka City Corpora- FAP 8A was conducted by the Japan International Coop- tion (DCC). Among other measures, the project supported eration Agency and covered a cumulative area of 850 sq construction of a 30-km embankment from Tongi to Kellar km focused on the Greater Dhaka area. It consisted of More, a 3.8-km floodwall, a 16.5-km access road from Mir- plans for the broader area covered by the Detailed Area pur to China Friendship Bridge, re-excavation of 30 km of Plan, including the DND area and also Tongi, Savar, and khals, 20 sluice gates, three pump houses (Goranchatbari, Keraniganj on the outskirts (JICA 1991). The plan proposed Kallayanpur, and Dholaikhal), and a 258-hectare water res- 40 • 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective ervoir. Dhaka East, which is bound by the Balu River and this report revealed considerable debate about wheth- encompasses approximately 124 sq km of low-lying area, er the eastern side of Dhaka should be embanked. One was not embanked.28 school of thought is that the embankment is necessary to address flood risks in Dhaka East, while others believe Based on the FAP studies and the NWP, Bangladesh devel- that doing so would result in embanking the city from all oped, in 1995, a Water and Flood Management Strategy sides.29 With intense rainfall events on the rise and lim- that acknowledged the need for integration of various ited constructed drainage in the area, the embankment entities in formulating and implementing flood-disaster of Dhaka East would effectively fully embank the core management policies. A five-year (1995–2000) program was Dhaka area from all sides and trap water inside the Dhaka begun to prepare the National Water Management Plan Metropolitan Area (DMA), requiring increasing resources (NWMP). Of 27 programs designed to benefit the country’s be spent on pumping out the accumulated water and on North Central Region, four exclusively targeted Dhaka’s maintenance of the existing canals, khals, and their con- pressing need for water supply, sanitation, sewerage, nectivity with the surrounding river system. flood protection, and storm water drainage. Of these, two (the Dhaka Flood Protection and Dhaka Storm Water Dhaka’s rapid growth has been accompanied by increases Drainage projects) specifically addressed the problem of in built-up area, which, as noted, have increased runoff flooding (WARPO 2001). rates, impeded infiltration, and aggravated waterlog- ging. These developments have highlighted the need for After Dhaka East was inundated in the 1998 floods, there investments in storm water drainage. Multiple projects were proposals for BWDB to construct flood-control in- have been undertaken by DWASA to mitigate the city’s frastructure along the right bank of the Balu, including drainage problem by providing a drainage system—from a flood embankment, flood wall, and drainage sluices the collection of water at the street level to the disposal (WARPO 2001). However, these were not carried out at the of the accumulated water through pumping stations. time due to the unavailability of funding. In 2004, as noted DWASA recently prepared a Storm Water Drainage Master in chapter 2, the Dhaka area experienced another major Plan based on which large investments in sewerage and flood event, and the eastern side of the metropolitan area drainage improvements are planned. again suffered extensive damage. This provided renewed impetus to address flooding in Dhaka East; ad a feasibility study conducted by Halcrow Group Ltd. in 2006 proposed The current situation in constructing an embankment extending from the Tongi railway bridge to Demra Ghat as well as other infrastruc- major areas of the city ture. However, the project was never implemented, in part Analysis carried out for this study shows that major areas due to difficulty in mobilizing funds (Express 2012). of Dhaka have specific sets of structural constraints. These are shaped by the hydrological and geophysical In 2012, BWDB submitted a fresh development plan to the characteristics of the areas, by the infrastructure that has Ministry of the Water Resources (MOWR) on the Dhaka been put in place historically for flood management, and Integrated Flood Control Embankment (also known as the by the pattern of urbanization that has unfolded. Eastern Bypass Road Multipurpose Project) (Express 2012). However, consultations undertaken during fieldwork for 28. For a review of the FAP, see Brammer (2010). 29. Study team’s communication with DWASA, MD. 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective • 41 THE DHAKA-NA RAYA N GA NJ-D EM RA ( D N D) AR E A The storm water drainage system of Dhaka West in- In the 1960s, the low-lying DND area was primarily ag- cludes khals, storm sewers, and tertiary drains and pipes ricultural. Since then, it has grown into a congested (figure 3.2). Storm water passes into storm sewers urban area, still low lying but now embanked on all sides through tertiary drains and pipes. The storm sewer then (figure 3.1). Because of haphazard and unplanned land carries the water to khals, which ultimately convey it to development, waterlogging frequently occurs during the pumping stations.30 The western embankment has discon- monsoon period, as excess water within the embanked nected the khals and canals in the city from the outer river area cannot pass out into natural channels but must be system (Hossain, Miti Nawshad, and Rahman 2013). pumped out. There is no constructed drainage system in the DND area. A single two-way pumping station at At present, there are several pumping stations operated Shimrail with a discharge capacity of 14.52 cubic meters by BWDB: Goranchat Bari, with a capacity of 25 cumecs; per second (cumec) is operational. But it has proven to be Dholaikhal at Mill Barrak with a capacity of 22 cumecs; inadequate to prevent waterlogging during the monsoon. and pumping stations at Kamalpur and Shimrail. These Pumping capacity needs to be increased. discharge into the Tongi Khal, Turag, and Buriganga riv- ers. The Kallyanpur pumping station (15 cumecs) and a Encroachment by unplanned urbanization and poor main- recently completed station at Rampura are operated by tenance have limited the functioning of the natural khals DWASA. Besides these, temporary pumps are installed at and former irrigation canals that could provide drainage various locations surrounding the western embankment services to the area and require regular maintenance. and floodwalls to drain storm water during the monsoon The link to the external river system is also diminished and other periods of heavy rainfall. Thirty-eight percent and needs to be restored to improve connectivity to the of the DMA has a drainage network operated by DWASA. It peripheral river system. consists of approximately 43 natural canals with a total length of 145 km, about 280 km of storm sewer lines, and 10.5 km of box culverts that drain an area of about 140 sq DHAKA WEST km. In addition to this, the city corporations also maintain The western embankment constructed after the 1988 surface drains within their areas of jurisdiction. Historical- floods usually protects Dhaka West from river flood- ly, Dhaka West possessed drainage channels and low-lying ing—but not always. In the 1998 floods, approximately 20 lands that drained the area naturally. With the encroach- percent of the area was inundated despite the embank- ment of rapid, unplanned urbanization, most of these ment. The floodwall along the Buriganga River was never channels and floodplain pockets have been filled up. Over completed because public pressure prevented removal of the years, land development projects have severed many some structures, such as the Sadarghat inland port (Fais- of the connections between khals and the surrounding al, Kabir, and Nishat 1999). During high tide, flood water rivers, further impeding drainage and contributing to enters Dhaka West through the port and at other places waterlogging. where people have removed some parts of the structures to allow easy movement of water. The sewerage pipes buried under the floodwalls, which carry domestic waste into the river, also allow water to flow back through the pipes into the city. 30. http://www.spatialcapability.com/Library/Liz/Floods_in_a_ Megacity.pdf; http://classes.geology.uiuc.edu/11SprgClass/ ESES222/FAP.pdf. 42 • 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective FIGURE 3.1. T HE DH AKA-N ARAYAN G AN J-DE MR A (D ND ) AR EA Source: Study team 2016. 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective • 43 FIGURE 3.2. EX IS TIN G KHAL S , PUM PIN G S TAT I ONS, A ND W ET L A N DS IN DH AKA W E S T Source: Study team 2016. 44 • 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective DHAK A EAST a 24-hour forecast and a 2–5 day outlook. A separate Dhaka East has no major embankments similar to those in weather forecast for metropolitan Dhaka, valid for six the DND area and Dhaka West. Nor does it have a dedicated hours and updated four times daily, is issued but is not storm water drainage network as in part of Dhaka West. location specific. Location-specific forecasts for quick on- Instead, its drainage system remains for the most part set intense rainfall are not made. Thus, BWDB and DWASA, natural and open. The vast area is drained by numerous the organizations that operate pumps on the western and depressions connected to main drainage channels, through southern sides of the city, do not receive advance warn- which water is discharged into the Tongi Khal and Balu ings that would tell them when to drain the water out rivers (figure 3.3). Although most of Dhaka East is still of the Dhaka West or DND areas. They also do not receive agricultural and rural, the land is slowly being converted to information about the intensity and duration of the rain. residential areas and becoming urbanized in an unplanned way. Land owners tend to develop their lands using unregu- In Dhaka East, where river flooding is the main issue, lated and improper land filling, causing obstructions to the flood forecasts are needed. These are provided by the original drainage system. As a result, Dhaka East is regular- Flood Forecast and Warning Center (FFWC) under the ly flooded during the monsoon months. Hydrology Division of BWDB. BWDB monitors the water levels, river flow, rainfall, and groundwater levels in Greater Dhaka (and also the rest of the country). BWDB’s Investments in urban urban monitoring infrastructure includes water level weather forecasting and monitoring stations in the Buriganga, Turag, Tongikhal, Balu, Shitalakhya, and Dhaleswari rivers that monitor early warning systems water levels five times a day at ten manually operated Early warnings about intense rain and precipitation are stations and two rainfall stations. FFWC has a Digital critical for the management of urban infrastructure, and Elevation Map (DEM) of Dhaka which has a resolution of inform key steps such as preparing pumps to drain water 300 meters. It issues river forecasts for Greater Dhaka at into rivers to avoid waterlogging. Compared with invest- Banish, Dhaleswar, Tongi Khal, Turag, Buriganga, Balu, and ments in infrastructure, investments in urban weather Lakhaya. However, it does not provide location-specific forecasting and early warnings have been historically very forecasts or inundation forecasts for Dhaka East. Assess- limited. At the time of this report’s preparation, the Ban- ments of hazard, vulnerability, and flood risk for the DMA gladesh Meteorology Department (BMD) was operating or Greater Dhaka are not made. Flood maps or flood risk one rainfall monitoring station for the entire city, supple- information services for different uses such as for urban mented by an S-band radar unit obtained with support planning or insurance are also not provided. • from the Japan International Cooperation Agency. The radar has not been calibrated and the automatic weather stations needed to calibrate it are not functional. The unit is also more appropriate for long-range weather events such as cyclones than for short-range events. The BMD presently uses a 20-km resolution to generate weather forecasts. The resulting forecasts indicate whether rain- fall will be heavy, moderate, or light and include warnings for extreme hot or cold temperatures. The public receives 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective • 45 FIGURE 3.3. EX IS TIN G KHAL S , PUM PIN G S TAT I ONS, A N D WET L A N DS IN DH AKA E AS T Source: Study team 2016. 46 • 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective SUMMARY • Major infrastructural interventions from the public sector have come in response to extreme events. Many of the major flood control measures undertaken in Dhaka have been initiated as a reaction to major flood events, not as part of planned urban expansion of the Dhaka area. While these have protected the Dhaka West and DND areas from river flooding, they have also contributed to changing the nature of the hazard that different areas are exposed to. The Dhaka West and DND areas that are embanked are no longer mainly exposed to river floods but to rain-induced water- logging. These infrastructure investments involve a path dependency and imply that the city must make additional investments in pumping infrastructure to pump water out into the peripheral river system in a more effective and efficient manner and also allocate adequate funds to maintain the infrastructure to minimize waterlogging in these areas. In parallel, these areas have also seen a decline of the natural drainage system in the form of canals and inland waterways. 3. Public Sector Responses to Flood Risk: A Historical Perspective • 47 • Experience in the low-lying DND area shows that flood-control infrastructure has itself contributed to the urbanization of the area by encouraging people to settle there even in the absence of an adequate drainage system or provision of urban services. This, combined with proximity to Dhaka and Narayanganj, has helped transform DND from a primarily agricultural to a highly congested urban area. • The construction of embankments in Dhaka West and the DND area, combined with the poor maintenance of rivers and other urban water bodies, have delinked the city’s internal waterways from the peripheral river system. Cut off from their natural connections with the rivers, both the Dhaka West and DND areas now must be drained using a large number of pumps. • The primary solution for addressing waterlogging and managing river flooding in Dhaka has been structural interventions (such as embankments, pumping stations, box culverts, and regulators), with much less attention given to nonstructural measures such as weather and flood forecasting or risk-based information services. 4 · Planning, Political Econo- my, and the Case for Institu- tional Reform 4 · Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 51 T he most complex and difficult challenges in manag- the authority to acquire and use land; raise and lower ing flood risk in the Dhaka Metropolitan Area (DMA) land; demolish and construct buildings; lay out or alter and the Greater Dhaka area are institutional and or- streets, bridges, and culverts; enlarge open areas; provide ganizational. The complexity arises from the multiplicity drainage schemes; and “any other matters consistent with of actors and agencies involved (See Appendix B) and the this Act which the Kartripakkha may think fit” (TIA 1953). political economy issues at play. A wide range of public The Act allows the Kartripakkha to “frame schemes (herein sector agencies are involved either directly or indirectly, called re-housing schemes) for the construction, mainte- often with overlapping mandates. Some are national-lev- nance and management of such and so many dwellings el agencies such as the Bangladesh Water Development and shops as they may consider ought to be provided for Board (BWDB), while others are municipal-level agencies persons of the poorer and working classes who (a) are such as Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK). Moreover, displaced by the execution of any improvement scheme while Dhaka is perceived as a city, in reality only parts of sanctioned under this Act; or (b) are likely to be displaced the city are under municipal management: vast swaths of by the execution of any improvement scheme which it is the area under the jurisdiction of Union Parishads with lit- intended to frame, or to submit to the Government for tle capacity for flood risk management or urban planning. sanction under this Act .” Urban planning is still driven by archaic laws that need urgent revision. This chapter provides insight into some Moreover, it also gives RAJUK power over corporations to of these issues and lays the groundwork for much-needed make final decisions in the case of complaints from the institutional reform. public. As explained later in the chapter, the Act allows RAJUK to play conflicting roles of planner, developer, and regulator with little accountability to the public. As such, The Town Improvement the Act needs to be updated and revised. Act, 1953, and emergence of urban planning Urban planning and the The Town Improvement Act (TIA), 1953, approved over 60 years ago, and amended in 1987, continues to guide urban first Detailed Area Plan31 planning in major urban areas in Bangladesh today. It pro- In the early 1990s, RAJUK began preparing the Dhaka Metro- vided the foundation for the establishment of the Dhaka politan Development Plan (DMDP). The DMDP included the Improvement Trust (DIT) in 1956. Modern city planning Structure Plan, the Urban Area Plan, and the Detailed Area in the Dhaka area began with the DIT and preparation of Plan (DAP). Although not directly focused on disaster or re- the DIT master plan in 1959. The plan covered an area of silience, this three-tiered plan had a direct bearing on flood roughly 570 square kilometers (sq km) (later extended to risk management in the way it addressed land use, water 829 sq km) inhabited by about a million people. In 1987, DIT resources, and flood plains in the Greater Dhaka Area. evolved into the Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK), which remains the main planning agency for Greater The Structure Plan (1995–2015) was a long-term develop- Dhaka. ment strategy for the 1,528 sq km of Greater Dhaka. It The TIA provides the legal basis for the formation of 31. http://cseindia.org/userfiles/RAJUK_Presentation_Au- Kartripakkhas and vests enormous powers in the agency. gust72011.pdf; https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/ Based on this Act, RAJUK and other Kartripakkhas have project-document/77480/39298-013-ban-tacr-01.pdf. 52 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform BOX 4.1 Policies and legislation affecting flood management in Greater Dhaka A large number of policies and regulations, both national and municipal, shape flood risk man- agement and urbanization in Dhaka. The National Housing Policy (1993 and updated in 2008), aims to ensure housing for all, particularly the poor. It articulates the role of the government as one of supplying serviced land at reasonable cost and promoting housing finance. It also aims to reduce encroachment and ensure environmental conservation in new housing con- struction. In the context of Dhaka, the reality of providing housing is particularly challenging. Although several public agencies are active in housing provision, no workable strategy to up- grade slums settlements is in place (Islam 2014). The scarcity of formally serviced land has left the development of the city largely to the in- formal sector. The National Urban Sector Policy (2011) was developed by the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development, and Cooperatives. It addresses numerous aspects of urban development—among them employment, resource mobilization, housing and slum improve- ment, environmental management, infrastructure and services, and rural-urban migration. However, implementation of many of these issues in Dhaka is weak. For example, rural-urban migration is a critical issue in urbanization. Yet there is no strategy or plan to manage it. The National Land Use Policy (2001) highlights the im- portance and modalities of zoning for integrated plan- ning and management of land resources of the country. In Dhaka, implementation is mixed because of vested interests illegally occupying land, a lack of political will, inefficiencies in the way land administration is orga- nized, and absence of a systematic database on land resource availability in the city. The National Water Policy (1991) emphasizes sustainable management of surface and groundwater water resources to ensure a decent standard of living for all and protection of fish- eries and the environment. The policy has not been updated to address climate risks. The Bangladesh Water Act (2013) regulates wa- ter resources management, natural drainage, and flood control. It also prohibits draining of wetlands that support migratory birds. The extent to which its enforcement provisions are implemented is unclear. Various other policies contain provisions to protect and manage wetlands. The Bangladesh Haor and Wetlands Development Board was established in 2000 for the integrated development and protection of wetlands. However, it is more of a policy-making body and plays no implementation role in wetlands management in Greater Dhaka. 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 53 projected urban growth and provided a series of poli- flood-flow zones (but not always clearly demarcated cy guidelines to achieve its objectives (Seraj and Islam as such) continued, undermining the land-use zones 2011).32 The Urban Development Plan (1995–2005) was a proposed in the DAP. Further, the SP and the UP of the medium-term development strategy. While the Structure DMDP allowed “rural” development in the flood-flow and Urban Plan were prepared by 1995, the DAP was not zones, creating ambiguities in implementation (Roy, Ja- completed until 2004.33 Moreover, it was gazetted by the han, and Asaduzzaman 2011). Moreover, enforcement of Government in 2010 and only then had a legal status. the DAP was left to RAJUK and not the city corporations. Produced with the assistance of the United Nations De- Importantly, the DAP was not accompanied with any velopment Programme (UNDP) and United Nations Centre implementation plan or local area plans or zoning laws to for Human Settlements, its purpose was to control land guide enforcement of the DAP at the local level (Rahman use and development and provide guidelines for public 2013: 123). and private investment priorities. The DAP expired in 2015 and was extended until December 2016.34 The DAP applied While DAP was gazetted and had legal status, it was to 350 sq km of Dhaka proper, 1,528 sq km covered by the not accompanied by any zoning policy, ordinances, or DMDP, as well as Savar, Narayangonj, Tongi, and Gazipur. regulations regarding land use or density management. For specific subareas, it provided detailed proposals for The city corporations also did not prepare any zoning infrastructure, roads, services, facilities, and land use. regulations or ordinances to enforce the plan within their With regard to flood management, it emphasized both areas of jurisdiction. Thus enforcement of the DAP has structural measures (embankments, sluice gates, box been extremely challenging. Ordinances specific to each culverts, siphon, drainage canals) and nonstructural mea- zone can serve a variety of purposes, such as managing sures (protection of khals, reexcavation of major khals, housing growth and construction, reaching consensus on demarcation and fencing of retention ponds upstream neighborhood development, streamlining the issuance of of pumping stations, and integration of the drainage construction permits, and protecting people and assets system with other flood protection infrastructure). It also from flooding and other hazards. They can help municipal emphasized public participation in the land-development agencies manage land use and create transitional land- process. use patterns to buffer against incompatible land uses. Zoning plans and ordinances can also help to balance the Implementation of the DMDP faced numerous chal- interests of different social groups and increase climate lenges. First, there was a significant gap between the resilience by managing urban density and patterns of approval of the Structure Plan (SP), Urban Plan (UP) and transportation and growth.35 Further, even though DAP the approval of the DAP in 2010 as a gazetted document. addressed the protection of flood zones and water bodies, During this time, housing construction in the DAP area mechanisms for reducing risks posed by disasters were continued unabated in a haphazard way (Rahman 2013). not mainstreamed in the plan (GOB 2013). DAP has also Second, even after the DAP was gazetted and had legal been critiqued for the fact its preparation and implemen- grounding, housing construction in areas defined as tation involved little public consultation (Farooqe 2012; Rahman 2013;). RAJUK’s plans are sometimes not available to local offices, meaning that many local officials lack 32. http://www.bip.org.bd/SharingFiles/journal_ book/20140427150129.pdf. 33. http://www.slideshare.net/AkhterChaudhury/a-short- hostory-of-urban-planning-in-bangladesh-new?next_slide- 35. http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/GIAWB/Doing%20 show=1. Business/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB15-Chap- 34. Communication with RAJUK officials, October 2016. ters/DB15-CaseStudy-Zoning-Urban-Planning.pdf. 54 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform FIGURE 4.1. ORG AN IZATIO N O F RAJUK Chairman Member Member Member Member Member Admin. & Finance Development Estate & Land Planning Dev. control Director Director Chief Engineer Director Director Plan Admin. Implementation Estate 1 Dev. Control 1 Preparation Director Director Chief engineer Director Director Plan Finance P&D Estate 2 Dev. Control 2 Implementation Director Director Architect Audit Land Director Law Source: RAJUK 2015a awareness of existing zoning and regulation. Finally, the OR G AN I Z AT I O N , B U D G E T, AN D S TAF F DAP was not accompanied by cost estimates for its imple- RAJUK is governed by a chairman appointed by the Ministry mentation. of Housing and Public Works. The chairman is supported by five members responsible for the agency’s five wings RAJUK has prepared a new draft Structure Plan (2016–35) (figure 4.1). under the Regional Development Planning Project funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). It is in the pro- RAJUK is a profit-making organization and earns revenue cess of preparing a new DAP for the period 2016–35. It is through a variety of sources including sale of developed important to ensure that the new DAP and related imple- land, apartments, asset transfer fees, fees for land-use and mentation efforts build on lessons from the past. building construction permits, and fines. In 2014–15, its rev- enue income was about $30.25 million (Bangladeshi Taka, BDT 238 crore36) and expenditures were about $6.74 million The Rajdhani Unnayan (BDT 53 crore), resulting in a surplus of about $23.5 million Kartripakkha (RAJUK) (BDT 184.71 crore); these numbers indicate vast resources and profits (RAJUK, 2015a). RAJUK also receives grants from RAJUK, the main planning agency for Greater Dhaka, is the government. Given its resources, RAJUK generally does situated under the Ministry of Housing and Public Works. not rely upon funds from development partners. Its mandate is to plan, develop, and regulate development within Greater Dhaka (RAJUK 2015a). As discussed below, there is significant conflict of interest in its multiple roles. 36. Using an exchange rate of 1 BDT = $0.013 (January 4, 2017). 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 55 TABLE 4.1. RA JUK’ S FIV E W IN G S AN D TH E IR STAFF ST R ENGT H Administration and 35 395 430 finance Planning 30/91 56 147 Development 45 30 75 Development control 70 105 175 Estate and land 9 112 121 Total 250 698 948 Source: Staff list of RAJUK website. Note: Based on conversation with town planner in October 2016, RAJUK has about 25–30 planners. However, the website shows that there are 91 planners. It is possible that the website is not updated. RAJ UK AS PLA NN ER training in land-use planning, zoning, geographic infor- One of RAJUK’s core mandates is to prepare plans and mation system (GIS) and spatial analysis, and other skills strategies for the development of the Dhaka area and techniques (Seraj and Islam 2011).38 In the absence (figure 4.2). This is undertaken by the planning wing. of these resources, the agency relies heavily on external There are approximately 30 town planners at RAJUK. Some consultants. Discussions with the planning wing revealed of the main tasks undertaken by RAJUK’s planners include limited coordination with local people and communities reviewing and processing requests for land use plans. in the preparation of plans. As was the case of the first Given the vast area for which they are responsible, for a DMPD plan, preparation of the new Structure Plan was population of about 17–18 million people, and the level not carried out by RAJUK’s planners but contracted to a of demand for processing land clearances, staffing is consultancy firm with support from ADB funding. Strong limited.37 in-house planning capacity needs to be built for the planning division to prepare and adjust plans to meet the Urban planners typically must have access to many kinds needs of the local communities. of data—for example, on patterns of population growth, poverty levels, land use, job patterns, demand for various services, urban mobility, and hazards. They must synthe- R AJ U K AS D E V E LOPE R size those data, undertaking consultations in order to RAJUK’s development wing implements the agency’s devel- develop options and strategies for further growth and opment activities, including preparation and estimation development. RAJUK, however, does not have ready access of projects, procurement, supervision of construction, to many of these types of data to inform planning on operation and maintenance (O&M), and so on. Its main a regular basis. Its planners also do not have adequate strength is a cadre of experienced engineers who are 38. http://www.bip.org.bd/SharingFiles/journal_ 37. Personal conversation, Chief Town Planner, RAJUK. book/20140427150129.pdf. 56 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform FIGURE 4.2. M AP O F RAJUK’ S DE TAILE D AREA PL AN, 201 0–1 5 Source: CEGIS 2016. 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 57 capable of handling and supervising construction and RAJUK’s development wing. Through the issue of permits, development projects. site visits, and monitoring of physical establishments, RAJUK also aims to ensure compliance of development ac- RAJUK provides serviced land for housing construction, tivities with the agency’s plans and legal instruments. often acquiring the land from private owners or from local government agencies at artificially low prices. It However, the permitting process is complex and time con- also builds housing even though, under the National suming (Doing Business 2015). RAJUK has not prepared any Housing Policy, government is supposed to limit its role zoning laws to implement and enforce the DAP at the local to maintaining an enabling environment, leaving housing level. Builders must obtain land-use clearance from the construction to private firms or individuals (World Bank planning wing. After publishing their construction plans, 2010).39 The agency’s building activities include excava- they must obtain another clearance, from the develop- tion, filling of land, and construction of roads, culverts, ment wing, before starting construction work. The process and bridges. Some of RAJUK’s developments have purport- is challenging and may take years to complete because of edly violated the agency’s own rules. For example, the lack of zoning ordinances and weaknesses in both wings Purbachal New Town Project required filling in part of the in inspection and reporting, with inspectors potentially floodplain of the Shitalakhya River in violation of existing susceptible to influence (Mahmud 2013: 49). laws and the DMDP (Farooqe 2012). RAJUK is responsible for inspecting buildings and other It is reported that RAJUK often turns developed land over structures in the DAP area. According to discussions with to the city corporations, private individuals, or developers agency officials, the number of building inspectors is not as described later in this chapter, without any drainage sufficient to monitor unauthorized development. The facilities. Because these entities are not involved in city’s eight zones are monitored by two inspection units, planning or implementing drainage facilities in the areas both of which are understaffed. It is unclear, moreover, developed by RAJUK they must do so after the fact, cutting who is empowered to enforce the existing regulations on through existing roads in the developed area. Fieldwork water bodies and floodplains. Overall, the number and ca- suggested that in some cases DWASA is reluctant to pacity of the wing’s personnel are not commensurate with assume responsibility for drainage for newly developed the agency’s requirements for development activities.41 urban areas after the land and road construction has RAJUK’s monitoring activities, such as ensuring compliance already taken place. with existing land-use policies and plans and preventing and reporting illegal landfilling and development that undercuts the flow of water or floods, are often hampered RAJ UK AS R EGULAT O R by the lack of skilled manpower. Given RAJUK’s surplus In its regulatory role, RAJUK exercises control over Dha- in revenues, it is unclear why additional funds are not ka’s growth and development by issuing land-use and allocated to improve planning capacity in the agency or construction permits and overseeing development ac- strengthen enforcement of the DAP. tivities.40 The building construction permits are given by RAJUK’s multiple roles open up a space for conflicts 39. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Re- between its mandate and activities. As regulator, RAJUK sources/223546-1269620455636/6907265-1284569649355/ issues permits for land development to private land CompleteReportSARHousingFinanceOctober2010.pdf 40. http://www.bip.org.bd/SharingFiles/journal_ book/20130718115951.pdf 41. Conversation with Chief Town Planner with study team. 58 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 59 developers and builders, while it is itself engaged in the East Region is responsible for flood risk management in process of housing and land development. Its dual roles the DAP area delineated by RAJUK. Two divisions under the as inspector and developer are not consistent and need to Central Zone headed by executive engineers look after be reconciled. Further, RAJUK builds in areas that are desig- flood management in the DMA. An executive engineer nated as flood zones in the DAP (Alam 2014). This makes its and supporting staff work full time for the city’s Flood charge as the enforcer of existing regulations extremely Forecasting Circle. The board’s Flood Forecasting and complex and challenging. RAJUK has built both Purbachal Warning Center (FFWC) provides flood forecasts for Great- New Town and Jhilmil on flood zones, converting wetlands er Dhaka as well as the rest of the country. But FFWC staff into housing projects. Given this conflict, it is difficult for do not perform any hazard, vulnerability, or risk analysis. the agency to play its monitoring and enforcement role Using public funds and with support from development effectively. partners, BWDB implements numerous projects. However, it was not possible to determine its budget for pumping, and O&M activities in the Dhaka area. Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) Overall only 15 percent of BWDB’s employees are techni- cal staff, most of whom are engineers (Rahman 2006). The Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) within According to BWDB officials, additional technical staff are the national Ministry of Water Resources (MOWR) plays a needed for flood forecasting, impact studies, construc- very important role in shaping flood-risk management in tion, and maintenance related in Greater Dhaka. Dhaka. As the country’s key water resources management agency, BWDB’s activities are national in scope. It under- takes projects and programs related to irrigation, flood B W D B ’ S D U AL R OL E I N F LO OD I N F R AS T R U C TU R E control and protection, drainage, river bank erosion, river AN D E AR LY WAR N I N G S I N D H AKA dredging, prevention of salinity intrusion, and land recla- With respect to flood risk management in Dhaka, BWDB mation (BWDB 2016). The board generally follows the plans plays a dual role in constructing flood infrastructure and of the Water Resources Planning Organization (WARPO) embankments and being responsible for river forecasting. as well as the National Water Policy (1999), the National Water Management Plan (2004), and other relevant plans Structural activities. BWDB has undertaken major in- and policies, including its own five-year strategic plans frastructural projects, such as the construction of (BWDB 2009). embankments in the DND area and Dhaka West, and con- tinues to be responsible for flood management through the O&M of regulators and pump houses. It is also re- ORGANIZATIO N, BUD GET, A ND S TA F F sponsible for dredging surrounding rivers to promote and BWDB is headed by a director general. Five additional protect natural drainage. However, consultations with director generals (ADGs) are responsible for administra- officials revealed that the effort devoted to maintaining tion, finance, planning, implementation, and O&M for the and dredging Greater Dhaka’s river system is insufficient, board’s eastern and western regions (MOWR 2015). Con- which contributes to waterlogging during the monsoon struction of flood management infrastructure for Greater season. Dhaka falls under one ADG (ADG East), whereas flood forecasting is the responsibility of another (ADG Plan- Forecasting and early warning. Weather and rainfall ning). A chief engineer within the Central Zone of BWDB’s forecasting are under the mandate of the Bangladesh 60 • FFWC has budgetary approval to employ seven employees; six positions are relevant to flood forecasting (one execu- tive engineer, two subdivisional engineers, two assistant engineers, and two assistant programmers). At present, it has only five staff, and positions for one subdivisional FIGURE 4.3. engineer and one assistant programmer are vacant. Ad- PO O RLY ditional personnel with skills in computer programming, MAIN TAINED RE G ULATOR S I N GIS, and remote sensing are needed. The center also needs DH AKA W EST greater capacity to employ its weather research forecast Source: Study team. model. Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA) The Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWA- SA), which falls under the Ministry of Local Government, Meteorology Department (BMD). As discussed in chapter 3, Rural Development, and Cooperatives (MLGRDC), is an BMD’s rainfall monitoring and forecasting capacity is weak autonomous provider of commercial services. Established and needs to be strengthened.42 The Flood Forecasting in 1963, it is responsible for (i) supplying safe water to and Warning Center, as its name implies, is responsible for residential, industrial, and commercial consumers in issuing flood forecasts and warnings. It obtains precip- Dhaka and Narayanganj; and (ii) building, developing, and itation data from BMD and uses it in its own models to maintaining sewage systems and storm-water drainage issue forecasts for Dhaka’s peripheral rivers. FFWC has the lines (DWASA 2015a). It assumed responsibility for drainage capability to issue five-day flood forecasts at 54 points on in Dhaka in 1989. Although drainage is typically a service 28 rivers of the country, including four locations in Greater provided by municipalities, in the 1990s DWASA was vested Dhaka (MoWR 2015).43 While the rivers are monitored with the mandate since the Dhaka City Corporation (DCC) throughout the year, flood forecasts are issued during the lacked sufficient capacity to provide drainage.44 Water monsoon season. An interactive voice response system supply is sourced mainly from groundwater (approximate- has been used to disseminate flood warnings to the pub- ly 78–87 percent) through deep tube wells. However, the lic, which is quick and effective during the rainy season authority is trying to find other sources such as from the (MoWR 2014). BWDB does not conduct any vulnerability rivers, owing to the environmental risks posed by ground- analysis as part of its flood risk assessments for Greater water depletion. The agency provides water at no charge Dhaka, and thus is not in a position to issue area-specific to some slum areas in an effort to be pro-poor. alerts or warnings to urban communities. 42. This will be strengthened through the World Bank–sup- ported Weather and Climate Services Regional Project. 44. Study team’s communication with DWASA Managing 43. http://www.ffwc.gov.bd/?id=div. Director. 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 61 TABLE 4.2. REVENUE IN CO M E AN D E X PE N DI T UR E, I N $ MI L L I ONS ( B D T C ROR ES ), F IS CAL YE ARS 2 0 10 – 14 Fiscal year 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 Revenue 64.44 72.99 88.43 101.24 115.71 income (5,074.30) (5,747.94) (6,964.00) (7,972.40) (9,112.00) Revenue 63.93 72.42 87.54 99.91 113.66 expenditure (5,034.30) (5,703.07) (6,893.56) (7,867.60) (8,951.00) 0.57 0.57 0.89 1.33 2.03 Profit/loss (40.00) (44.86) (70.44) (104.80) (160.00) Source: DWASA 2015a (converted from Bangladeshi Taka, 1 BDT = $0.013). O R G A N I Z AT I O N , B U D G E T, A N D S TA F F 350 km between 2010 and 2015. The system is designed DWASA is overseen by a board of 13 members from various to drain flood waters through natural canals into the professional organizations and government agencies rivers surrounding the DMA. The storm-water network (DWASA 2015b). The authority’s managing director is sup- covers roughly 38 percent of the area of the DMA and ported by four deputy managing directors, each of whom about 14 percent of Greater Dhaka, as defined in the heads a division: operation and maintenance (O&M); DAP (CEGIS analysis). In 2015, one sewage treatment research, planning, and development (RP&D); finance; and plant received sewage from 926 km of sewer lines; administration. Functions relevant to flood-risk/drain- about a quarter of the city has sewer coverage.45 age management are carried out under the first two. The DWASA service area is organized into 11 zones—10 in Dha- The spatial coverage of DWASA’s drainage network ka and 1 in Narayanganj. O&M, revenue collection, and includes only part of the area under the two city corpora- other functions are managed by these zonal offices. tions and does not extend over the entire DMA or Greater Dhaka. The DND area and most of the fringe areas outside DWASA is a profit-making agency, and its net profits the DMA do not have a storm-water network increased between 2011 and 2015 (table 4.2). In addition (see figure 4.4). DWASA also maintains the larger open ca- to sales, it receives budgetary allocations from the gov- nals within the DMA (DWASA 2013). In recent decades, the ernment and project funds from development partners. approach to drainage in the city has been to cordon off According to a DWASA official, funding requirements for the city from the rivers and, when the city floods, to pump new drainage projects are very high, and particularly the flood water out. This approach has required signifi- challenging when it is requested to provide drainage after cant investments in building, operating, and maintaining land is already developed by RAJUK. pumping stations. Currently the mandate for drainage is split among several CONFLIC TING D RA IN A GE M A N D AT ES entities, among them DWASA, BWDB, and the two city AND THE ISSUE O F M A IN T EN A N CE corporations. Field research carried out for this report DWASA’s storm-water network (figure 4.3)comprises ap- revealed a lack of clarity on which agency was responsi- proximately 350 km of lines, 74 km of open canals, 10.5 km of box culverts, and pumping stations at Kallyanpur and Rampur. The storm-sewer lines grew from 275 to 45. Consultation with DWASA officers. 62 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform FIGURE 4.4. DWAS A’ S DRAIN AG E N E TW O R K I N T HE DHAK A M ET R OP OLITAN ARE A Source: Study team (based on DWASA information) 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 63 FIGURE 4.5. A RE AS UN DE R TH E JURIS DICT I ON OF T HE TW O CITY CO RPO RATIO N S S IN CE MAY 201 6 Source: CEGIS 2016. 64 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform FIGURE 4.6. O RG AN IZATIO N O F DH AKA N ORT H CI T Y COR POR AT I ON MAYOR / ADMINISTRATOR 36 Ward Councilors & 12 Women Councilors Secretary CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Urban Waste Store and Social Welfare Public Engineering Revenue Health State Account Law Transport Transport Panning Management Purchase & Slum Improv. Relations Internal Computer Establishment Protocol Security Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Audit. Cell Source: DNCC 2016. ble for maintaining the various drains within Dhaka. many industries in Dhaka do not have treatment For example, DWASA officials suggested that DWASA plans for the effluent they generate, which goes un- maintains some of the khals, even though they are treated into the rivers. under the jurisdiction of the city corporations who are responsible for maintenance (but owned by the national Ministry of Land). While the city corporations DNCC and DSCC: Dhaka’s are responsible for maintaining the city’s “surface-wa- ter” drains, DWASA is apparently responsible for main city corporations maintaining its “storm-water” drains though, in prac- Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC) and Dhaka South tice, the difference is not always clear. Clearly, greater City Corporation (DSCC) were created in 2011 by dividing institutional clarity on the subject of drainage and the earlier DCC (Local Government Act of 2009, Amend- maintenance is needed for any comprehensive and ef- ment 2011). DNCC and DSCC are both part of the MLGRDC. fective approach to urban development and flood risk As municipal corporations, they are responsible for management in Dhaka. providing basic services—among them collecting solid waste, building and maintaining roads, street lighting, With World Bank support, DWASA has prepared a provision of public transportation and basic health storm water drainage master plan. In 2015, DWASA had facilities, and cleaning drains and sewerage lines. 3,242 staff (DWASA 2015a, 2015b). Most work on water supply and a smaller percentage work on drainage. Until recently, the jurisdiction of the two corpora- While in old Dhaka the drainage and sewerage lines tions was largely limited to Dhaka West (the western were combined, the newer network is mostly sepa- part of the DMA). In May 2016, 16 Union Parishads rate. Most of the storm water goes directly to rivers were brought under the jurisdiction of the DNCC and without treatment. This problem is exacerbated as DSCC (figure 4.5). (Union Parishads are the smallest 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 65 TABLE 4.3A. BUDG E T FO R DH AKA N O RTH CI T Y COR POR AT I ON (BD T CR OR ES), FI SCAL YEAR S 201 2–1 5 Fiscal year 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 Budget from central government Not available Not available 64.00 135.00 Revenue collection by DNCC Not available Not available 521.46 882.15 Development projects Not available Not available 140.38 476.00 Total 725.84 1,493.15 - - $ million equivalent $9.2 $189.8 TABLE 4.3B. BUDG E T F O R DH AKA S O UTH C IT Y COR POR AT I ON (BD T CR OR ES), FI SCAL YEAR S 201 2–1 5 Fiscal year 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 Budget from central government 158.50 190.52 112.78 327.00 Revenue collection by DSCC 224.18 252.10 394.33 632.09 Development projects 275.51 156.29 304.35 1,635.48 Total 658.19 598.91 811.46 2,594.57 $ million equivalent $83.7 $76.1 $103.1 $329.8 Source: Data obtained from the city corporations. administrative and local government units in Bangla- by an elected ward councilor whose responsibilities desh.) include monitoring services at the ward level. Councilors may also submit ward-level development plans for inclu- sion into the corporation’s development plans. ORGANIZATIO N, BUD GET, AND STAFF The DNCC and DSCC derive their funds from a variety of DNCC and DSCC have similar organizational structures sources including taxes, markets, central government (figure 4.6).46 Both are headed by mayors elected by the grants, and funding from development partners. In the voters for a period of five years. Each mayor is supported last few years for which data are available, overall reve- by a chief executive officer. nues of both DNCC and DSCC have increased (see tables 4.3a and 4.3b). Administrative and development functions are handled by the office of the chief executive officer. Each corporation The city corporations have highly limited capacity for has 15 departments—for urban planning, information and urban planning. DNCC has about 200 staff in the solid communication technology (ICT), engineering, revenue, waste division, including 3,500 support staff. About 50 solid waste management, and so on. The engineering staff work on drainage in the engineering division with departments are responsible for development and main- support from 200 support staff. However, their planning tenance of roads, footpaths, and surface drains. division has only two technical staff, a town-planner and an architect, indicating the limited priority given to Both DNCC and DSCC are divided into smaller administra- this division. Similarly, in DSCC, about 2,000 staff work on tive areas known as wards and zones. Each ward is headed provision of solid waste while 40 staff work on drain- age. Only six officials working in the planning division 46. http://www.dncc.gov.bd/. (including two urban planners, one geographer, one 66 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform BOX 4.2. Solid-waste management in Dhaka A sound system for managing the disposal of solid waste is a critical deter- minant of the success of any city’s drainage system. However, in present-day Dhaka, the clogging of storm-water drains and manholes with uncollected waste is a primary cause of frequent, localized flooding. In Dhaka, responsi- bility for solid-waste disposal lies with two city corporations: Dhaka North City Corporation (DNCC) and Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC). The principal solid-waste activities of the corporations are street sweeping, unclogging of drains, collection of waste from designated points in neigh- borhoods, and conveyance of that waste to the landfill managed by the corporation. However, for both the DNCC and the DSCC, the extent of uncol- lected waste is substantial. According to DSCC officials, Dhaka South gener- ates an estimated 3,300 tons of solid waste per day, only two-thirds of which (2,200 tons) is collected. Of the collected amount, 1,900 tons are processed in landfills, while the remaining 300 tons are recycled. The situation for DNCC is similar. The rapidly growing outskirts of Dhaka are not covered by the city corporations. Although authorities at the subdistrict level there (in entities known as upazilas) are nominally in charge of waste management, in most cases no formal solid-waste collection system has been established. A national strategy for waste management (National 3R Strategy for Waste Management) has been developed by the Department of Environment in the Ministry of Environment and Forests. In 2005, a Solid Waste Master Plan for Dhaka was conceived to transform the municipal solid waste management system. It set out to develop a participatory waste-management program, build government capacity to collect and transport waste, modernize and ex- pand disposal sites, and improve administrative and financial management. To address the issue of solid waste management in Dhaka, the waste man- agement departments of the DNCC and DSCC should adhere closely to the na- tional strategy and the citywide master plan. There is also a need to develop a recycling strategy to reduce the need for primary and secondary solid waste collection. 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 67 sociologist, and two researchers) alongside three office planning is under the mayor’s office. In Dhaka that is not assistants. Here too, relatively little importance is given the case and there is a disconnect between planning func- to planning. tions and municipal service delivery functions. The urban planning divisions of the two city corporations focus on tasks such as ward-based GIS mapping; approval AC T I V I T I E S R E L E VAN T T O F LOOD of multistoried (6, 10, and up ) buildings; management of R I S K M AN AG E M E N T on-street car parking; road naming and name plate setup; The two corporations’ major tasks related to flood risk representing DSCC in national exhibitions; site develop- management are (i) construction, improvement, and ment schemes, including development of sites or erecting/ maintenance of surface drains within their jurisdiction (in- re-erecting of a building or any plot of land covered by the cluding slum areas); and (ii) solid waste management (box master plan; city beautification; publishing DSCC’s yearly 4.2)—both of which are essential to relieving the drainage reports; restrictions, regulations, and prohibitions on congestion that contributes to waterlogging in the city. the development of sites and the erection/re-erection of DNCC’s website states that the engineering department buildings within the city; regulation of building controls; is also tasked with the development of low-lying areas, heritage and risky building identification and develop- though it is unclear what this entails and how it relates to ment; and the renaming of roads/infrastructures. The RAJUK’s activities. urban planning departments are not directly involved in flood-risk mitigation. The above indicates the limited at- When the fieldwork for this study was conducted, the tention to spatial planning placed by both urban planning corporations were considering preparing drainage master divisions under the two city corporations. plans for the city. At present, however, neither corporation has a long-term strategic plan for addressing flood-risk Most important, it is unclear how planning undertak- mitigation. Coordination of drainage management with en by the two city corporations relates to the planning DWASA’s activities is also unclear. functions undertaken by RAJUK. Typically, the office of FIGURE 4.7A. ON G O IN G F ILLIN G O F FIGURE 4.7B. SAND MI NI NG FOR LOWLA ND S I N DH AKA E AS T CONST R UCT I ON ACT I VI T I ES I N D HAK A EAST Source: Study team (October 2016). Source: Study team (October 2016). 68 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform BOX 4.3. Hatirjheel Lake: A case study in interinstitutional cooperation Despite the institutional fragmentation noted above, the Hatijheel project in Dhaka stands out as a good example of institutional coordination. The estimated $250 mil- lion Hatirjheel-Begunbari Integrated Development Project was initiated in 2007. The project aimed to enhance the capacity of the locale to retain storm water by trans- forming a wastewater canal into a freshwater lake with recreational facilities for city dwellers, while also connecting the northern and southern sides of the lake with roads, bridges, and viaducts. The concept for the project, which began in 2008 over an area of 122 hectares and is nearing completion, was based on a technical study commissioned by RAJUK and carried out by the Bureau of Research, Testing and Con- sultation of the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. Owing to its multisectoral nature, several agencies worked closely on the project. The Ministry of Housing and Public Works was the lead ministry. RAJUK was the main implementing agency. To facilitate interagency communication and cooperation, a steering committee of project directors from the partner agencies was established, chaired by the minister of Housing and Public Works. Participating agencies had clear mandates. RAJUK was responsible for acquiring the land (and for compensating the previous owners), excavating the site, and building waste disposal infrastructure. The local government’s engineering department executed the designs for a two-lane road along the lake, a footpath, a bridge, overpasses, and landscaping. The Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA) built the storm water and sanitary drainage system and water supply network. The Bangladesh Army provided overall supervision during project implementation (Hatirjheel Project Office 2015, personal communication). It is important to note the role of local research in this context. The university pro- vided the architectural and structural designs for the drainage systems, the traffic system, lowland excavations, and roads and walkways. Detailed studies were carried 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 69 out by the Bureau of Research, Testing and Consultation to estimate the retention capacity of Hatirjheel needed to protect adjoining areas from flooding and water- logging during the monsoon season. Detailed surveys were undertaken to identify private and government-owned land within the project area, and land acquisition proposals were prepared for the storm-water retention area. Plans were designed to excavate and remove sludge and to divert domestic and industrial sewage (pre- viously discharged into the lake) through new sewers to be built along the periphery of Hatir- jheel. These diversion structures and an associ- ated sewage treatment plant will be construct- ed by the Bangladesh Army near the main inlet point. Land acquisition was a major challenge. Of the total 122 hectares required, only about 32 hectares had been acquired prior to the proj- ect. Another 57 hectares were privately owned, and 33 hectares were so-called Khas land (land redistributed under earlier land reforms). Evic- tion of illegal occupants of the land caused delays in implementation of the project. One of the main lessons from the project is that cross-sectoral coordination is possible, given the high-level support at the ministerial level. In this case, a steering committee chaired by a senior minister and clear demarcation of re- sponsibilities were instrumental in achieving coordination among agencies. Another lesson is that strong prior technical work and support from local uni- versities were crucial in providing technical support to the project. Third, the case shows the importance of planning. Finally, strong monitoring (by the Army in the case of Hatirjheel) was also critical in the success of the project. Source: Study team. 70 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES The Union Parishads, Analysis carried out for this report reveals multiple in- the DND area, and stitutional issues that need to be addressed. First, there is overlap in mandates for urban planning and land use cantonment boards between RAJUK and the two city corporations. The city corporations can prepare master plans for the develop- T H E U N I ON PAR I S H AD S ment, expansion, and improvement of any area within the A large part of Greater Dhaka falls outside of the city (Local Government Act of 2009). They can also prepare jurisdiction of the DNCC and DSCC and is governed by ap- land-use plans, undertake site-development schemes, proximately 77 Union Parishads, which are the smallest and regulate housing. These powers contradict and over- administrative and local government units in Bangla- lap RAJUK’s mandate and need to be resolved. Second, desh. Union Parishads cover more than 70 percent of the current lines of reporting and vertical accountability are DAP area (CEGIS analysis). Under the Local Government misaligned and create institutional inefficiencies. RAJUK Ordinance of 1997, Union Parishad members are publicly reports to the Ministry of Housing and Public Works, elected. Their functions include agricultural, industrial, whereas the two city corporations operate under the community, and development activities. They do not authority of the MLGRDC. Thus, even when it relates to manage flood risk or have any capacity for planning local government/urban issues, RAJUK does not have to be within their jurisdictions. This critical issue must be accountable to the MLGRDC. It is also harder to resolve is- considered as the Greater Dhaka area is developed and sues across ministries than within a ministry. This creates urbanized. various institutional redundancies. Third, there are discrepancies between planning zones T H E D H AKA- N AR AYAN G AN J - D E M R A AR E A and legal jurisdictions. While RAJUK makes land-use plans Although the formerly agricultural Dhaka-Narayan- for the entire DAP area (that is, Greater Dhaka), DNCC and ganj-Demra (DND) area falls within the DMA, until recently, DSCC prepare plans and deliver services in jurisdictions it was not serviced by any city corporation but rather that are subsets of that larger area. This has critical impli- by upazilas (which are subunits of districts) and Union cations for the management and service delivery of the Parishads. In May 2016, some parts of the DND area came entire DAP region. Finally, as noted earlier, there is also under the jurisdiction of the DSCC. It is too early to tell overlap between RAJUK and DWASA in drainage manage- how service delivery may change as a result. The rest of ment. Consultations carried out for this report revealed the DND area continues to fall under the jurisdiction of significant disagreement about which agency was re- Union Parishads. The area is now highly congested and sponsible for the drainage system and its maintenance, bound on all sides by embankments topped by roads. typically done by a single municipal agency. Because of the embankments, even moderate rains result in waterlogging. With rapid urbanization, the earlier institutional arrange- ments for the provision of basic services have ceased to work. At present, DSCC and the Narayanganj City Corpo- ration (NCC) provide some basic civic services to parts of the DND area. DWASA is providing water supply and sewerage in the DND area to some extent. Management 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 71 of the pumps at Shimrail is undertaken by BWDB. The area Other institutions and urgently needs to be brought under and serviced by mu- the private sector nicipal administration. Other agencies have an indirect influence on flood risk management and preparedness in Dhaka (appendix B). CANTONMEN T BO A RD S There are three cantonment areas in Greater Dhaka: The Department of Disaster Management under the Min- Dhaka (shown in figure 4.1), Gazipur, and Savar. Each is istry of Disaster Management and Relief is responsible for governed by a board. The cantonment boards began as a response and relief. The Bangladesh Inland Water Trans- way of providing services to military families cantoned port Authority under the Ministry of Shipping and Inland in the area. The Dhaka Cantonment Board, for example, Water Transport is responsible for controlling inland wa- began providing services in 1951. The boards have sole ter transport in the country including Dhaka. responsibility for a number of municipal services within their boundaries, such as operating schools and hospitals; The Local Government Engineering Department under providing streetlights; building and maintaining parks, the MLGRDC is mandated to develop, implement, and roads, and mosques; and building and managing sewage maintain small-scale water projects across Bangladesh. and drainage facilities. They also work in tandem with the Its functions relate to the development and mainte- Defense Officers Housing Society, but their coordination nance of urban infrastructure—such as sewerage, roads with other agencies responsible for municipal services or and footpaths, small flood-control embankments, sluice flood control (RAJUK, DWASA, DNCC, DSCC) is limited. The gates, culverts, rubber dams, and canals (LGED 2014)—with boards have their own short-, medium-, and long-term obvious implications for flood control. plans that are generally not shared with the public or other agencies. Since the 1950s, the Ministry of Land (which has had different names at different times) is entrusted with The cantonment boards are headed by executive offi- land management for the country. Its objectives include cers, under whom branches operate for administration, settlement of state-owned lands (khas lands), sairatmahals taxes, water, electricity and so on. The engineering and (jalmahal, shirmpmahal, and so on), vested properties, and civil works branches are responsible for spatial planning, abandoned properties. The ministry has begun a national facilities and structures, construction, and maintenance of land-zoning project that will likely affect flood risk manage- the road and drainage networks. It was not possible to de- ment in Dhaka and the rest of the country (MOL 2016). termine if they have any capacity for flood-risk assessment or take it into account in residential planning and housing The Department of Haor and Wetland Development development. under the Ministry of Water Resources is responsible for the integrated development of Bangladesh’s wetlands.47 As statutory bodies akin to local governments, the boards However, it does not manage or oversee urban wetlands in must cover their own expenses. It was not possible to in- the DMA or DAP area.Private developers play a very active fer from available budget figures whether the boards had the ability to manage drainage. 47. Haor: A bowl-shaped wetland ecosystem in the northeastern part of Bangladesh. Also known as a back swamp. Baor: An oxbow lake formed by dead arms of rivers; commonly identi- fied as freshwater wetlands. 72 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 73 role in Dhaka’s urbanization and thus shape the city’s long-term flood risks. Amid rural-urban migration, demand for housing in Dhaka is high and rising. Because land is relatively cheap in Dhaka East, private land developers are purchasing low-lying lands and wetlands there and build- ing housing (figure 4.7a and 4.7b). RAJUK does not appear to have exerted effective control over such purchases or the ensuing development activities. Recent field research for this study revealed that more than 300 housing proj- ects were under way in the DMDP area—most located in flood-flow zones and in violation of the DMDP’s flood-zone policies (Alam 2014). Many of the developers and projects are informal (Quium 2007). In Greater Dhaka, housing on land that is six meters or above sea level tends to be protected from waterlogging. For this reason, developers tend to fill land to approx- imately that height. Survey results published in 2014 indicated that 41 percent of the housing projects in the DMDP area raised the height of land by 3 meters; in 21 percent of projects, lowlands had been raised by 7 meters (Alam 2014). Owners, too, may raise the elevation of their land after buying it from a developer. Despite these ef- forts, interviews with plot owners showed that the areas continued to experience waterlogging (Alam 2014). All of these observations point to the need for improved enforcement of existing regulations governing wetlands and flood-flow zones.48 Subdivisions on the urban periphery are an affordable housing solution for low- and middle-income groups. But urbanization has outpaced effective government regulation. Withholding official acknowledgment of newsubdivisions on the grounds that do not conform to planning regulations poses a dilemma for families who have acquired housing there and seek equal protection of the law. • 48. http://www.theguardianbd.com/land-use-of-dhaka-metro- politan-development-plan-area-past-and-present-scenario/. 74 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform SUMMARY • The above analysis highlights that for Dhaka, there is no integrated flood risk management plan. The Structure Plan (1995–2015) and the DAP (gazetted in 2010 and valid till 2016 with a one-year extension) have de facto been used to make decisions about land use, but without a comprehensive implementation plan or a coordinated approach to managing flood risk. The analysis further highlights the following key institutional issues that need to be addressed: • The Town Improvement Act that governs planning in Dhaka is outdated and needs to be revised on a priority basis. The Town Improvement Act (1953) was prepared over 60 years ago and bestows enormous powers to RAJUK with little public accountability, and needs to be revised. • No overarching municipal agency is mandated to provide services within Greater Dhaka, resulting in institutional dysfunction and inadequate service delivery. Until recently, the two city corporations DNCC and DSCC together had jurisdiction over only some of the DMA. Significant parts of the DMA, DND area, and Greater Dhaka (outside the DMA area) were, until recently, not under any municipal jurisdiction. Outer parts of Greater Dhaka and the DND area were and even now continue to be governed by Union Parishads. If indeed the plan is to develop the entire area under the Detailed Area Plan into an integrated urban area, it would make sense for the government to bring the entire area under one or more municipal corporations. • Disconnect between planning functions and service delivery. Contrary to good practice, where planning offices and functions typically fall under the purview of 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 75 the mayor, 49 in Dhaka, planning is carried out by RAJUK with little contribution 1 from the planning offices of the DNCC and DSCC. The two city corporations have planning departments but with limited human resources and technical skills needed for planning. • The chairman of RAJUK is not elected and hence not accountable to citizens. The chairman of the very powerful agency RAJUK is appointed and not elected like a mayor and has little accountability to the public. Yet, RAJUK is in a position to undertake extremely important decisions about land use, water bodies, and housing that directly affect the citizenry on a regular basis. This leadership structure requires reform to enable greater public accountability. • The agencies involved in urban planning and municipal service delivery lie within different ministries and have different accountability structures. RAJUK reports to the Ministry of Housing and Public Works. On the other hand DNCC, DSCC, DWASA, and the Union Parishads report to the MLGRDC. BWDB falls under the Ministry of Water Resources. Thus at a ministerial level, RAJUK has no accountability to the MLGRDC even though its activities directly affect municipal and local governance. This accountability structure needs to be reformed. Stronger mechanisms are also needed to ensure horizontal coordination between agencies in different ministries. • The boundaries—and service responsibilities—of the two city corporations have been expanded without adequate planning or additional resource allocations. Since 49. One example of this is Washington, DC, where the DC office of planning is under the mayor. 76 • 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform May 2016, additional parts of Dhaka East and the DND area have come under the jurisdiction of the two city corporations. Neither city corporation has a long-term strategic plan for drainage or flood risk management. The capacity of both for planning, financing, and implementation will have to be enhanced if they are to meet their expanded mandates, notably in the area of drainage provision. The Unions Parishads that provide services in the rest of Greater Dhaka have very limited capacity for flood risk management. • Contradiction between RAJUK’s regulatory and development roles. RAJUK issues licenses for land use and building construction to private land developers, but it also develops land for its own account with no clear oversight. Published research and consultations reveal that RAJUK has undertaken development activities in low-lying areas (for example, Purbachal, the Jhilmil Land Development Project) in violation of its own plans. The agency’s contradictory roles need to be addressed and clear and transparent accountability mechanisms need to be put in place. • Even though RAJUK is a profit-making organization, provision of housing for urban poor is not its priority. RAJUK’s development activities primarily cater to the urban middle and upper class. Provision of affordable housing for the urban poor is a major gap. • Ad hoc incorporation of flood risk into implementation of the DAP. In Dhaka, multiple agencies are involved in activities that have a bearing on flood risk management. However, there is no integrated flood risk management plan or any mechanism for coordination between RAJUK, DNCC, DSCC, BWDB, or DWASA. As such, the incorporation of flood risk concerns into the implementation of the DAP happens on an ad hoc basis. Any future infrastructure decisions, such as the Eastern Bypass, should be considered within the context of a flood risk management and urbanization strategy for the entire Greater Dhaka area. • Urban water bodies lack clear ownership; maintenance of natural canals and river systems has been neglected. While DWASA maintains some khals and waterways that are part of its drainage network, it is unclear which agency is ultimately responsible for managing and protecting Dhaka’s lakes, water bodies, and canals; maintaining (and not just monitoring) water quality; and preventing encroachment and dumping. Regular maintenance is essential for these lakes to effectively function as retention areas and if water is to drain adequately during monsoon season. Likewise, regular dredging of the 4. Planning, Political Economy, and the Case for Institutional Reform • 77 surrounding river system, a BWDB mandate, is not given sufficient priority by the agency. • Responsibility for drainage is split across multiple agencies. In Dhaka, some pumping stations are operated by DWASA, others by BWDB. Storm-water drainage is provided by DWASA, while DNCC and DSCC manage surface-water drains. However, there is little coordination between DWASA and the two city corporations on drainage maintenance. BWDB, DWASA, RAJUK, DNCC, and DSCC, and the Upazilas often implement their projects in isolation from the others. Overlapping development, with implications for drainage and waterlogging, creates disruptions particularly in the monsoon season. • Current drainage provided by DWASA covers only 38 percent of the DMA. Although DWASA has a noteworthy task of providing water supply, sewerage, and drainage services, its drainage services cover only 38 percent of the DMA and are absent from most of Greater Dhaka and the DND area. Drainage coverage needs to be expanded, especially in Dhaka East, before further urbanization occurs. No overarching agency is presently responsible for the provision of drainage, sewerage, or wastewater treatment in those parts of Greater Dhaka where DWASA does not operate. • RAJUK lacks the information base to undertake proper land-use planning and zoning. It does a poor job of engaging with the public and consulting with local governments and communities during plan preparation. Strengthening planning capacity and ensuring public participation will be essential in improving urban resilience in Dhaka. • Insufficient focus on urban weather early warning systems. The Flood Forecasting and Warning Center (FFWC, under BWDB) is set up to assess river floods. But because Dhaka is also vulnerable to intense rainfall, BMD’s capacity for forecasting needs to be strengthened, as does FFWC’s capacity to undertake impact-based forecasting to help target communities at risk and help them prepare in advance for flood events. • Absence of constructive engagement and partnership with private developers. At present, private developers are openly filling up land and developing low- lying areas. There is no coordinated mechanism for public sector agencies and private sector agencies and developers to address the problems of urbanization, including flooding. Such a mechanism needs to be developed. 5 · Conclusion and Recommendations 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 81 T he complex institutional landscape shaping flood system. This connectivity between the internal natural risk management has long-term implications for drainage network and surrounding river system needs to strengthening urban resilience in Dhaka. As chap- be restored. ter 2 shows, Dhaka is at high risk of flooding and this is expected to increase with climate change and variability. Disconnected from urban planning, flood management Urbanization in Dhaka has been accompanied by a signif- infrastructure has put Dhaka onto a path that needs icant decline in the city’s wetlands and waterways. This significant adjustment. Infrastructure has been erect- affects the conveyance capacity, navigability, and water ed without a full understanding of its consequences, quality of its water bodies, with significant implications with comparatively little attention to planning, zoning, for flood risk management. It is unclear which agency enforcement, forecasting, and early warning systems: crit- owns the city’s wetlands and waterways or is responsi- ical “nonstructural” tools that can help the city manage ble for maintaining these. As chapter 3 shows, the public people, land, and resources in a more balanced way. This sector’s response to managing flood risk has mainly been scenario, where infrastructure investments are made to in the form of infrastructural investments. Further, these manage flooding before or in a manner disconnected from have been most often in reaction to extreme weather urban planning can be referred to as an “infrastructure and flood events and not as a result of a comprehensive, trap” facing Dhaka city today. integrated, and participatory urban planning or flood risk management process. To some extent, flood infrastruc- Given this scenario, what are the options for managing ture in Dhaka has contributed to reshaping the nature of flood risks as urban expansion continues unabated in the city’s hazards. While before the construction of the Greater Dhaka? How can the city innovate? As the case of western embankment in the 1990s, the main hazard facing Singapore shows, transformative solutions are possible Dhaka West was flooding from high river water and heavy (see box 5.1). rain, now the hazard in Dhaka West is primarily urban flooding and waterlogging resulting from suboptimal For Dhaka, the answer lies in (i) undertaking difficult drainage. Dhaka Wast continues to be at high risk due to but priority institutional and organizational reforms; intense rain and river flooding.49 (ii) moving towards innovative approaches to managing flood risk using eco-engineering /nature based solutions, Flood infrastructure has also been an important driver early warning systems, land use planning and zoning (dis- of urbanization. For instance, in the Dhaka-Narayanganj- cussed below), instead of relying mainly on infrastructure Demra (DND) area, it has helped transform what was based approaches and (iii) shifting away from a reactive a primarily agricultural area in the mid-20th century approach to addressing flood risk fully as part of an inte- to a messy, congested urban area today. It enabled grated and participatory urban planning process. These rural migrants to settle, leading to urbanization and are summarized in table 5.1 and further discussed below. densification, even though there was no systematic municipal governance or provision of urban services in the DND area. Due to institutional issues and limited investments in maintenance of urban water bodies, drainage canals, and infrastructure, parts of the internal waterways (particularly in the western and southern parts of the city) are also disconnected from the outer river 49. 82 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations BOX 5.1. Singapore’s urban reform The transformation of urban Singapore provides important insight into how cities in developing countries can transform themselves. In the 1960s, Singapore faced many of the problems that Dhaka faces today: a declining river system, increasing slum settlements, limited wastewater treatment, and poor waste collection. The city’s reform process took decades and involved a multitude of institutional, structural, and nonstructural measures. A planning committee was set up and chaired by the housing authority. An extensive planning exercise brought stake- holders together to consider possible options and strategies, after which an inte- grated planning system was put in place. An interagency committee on rivers was then set up and significant funding invested in cleaning up the rivers. A multiagen- cy land-use plan was prepared, with the requirement that it be reviewed every five years by a steering committee. These steps were accompanied by building design plans at the plot level. Strong emphasis was placed on water rationing and reuse. The city made a commitment to maintain its green cover, requiring every building to replace the green cover it eliminates. There is a strong emphasis on public transportation and bicycle paths. The reform was accompanied by investments in public housing and strong support for home ownership. Financing mechanisms were also set up to support housing. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 83 TABLE 5.1. SU MMARY O F KE Y RE FO RMS AND I NVEST MENT S Enact Eco-Engineering measures in Policy and institutional reforms Organizational strengthening Greater Dhaka • Bring DMA (including DND area) fully • Establish interministerial steering • Revitalize khals, lakes, and under municipal management committee on wetlands and rivers water bodies • Revise outdated Town Improvement • Substantially improve planning • Dredge surrounding river Act (1953); Resolve RAJUK’s capacity in City Corporations system regularly (BWDB) to Development and Regulatory improve connectivity of urban • Strengthen DNCC and DSCC functions through policy reform wetlands and river system capacity for monitoring and across DAP area • Clarify planning functions of RAJUK enforcement of development and City Corporations activities • Strengthen early warning systems and flood • Prepare zoning policy, laws and • Strengthen RAJUK’s monitoring management information regulations capacity systems • Clarify City Corporations’ mandate for • Modernize/improve design of oversight of urban water bodies and flood infrastructure waterways • Extend drainage to entire DMA • Prepare updated DAP including zoning policies, regulations, and integrated • Improve solid waste flood risk management plan for DAP management area • Undertake eco-engineering • Consolidate drainage under DWASA investments in designing new infrastructure Recommendations role of planner, developer, and regulator—a built- for institutional and in conflict of interest. Moreover, planning and city organizational reform management functions are divorced. Planning is done by RAJUK, while municipal services are provided by DNCC and DSCC. To address this disconnect, it is INSTITUTION A L A N D P O LICY REF O RM S recommended that RAJUK be mainly responsible for Revise outdated Town Improvement Act (1953). One of the Structural Planning and zoning. The city corporations priority actions going forward is to reform the outdated will be responsible for more detailed planning, zoning Town Improvement Act (TIA). The TIA was approved over 60 and enforcement within their areas of jurisdiction. years ago and should be revised to take into account the Moreover, development and monitoring functions current realities, level of urbanization, institutional ar- should be moved out of RAJUK and undertaken by rangements and challenges facing Dhaka. The revised Act the municipal corporations. Private entities can also should address the conflicting powers bestowed to RAJUK be engaged in provision of housing. RAJUK’s main and similar planning agencies in other major urban areas mandate would be to undertake comprehensive in Bangladesh. Revision of this Act could also become a planning for Greater Dhaka in an integrated way, in blueprint for addressing the disconnect between urban coordination with the city corporations, upazilas, and planning and municipal service delivery in other major communities . The realigned RAJUK should also pre- cities in Bangladesh. pare a zoning policy for the Greater Dhaka area which · currently does not exist. It would also be responsible Reform RAJUK by clarifying planning functions and for coordinating with the existing (and future) city moving its monitoring and development functions to corporations to ensure that all zoning laws prepared city corporations. RAJUK presently plays the triple by the city corporations are consistent with the 84 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations overall plan for Greater Dhaka. RAJUK should become · Consolidate drainage under DWASA. At present, the a hub of public information on land use and spatial Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWA- plans, including databases, risk maps and maps of wa- SA) provides drainage services to 38 percent of the ter bodies for the entire Detailed Area Plan. DMA. This should be expanded to the entire DMA · at a minimum and eventually to all of Greater Dha- Establish an interministerial committee on Dhaka’s ka—that is, to the entire area covered by RAJUK’s rivers, urban wetlands, waterways, and drainage. One Detailed Area Plan. A basic drainage network should of the main challenges in land and flood management be in place as land is being prepared and serviced in Greater Dhaka is maintaining the urban wetlands, for housing construction. Responsibility for the con- water bodies, khals, and drainage facilities within Dha- struction and maintenance of drainage should be ka, as well as the river system surrounding the city. To consolidated under DWASA, which has much more address this issue, an interministerial committee on experience providing the services. · rivers, urban wetlands, and waterways is recommend- ed. The committee would provide oversight on the Legislation to task the city corporations with man- activities of relevant agencies. The BWDB would con- agement and oversight of urban lakes, wetlands, tinue to be responsible for river dredging and DWASA and water bodies. At present, no agency is clear- for maintenance of canals and storm water drainage. ly responsible for ownership, management, and The city corporations would be responsible for main- maintenance of urban wetlands and waterways. taining urban water bodies (notably lakes) through Appropriate policy and legal measures need to be issuance of land-use plans and zoning ordinances. This put in place to clearly assign this responsibility to committee would report to the prime minister’s office the city corporations. Since the mayors are elected and work closely with RAJUK and the city corpora- officials, it will enable greater commitment to this tions. It would comprise representatives of BWDB; the vital urban resource that can have numerous ben- city corporations; the Ministry of Housing and Public efits for improving the quality of life beyond flood Works; MLGRDC; the Ministry of Water Resources; risk mitigation. DWASA; the Department of Environment, and Upazila Parishads. It would meet on a quarterly basis and be responsible for ensuring that high priority and over- R E C OM M E N D AT I O N S F O R · sight be placed on the management of the urban river OR G AN I Z AT I O N AL R E F OR M S system, wetlands, and ecology, in support of sustain- Strengthen the human resource and planning ca- able urbanization. pacity of the city corporations. The capacity of the · planning departments of the DNCC and DSCC should Bring the DND area and Dhaka East under municipal be strengthened. The city corporations should be management. Until May 2016, Dhaka East and DND responsible for preparing—and able to prepare— area were not under the jurisdiction of any municipal detailed land-use plans and zoning ordinances agency and were urbanizing haphazardly. Instead of consistent with Greater Dhaka plans. To support an ad hoc approach to urbanization, East Dhaka and this, staff capacity and resources allocated to the the DND area should be brought fully under municipal planning departments should be strengthened. The control to ensure systematic management of land, two departments should work in close collaboration resources, and services. in the interest of consistency. This approach would allow the city corporations to have more discretion 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 85 BOX 5.2. Lessons from Case Studies Case study analysis of eco-engineering approaches to flood risk mitigation in New Orleans, Portland, Rotterdam, Singapore, Beira and Ho Chi Minh City have important lessons to offer. They show that efforts to use eco-en- gineering based approaches were accompanied by important institutional reforms. In Singapore, for instance, they were part of an overall reform pro- cess to improve livability and sustainable urbanization that took decades to unfold and involved numerous legal and regulatory changes, strength- ening planning, inter-agency coordination, and allocation of funds for ma- jor tasks such as cleaning rivers. In all cases, a change of thinking about how to address flood risks was involved and required strong political will. The cases demonstrate the many benefits of eco-engineering beyond flood risk mitigation. In New Orleans, storm water drainage focusing on the principals of retaining and reusing water can help reduce the load on the drainage system, allow improved water circulationand also help improve water quality. In Portland, retrofitting streets through the Green Streets program has helped reduce sewer overflows and water pollution. Eco-engi- neering measures are context specific and involve important partnerships between public and private sector institutions and local communities. Even though the measures may be small (e.g. rain gardens, permeable pav- ing, water harvesting), when applied over a large area can have significant benefits and be cost effective (see appendix A). 86 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations over planning and land use within their areas of juris- · Enhance investments in early warning systems and diction. Monitoring of land development, oversight develop systems that are tailored to the hazards of water bodies, and monitoring of filling functions facing specific areas of Dhaka. Enhance investments should also be placed under the city corporations, as in early warning systems and develop systems that they are best placed to monitor activities within their are tailored to the hazards facing specific areas of jurisdiction. Because mayors are elected officials, Dhaka. Different areas of Dhaka face different types this option would introduce a significant measure of of hydro-meteorological hazards—Dhaka East and accountability into the planning and zoning system. the fringe area are mainly exposed to river floods and Staff capacity for monitoring land use and water rainfall; DND and Dhaka West are mainly vulnerable bodies in their areas of jurisdiction should also be to rain-induced waterlogging. These require tailored enhanced. early warning systems. The capacity of the Bangla- · desh Meteorology Department (BMD) to provide short Prepare new Detailed Area Plan based on a participa- duration rain alerts and early warnings should be tory process and accompanied by zoning policies and strengthened through improving rainfall monitoring regulations. RAJUK has prepared a Structure Plan, a and radar systems.50 This will particularly support draft of which is available. A new Detailed Area Plan users such as BWDB and DWASA and residents of the (to succeed the earlier one) is apparently under prepa- Dhaka West and DND areas. Further, BWDB’s Hydrolo- ration. Given past problems in implementation, and gy Unit should set up a Flood Risk Information System the time lag between the preparation of the Structure for developers and the public.51 Flood risk maps can Plan and the past Detailed Area Plan, this process support preparation of flood zoning regulations for should be expedited. Further, the new Detailed Area the entire area and help identify areas more or less Plan should be prepared for the entire area to be prone to flooding. These flood maps should be made covered, and with public consultation and input. available to the public and to planning agencies in Moreover, the new plan should be accompanied by Dhaka to inform planning and zoning. The Hydrolo- clear zoning polices and regulations. gy Division of BWDB should strengthen its capacity · for location specific forecasts for Dhaka, specifically Demarcate areas into zones and prepare local area Dhaka East, including impact-based forecasting. These plans and zoning regulations. The entire area covered measures would greatly help to manage flood risk in by the Detailed Area Plan should be divided into zones Dhaka.52 · and the city corporations should prepare local area plans and zoning laws/ordinances for each zone based Allocate sufficient funding to maintenance. Extensive on a participatory process in accordance with the up- investments in infrastructure require proportionate dated plan. In the past, even though the Detailed Area long term but routine investments in maintenance. Plan was gazetted, RAJUK or the city corporations did While it was difficult to determine the amounts not prepare a zoning policy or regulations. Without these, it was extremely challenging to implement or enforce the plan and manage densification, housing 50. This is being underpinned by the World Bank–supported Weather and Climate Services Regional project. development, or urban growth. Going forward, this 51. For an example of such a system, see http://fris. nc.gov/ will be essential. fris/Home.aspx?ST=NC 52. A recently effective (May 2017) World Bank project is ex- pected to support BMD’s and BWDB’s forecasting services for Dhaka. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 87 allocated for maintenance by BWDB and the city they can be used in conjunction with hard engineering corporations, it was evident that given the state of approaches to water management, can be cost effective the river system in urban waterways, the investments compared to infrastructure approaches and are vital to in maintenance are not sufficient. This needs to be climate resilience. enhanced. · In Dhaka, as discussed in chapter 3, flood risk manage- Strengthen engagement and partnership with private ment has emphasized embankments, flood walls, pumps, developers. At present, private developers are openly box culverts, and sluice gates, despite which waterlogging filling up land and developing low-lying areas. There remains a regular problem both in Dhaka West and the is no mechanism between public and private sector DND area. Further, the connectivity between the internal agencies and developers to address the problems of waterways and canals, wetlands, and river systems has urbanization, including flooding. Such a mechanism been compromised and needs to be reestablished to man- needs to be developed. age flood risk. Building on lessons from ongoing international efforts, Recommendations for the application of eco-engineering solutions in the context of Dhaka implies consideration of the overall eco-engineering approaches connectivity of the hydrological system across the city’s to flood risk mitigation urban catchment, ensuring the connectivity of the inter- In many of the world’s cities, flood risk mitigation has nal waterways with the surrounding river system, and tended to rely on infrastructure-based solutions. There is balancing structural and nonstructural interventions. The a growing realization that while these are needed in many focus should be to revitalize the natural urban canals and instances, they are not necessarily the optimal solution water bodies, dredge the peripheral river system, expand and may increase flood risk.53 Among recent approach- the storm-water drainage network, promote innovative es to flood risk management, “eco-engineering,” “green infrastructure design, prioritize maintenance, and main- defense,” or “green adaptation” stand out as some of the tain links between the internal waterways and peripheral most innovative (see appendix A). Briefly, these concepts river system. Within this broader framework, specific refer to the use of eco-system functions to provide pro- measures could be taken in major areas of Greater Dhaka, tection from flooding, food and freshwater security, and as described below. sustainable livelihoods (Hulsman & Maarse 2010). They involve maintaining and restoring natural ecosystems and the services they provide; protecting vital functions M E AS U R E S F O R D H AKA W E S T such as water flow and quality; and reliance on natural The western part of the DMA has developed as an barriers for flood protection (Hulsman & Maarse 2010). In unplanned urban area since the 1960s. Although flood-con- the Netherlands, where they have been pioneered, they trol infrastructure was constructed by BWDB after the have guided initiatives such as the Room for the Rivers catastrophic floods of 1987 and 1988, maintenance of that program.54 Case study analysis (see box 5.2) shows that infrastructure has not been adequate. Many of the sluices are not functioning efficiently. Illegal encroachment of natural canals and wetlands and unplanned construction 53. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/role- of-flood-risk-management.pdf. 54. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/em/winter15/ highlight3_sidebar.html. 88 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations of housing and industries have complicated maintenance be protected against encroachment through eco-engi- of canals. The high price of land and the absence of a long- neering options, such as building perforated sidewalks term vision, integrated planning, and coordination among and a 2–3 meter green strip on both sides of the relevant agencies have further exacerbated the problem canal. Eco-engineering can potentially help convince of waterlogging. residents to use the sides of the canals for walking instead of encroaching upon them to build dwellings The flood and drainage infrastructure maintained by (as evident in the case of Hathirjheel). This can also BWDB, DWASA, and the two city corporations consists of enhance the recreational value of the khals. · embankments, flood walls, sluice gates, and a storm-wa- ter drainage network (box culverts, pipes, drains, and Dredge peripheral rivers. BWDB should undertake reg- pumps). DWASA’s drainage system covers only 38 percent ular dredging of the surrounding rivers. The Buriganga, of the DMA, not enough to meet the requirements of the Turag, Balu, and Tongi Khal rivers must be dredged area. The peripheral river system also plays an important regularly to maintain their conveying capacity, envi- role in draining storm water from the area, as these rivers ronmental flow rates, and connectivity with khals. All are linked with the internal natural canals of the city and peripheral river systems have to be revitalized because with the outer river system of Greater Dhaka. Connectiv- of the interconnected nature of rivers. · ity of the waterways must be maintained and protected from encroachment if they are to drain the area properly Create a buffer zone. A buffer zone must be created at all times. to protect the Dhaleswari, Bangshi, Turag, Tongi Khal, and Buriganga rivers and so facilitate the smooth pas- Within this overall framework, the following measures sage of flood flows. All of these rivers enter Greater can be taken in Dhaka West: Dhaka from both sides; many are connected to the · Jamuna on the west. A minimum width for the buffer Revitalize silted up or encroached khals. Khals that zone is proposed in appendix b, table b.2. The zone are crucial for proper drainage should be revitalized. must be protected and preserved by a low embank- These include at least the following khals: Katasur, ment that would store flood water up to a certain Hazaribagh, Ibrahimpur, Kallyanpur, Abdullahpur, limit and during the monsoon season. In the dry sea- Ramchandrapur, Baunia, Digun, Diabari, Dholai, son, the floodplain inside the embankment could be Rayerbazar, Baishteki, and Shahjahanpur (figure 5.2). used for recreational purposes. · Highly degraded from dumped waste and illegal en- croachment, these khals must be reexcavated.55 Expand storm-water drainage. All of Dhaka West Preliminary analysis based on results from a hydro- should be covered by a properly maintained storm-wa- dynamic model for the DAP area developed by CEGIS ter drainage network. Regular cleaning of the network indicates the required minimum width of khals that will lessen congestion after high-intensity, short-dura- will be needed to improve flow (appendix b, table b.1). tion rainfalls. · Introduce eco-engineering options on the canal net- · Preserve water retention areas for pumping stations. work. Both sides of the natural khal network should Water retention areas for the pumping stations of Dhaka West should be preserved and converted into permanent wetlands, thus promoting eco-tourism and 55. The depth and width would need to be determined through follow-up studies. attenuating flood peaks during extreme events. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 89 FIGURE 5.1. HY DRO LO G Y O F LAN D CO V E RED BY T HE D ETAI L ED AR EA PL AN Source: Study team 90 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations FIGURE 5.2. PRO PO S E D KHAL S TO B E E X CAVAT ED AND R EVI TAL I ZED I N DHAK A WEST Source: Study team 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 91 · Reclaim and revitalize lakes. The artificial lakes of As a first step, the area should be brought under full Dhanmondi, Banani, and Uttara must be cleaned municipal oversight and administration so that it can under DWASA supervision to increase their retention be managed and serviced in a planned way. Land-use capacity. Recreational facilities should be modernized planning and zoning in Dhaka East should be compatible to promote eco-tourism. with planning for the entire DAP area. Drainage should · be expanded in the area in accordance with land-use and Establish a central, eco-friendly solid waste manage- zoning plans—that is, before the land has been developed ment system to convert waste into green fertilizer. and provided with roads, water, and other services. To This measure would lessen waste dumping in natural maintain Dhaka East’s connectivity with the river system, canals and storm-water drains and reduce clogging the following measures can be undertaken. · and silting. · Revitalize and protect natural canals. Natural canals Undertake design improvements in flood infrastruc- (figure 5.3) must be revitalized and protected to ture. Design improvements in existing infrastructure maintain water flow and establish connectivity with are needed. For instance, 11 sluice gates (or regu- the river system. The khals in question include the lators) currently operate in Dhaka West. Most are Zerani, Manda, Meradia-Gazaria, Koshai Bari, Shahjah- manual and very heavy to operate. Furthermore, their anpur, Shahjadpur, Sutivola, Dumni, Boalia, Rampura, size is narrower than the natural canals, which limits Govindapur, Segunbagicha, Norail, Begunbari, and the flow of water. Modernizing these sluices would en- Khilgaon-Basabo, which are degraded and should be hance their efficiency. Improvements in the efficiency reexcavated on a priority basis. Their estimated min- of pump operations also offer energy efficiency gains. imum width, based on modelling analysis carried out · by CEGIS, is indicated in appendix b, table b.3. · Clean box culverts. All box culverts should be cleaned regularly by DWASA to maintain connectivity with Mark and protect canals through “green adaptation.” natural canals and promote the smooth flow of water. These natural canals can be protected from encroach- ment by creating a 2–3 meter green strip that will increase the ecosystem value of the canals. · MEASUR ES FO R DHAK A EAST Create a buffer zone for the Balu and Lakhya rivers. At present, Dhaka East is very different from Dhaka West This zone should be protected and preserved using in terms of its hydrology, population density, institution- a low embankment to store flood water to a certain al arrangements, and access to drainage and sewerage. limit during the monsoon season and to prevent This area is not yet controlled against river flooding, nor encroachment. In the dry season, the floodplain does it have a storm-water drainage system. It is primar- inside the embankment can be used for recreation- ily drained by isolated depressions, natural canals, and al purposes. figure 5.4 is a cross-sectional view of a the river system. However, in the absence of any munici- river section with a low embankment (doubling as a pal organization to provide services to this area, limited walkway) and buffer zone. The design section of the land-use zoning, and limited oversight by RAJUK, the area embankment should be fixed after further technical is being used for haphazard landfilling and urbanization. studies. Vegetation can be implanted over the em- This needs to be urgently addressed if Dhaka is to em- bankment to provide living space for aquatic species bark on a more sustainable development path. during the monsoon. A strip of vegetation 4–5 meters 92 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations FIGURE 5.3. PRO PO S E D KHAL S TO B E E X CAVAT ED AND R EVI TAL I ZED I N D HAK A EAST Source: Study team. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 93 wide can be planted on the outer side of the embank- ments and floodwalls. Roads top the embankments. The ment. pumping station at Shimrail drains water from the DND · area into the Shitalakhya River.56 The natural runoff to the Dredge peripheral rivers. The rivers surrounding canals has been disrupted by unplanned settlements, and eastern Dhaka, specifically the Shitalakhya and Balu, the drainage canals built by BWDB to carry water toward should be dredged regularly to allow water to flow the pumping station are badly dilapidated and clogged ow- smoothly. Interconnection of peripheral rivers and ing to unauthorized encroachment and solid waste. tidal effects in the above-mentioned rivers partial- ly control the flow of the peripheral river system, Although some areas within the DND area have recently especially during the dry season. Therefore, regular come under management of DSCC, most of the area does maintenance dredging is necessary to maintain the not enjoy any basic services. DWASA does not operate a dynamic of the river system. storm water drainage network in the DND area. Conse- · quently, drainage congestion has become a major problem Promote eco-tourism by protecting wetlands. Wet- that exacerbates flood risk in this area (Islam and Haque lands and waterbodies retain water and serve as 2005). About 87 percent of the area becomes affected by eco-tourism sites. Some wetlands preservation zones waterlogging and inundation with a depth of 1–3 meters are shown in figure 5.5. during moderate storms. It is also one of the areas most · at risk of inundation owing to climate change (Dasgupta Deploy innovative eco-engineering measures. Eco-engi- et al. 2015). neering measures such as planted drainage channels, plaza planters, rainwater harvesting, and permeable To address waterlogging issues, the DND area should come paving should be undertaken to enhance urban devel- under municipal administration, with clear responsibili- opment in this area. ties for provision of basic services. · Integrate the installation of a storm-water drainage Within the framework of an integrated approach to land network with overall spatial planning. The connec- use and hydrology for Greater Dhaka, the following mea- tivity of the storm-drainage network with natural sures can be undertaken in the DND area (figures 5.6 and khals should be properly monitored and maintained. 5.7).57 · Regular cleaning is mandatory for proper functioning of the network. Reexcavate and maintain canals. The BWDB should reexcavate the major drainage canals in Pagla, Fatulla, and Shampur, as well as other primary and secondary MEASUR ES FO R T H E D HA K A - drainage canals and protect them against encroach- NAR AYANGA NJ-D EM RA A REA ment along their full length of 45.4 kilometers. The The low-lying DND area is one of the most vulnerable to flooding, at present and in the context of future climate 56. The pump was originally constructed for irrigation purpos- scenarios (Dasgupta et al. 2015). It is situated between the es. It used to allow access to water from the river system to irrigate land. Its operation was reversed to drain out Buriganga River to the west and Sitalakhya to the east, and water and is used for flood management purposes. lies in the flood plain of the Meghna River. Most of the for- 57. Some of these measures have also been proposed by fea- sibility studies carried out by CEGIS, RRI, and Development mer agricultural lands have become unplanned residential Design Consultants (DDC) under the Drainage Improve- and industrial areas. The DND area is encircled by embank- ment of DND project (BWDB 2010). 94 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations FIGURE 5.4. US IN G A LO W E MB AN KME N T AS A BUFFER ZONE ALONG R I VER S Source: Study team. Low height enbankment cum walkway Floodplain Floodplain River section River section canals should be regularly maintained. The regulato- poses. This should be done in full compliance with the ry authorities should protect the canals from illegal recently developed Structural Plan.58 · encroachment. · Provide for storm-water drainage. A piped storm-wa- Build green strips and fencing. Two to three meter ter drainage network should be established to handle green strips with green fencing could be developed storm water for the entire area. DWASA should be on both sides of the canals to infiltrate water into made responsible for maintaining and cleaning this the ground. The strips would prevent erosion, dis- drainage network.59 · sipate wave energy, and discourage encroachment. They could also be used for recreational purposes. Increase pumping capacity and efficiency. The present · pumping station at Shimrail (four pumps with a total Practice land-use zoning and enforcement. The area pumping capacity of 14.52 cumecs) is not sufficient should be divided into zones depending on their vul- to evacuate excess water from the area. The capacity nerabilities (for example, high risk of waterlogging) or and efficiency of the station should be increased and essential uses (for example, water retention). Some very additional stations installed at other locations (for low-lying parts of the DND area are still free of housing example, Adamjinagar, Pagla, Fatulla). · or other infrastructure and are submerged throughout the year. Any future development of these areas should Maintain the existing embankment. The existing 31 be subject to risk zoning and enforcement. kilometers of embankment (topped by a road) should · Ensure preservation of a minimum wetland area. At 58. https://www.rajukdhaka.gov.bd/rajuk/image/slideshow/ least 20 percent of the area should be declared by Dhaka_Structural_Plan.html. RAJUK as permanent wetland for water-retention pur- 59. This could be done building on existing design studies. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 95 FIGURE 5.5. P RO PO S E D W E TLAN D PRE S E R VAT I ON ZONES Source: Study team 2016. 96 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations FIGURE 5.6. P RO PO S E D M E AS URE S F O R TH E D HAK A-NAR AYANGANJ-DEMR A AR EA Source: Study team 2016. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 97 be strengthened to protect the entire DND area lowlands, rivers, floodplains, and agricultural lands. from river flooding. The embankment should be Flooding of the area is still controlled by the major maintained by BWDB. rivers (Old Brahmaputra, Jamuna, Bangshi, Dhaleswari, · Kaliganga, Gazikhali, Ichamati, Chilai, Suti, Sitalakhya) Improve the design of existing infrastructure. and their many tributaries. No storm water drainage Existing hydraulic structures should be remodeled network exists in this area; it is drained by wetlands, and renovated using an eco-engineering approach. natural depressions, and canals. Expansion of Dhaka to For example, eco-concrete (with rough surfaces accommodate a growing population will pose immense that become overgrown with algae) could replace pressure on this area. To ensure that urbanization is not ordinary concrete in new hydraulic structures, unplanned and self-defeating, the following eco-engi- providing space for fish and other aquatic species neering measures should be taken (figure 5.7): · while enhancing the filtration capacity of water. Regulators and sluices should be automated to Dredge peripheral rivers. The area’s peripheral rivers increase their efficiency. (Bangshi, Dhaleswari, Kaliganga, Ichamati, Chilai, · Sitalakhya) should be dredged regularly by BWDB and Create buffer zones. On both sides of the Lakhya their connectivity maintained.60 · River, buffer zones could be established to increase carrying capacity and discourage encroachment of Maintain the existing canals. Existing natural canals the riverbank. should be protected from illegal encroachment brought on by unplanned urbanization. Provision should be made for green strips 2–3 meters wide along both sides of the canal to prevent encroachment and MEASUR ES FO R A REA S CO VERED BY increase the canals’ ecological value. · THE DETAILED A REA P LA N BUT O UT S I D E THE DHAKA M ET RO P O LI TA N A REA Protect and preserve the area’s wetlands. The The lands covered by the DAP but outside the DMA municipal corporations should acquire enough extend over 1,130 square kilometers, most of them land to preserve and protect these wetlands from suburban and semi-developed but also including encroachment. • 60. Studies carried out by CEGIS estimate dimensions of buffer area for Bangshi, Dhaleswari, and Lakhya. 98 • 5. Conclusion and Recommendations FIGURE 5.7. P RO PO S E D B UFFE R ZO N E F O R MAJOR R I VER S OF GREATER DH AKA Source: Study team 2016. 5. Conclusion and Recommendations • 99 100 • References REFERENCES Abdul Kalam, A. K. A. 2009. “Planning Dhaka as a Global ——. 1997. Bangladesh Population Census 1991 Urban City: A Critical Discourse.” Journal of Bangladesh Area Report. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning. Institute of Planners 2: 1–12. ——. 2001. Population Census 2001 Preliminary Report. Ahmed, Iftekhar. 2014. “Factors in Building Resilience in Dhaka: Ministry of Planning. Urban Slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Procedia Economics and Finance 18: 745–53. ——. 2014. “Census on Slum Dwellers.” Ministry of Planning, Dhaka. Ahmed, S., and G. Bramley. 2015. “How Will Dhaka Grow Spatially in Future? Modelling its Urban Brammer, Hugh. 2010. “After the Bangladesh Flood Growth with a Near-Future Planning Scenario Action Plan: Looking to the Future.” Perspective.” International Journal of Sustainable Environmental Hazards: Human and Policy Built Environment 4 (2): 359–77. Dimensions 9: 118–30. http://www.southasia. ox.ac.uk/sites/sias/files/documents/ Alam, Md. Jahangir. 2014. “The Organized Encroachment Oxford%20University%20CSASP%20-%20 of Land Developers: Effects on Urban Flood Work%20in%20Progress%20Paper%2017%20 Management in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Brammer%20Flood.pdf. Sustainable Cities and Society 10: 49–58. BWDB (Bangladesh Water Development Board). 2016. Alam, S. 2006. “The Implications of Floods for Dhaka City “Bangladesh Water Development Board Planning.” In Options for Flood Risk and Damage (History).” Retrieved March 25, 2016, from Reduction in Bangladesh, edited by Kamal http://www.bwdb.gov.bd/index.php/site/ Siddiqui, and A. N.H. Akhtar Hossain. University page/6d77-1f17-3398-c39b-879c-318e-fe07-40f1- Press Limited. 7bbd-8020. Alam, Mozaharul, and Md. Golam Rabbani. 2007. CEGIS (Center for Environmental and Geographic “Vulnerabilities and Responses to Climate Information Services). 2009. Change for Dhaka.” Environment & Urbanization, International Institute for Environment and ——. 2015. “Draft Final Report on Flood Hydrology Study Development (IIED) 19 (1): 81–97. for the Western Part of Dhaka Metropolitan Area.” Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha Banks, N. 2012. “Urban Poverty in Bangladesh: Causes, (RAJUK), Dhaka. Consequences and Coping Strategies.” BWPI Working Paper 178, Brooks World Poverty Dasgupta, Susmita, Asif Zaman, Subhendu Roy, Mainul Institute, University of Manchester. http:// Huq, Sarwar Jahan, and Ainun Nishat. 2015. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ Urban Flooding of Greater Dhaka in a Changing id=2166863. Climate: Building Local Resilience to Disaster Risk. Directions in Development. Washington, BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 1977. Bangladesh DC: World Bank. National Population Census Report—1974. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning. Dewan, Ashraf. 2013. Floods in a Megacity: Geospatial References • 101 Techniques in Assessing Hazards, Risk and Hossain, S. 2008. “Rapid Urban Growth and Poverty in Vulnerability. Dordrecht: Springer. Dhaka City.” Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology 5 (1): 1–24. Dewan, Ashraf, and Yasushi Yamaguchi. 2009. “Using Remote Sensing and GIS to Detect and Monitor Hossain, S. M., S. S. Miti Nawshad, and Md. Lutfur and Use and Land Cover Change in Dhaka Rahman. 2013. “Circular Water Transport System Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005.” of Dhaka City: Analysis of Existing Condition, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 150: Inherent Problems and Future Prospects.” In 237–49. Dhaka Metropolitan Development Area and Its Planning: Problems Issues and Policies, edited DWASA (Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority). by Sarwar Jahan, and A.K.M. Abul Kalam. Dhaka, 2013. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Institute of Planners. ——. 2015a. Annual Report. Dhaka: DWASA. Hulsman and Maarse. 2010. Dutch experience with green adaptation in water management. Delft. The ——. 2015b. “Organogram.” Retrieved February 11, 2015, Netherlands: Deltares. from http://dwasa.org.bd/index.php/home/ organogram/. Huq, S., and M. Alam. 2003. “Flood Management and Vulnerability of Dhaka City.” In Building Safer Faisal, I. M, M. R. Kabir, and A. Nishat. 1999. “Nonstructural Cities: The Future of Disaster Risk, edited by Flood Mitigation Measures for Dhaka City.” A. Kreimer, M. Arnold, and A. Carlin, 121–35. Urban Water 1 (2): 145–53. Washington, DC: World Bank. Farooque, M. A. 2011. “Dhaka Megacity: From Reactive Islam, M. S. 2014. “Inclusive Urban Development in Government to Anticipatory Governance.” Dhaka: Review of the National Housing Policy.” Presentation to BAPA-BEN Special Conference Presentation to World Town Planning Day on Urbanization, Traffic Jam, and Environment, online conference on “Equality in the City— Dhaka, Bangladesh, January. Making Cities Socially Cohesive,” November 5–7. http://www.ifhp.org/event/world-town- Government of Bangladesh. 2013. Guidelines for planning-day-0#.U9dJIrEYfqM. Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into Land Use Planning for Upazilas and Municipalities in Jha, A. K., R. Bloch, and J. Lamond. 2012. Cities and Bangladesh. ADPC report. Bangladesh: Urban Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Development Directorate (UDD)and Thailand: Management in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC). World Bank. http://www.adpc.net/igo/category/ID509/ doc/2014-y17Gw3-ADPC-Guidelines_Bangladesh. Li, X., G. Turner, and L. Jiang. 2012. Grow in Concert with pdf. Nature: Sustaining East Asia’s Water Resources through Green Water Defense. Washington, DC: Hossain, A.T.M. 2001. “The Engineering Behaviour of the World Bank. Tropical Clay Soils of Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Durham, LGED (Local Government and Engineering Department). England, United Kingdom. 2014. Annual Report of LGED (FY 2012–13). 102 • References Dhaka: Ministry of Local Government, Rural events%2Fmaterials%2 Development & Cooperatives. Fgm02_2_2_07pa.pdf&ei=6cGfVNz5JszIuAS3-I DQCQ&usg=AFQjCNEpN7eb6mksylRG-zdGErAtu Mahmud, Md. Akter. 2013. “Management of Growth OlGSQ&bvm=bv.8200133. and Planned Development of Dhaka City: The Necessity of Proper Enforcement of Planning RAJUK (Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha). 2015a. Annual Standards.” http://www.bip.org.bd/SharingFiles/ Report of RAJUK . Dhaka: RAJUK. journal_book/20130718115951.pdf. ——. 2015b. “Dhaka Structure Plan 2016–2035 (Draft).” Mahbub ul Haq Human Development Center. 2014. Human RAJUK, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Development in South Asia 2014— Urbanization: Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka. Challenges and Opportunities. Human Development Report. Islamabad, Pakistan: Roy, S. C., I. Jahan, and Md. Asaduzzaman. 2011. “DMDP Mahbub ul Haq Human Development Center. as a Tool to Safeguard the Flood Flow Zones from Unrestrained Development.” Journal MoWR (Ministry of Water Resources). 2014. Annual Report of Bangladesh Institute of Planners 4: 7l–79. of the Ministry of Water Resources (FY 2012–13). http://www.bip.org.bd/SharingFiles/journal_ Dhaka: MoWR. book/20130724140932.pdf. Mohit, M. A. 2012. “Bastee Settlements of Dhaka City, Seraj, T. M., and Md. A. Islam. 2011. “Detailed Area Plan: Bangladesh: A Review of Policy Approaches Proposals to Meet Housing Demand in Dhaka.” and Challenges Ahead.” Procedia—Social and http://www.bip.org.bd/SharingFiles/journal_ Behavioral Sciences 36: 611–22. book/20140427150129.pdf. Mowla, Q. A., and M. S. Islam. 2013. “Natural Drainage Siddiqui, K., J. Ahmed, K. Siddique, S. Huq, A. Hossain, S. System and Water Logging in Dhaka: Measures Nazimud-Doula, and N. Rezawana. 2010. Social to Address the Problems.” Journal of Bangladesh Formation in Dhaka: 1985–2005: A Longitudinal Institute of Planners 6: 23–33. Study of Society in a Third World Megacity. Routledge. Quium, A. S. M. Abdul. 2007. “Sustainable Urban Development in Dhaka.” http://www.bip.org.bd/ Sultana, M. Sufia, G. M. Tarekul Islam, and Zahidul Islam. SharingFiles/journal_book/20130718123017.pdf. 2009. “Pre- and Post-Urban Wetland Area in Dhaka City, Bangladesh: A Remote Sensing and Rahman, Md. T. 2013. Urban Governance and Informal GIS Analysis.” Journal of Water Resource and Growth Regulation in Dhaka. Dhaka: A. H. Protection 1 (6): 414–21. Development. Tan, Y. S., T. J. Lee, and J. Tan. 2009. Clean, Green and Blue: Rahman, M. H. 2006. “Flood Management in Singapore’s Journey Towards Environmental Bangladesh.” Retrieved December 28, and Water Sustainability. Singapore: ISEAS 2014, from http://www.google.com.bd/ Publishing. url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source= web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCoQFjAD&url= Taylor, J. 1840. A Sketch of the Topography and Statistics of http%3A%2F%2Fwww.narbo.jp%2Fdata%2F01_ Dacca. Calcutta: Military Orphan Press. References • 103 Uddin, M. N., M. F. Anwar, M. T. Rahman, and M. N. Mobin. 2014. “An Investigation on the Pattern of Land Use Change in Dhaka City Using Remote Sensing and GIS Application.” Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources 7 (2): 105–09. UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) and UNECLAC (United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 2009. Eco- efficient and Sustainable Urban Infrastructure Development in Asia and Latin America. http:// www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/2/52002/ singapore_abc_waters_programme.pdf. UN-Habitat. 2008/2009. State of the World Cities: Harmonious Cities. London: Earthscan. World Bank. 1989. “Flood Control in Bangladesh: A Plan of Action.” Technical Paper 119, World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.preventionweb. net/files/2802_multipage.pdf. ——. 2003. Building Safer Cities: The Future of Disaster Risk. Disaster Risk Management Series 3. Washington, DC: World Bank. ——. 2010. Expanding Housing Finance to the Underserved in South Asia: Market Review and Forward Agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank. ——. 2012. Grow in Concert with Nature: Green Water Defense for Flood Risk Management in East Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank. ——. 2015. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. ——. 2016. Country Partnership Framework for Bangladesh for the Period FY 16–FY 20. World Bank Report 103723-BD. Washington, DC: World Bank. 104 • Appendix A Appendix A • 105 APPENDIX A. ECO-ENGINEERING FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT: PROFILE OF SELECTED CASE STUDIES The eco-engineering people from flooding through better planning and water approach to water management. management in delta regions Case studies F lood mitigation is one of the greatest challenges for The Green Water Defense or eco-engineering concept delta areas such as Dhaka. To meet those challeng- has been demonstrated in a wide range of applications, es, flood-prone cities around the world are turning six of which are profiled in the case studies below. These to integrated, sustainable, and adaptive solutions. These experiences have shown that Green Water Defense can include variations of the Green Water Defense approach be cheaper than traditional solutions and often are more to adaptive water management in delta regions. This cost-efficient because they serve multiple purposes. appendix briefly describes the underlying approach to eco-engineering and profiles six cities that are translating this approach into action.61 N E W O R L E AN S : G R E AT E R N E W O R L E AN S (G N O) U R B AN WAT E R PL AN A number of terms are used to suggest the integral, sus- The U.S. government pledged more than $100 billion to tainable, and adaptive approach to water management. rebuild the city of New Orleans after it was struck by All stress the importance of working with nature and mak- Hurricane Katrina, possibly the largest natural disaster ing use of natural functions in human interventions for in the history of the United States (Costanza et al. 2006). the benefit of both the human and the natural systems Rebuilding the city provided an opportunity to recon- (box a.1). sider flood-risk mitigation. The traditional approach to storm-water management—a forced drainage system with In the eco-engineering or Green Water Defense approach, levees—is resource-intensive, inflexible, and insufficient used interchangeably in this report, structural measures (GNO Urban Water Plan 2013). The system’s three main move beyond hard-engineered structures such as flood defects were found to be (i) insufficient capacity (lead- defenses and drainage channels to include more natural ing to overflows); (ii) subsidence caused by pumping; and and sustainable measures such as wetlands and natural (iii) exclusion of water from public spaces by levee walls, buffers. The “nonstructural” measures aim to protect which diminished the value of the area’s waterways and water bodies as public assets (GNO Urban Water Plan 2013). Indeed, forced drainage is considered the primary cause of 61. A detailed review of eco-engineering approaches to flood subsidence in the region which, in combination with a rise risk mitigation was undertaken as part of this study. An abbreviated version is presented in this appendix and the in sea level, increases the vulnerability of the urban area. detailed review is available upon request. 106 • Appendix A BOX A.1. Defining eco-engineering approaches to water management Eco-engineering: The design of sustainable ecosystems that integrate human society with its natural environment to stimulate both (Mitsch & Jorgensen 2003). Green adaptation: Adapting to climate change by embedding natural functions in land and water use planning in order to not only strengthen livelihoods and support development, but also to enhance ecosystem health (Hulsman et al. 2011). Green infrastructure: Green infrastructure is the strategically planned network of high-quality green spaces (EU 2012). The Environmental Protection Agency in the United States uses the term green infrastructure for its approach to using vegetation and soil for managing storm water runoff on the spot in local communities (EPA 2013). Green Water Defense refers to the use of ecosystem-based measures in an integrated, holistic approach to flood-risk reduction (Marchand et al. 2012). As promoted by the World Bank, the United Nations Environment Programme, and other institutions and organizations, Green Water Defense is based on the concept of “green growth” as an alternative to traditional methods of flood protection. Appendix A • 107 Developed by a consortium of American and Dutch so-called blue-green infrastructure to improve water partners, the GNO Urban Water Plan addresses all three quality and prevent mosquito breeding. It also encourag- defects through an approach that focuses on adapting es infiltration into the ground water to further prevent to water rather than defending from and excluding it, subsidence. retaining water rather than draining it as fast as possi- ble, and making water visible. It is based on a series of In the GNO Urban Water Plan, the foregoing strategies hydrological, ecological, and social principles that include and general measures are combined into seven types of “when it rains, slow and store”; “when it’s dry, circulate interventions or facilities that improve urban water man- and recharge”; “live with water”; “work with nature”; “work agement while also increasing environmental and spatial together”; and “design for adaptation.” quality, providing recreational facilities, and increasing land value. The seven types are described below. · The three principles on which the approach is based can be stated as follows: (i) slow down the water as much as Small-scale retrofits slow, store, and infiltrate storm possible by capturing and infiltrating rain locally in order water locally in public spaces (streets, parks, squares) to reduce the speed and the amount of storm-water run- and on private property. · off; (ii) store water in the landscape in canals and ponds and use as much as possible; (iii) drain only when neces- Circulating canals contribute to water storage ca- sary and as little as possible. pacity and drain excess water; they also recharge groundwater and support local habitats. · Strategies for slowing down water are based on the eco-engineering principles of bio retention and infiltration Strategic parklands provide large-scale water storage that make use of green infrastructure (GNO Urban Water capacity while increasing the quality of open space Plan 2013). The measures involved are relatively small in and providing recreational facilities. · scale but, when applied over a large area, have a signif- icant effect. They include rain gardens and bio-swales, Integrated wetlands contribute to water-storage ca- permeable paving, green roofs, and water harvesting. pacity and increase infiltration. The store-and-use strategies enhance water storage by · Integrated waterworks consist of all infrastructural retrofitting or improving existing storage areas such as ca- elements that contain, guide, and filter storm water, nals and ponds, as well as introducing new measures that surface water, groundwater, drinking water, sewage, include basins, constructed wetlands, and underground and industrial wastewater. They include water-treat- storage, as well as retrofitting and constructing canals ment plants, drainage pumps, sluices, weirs and gates. · to increase their storage capacity. In addition to reducing flood risk, these measures also reduce the risk of subsid- Regional monitoring networks provide real-time data ence through infiltration of ground water. on quality and quantity of both surface water and groundwater to address short-term drainage needs Strategies that infiltrate and store water locally can and long-term trends. · significantly reduce the load on the drainage system. Water that cannot be infiltrated, stored, and used is Waterfront development zones encourage multifunc- drained as efficiently as possible. The proposed drain- tional urban development around waterways and age system allows for the circulation of water through parklands. 108 • Appendix A FIGURE A.1. RE CO MME N DE D PUB LIC PO LICY AND I NFR AST R UCT UR E ACT I ONS, NEW ORLEA N S WATE R PLAN GREATER NEW ORLEANS URBAN WATER PLAN Public Policy Actions Public Infrastructure Actions Manage groundwater to control Adopt Urban Water Plan subsisdence Develop stormwater retention Monitor and record water levels and standards and best practices quality Ensure dedicated funding sources Engage in inter-parish water for Urban Water Plan strategies management Create a stormwater / groundwater management unit in each city / Finance, built, operate, and parish maintain components of regional water management system Establish a Regional Water Management Authority Parish Stormwater / Groundwater Management Units Existing Parish Water Management Entities Regional Water Management Authoriy Facilitate inter-parish collaboration Establish close collaboration with state groundwater managers Coordinate Urban Water Plan Cordinate Urban Water Plan initiatives with public policy improvements with public partners infrastructure partners Compile groundwater monitoring Develop Urban Water Plan goals data Generate annual reports on status Propose Regulations of water quantity and quality objetctives Appendix A • 109 The structural measures of the GNO Urban Water Plan ABC Waters, launched in 2006, advocates an integration of are accompanied by nonstructural (policy) measures. the environment, water bodies, and community to create a figure a.1 provides an overview of the integration sustainable urban environment and transform Singapore’s between infrastructural measures and policy recommen- water bodies from mono-functional elements to more inte- dations proposed in the Urban Water Plan. grated, multifunctional elements. Storm water is detained and treated on site using plants and soil media before The GNO Urban Water Plan is in the early stages of im- being allowed to flow into waterways and reservoirs. This plementation as funding is being sourced. Total costs practice reduces runoff and the risk of local flooding, while are estimated at $6.2 billion. Demonstration projects also facilitating improvements in water quality (vital for are important steps in the implementation effort. The ensuring a sustainable water supply for the city-state) and plan is expected to save the area more than $10.8 billion increasing biodiversity. in avoidable flooding, subsidence, and insurance costs over a period of 50 years. The direct and indirect impact The ABC Waters master plan, developed in 2007, encompass- on the regional economy is estimated at $11.3 billion. es more than a hundred projects that contribute to the Employment is expected to increase by up to a 100,000 development of this sustainable system. To be developed in jobs, and property values are projected to rise by $183 phases by 2030, the plan has three guiding principles (Tan, million. In total, estimated benefits are expected to Lee, and Tan 2009, cited in UNESCAP and UNECLAC 2009). · reach $22.3 billion, three times the investment, over the 50-year period. Active. The plan provides new community spaces and brings people closer to water through recreational activities. With more opportunities for interaction, SINGAPOR E: A BC WAT ERS P RO GRA M people will connect with the water, developing a sense Singapore, a densely populated city-state of 5.4 million of ownership and valuing it more. · people living on 700 square kilometers of land (World Economic Forum 2014), receives 2,400 mm of rainfall Beautiful. The plan develops reservoirs and water- annually and has a catchment area that stretches across ways into vibrant and aesthetically pleasing lifestyle two-thirds of the nation’s surface area (PUB 2011). Rain- attractions that integrate with parks, estates, and even water is collected and stored in 17 reservoirs, 32 major commercial developments. · rivers, and more than 7,000 km of canals and drains (PUB 2011). This catchment system forms part of a sustain- Clean. The plan provides for improved water quality by able water-management system that ensures not only incorporating features such as aquatic plants, reten- sufficient water supply but also efficient storm-water tion ponds, fountains, and recirculation to help remove management for a rapidly growing city with limited nutrients. The aim is also to minimize pollution in the space for expansion. waterways through public education and by promoting a sense of responsibility for water quality. The Singapore government has decided to combine the two objectives of flood-risk reduction and ensuring The ABC Waters Program distinguishes between measures fresh water supply by integrating flood prevention and that contribute to water catchment, water treatment, and harvesting of rainwater. The many reservoirs, rivers, and water conveyance water storage. Each category is described canals play an important role. below. 110 • Appendix A Catchment. Measures to expand the catchment area of nique that makes use of gabions and wood crib walls on the city range from large-scale planning strategies to mea- either side of the waterway. sures affecting individual buildings such as roof gardens or terraces, balconies, planter boxes, ground-level green- ABC Waters has a large-scale public outreach program to ery, and vertical greenery. increase community awareness. The program includes educational activities around water bodies throughout Traditionally, storm-water catchment in roads and walk- Singapore, as well as signage and information boards ways in Singapore occurs through chambers that channel at project sites. A demonstration project engaged the runoff into drains and culverts, which in turn convey it to community and increased awareness of the program. The main storm-water canals. ABC Waters proposes to incor- Kolam Ayer ABC Waterfront, completed in 2008, consisted porate bioretention swales and basins into this layout, of a 200-meter make-over of the Kallang River. The Public contributing not only to water retention but also allowing Utilities Board in Singapore involved community organi- storm water to be treated before being discharged into zations, schools, and residents early in the design process. the waterways (figure a.2). In addition to community participation and awareness, the program deploys depth markers and early warning Treatment. The water-treatment features of ABC Waters systems to warn the public of rising water levels. slow, retain, and clean storm-water runoff, simultaneously reducing the load on the drainage system and improving Bishan Park and Sengkang Riverside Park showcase the the water quality. Natural systems of plants and soils are concepts underlying ABC Waters, the design features of a cost-effective, sustainable and environmentally friendly which have been implemented throughout Singapore. approach to improving urban water quality. Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park is a result of a collaboration between two of Singapore’s governmental agencies: the Conveyance and storage. Singapore’s existing storm-wa- National Parks Board and the Public Utilities Board. The ter drainage system consists mainly of trapezoidal or park, completed in 2011, makes use of a cleansing biotope U-shaped concrete canals. These canals can drain storm located in part of the park, the Pond Gardens, to maintain water only at a high rate; they contribute nothing to water quality without chemical treatment. In addition, other water-management objectives such as infiltra- the Kallang River, a previously canalized concrete stream tion or treatment. In addition, they have little impact running through the park, has been restored to a mean- on increasing spatial quality, biodiversity, or recre- dering river with bioengineered river banks. ational opportunities. Creeping plants and gabions can enhance the appearance and biodiversity of such water- Sengkang Riverside Park, constructed in 2009 by Sin- ways (figure a.3). gapore’s National Parks Board, center on a pond and constructed wetland that act as a buffer during heavy The use of natural materials as structural elements in the rainfall. Excessive rainfall is collected in the pond and design of waterways (a technique known as bioengineer- released later through special outlets. The construct- ing stabilization) goes beyond aesthetics and biodiversity ed wetland, with a surface area of approximately 2,500 to stabilize river banks and reduce erosion, reduce the square meters, treats storm-water runoff and natural velocity of water flow, facilitate the settlement and sewage from a surface area that amounts to more than deposition of sand and silt to protect water quality down- 40 percent of the park area. The open pond into which the stream, and increase soil integrity through root networks. water eventually flows is used to irrigate the park. At the figure a.4 illustrates the design of a construction tech- same time, the pond and constructed wetland, located in Appendix A • 111 FIGURE A.2. S E CTIO N O F DE S IG N FO R B IO R ET ENT I ON SWAL ES I N WAL K WAYS . Source: PUB 2011. FIGURE A.3. TW O S E CTIO N S S H O W IN G AN EXI ST I NG CANAL WAL L (L EFT ) A N D P ROP OSE D CAN AL WALL W ITH G AB I ONS (R I GHT ) Source: PUB 2011. FIGURE A.4. A B IO E N G IN E E RIN G S TAB ILIZATI ON T ECHNI QUE APPL I ED I N TH E K A LLA NG RIV E R IN S IN G APO RE Source: PUB 2011. 112 • Appendix A FIGURE A1.5. O LD S E W E RAG E S Y S TE M (LE F T) AND SEPAR AT ED SEWER AGE SYST EM (R I GHT ) a wider reservoir area, have a recreational and educational Waterplan 2 Rotterdam, an ambitious effort to cope with value, while also increasing biodiversity. present and future water risks, is a unique cooperative effort between the municipality and three water boards to integrate urban development and spatial planning with WATERPL AN 2 RO T T ERD A M better water management. The underlying theme is that Although the harbor city of Rotterdam (600,000 inhabi- these components can reinforce one another by exploit- tants) owes much of its prosperity to its strategic position ing the synergies between land, water, and environmental in the delta of the Rhine, water can also threaten its management. Waterplan 2 proposes interventions to existence. Water threatens the city from at least three accommodate volumes of water by increasing storage different directions: from the River Rhine, from the North capacity (on the surface and underground) and to improve Sea, and from above. water quality using a separated sewerage system. The Maesland Barrier (built in 1997) solved much of the Museumpark is an example of a multifunctional use flood risk posed by the sea. But the problems associated solution for underground water storage. Utilizing special with high river discharge and heavy rainfall linger. At pres- design techniques, the parking garage can store 10,000 ent the city is inadequately prepared for the drainage of cubic meters of water during heavy and prolonged precipi- water during a heavy downpour, a challenged compound- tation while maintaining its normal function as a car park. ed by a combined sewerage system that is not up to its When the heavy rainfall ends, the stored water can be task. It has been calculated that to effectively cope with a discharged into the city’s drainage system. once in hundred years rainfall event, the city would need additional storage capacity of 500,000 to 600,000 cubic But progress in meeting the initial target for storage meters, the equivalent of 50 to 60 hectares of land covered capacity has been slow. Going forward, emphasis will by water a meter deep. In densely populated Rotterdam be placed on encouraging more participation from the this space is simply not available, so alternative solutions private sector, namely, real estate developers and housing need to be found to meet the challenge. With anticipated corporations. climate change, the needed storage capacity could ap- proach 750,000 cubic meters. From 2008 to 2011, about 50,000 square meters of green roofs were created in Rotterdam to retard run-off, thus Appendix A • 113 attenuating the peak flow and extending run-off over Water and sanitation systems are inadequate (VCAPS a longer. In 2011 Waterplan 2 established an annual Consortium 2013). target of an additional 40,000 square meters per year. Achieving that goal will require the cooperation and A draft master plan through 2025 does not address these support of the municipality, the water boards, and the issues sufficiently. Climate change, flood protection, and general public. water supply get particularly short shrift (VCAPS Consor- tium 2013). A separated sewerage system reduces the risk of spill- over of untreated sewage water into surface water The Ho Chi Minh City Climate Adaptation Strategy in- during high-intensity precipitation. As sewage pipes troduces an adaptive delta management approach that reach their useful life of about fifty years, the old com- builds on the principles of eco-engineering and takes into bined system can be replaced by a separated system, account likely climate change and future uncertainties where technically and financially feasible. (figure a inherent to long-term planning. The strategy is the result 1.5). of a strategic partnership between the Vietnamese and Dutch governments and the city of Rotterdam, funded Total investments for the Waterplan in the years 2007– by the Dutch Global Water Program. Developed in 2013 12 were approximately USD 93.3 million62 (€82 million). by a multi-disciplinary team of Vietnamese and Dutch More than half was provided by the water boards, the experts, the objective is to enhance the sustainable so- rest by the municipality. The concept is “the task holder cioeconomic development of Ho Chi Minh City. pays” whereby water boards are responsible for mea- sures that contribute to the water quality and water Important elements of the strategy are integration quantity goals, and the municipality pays for measures of short-term actions and long-term developments; dealing with sewerage, open space, and recreational cost-effective, flexible interventions for adapting to facilities. The municipality provides land free of charge, changing circumstances (climate change or socioeconom- as required. ic developments); sectoral integration (urban planning, flood-risk management, water and sanitation, environ- mental science); and links with ongoing projects and CL IMATE ADA P TAT I O N S T RAT EGY: initiatives (VCAPS Consortium 2013). HO CHI MIN H CIT Y, VI ET N A M Ho Chi Minh City lies on the Saigon River. The popu- These elements are incorporated into six strategic lation of 7 million is growing, spurred on by a vibrant directions to increase the resilience of Ho Chi Minh City economy. With unplanned urbanization, the city has over the short term (through 2025), the medium term expanded into poorly drained flood-prone areas along (2025–50), and the long term (2050–2100). the seacoast. Presently, a third of the urban area is vulnerable to regular flooding from the sea, rainfall, Strategic direction 1: Development sensitive to base con- and the river (VCAPS Consortium 2013). The problems ditions. Development should take place in accordance of flooding and poor drainage are likely to worsen with with elevation, soil and water conditions, and exposure climate change. Other problems exist as well. Over- to sea-level rise. Low-lying, flood-prone areas should be extraction of groundwater has increased subsidence. avoided for dense urban development; any development planned for these areas must incorporate adaptive mea- 62. Conversion rate of €1 = USD 1.14 (June 28, 2017) sures to mitigate flood risk. 114 • Appendix A Strategic direction 2: A stepwise approach to flood pro- incentives. Physical improvements to the existing system tection. To ensure flood protection on a larger scale, a are required. range of flood-control measures is required. These include large infrastructure, community-based measures, and Strategic direction 4: Coping with salinization. Direction nonstructural measures such as the development of 4 proposes to prevent salinization through structural flood-protection standards, strengthening of emergency flood-protection measures, smart dredging, and flush- response capacity, and adequate reservoir management. ing the urban water system. Adaptive measures such as moving drinking-water intakes upstream and converting Strategic direction 3: Increased capacity for water storage to salt-tolerant vegetation in those areas susceptible to and drainage. This direction focuses on localized floods flooding are proposed. resulting from high tides and heavy rainfall and caused by (i) insufficient storage capacity in built-up areas, (ii) low Strategic direction 5: Alternatives for groundwater use. elevation aggravated by land subsidence, and (iii) insuf- In order to retain a sustainable groundwater table and ficient or inadequately maintained sewage and drainage reduce subsidence, abstraction should be reduced sub- systems. All of these conditions are expected to worsen stantially. This can be achieved by improving surface in the near future. A series of measures aims to increase water quality as an alternative water supply in combina- water retention and discharge through: tion with enforcement of regulations on groundwater · abstraction. Retention ponds · Strategic direction 6: A stronger blue-green network and Minimization of impermeable surface area “urban ventilation.” Direction 6 aims to reduce heat stress · in the city through a variety of measures, including rein- Above-ground storage basins and underground water forcement of the city’s network of blue and green spaces, storage implementation of green building codes, and planning · for natural ventilation (VCAPS Consortium 2013). Water retention on roofs · Some of the main measures proposed in the Climate Increased evapotranspiration through vegetation Adaptation Strategy are nonstructural, particularly under · strategic direction 1. Careful consideration of land con- Land-use regulation ditions in land-use planning and zoning are proposed in order to promote climate adaptive planning. In addition, the strategy highlights the importance of enforcing reg- In addition to these interventions, storage and drainage ulations against encroachment of waterways, as well as standards must be reviewed and made consistent with the development and application of procedures to enforce the estimated effects of climate change. Procedures storage and drainage standards. It also proposes a review to enforce the new standards must be developed, and of these standards. Finally, it proposes the strengthening ongoing or planned development and maintenance works of emergency response capacity and mechanisms as an must reflect them. Compliance and enforcement can important nonstructural measure. be encouraged by raising water awareness and building capacity among urban planners. Enforcement can also be The Climate Adaptation Strategy is an ambitious program encouraged through juridical procedures and economic in the early stages of implementation. Although it is diffi- Appendix A • 115 cult at this stage to develop a definitive cost estimate, a striving for “integrated system solutions”; and the initial cost range is $110–130 million. Avoided flood using all readily available knowledge, including local damage is estimated at $1.4 billion (VCAPS Consortium knowledge. · 2013). Be adaptive. The approach is iterative: plan > do > learn > improve > do. · GR EENINFR A 4 BEI RA : BEI RA , M O Z A M BIQ U E The city of Beira sits just a few meters above sea level. Pursue a participatory approach. Beira stakeholders Poor storm-water management results in regular flood- will be involved throughout the different phases of ing of the city and peri-urban area. Natural depressions the project. in the Beira floodplain retain water for long periods of time, leading to extended inundations. In addition, The main deliverable is a detailed plan for implement- Beira is confronted with other water-related challenges ing green infrastructure in the pilot area, including such as providing drinking water, managing wastewa- water retention areas and drains to address the ter, and ensuring adequate sanitation. The threats of storm-water problem. The plan will be developed to the climate change, rising sea level, and land subsidence point where it can be presented to local decision mak- call for an integrated approach to water management. ers for consideration and implementation. Thus it will Growing demand for space in the delta area, coupled include an infrastructure financing strategy, as well as with illegal construction and a lack of capacity for a proposal for an appropriate governance structure for planning, inspection, and enforcement, add to the developing the infrastructure and ensuring subsequent challenge. operations and maintenance. Furthermore, GreenInfra- 4Beira will be a demonstration case and thus a catalyst The GreenInfra4Beira project being developed by a for future developments in Mozambique and abroad. consortium of Dutch organizations including Deltares, Witteveen+Bos, and Wageningen University will de- A detailed green infrastructure plan will be developed for ploy green infrastructure and adaptation to address a demonstration project in the Chota neighborhood with these issues. The project will examine the feasibility, the objective of obtaining stakeholder support for an costs, and benefits of water-management and preven- ecosystem approach to storm water management. Em- tion measures that make use of ecosystems such as phasis will be placed on the combined use of innovative wetlands and the coastal environment to naturally tools and approaches. Situated in an alluvial zone, the mitigate storm water. Essential to the approach is local Chota area is one of the lowest urbanized areas of Beira execution by key Beira stakeholders. The project is a (1–2 meters above mean sea level). Most settlements are follow-on to the Masterplan Beira 2035 project, which built on landfills along the sides of roads and paths. began in 2012. The green infrastructure strategy for the Chota area The approach is based on three key principles (Brils et envisions the following measures: · al. 2013): · Creation of a lagoon to serve as retention basin Be well informed. This point includes an under- along the eastern coast. This will require deepening standing of the functioning of the Beira ecosystem a former lagoon, which has become silted from sedi- and its relationships to the Beira social system; ment depositions. 116 • Appendix A · Creation of a drainage channel from the newly de- Important eco-engineering aspects in the current ap- signed Maraza retention basin to the new lagoon. proach to storm-water management are to retain as much · run-off as possible through green infrastructure; to intro- Rehabilitation of the current A3 drainage channel and duce measures ranging from the local to the city-scale; its connection to the lagoon. and to combine structural with nonstructural measures. · Creation of smaller retention basins within Chota The structural measures that have been introduced area. include so-called Green Streets as well as measures to retrofit existing buildings and to impose energy and en- Although the initial strategy has focused on structural vironmental design requirements on new structures. All measures, nonstructural and capacity building measures measures address storm water on site by retaining and are on the agenda. The project will include capacity build- infiltrating water as much as possible. ing of staff, a communication and awareness program, and recommendations for legislation and regulated urban Open-space measures. Green Streets intercept and infil- planning. trate storm water through a combination of landscaped curb extensions, swales, planter strips, pervious pavement and trees. Streets account for 35 percent of the city’s POR TLAND, O REGO N, US A impervious surface area, so street runoff contributes sig- Portland has a long-standing history of green infrastruc- nificantly to storm-water volumes. By retrofitting streets, ture projects, initiatives, and programs. Since the early both in public and private developments, with intercep- 1990s, the city’s Bureau of Environmental Services has tion and infiltration measures, the city reduces combined had a multi-faceted and largely successful Stormwater sewer overflows and water pollution (WERF 2009). More Management Program that addresses multiple goals and than 1,400 streets in Portland have been retrofitted ac- includes education, outreach, and community initiatives. cording to the Green Streets approach, and several more The program was developed in response to an inadequate are in the pipeline (Kurtz 2014). drainage and sewerage system (partly separated and part- ly combined depending on the location within the city) The award-winning Southwest 12th Ave Green Street that was insufficient to discharge the heavy rains that fall Planters project on the Portland State University campus, on the city. completed in 2005, is a prime example of the Green Streets principle. Four sequential storm water planters were The average annual precipitation in the Portland area is introduced to capture and treat runoff from 8,000 square 970 mm, leading to about 10 billion gallons of storm water feet of street surface. WERF (2009) described the concept runoff per year over streets, parking lots, buildings, and as follows: other hard surfaces. In addition to carrying pollutants to rivers and streams, the volume and speed of the runoff Water flows along the curb and enters the first plant- can cause flooding and erosion, destroy natural habitat, er via a channel cut into the curb. Depending on flows, and contribute to combined sewer overflows. Together water will pond to a depth of 6 inches, promoting with property owners, architects, engineers, and devel- infiltration and biological uptake of pollutants. If opers, the city has been exploring ways to better manage flows exceed this capacity, water will exit the first onsite surface storm water. planter through a second curb cut and be routed into the subsequent planters, either infiltrating to ground- Appendix A • 117 water or, during intense storms, eventually entering mittee was complemented by a Sustainable Stormwater the storm drain system. The planters themselves are Management Division (2002), a multidisciplinary group of designed to be long and narrow to fit into the existing professionals responsible for planning, technical assis- sidewalk space, and they contain a mix of rushes, tance, outreach and monitoring. trees, and shrubs that provide attractive landscaping year-round. With a quarter century of experience with eco-engineering and green solutions, Portland has demonstrated what Building-scale measures. Existing buildings are retrofitted is possible. The city’s Stormwater Management Program with eco-roofs that significantly decrease storm-water has significantly reduced storm-water runoff, improved runoff, reduce energy use, reduce water pollution and ero- water quality, reduced heat stress, promoted biodiversity, sion, improve air quality, improve biodiversity, and reduce enhanced neighborhoods, and raised property values. the urban-heat-island effect (BES 2014). Approximately 420 More importantly, Portland has demonstrated that green eco-roofs have been constructed (Kurtz 2014). eco-engineering principles are more cost-effective than the traditional approach (Kurtz 2014). For publicly funded new developments, the city im- poses energy and environmental design requirements, Portland’s program uses governmental grants, taxes, and incorporation of Green Streets, and consideration of development incentives. Incentives can be important in eco-roofs. For new private developments, partnerships forging public-private partnerships. Normally, developers are established with property owners to implement must comply with a certain floor-to-area ratio in urban storm-water retrofit projects. These structural mea- areas. However, as an incentive, developers who place a sures are complimented by policies, building codes and green roof on their building are entitled to a higher ratio. other nonstructural measures. In addition to incentives, These partnerships offer a win-win situation for both several policies encourage the application of sustainable government and private developers. • storm-water practices. The requirements for new develop- ment and redevelopment, both public and private, are set forth in the Stormwater Management Manual (1999). Demonstration projects throughout the city are closely monitored. The monitoring and reporting of these mea- sures is an important contribution to the success of the program, as the data collected are used to quantify the benefits of these measures, to improve their design and functioning, and to reduce maintenance costs by tracking performance and addressing maintenance needs as they arise (WERF 2009). Finally, the city created a Stormwater Policy Advisory Committee (1996), which included a diverse group of stakeholders—architects and landscape architects, engi- neers, institutional organizations, and the storm-water treatment industry—to advise the city. The advisory com- 118 • Appendix B APPENDIX B. ORGANOGRAM OF KEY AGENCIES Ministry of Water Resources Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief Bangladesh Water Bangladesh Haor Department of Disaster Water Resources and Wetlands Management Development Planning Development Board Authority Board Flood Forecasting and Warning (a) Relevant agencies under the Ministry of Water Resources (b) Agencies under the Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief Ministry of Local Government, Ministry of Housing and Rural Development and Public Works Cooperatives Local Dhaka Water DNCC, DSCC, other Public Government Supply and city corporations, RAJUK Works Engineering Sewerage upazilas and union Dept. Department Authority parishads (c) Agencies under the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and (d) Agencies under the Ministry of Housing and Cooperatives Public Works Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Shipping and Ministry of Defence Forest Inland Water Transport Bangladesh Department of Bangladesh Inland SPARSSO Meteorological Environment Water Transport Department Authority (f) Agencies under the Ministry of Defence (g) Agency under the Ministry of (h) Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Forest Shipping and Inland Water Transport Appendix C • 119 APPENDIX C. EXCAVATION OF KHALS TABLE C.1. RE Q UIRE D M I NI MUM WI D T H OF PR OPOSED NAT UR AL KHAL S TO B E RE E XCAVAT ED I N DHAK A WEST Name Length (km) Minimum width (m) Katasur 2.60 15 Baunia 7.60 25 Abdullahpur 5.50 15 Digun (main) 4.20 30 Kallayanpur Uma 1.10 12 Kallayanpur Cha .95 14 Kallayanpur Kha 3.30 10 Ramchandrapur 1.40 12 Kallayanpur Ka 2.70 8 Kallayanpur main 3.00 25 Dholai .40 12 Hazaribagh .42 25 Ibrahimpur .85 20 Shahjahanpur .80 8 Source: Data obtained from the city corporations. TABLE C.2. RE Q UIRE D M INI MUM WI DT H OF BUFFER ZO N E FO R PE RIPH E RAL R I VER S OF D HAK A River name Buffer width on each side (m) Turag 50–225 Dhaleswari 500 Buriganga 100 Bangshi 50 Tongi Khal 75 Balu 50 Sitalakhya 25 Chilai 50 Source: CEGIS 2016 120 • Appendix C TABLE C.3. ESTIM ATE D MIN IM UM W IDTH O F NAT UR AL K H A LS T O B E RE E XCAVATE D IN DH AKA E AST Name Length (km) Minimum width (m) Zerani 5.00 20 Meradia-Gazaria 2.60 25 Manda 5.00 8 Khilgaon-Basabo 3.20 15 Sutivola 7.40 25 Kosaibari- Boalia 5.60 10 Shahjadpur 7.80 5 Dumni 3.50 35 Boalia 1.90 30 Gobindapur 3.70 25 Segunbagicha .85 16 Norail 2.20 22 Begunbari 2.00 55 Source: CEGIS 2016