Boosting Pakistan’s Export Competitiveness: Private Sector Perspectives Proceedings from Round Table Meetings held in Islamabad, Peshawar, Karachi and Lahore September - November 2017 1 Table of Contents 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Methodology a. Identification of enterprises b. Provincial participation c. Organization of breakout activity d. Reporting of proceedings and way forward 4. Key challenges to export competitiveness 5. Province-specific prioritization of issues 6. Annexures a. Annexure 1: Agenda for the meeting b. Annexure 2: Exporter identification form c. Annexure 3: Presentation by World Bank Group d. Annexure 4: Presentation by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association e. Annexure 5: Group-wise questionnaires f. Annexure 6: List of meeting participants g. Annexure 7: Select media mentions h. Annexure 8: Select photos from the meetings 2 1. Summary Global and regional trade integration offers Pakistan tremendous potential in driving and sustaining growth and poverty reduction. Despite this potential, trade has not been effectively leveraged to catalyse growth in Pakistan in recent years. Trends in relative trade and competitiveness have been worrying, with export earnings declining 20 percent over the period FY2011-2017 and market share contracting by 1.45 percent annually. Understanding the constraints on trade and competitiveness from the perspective of the private sector engaged in export activities is critical to developing and implementing effective trade policy. To support the Government of Pakistan in the preparation of its new Strategic Trade Policy Framework (2018- 23), the World Bank Group conducted a series of private sector stakeholder consultations with current, past and potential Pakistani exporters in the manufacturing, agro processing, and services sectors. A total of 254 private sector representatives participated in four separate events organized in different provinces between September and November 2017. This note summarizes the main concerns expressed by the private sector during these consultations. The note’s main objective is to contribute to a fruitful private-public dialogue which can ultimately lend inputs for trade policy. The role of the World Bank Group in this respect is to bring together the private sector and the public sector, so that the constraints that the former face are presented to the latter. As such, the challenges to be summarized here are those identified by the key firms present during the private sector engagement meetings, during the fourth quarter of 2017, and not by the World Bank Group. Key challenges to export competitiveness identified by the private sector via these consultations include: a) regulatory constraints at federal and provincial government levels, b) high cost of doing business, including energy costs and import tariffs, c) inadequate trade facilitation and supporting instruments, d) lack of coordinated support from institutions responsible for export promotion and help towards market and product diversification, e) weak availability of credit for exports, particularly for potential and new exporters, and f) an exchange rate regime that is perceived to reinforce the anti-export bias of the de facto trade policy. Participating business associations also called for a detailed evaluation of reasons due to which intended benefits from Pakistan’s free trade agreements (FTAs) and European Union’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP+) could not be achieved. 3 2. Background The round table meetings were held between the period September to November 2017 in Islamabad (26 th September), Peshawar (19th October), Karachi (9th November), and Lahore (14th November). The meetings had participation from all sectors of the business community including agriculture, manufacturing and services sub-sectors. The meetings were organized in collaboration with relevant business associations including Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industries, Islamabad Chamber of Commerce and Industries, Lahore Chamber of Commerce and Industries and Sarhad Chamber of Commerce and Industries. The meetings also had participation from sectoral associations e.g. All Pakistan Textile Mills Association, Pakistan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association and Pakistan Software Houses Association for IT and ITES. The key objectives of these meetings were: a. To identify constraints being faced by existing exporters, disaggregated by minor or major limitations that exporters are confronting b. To identify barriers that potential exporters, particularly small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are facing while engaging in trade c. To point out regulatory, policy, infrastructural and knowledge gaps that are averting exporters from engaging in trade and d. To identify major restrictions and barriers that are being faced by existing and potential women exporters. The interventions and recommendations from these consultations will be presented to Ministry of Commerce as a key input for Strategic Trade Policy Framework (2018-23). 3. Methodology The team conducted a detailed assessment of past studies providing insights into macro and micro level constraints impeding competitiveness of key export-oriented industries in Pakistan. Current data on exporting sectors and ‘direction of trade’ information was also studied vis-à-vis competitor economies. This preliminary desk and literature review exercise helped in informing our consultations and round table meetings with the private sector. The heterogeneity of issues also motivated the team to host consultations at various key exporting destinations of Pakistan. Identification of enterprises: To acquire knowledge on issues faced by a wide range of businesses, for each province, we split the invited enterprises for consultation across four groups. These included current exporters, past exporters, services sector and potential exporters. There was no preference of pre-selecting 4 any sectors and therefore the invitation was sent out to the meta directory of exporters in each of the collaborating chambers of commerce and industries. It was also important to ensure the presence of past exporters i.e. those who are still active in business however are unable to remain an exporter due to internal or external constraints. The category of ‘potential exporters’ included representation from small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Again with in the SMEs there was no preference to pre-select any of the sectors and therefore we had sent out an invitation to the office bearers of Chambers of Small Industries. The presence of large exporters was ensured with the outreach provided by Pakistan Business Council. With help of the Board of Investment (BoI), Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP) and Small and Medium Enterprises Development Authority (SMEDA) we also ensured the presence of businesses persons (or entities) who are representing Pakistan in inter-governmental working groups hosted by multilateral and bilateral trade forums. This included leadership (or their nominee) from Pakistan Afghanistan Joint Chamber of Commerce & Industry, India Pakistan Business Council, Iran Pakistan Joint Business Council etc. Provincial participation: A key reason to host the meetings at various exporting hubs of Pakistan with in three different provinces was to document the heterogeneity of issues faced by different regions. While we were able to meet with business persons from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab and Sindh provinces, the business persons from Balochistan participated in the Islamabad meeting. The representation from Lasbela district of Balochistan was also ensured in the Karachi meeting. In our opening session of all meetings, Ministry of Commerce, Government of Pakistan was invited to explain the objectives of this exercise and expected outcomes. The opening session (see programme at annexure 1) which also included a detailed presentation by WBG titled ‘Unlocking Private Sector Growth through Increased Trade and Investment Competitiveness’ also had presence from various other government bodies including State Bank of Pakistan, BoI, TDAP, SMEDA, and provincial Planning & Development Departments. The latter sessions however only focused on private sector’s own discussion based on Chatham House rule i.e. participants were free to exchange ideas and possibly use the information received as they will, but not reveal the identity nor the affiliation of any other participant making interventions. Organisation of breakout activity: After the WBG presentation, a brief question and answer session was allowed. This was followed by clear guidelines to all the participants how to split across their respective groups and undertake (group) discussion. The participants’ name was shown on the screen under any one of the categories according to their current status i.e. current exporter, past exporter, services sector, or potential exporter. The format of registration form (annexure 2) allowed us to make the group wise distinction. Once seated they were provided with one group questionnaire for discussion and preparing a (group) response. Any participant wishing to provide their own industry’s perspective or individual response could also complete the same questionnaire independently, besides also contributing to the group interventions. All groups had one hour to complete their discussion around questions (provided at annexure 5). They were allowed additional time to prepare group presentations. For the remaining time of the meeting, each group was provided at least 20 minutes (followed by question and answer session of 5 minutes) to present their perspective. Reporting of proceedings and way forward: While the team aims to present findings from the round table meetings to the Ministry of Commerce as a key input for Strategic Trade Policy Framework (2018-23), the 5 same will also be presented in a national-level public-private policy symposium which will have presence of leading business leaders, relevant government officials, and noted trade economists from Pakistan. A key expectation from this symposium would be to present the consolidated findings from across Pakistan and validate the final recommendations being put forward to Ministry of Commerce, Government of Pakistan. 4. Key challenges to export competitiveness The qualitative responses come from 254 respondents who had participated in Islamabad, Peshawar, Karachi, and Lahore meetings. The male-female ratio across the overall sample was 3:1, however we may note that this is not representative of the enterprise universe in Pakistan. Around 71 percent of the participants were from the manufacturing and agro processing sectors (Figure 1) while the remaining were from the services sector. Within the manufacturing sector, key sub-sectors represented at the meetings include: textile, steel, pharmaceuticals, cement, auto parts, chemicals, oil and gas, construction material, fast moving consumer goods, and engineering. The food processing segment was also represented in all meetings. From the services sector there was a concentration of firms from information and communication technologies, finance and insurance, transport, health care, education and capacity building, and consulting services. Figure 1: Sectoral Representation of Participants Services, 26% Agro Manufacturing, Processing 61% , 10% Agriculture, 3% In terms of current status of businesses, 35 percent were current exporters, 23 percent were past exporters, 22 percent were from the services sector and remaining 20 percent were potential exporters. As per SMEDA’s 6 employment size criteria, 72 percent of our participants represented SMEs, while 28 percent were from larger entities.1 The key challenges highlighted during our meetings are categorized below under select broad categories: • Energy costs: There needs to be a policy to put a cap on the gas and electricity tariffs faced by exporting entities. The frequent changes in rates of utilities have adversely affected the forecasted cash flows and result in reduced competitiveness vis-à-vis peer economies. The current exporters suggested that gas and electricity tariffs should be in-line with the competitor economies e.g. Bangladesh, India and Vietnam (cross-country rates of gas and electricity provided in Annexure-4). The potential exporters explained that while the supply of energy has improved over the past 12 to 18 months, however cost per unit has not come down. • Distortions in taxation: The tax regime faced by exporters and importers of raw materials and machinery also requires certainty in the medium term. Recent changes in tariffs and regulatory duties, without a comprehensive discussion in the parliament or with the business community have increased the cost of trade across the country. The current exporters suggested that the general sales tax (GST) and other tax related rebates must be provided on all exports through an automatic adjustment (as per the report of Tax Reform Commission) and exporters should not have to repeatedly knock on the doors of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to settle refund amounts. The ‘potential exporters’ group in Lahore came up with specific tax-related interventions which could help bring down cost of compliance for SMEs. They explained that there is a need to reduce GST, tariffs and regulatory duties on imported intermediate goods. Furthermore, the total number of taxes faced by SMEs at the federal, provincial and local level currently stands at 56 as per a 2015-16 exercise by the BoI. These may be consolidated to bring down compliance costs. To encourage formalization of SMEs in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, it was suggested that documentation-related complexities (at the time of registration and renewal with Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, FBR, provincial tax authorities, and municipal regulatory bodies) in the current company incorporation and taxation regime may be rationalized. The manufacturing sector exporters, particularly from Lahore and Karachi explained that the mandate of Tax Reform Commission may be expanded to see how the role of FBR can be transformed into an entity which helps manufacturing sector’s exports. Currently over two -thirds of the overall burden of government revenue collection falls on the industrial manufacturing sector. The tax exemptions to large agriculture and agro-processing businesses may be revisited. • Financial intermediation: The lack of adequate banking channels with neighboring countries (e.g. Afghanistan, Iran, and India) and non-traditional export destinations e.g. central Asian economies is not letting exporters realize their potential. Also, the existing banking system of Pakistan must be made compatible with key export destinations in order to ensure that there are no undue financial barriers to trade. 1 An entity employing up to 250 employees is termed small and medium enterprise. 7 The business community from disadvantaged and conflict-hit areas of Balochistan and western Khyber Pakhtunkhwa highlighted the lack of tax-free raw material imports and tax holidays to restart industrial growth. The micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in these areas have demanded a policy of preferred purchase across government procurement, however this may require changes in the rules being currently followed by Public Procurement Regulatory Authority of Pakistan.2 It may also be difficult of MSMEs to complete the traditional compliance requirements of financial institutions for accessing credit for working capital and fixed investment. Examples from ASEAN economies were highlighted where banks were encouraged to customize their credit products, simplify the process of application and offer flexible payback options for MSMEs. However, it was noted that such customization should also include guarantees by the government which can save MSMEs from collateral requirements. Similarly, the central bank will need to consult MSMEs, many of whom may be potential exporters, before introducing any new financial services in order to ensure appropriate inclusion and uptake. The past exporters explained that the financing under State Bank of Pakistan’s Export Finance Scheme3 and Long Term Financing Facility (LTFF)4 should be expanded for past exporters currently failing to regain their market. The services sector and potential exporters from this sector explained that the Central Bank regulations on lending procedures for services sector exporters need to be updated in view of the current difficulties faced by this sector.5 The State Bank of Pakistan’s ‘Prudential Regulations for SME Financing’ require more detail on support to services sector start-ups with a view to enhance their exporting capacities. • Customs processing: The time taken for custom clearance must be reduced in order to facilitate exports, especially for perishable items.6 In the case of delays in clearance of perishable items, there must be a mechanism of public-private risk sharing. The automated system being used by the customs department until now has shown mixed performance. The customs software at land route trading posts often suffers due to lack of efficient internet connectivity. This allows officials to resort to the manual customs processing in turn also opening the doors for rent seeking. • Exchange rate regime: The State Bank of Pakistan should convene a quarterly public private working group to discuss recommendations on the prevalent exchange rate management. Currently there are varying views with in the government regarding the overvalued exchange rate. The current exporters suggested that an overvalued exchange rate should be allowed to gradually adjust to its equilibrium value. This will benefit the key export-oriented industries in the longer run. The management of exchange rate policy should also take in to account the fast changing value of currencies in the competitor economies. 2 The term ‘preferred purchase’ refers to additional points (or preference) which may be given to these suppliers during the competitive bidding process. 3 For details on Export Finance Scheme see http://www.sbp.org.pk/incen/BookGuidlines-EFS.pdf. 4 For details on LTFF see http://www.sbp.org.pk/incen/FAQs%20on%20LTFF%20Scheme.pdf. 5 The SBP policy on SME finance may be seen here http://www.sbp.org.pk/smefd/PolicyPromotionSME-Finance.pdf. 6 Pakistan’s position on Logistics Performance Index may be seen here https://lpi.worldbank.org/domestic/performance/2016/C/PAK. 8 • Export promotion infrastructure: There is a need for the trade associations, chambers of commerce and industry and the federal and provincial governmental trade promotion departments (e.g. provincial Boards of Investment, departments of industries, etc.) to develop their capacity to research non-traditional markets abroad and possible future export destinations and products. This may include conducting road shows, expositions, etc. to help in marketing export products on the global market, the collection of requirements regarding quality standards, and ancillary requirements for developing technical and managerial skills. A diverse market may enhance the probability of exporting all types of goods. The trade offices in embassies of Pakistan may also aid in identification and promotion of potential exports in their respective regions. The business community was not satisfied with the outreach of commercial and trade officials posted in Pakistani embassies abroad. They should be given annual targets, failing of which a replacement should be considered. • Transport and warehousing: There needs to be a policy to put a cap on the transporting and warehousing costs faced by exporters. One way to achieve this may be through lowering the burden of taxes (and other levies) on transport and warehousing sector in return for certainty and lowering of price by private operators. Currently, several dry ports across the country are not effectively operational. Furthermore, the travel and dwell time faced by consignments is uncertain due to bottlenecks in in-land- and border-related trade infrastructure. The current exporters suggested that there is a need to review and lower (through policy changes) costs of transport and transit fees faced by the exporters. The provincial and local toll taxes also contribute to higher costs of moving the consignments. Several such taxes or levies can be consolidated. In this regard, this group was concerned regarding weak consultation around National Transport Policy 2017. This policy may be amended to include specific provisions which bring down the costs in transport and warehousing sectors. • Fiscal support for exporters: All fiscal incentives or subsidy packages provided to the exporters should be evidence-based. There should be a careful evaluation of past textile export packages provided by the Prime Minister – to see how much such packages have delivered in the past. Most export packages suffer from weak targeting.7 It was suggested by current exporters in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa that a scorecard method at the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan could lead to a clearer identification of new and potential exporters. Fiscal support should be strictly targeted towards these groups. Furthermore, such support should be time bound and with clear export targets in volume or value (of exports). • Role of FTAs and evaluation of GSP+: An evaluation is also required to see why Pakistan has not been able to achieve the benefits at a scale envisaged after the awarding of the European Union’s GSP+ arrangement. The representatives of FPCCI emphasized that all FTAs and preferential trade agreements (PTAs) may be carefully reviewed in the interest of local manufacturing industry and services sectors. This is particularly important at this stage as Pakistan is negotiating the next phase of China-Pakistan FTA. 7See chapter on export competitiveness in Ahmed, V (2017) Pakistan’s Agenda for Economic Reforms. Oxford University Press , Karachi. https://oup.com.pk/new-arrivals/pakistan-s-agenda-for-economic-reforms.html 9 The past exporters explained that their industries could not compete after signing of FTAs with some very large economies. These included businesses from plastics, furniture, wood and wood products, paper and paper board. Such FTAs should be revisited and revised to allow a level playing field to the local manufacturing industry. The services sector participants in Lahore suggested that the revision of China-Pakistan FTA should include provisions for services and foreign direct investment and agreement on double taxation settlement. • Agriculture input costs: The uncertainty around agricultural imports needs to be cleared. Several imports (including inputs) are regulated and only allowed for a temporary period and at uncertain rates of import tariffs. This will send a strong signal to farmers of major and minor crops who face the risk of large price variations under an ever-changing trade policy towards the crop, livestock, forestry and fisheries sectors. The indirect taxes on agricultural inputs e.g. general sales tax also need rationalization. Currently, agriculture inputs are exposed to cascading due to lack of an effective value added tax mechanism.8 • Gaps in Skilled and Semi-skilled Labour market: The current exporters explained that the technical and vocational education training (TVET) institutes need to respond to the needs of local manufacturers. Most TVET institutions are focused on producing semi-skilled and not skilled labour. The ‘potential exporters’ group in Islamabad also explained that the incubators at the engineering universities need to be encouraged through changes in provincial development policies (e.g. Punjab Growth Strategy) and specific programmes under the provincial annual development plans to help start-ups in manufacturing sector to sustain the initial period of their existence and also become exporting entities over the medium term. • Issues specific to services exports: The Services Sector Export Development Strategy formulated by the Ministry of Commerce may be revisited and after consultation with all services sector stakeholders, a revised strategy may be approved by the Cabinet. Given a large skilled workforce in the information technology sector, the government should prioritize IT-enabled services across the services activities (e.g. trade in IT-enabled health services and medical tourism). The Services Sector Export Development Strategy should also consider new sectors where the cost of skilled professionals within Pakistan is lower in comparison to peer economies (e.g. in provision of medical transcription services). Special Economic Zones (SEZs) are also required for services sectors along with tailored facilitation such as incubation services for start-ups. Most services sector start-ups or exporters are dependent upon internet penetration, therefore overall infrastructure gaps which prevent IT-connectivity needs to be addressed in rural and even peri-urban areas. Consultation processes and dialogues with trade bodies must involve all the stakeholders in the services sector. Currently there is no structured mechanism for public-private dialogue with the services sector, neither at the federal nor provincial government level. 8Cascading here refers to tax burden that is applied at every stage in the supply chain, without any adjustment for the tax already paid at earlier stages. This distorts the production decisions and increases cost of doing business. 10 • Gender-specific barriers to trade: The problem of exclusion of women from mainstream trade policy discourse in Pakistan was highlighted as a key concern. This was also cited as a critical reason as to why gender-specific barriers to expansion of women businesses and women’s participation in trade have not been addressed during the recent past. A key demand of most current women exporters is greater access to information and networking. The potential women exporters felt that the women chambers of commerce and industries (CCIs) still lacked the capacity to guide their members towards becoming exporters over the medium to longer run. The city-specific chambers of commerce and industry and federation of CCIs has still not allowed adequate representation of women at senior levels of management. The relevant wing which regulates CCIs at the Ministry of Commerce has also not sent strong advice to chambers and associations to make adequate representation mandatory. The potential women exporters also expressed the desire that TDAP subsidize the participation of (women) entrepreneurs from disadvantaged regions of Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkwa. The participants in the Lahore meeting highlighted gender-specific non-tariff barriers (NTBs) and called for safe amenities in land-based trade check posts. They see vast potential of trade with India through Wagah border, particularly in sectors such as textiles, jewelry, bridal dresses, cosmetics, processed food and herbal products. Therefore, they recommended one-window trade and tax facilitation centers along with converting all regulatory compliance processes to online. The past (women) exporters informed that a key cost which they were unable to bear relates to testing and certification requirements. In their opinion, there was no guidance available through the government channels on how to adapt with the fast changing certification requirements abroad. They cited the example from other South Asian countries where there are one-stop web portals and telephonic hotlines to guide women and build their capacity to cope with this issue.9 As potential women borrowers or applicants for export finance continue to face barriers in accessing formal banking channels, therefore it was highlighted that the necessary training of banking sector officials on gender-sensitive banking operations may be part of the central bank’s prudential regulations. • Certification requirements: The past exporters informed that getting product compliance and relevant certification to remain in traditional markets and penetrate in non-traditional markets has become an expensive exercise. The facilitation programmes from other South Asian countries were again cited. During the meetings, no specific details or examples regarding such programmes were discussed. It was revealed that a key reason why Pakistan was unable to achieve the anticipated gains from GSP+ was weak knowledge of certification requirements particularly for non-textile items in which Pakistan enjoys market access. • Regulatory burden: The group of past exporters during the Islamabad meeting suggested that the National Accountability Bureau10 may constitute a working group to study regulatory burdens on key export-oriented industries, costs of delayed business prosecution and corruption in dealing with 9 For example see SAARC Chamber Women Entrepreneurs Council. http://www.scwec.com 10 The National Accountability Bureau is Pakistan's apex anti-corruption organization. 11 government, particularly faced by SMEs not able to afford such transactions costs. For example, reducing the human interface in federal and provincial tax departments was cited as an example which could bring down costs related to corruption. The potential exporters highlighted that the number of days and procedural steps required to obtain connection of utilities needs to be reduced.11 Similarly, for plant expansion and land acquisition, application-and-wait time for licenses and permits may be reduced. The members of this group in Lahore meeting explained that several businesses were waiting to get electricity connections even after a wait of 12 months in the Sundar Industrial Estate – a flagship venture of Punjab Industrial Estates Development and Management Company. 5. Province specific prioritization of issues There were variations across provinces in terms of key priority issues hindering competitiveness. In the case of Sindh, main challenges included: a) dealing with tax authorities, b) lack of required skills in the labour market, c) weak role of business associations in demanding reform; providing awareness regarding their dialogue with the government and demanding facilitation, d) high tariff rates on imported inputs, e) lack of support for research and development in current and potential exporting sectors, f) weak banking channels at potential export destinations. A key concern during this meeting was that Sindh is the only province which is unable to trade with neighbouring country via land route. On the utilities and related inputs, the members of potential exporter group felt that the formal businesses are now receiving uninterrupted energy supply, however the cost of electricity and gas is high vis-à-vis competitor economies. In the case of Punjab, main challenges were: a) an uncertain post-18th constitutional Amendment regulatory regime faced by businesses - including the municipal, environmental and labour permits requirements, b) shortage of labour with required skills, c) complex tax regime for small exporters, d) lack of government support towards: timely coordination (within government) of export promotion measures, technological advancement support, and expansion of marketing efforts in potential export destinations. The business associations from Punjab wanted greater interaction with their counterparts in China and India to allow exchange of ideas regarding future trade and investment cooperation. They were particularly concerned over lack of consultation on the free trade agreement between China and Pakistan currently under revision. Current exporters felt that exports to India could be increased via land routes if government is willing to negotiate the NTBs faced by Pakistani exports in lieu of effectively addressing those NTBs faced by Indian merchandise in Pakistan. The issue of lack of transparency in exchange rate management was also highlighted as a key concern – something which heightens expectations of a future free fall of the Pakistani rupee. There was also a desire that annual evaluation of trade missions based in Pakistani embassies abroad should be carried out against a baseline and published for the knowledge of the business community. 11 For example see WBG’s doing business in Pakistan analysis here: http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/pakistan 12 In the case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, while issues faced in compliance with taxes and refunds remained a key concern (which is also preventing formalisation of businesses), the production side barriers to adoption of new technologies was highlighted. This could be a limiting factor as regards participation of enterprises from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) programmes. This was followed by several other challenges including: a) lack of labour as per demands of the changing production requirements, b) weak coordination of federal and provincial government to deliver export promotion packages for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s business community, c) weak awareness regarding government facilitation in marketing, testing services, and visa facilitation, d) overvalued exchange rate, and e) expensive and uncertain supply of energy. Several sector-specific associations were concerned regarding the arbitrary imposition of regulatory duties. Some other challenges include: lack of effectively operational dry ports in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, fast changing state policies towards transit trade with Afghanistan (a key concern of services sector exporters), damage occurring to merchandise being traded via Torkhum border, and slow progress in the area of mineral development – a sector which the local business community feels can bring medium to long term dividends. Before moving to provincial meetings the team had also conducted a round table consultation in Islamabad, where the business community from Balochistan province had also participated. Again, apart from the usual constraints related to taxation, energy and the exchange rate, a key concern was the manner in which Pakistan was trying to pursue FTAs with Brazil, South Korea, Turkey, Thailand and some other trade partners. The business associations were concerned that broad based consultations had not taken place before the framework meetings of these FTAs. Similarly, the representatives of manufacturing associations showed their concern at the lack of information available to local businesses regarding opportunities in Gwadar and SEZs under CPEC. The business community in Balochistan also wants export promotion as a key target in the recently announced ‘Prime Minister’s 10-year Uplift Package’ for the province. Figure 2: Key response words from Islamabad Round table meeting on 26th September, 2017 13 Figure 3: Key response words from Peshawar Round table meeting on 19th October, 2017 Figure 4: Key response words from Karachi Round table meeting on 9th November, 2017 14 Figure 5: Key response words from Lahore Round table meeting on 14th November, 2017 15 Annexures 16 Annexure 1: Agenda for the meeting12 09:30 Registration 10:00 Welcome Remarks by Dr. Vaqar Ahmed, SDPI Remarks by Patchamuthu Illangovan, Country Director, World Bank Group, Islamabad. • Remarks by Mohammad Younus Dagha, Secretary Commerce, • Government of Pakistan. • 10.30 Introduction to consultation methodology and breakout sessions by SDPI 10:40 Technical presentation by World Bank 11:00 Refreshment Break 11:15 Breakout sessions Note: Participants will be invited to split across 4 groups. Each group will be provided a set of five questions/issues for discussion. 12:15 Presentation by Group Leads and Q&A 13:15 Closing remarks and comments by World Bank 13:20 Roundup, way forward and vote of thanks by SDPI 13:30 Lunch 12This agenda is for Islamabad meeting. In the meetings held across provincial capitals, heads of WBG Islamabad office and Ministry of Commerce were represented by their nominees. 17 Annexure 2: Exporter Identification Form Sr. Name Enterprise Designation Gender Main Are you a Have Is your Email No. name [M/F] product/service current you entity SME or cell provided by exporter? been an or large # your exporter enterprise? [Yes/No] enterprise? in the past? [Yes/No] 1 2 3 4 5 6 18 Annexure 3: Presentation by World Bank Group Pakistan – Unlocking Private Sector Growth through Increased Trade and Investment Competitiveness Trade and Competitiveness Global Practice (GTCDR) Trade dynamics in recent years 1 19 Pakistan’s exports grew far more slowly than those of its South Asian peers 2500 2000 Export Index (1980=100) 1500 1000 500 0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2011 Pakistan South Asia World Source: Estimates from UNCTAD statistics, World Bank staff calculations. 2 …because Pakistan has not fully embraced the GVC revolution… Foreign Value Added in Gross Exports Domestic Value Added in Third Country Exports 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 PAK BGD LKA IND NPL THA MYS VNM THA NPL VNM IND MYS LKA BGD PAK 2000 2011 2000 2011 Source: Estimates from EORA, World Bank staff calculations. 3 20 …and it shows in lower FDI inflows… FDI net inflows (% of GDP) 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Rest of South Asia Pakistan Source: Estimates from UNCTAD statistics, FDI Markets and World Bank staff calculations. 4 …and in less sophisticated FDI flows - critical for diversification and productivity gains Share of announced FDI inflows by technology level Goods Services 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% 2005 2015 2005 2015 Resources Based Low-Technology low-knowledge intensity knowledge intensive Medium-technology High-Technolgy Source: FDI Markets and World Bank staff calculations. Note: Refers only to press announcements During 2015, Natural resources investments are related with Coal, Oil and Natural Gas projects from (China, UAE, UK, Poland) 5 21 Indeed, Pakistan’s export basket is concentrated, with textiles and foodstuff representing more than 70% in 2015 Source: Observatory of Economic Complexity 6 …and also in terms of markets, concentration is comparatively high… 250 200 Number of Destinations Reached 150 100 50 0 Brazil China Indonesia India Malaysia Pakistan Thailand Turkey 2014 2015 2016 7 22 …only selected products reach a wide set of destinations… 200 180 Number of destinations reached 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2014 2015 2016 Source: WITS Notes: This indicator is a measure of the diversification of trade along the destination dimension by product. 8 …and sophistication has also been lagging behind… Sophistication of Exports (EXPY) 10 9.9 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.4 China Malaysia Turkey India Pakistan Source: WITS 2006 2015 Notes: Estimating the level of technological sophistication embodied in a country’s export portfolio gives an indication of that c ountry’s economic development. The country’s expected GDP per capita, EXPY, is given by summing all the PRODY (weighted average of per capita GDP of countries p roducing that product, with weights derived from revealed comparative advantage) values for the products exported by the country, each weighted by the product’s share in total exports. 9 23 … with lots of space for quality upgrading China China United Afghanistan States Source: WITS 10 Why has Pakistan’s relative trade and investment performance declined? 11 24 The declining trend in Pakistan’s relative competitiveness has structural underpinnings anchored in four areas: 1. Relative prices 2. Trade Policy 3. Trade Facilitation, Logistics and Infrastructure 4. Investment Climate 12 Pakistan’s exports are sensitive to real exchange rate movements Real Effective Exchange Rate and exports 28 125 26 120 24 Real Effective Exchange Rate 115 22 Exports (USD Billion) 20 110 18 105 16 100 14 95 12 10 90 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Exports REER Source: Estimates from UNCTAD statistics and State Bank of Pakistan’s, World Bank staff calculations Notes: The real effective exchange rate is referred as REER, which measures the development of the real value of a country’s currency against the basket of the trading partners of the country. Increases in the REER denote real appreciations 13 25 … indeed, the 30 percent appreciation since 2010 contributed to a decline in exports of 17 percent Total Exports -.57 Log REER 1.8 Log W orld Income -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Merchandise -.56 Log REER 1.8 Log W orld Income -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Services -.66 Log REER 2.3 Log W orld Income -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Elasticity Source: Estimates from UNCTAD statistics and State Bank of Pakistan’s, World Bank staff calculations Notes: The real effective exchange rate is referred as REER, which measures the development of the real value of a country’s currency against the basket of the trading partners of the country. Increases in the REER denote real appreciations 14 Pakistan has a protectionist, discretionary and complex trade policy Simple Average Tariff (2006-14) 16 14 Tariff Rate (percent) 12 10 8 6 4 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Pakistan South Asia East Asia & Pacific Source: Estimates from WITS, World Bank staff calculations. 15 26 … and tariff rates are high compared to other countries and regions Weighted Average Tariff by Category (2014) 16 14 12 10 Percentage 8 6 4 2 0 Consumer goods Intermediate goods Raw materials Capital goods Pakistan Vietnam Malaysia South Asia East Asia Source: Estimates from WITS, World Bank staff calculations. 16 Observed tariff liberalization efforts in capital and intermediate goods are not enough Intermediates Capital goods 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10 Percent Percent 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 2006 2009 2012 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Bangladesh Pakistan Malaysia Vietnam Bangladesh Pakistan Malaysia Vietnam Source: Estimates from WITS, World Bank staff calculations. 17 27 … and are often inconsistent with other policy measures Number of tariff % total imports RDs revenue as % of lines paying RDs paying RDs paid custom duties 105 0.6 1.9 FY 12/13 250 0.7 1.9 FY 13/14 568 9.7 9.3 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 1,090 11.9 15.7 Source: Authors’ elaboration with customs data from FBR. Source: Estimates from WITS, World Bank staff calculations. 18 And exemptions don’t do the trick: they are skewed towards larger firms Percentage of Duty Exemptions claimed by top 100 firms, FY 15/16 70 8.7 61.8 60 8.0 50 10.1 40 9.9 30 16.6 20 10 8.5 0 1 1-5 6-10 11-25 26-50 51-100 top 100 Source: World Bank staff calculations. 19 28 In services trade policies, there are also some inconsistencies Source: World Bank STRI, trade in services database WDI. 20 Trade facilitation and logistics need to be improved to enhance GVC integration Logistics Performance Index 2016 LPI 4.0 Timeliness 3.0 Customs 2.0 1.0 Tracking and tracing Infrastructure Logistics quality and International shipments competence Bangladesh Pakistan Turkey Malaysia China Source: WITS, World Bank staff calculations. 21 29 Investment climate constraints continue to impede private sector growth Pakistan’s performance on DB indicators, 2017 Time Entailed in Doing Business Position: 144/190 Economies 300 Starting a Business (141) 250 200 Dealing with Resolving Insolvency Construction Permits (85) 150 (150) 200 100 Enforcing Contracts (157) 50 Getting Electricity (170) 150 0 100 Trading across Borders Registering Property (172) (169) 50 Paying Taxes (156) Getting Credit (82) 0 Starting a Dealing with Getting Registering Protecting Minority Business Construction Electricity Property Investors (27) Permits Pakistan South Asia High Income OECD DB 2017 Rank Source: World Bank Doing Business, World Bank staff calculations. 22 What would it take to move the trade agenda forward? 23 30 Now it’s your turn! Your opinion matters Private sector engagement exercise 24 31 Annexure 4: Presentation by All Pakistan Textile Mills Association RESTORATION OF EXPORT COMPETIVENESS OF TEXTILE INDUSTRY APTMA 26 th SEPTEMBER 2017 TRADE & EXTERNAL SECTOR-INDICATORS US $ Million FY 18 Commodities Commodities FY 16 FY 15 17 FY16 FY FY 17 Projected Exports Exports 23,667 20,802 20,802 20,448 20,44819,572 Imports Imports 45,826 44,765 44,765 53,026 53,026 58,020 Trade Trade Deficit-Goods Deficit-Goods (22,159) (23,963) (23,963) (32,578) (32,578) (38,448) Trade Trade in Services in Services –Deficit -Deficit (2,963) (2,400) (2,400) (3,573) (3,031)* *(4,075) Total Total Deficit in in Deficit Goods Goods & Services &Services (25,122) (26,363) (26,363) (36,151) (35,609) (42,523) Remittances Remittances inflow inflow 18,720 19,915 19,915 19,304 19,30418,492 Total Total External External Deficit Deficit (6,402) (6,448) (6,448) (16,847) (16,305) (24,031) Sources: PBS, SBP * Value from last three years average increase in deficit 32 POTENTIAL CLOSED CAPACITY Maximum Exported Current Exports Value @ Current Items Unit % Change Prices Quantity Quantity (2016-17) $ Million Cotton Yarn M. KGs 740 455 -39% 778 Cotton Cloth M. Sq. Mtrs 2,625 1962 -25% 717 Hosiery & Knitwear M.Doz 132 113 -14% 396 Bed Wear M.Kg 365 353 -3% 73 Towel M.Kg 192 183 -5% 39 Ready Made Garments M.Doz 41 35 -15% 400 Synthetic Fabrics M. Sq. Mtrs 843 123 -85% 1,200 Potential Direct Exports Forgone per annum $ 3,602 Million * 30-35% of Production capacities of Textile industry closed TEXTILE & CLOTHING EXPORTS GROWTH Value $ “Billion” % Change Countries 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2011-17 India 27.7 32.9 32.3 35.4 37.6 36.3 36.4 31% Bangladesh 19 21.4 24.6 28.4 30.7 31.8 31 63% Vietnam 15.2 16.7 18.1 21.5 25.2 28.4 31.5 107% Sri Lanka 4.1 4.2 4 4.5 4.93 4.82 4.9 20% Pakistan 13.8 12.4 13.1 13.7 13.5 12.5 12.5 -10% 33 ENERGY ▪ Energy cost is more than 30% of the total conversion cost in spinning, weaving and processing industries. ▪ Industrial gas tariff of Pakistan is 100% higher whereas electricity tariff is approx. 50% higher compared to regional competitors. ▪ Electricity is burdened with various surcharges of Rs. 3.63/kWh which represents excessive line losses, theft and system inefficiencies. In reality textile industry is supplied electricity through dedicated feeders with little or none line losses or non-payments. ▪ Gas is burdened with various add ons including (GIDC, UFG and irrational and excessive cost of supply) ▪ RLNG pricing is supposed to follow the principle of ring fencing but in contravention system wide excessive UFG of more than 9.2% is being charged whereas international norms allow for only 2% UFG Textile Industry can not pass on system inefficiencies to its international buyers. GAS TARIF COMPARISON US $/MMBTU FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRY 9.5 6 4.2 4.5 3 Bangladesh Vietnam India Pakistan System Pakistan RLNG Gas 34 In contrast the DES import price for July in Pakistan was approximately 6.73 $ per MMbtu ELECTRICITY TARIF COMPARISON US Cent /KWh FOR TEXTILE INDUSTRY 11 2* 9 7 7 India Vietnam China Pakistan * India’ State governments are giving subsidies ranging from US cent 1 to 2 cents per unit. Electricity tariff for Xingjiang province of China further subsidized to 6 cents per Kwh 35 EXPORT POTENTIAL Detail Unit Volume Surplus Yarns Million KG 740 Surplus Grieg Fabrics Million SQM 918 Surplus Processed Fabrics Million SQM 1,706 Processed fabric if surplus yarn & Grieg converted Million SQM 5,584 Additional Exports Potential (convert into garments) Value $ 11.9 Billion Revival of Closed Capacity Potential Value $ 3.6 Billion Total Export Potential Value $ 15.5 Billion Additional Investment $ 6 Billion Additional Jobs Creation 3 Million ESSENTIAL INITIATIVES FOR RESTORATION OF VIABILITY AND GROWTH OF TEXTILE INDUSTRY AND EXPORTS IMMEDIATE MEASURES 1. Implementation of PM’s Export led Growth package in letter and spirit. a) Immediate payment of drawback of taxes on realization of export proceeds to manufacturers cum exporters by State Bank Of Pakistan. b) Withdraw condition of 10 percent increase in exports for eligibility of duty drawback from July 2017- June 2018. c) Allow Duty / Tax free import of Cotton to provide internationally competitive raw materials to the industry. 2. Payment of all outstanding refunds of Sales Tax of the industry due upto June 2017. 3. Withdraw surcharges(Rs. 3.50/kWh) to bring electricity tariff at par with region @ Rs. 7/KWh. Provide RLNG/Natural gas (inclusive of GIDC) at Rs.600/mmBTU to the Industry across the country 4. Appropriate Exchange Rate adjustment to reflect actual market conditions. Annexure 5: Group-wise Questionnaires 36 Group 1 Questionnaire Name _______________________ Table_______________________________ Question 1: What do you export and where? What would you like to export and where? Question 2: What are the main constraints that you face when exporting or scaling up exports (e.g. access to finance, inputs, and energy; finding clients; dealing with standards, customs, taxes and tariffs; exchange rate risk etc.)? Note: Please use additional pages if required. Question 3: What is preventing you to enter more sophisticated markets? Question 4: What is the nature of problems that you face when dealing with various government departments, in the process of exporting? Problems Proposed Solutions Question 5: Do you see competition from foreign enterprises as a challenge or an opportunity, why? 37 Group 2 Questionnaire Name _______________________ Table_______________________________ Question 1: What were you exporting and where? What would you like to export and where? Question 2: What were the main difficulties due to which you have stopped exporting (e.g. access to finance, inputs, and energy; finding clients; dealing with standards, customs, taxes and tariffs; exchange rate risk etc.)? Note: Please use additional pages if required. Question 3: What has prevented you to enter more sophisticated markets? Question 4: What was the nature of problems that you faced when dealing with various government departments, in the process of exporting? Problems Proposed Solutions Question 5: Do you see competition from foreign enterprises as a challenge or an opportunity, why? 38 Group 3 Questionnaire Name _______________________ Table_______________________________ Question 1: What do you produce/manufacture? Question 2: What is stopping you from starting to export? (e.g. access to finance, inputs, and energy; finding clients; dealing with standards, customs, taxes and tariffs; exchange rate risk etc.)? Note: Please use additional pages if required. Question 3: What is preventing you to enter more sophisticated markets? Question 4: What are the major problems that you face when dealing with various government departments, which may also act as a disincentive for you in becoming an exporter? Problems Proposed Solutions Question 5: Do you see competition from foreign enterprises as a challenge or an opportunity, why? 39 Group 4 Questionnaire Name _______________________ Table_______________________________ Question 1: Which service are you providing? Are you able to export this service? Question 2: What are the main constraints that you face when exporting or trying to export (e.g. access to finance, inputs, and energy; finding clients; dealing with standards, customs, taxes and tariffs; exchange rate risk etc.)? Note: Please use additional pages if required. Question 3: What is preventing you to enter more sophisticated markets? Question 4: What is the nature of problems that you face when dealing with various government departments, in the process of exporting or trying to export? Problems Proposed Solutions Question 5: Do you see competition from foreign enterprises as a challenge or an opportunity, why? 40 Annexure 6: List of Meeting Participants Islamabad13 Name Enterprise Name Designation Zohair Ahmed Amreli steels PR Affairs Barkan Saeed P@sha Chairman Noshaba Shehzad ICCI Director Masood Hassan Adnan Wahid Fans Director Saad Adnan Pak Fans Director Hina Mansab Khan Laila Collections Owner Hassan Farid Pak Steel CEO Wajid Iqbal Amreli Steel Resident Director Nighat Umer Pakistan Ordinance Manager Export M. Abdul Wahab Zaireen e Haram Pvt. Ltd. CEO khurram Shahzad KSB Pumps Co Ltd AM Procurement Nabeel Sabir P@sha Senior Manager Asim Ghaffar LMKR VP R&D Wajiha Syed Ali Medical Center Head of HR & D Sheraz khan Welt Konnect DIR (Business Develop) Haji Fojan National enterprises ADPIEA Asif Ikram MAP President Adil Bashir APTMA SUC A. Rahim Nasir APTMA 13This list is not edited. Only the names of focal persons are provided. Several of our participants were accompanied by multiple accompanying representatives from the same organization. Similarly business associations had ensured multisectoral presence during the group work. The names of these additional participants are being acquired from secretariats of these associations. 41 Hamid T. Khan APTMA General Secterary Imran Shaukat SDPI/ JOBI Advisor Faheem Sardar Askari Security Ltd CEO Hafiz M Zia Ullah KSB Pumps Co Ltd DM Jawad Ahmed Fori Mazdoori Operational HR Lead Iqbal Kidwai PCMA COO/ General Secretary Irshad Ahmed Volta Manager Export Dr. Shiamil Daud Maryam Memorial CEO Hospital/RCCI Faisal S. Khan Ovex Technologies CEO Quratul Ain Eastern Dresses CEO Usman Shaukat Bio-Labs Pvt. Ltd Director Wasim Khokhar Bridgig Trade CEO Mian Waqas Fazal Ind Director Salman F Banday KSB Pumps Co Ltd Deputy Manager Rehan Bharara FGCC Chairman Sadia Waseem Saddis Fashion CEO Syed Turab Haider Amreli Steels Karachi Corporate Affairs Zaidi Mahwish Afiridi RCCI Chairperson Women Entrepreneur Excutive Member Zahid Manzoor Advance Engineering Business Manager Azra Akram Lead Engineering Team Lead Hadi Shah Innix-prime Senior Executive Urooj Fatima Innix-prime CEO Mariya Razzaq RCCI Head of WBIC 42 Shanza Anwar Anwar Industries Director Gul Zaiba Jawad Pernia Couture Head Mariha Ali Ali Impex MD Meher-un-Nisa Ali Impex V. Chairman Rubia Fayyaz Welt Konnect Employee M. Umer Tariq RCCI Head R&D Asma Kamran Mom's Food Owner Mr. Kamran Mom's Food Owner Talha bin Afzal P@sha Program Manager Peshawar Name Enterprises Name Designation Rehma Riaz Chief Executive M. Sabir CEO Khawaja Younas Naseer MD Riaz APP Food Governor Saima Amjad Entrepreneur Nasreen Aftab Owner Amber Zia Zia Custom Agency Director Muhammad Adnan Jalil FPCCI Chairman Standup Committee Faisal Bashir APCEA Executive Member Mohammad Aslam Ashraf Group MD Nauman Tariq TACCI Executive Member Bilil Mutafa Al-Bilal Enterprises APCEA M. Sohaib Roomi Sami n Sami Director 43 M. Ali Zahid Emirates Airline Sales Manager Muhammas Nauman Amin Group of Industries Director Shah Zahid Ullah KPCCI President Engr. Khalid Haider FPCCI Executive Officer Mazhar-ul-Haq Trans World International Chairman Export standing Committee Ashfaq Afridi SMEDA Manager Faauzia Luqman Chamber President Rasheed Paracha FPCCI VP Mohammad Anees ashraf Ashraf Group Director Jabir Ullah Shahzad Enterprises Director Mujeeb Ullah Mujeeb Enterprises Director Kawal Iqbal WCCI Chamber Project Coordinator Sartaj Ahmad Khan Chitral CCI President Mohammad Wazir Wazir Traders CEO Minhaj APCEA Ex. Chairman Syed Sabir Ali Shah P&D Department Senior Policy Advisor Jamshed Savol Premier Formica CE Waseem Premier Model School & Director Colleges Shafique ur Rehman Rehman Medical Institute CEO Abdur Rauf Shah Bannu CCI President Lazeza Liza Boutique & Gemstones Owner Akhter Amin APCEA/ Amin Gold Smith Exeutive Member/ SVC Standing Committee 44 Muhammad Fayyaz RCCI Qureshi Mian Ifthikhar Mian Ifthikhar Enterprises & Co Owner Dr. Yasir IM Sciences Assistant Professer Col Abdul Rauf Khan Karakoram Gemstones CEO Bashir Khan FPCCI, Peshawar Secretary Muhammad Usman Pak Match Director Muhammad Ikram Ikram Nature Exploration Pvt CE Ltd Amir khan FCCC Press Secretary Mushtaq ahmed APCEA SV Chairman Karachi Name Enterprise Name Designation Altaf Maitlo Ministry of Commerce Assistant Chief Nazir Ahmed Imtiaz Enterprises Business Manager Uzma Taslim KCCI Research Director Adil Nakhoda IBA ASST.PROF Ms. Jordan Swiss Consulate Deputy Head Saeed Sherani PAAPAM MC Member S Rizwan Ali Bahria Manager BIC A.Salam Shah Ministry of Commerce Director TP Abdul Razaq Ministry of Commerce SO-TP Maheen Salman Global Consultancy MD Fletcher D. Albert Swiss Business Council BOM Sidra Arshad KCCI Research Analyst 45 Nasir Rizwan AkD Securities Faheem Baig Karachi Metropolitan Farhan Ahmad General Tyre Company Secretary Abdul Rahim Galaxy Engineering Ceo Junaid Zameer DP World Ceo Saleem Siddique AGEC Ceo Ghazala Saifi WCCI Karachi South Founder SVP Sayyid Mansoob KMA Pakistan SME Board Chairman Mudassir Iqbal Women Dev. Dept, GOS Secretary Capt.Muhammad Sarfaraz Bureau Vertex Pakistan Manger Marine Nabeel Sabir P@SHA Senior Manager Shehryar Hydri P@SHA Secetary General Col.Khan Ullah Ijara Capital Executive Director Mr. Majyz Aziz Engineering Group Chairperson Mr. Aziz Memon Kings Group Group Chairperson Mr. Tariq Ikram TDAP Mr. Samir Amir Pakistan Business Council Dr. Bilal Ahmed FPCCI Director Dr. Shahida Wizarat IOBM Mr. Sohaib Jamali BR Research Mr. Hammad Siddiqui CIPE Mr. Huzaifa CIPE Ms. Marzia Raza OUP Pakistan 46 Lahore Name Enterprise Name Designation Hassan Ashraf ACCA Pakistan Business Development Manager Umme Amen AR Secondry school of science Coordinator Iqbal Kidwai PCMA Serectary General Memosh Khan Haleeb Foods CEO Rizwan Ahmed Punjab Bank Ltd CEO Ziauddin S.K Group CEO Anila Saleem WCCI Lahore Vice President Shahid Jamal Kazi IFI Consultant President Asad Feroze Secondry school Partner Ali Saeed STEMWR Manager Falahat WCCI President Mazhar Iqbal Ary News Chief reporter Ali Saeed Jang News Commerce reporter Nadeem Gloves Associator, Sialkot Chairman Dr. Shahid Raza SR Consultant private Ltd Chairman Faaiza Amjad WCCI Lahore Senio Vice President Sadia Khuram CAREEM GM Punjab Col. Hasan Khawar NCBAZE Faculty Mrs Huma NCBAZE Faculty Sidra Zameer WCCI Lahore Member Salman Javed SAP-PAK Manager Faisal SOS-CV Pakistan Director Iqbal HANDS Project officer 47 Naida P & DD Punjab Assistant Chief M.Umer Descon Engg-BD Kamran Niazi USAID EG Wali Skill city CEO Shams Fazal Trade CEO M.Aslam PWIARA M.Irfan Planning Commission Chief Muhammad Ahmed Malik Malik steel Director Muhammad Ahmed Malik Malik dairies Projector Muhammad Ahmed Malik Malik Garments Projector Muhammad Nouman Six seconds Project Mnanager Khalid Mahmood Mill ltd Exective Director M. A Hijaar Market Eyen International CE Hafiz PERI Associate Research Fellow M.Sajid Khan Farhaj Export Manager Fatima Malik BNU Lecturer Jamil Naz APEC Ishrat Farooqui KWCCI Former President Anusheh Naveed Ashraf Invest & Innovate Head of Insights Dr. Azhar Saver Feeds Chairman Sadia Malik Inoaura Impact Ventures CEO Anis ul Haq APTMA Secretary General Mumtaz Anwar PERI Director Younus HYK 48 Dr. Javed Lahore Founder President Usman Zahid World Bank Consultant Ammara Farooq Malik Seplaa Enterprises CEO Dr. Syed Health Business Managing Partner Qaisra Sheikh WCCI Lahore Former President Ather The News on Sunday Assistant Editor Zulfiqar AR Secondary school of Science Section Head Sohail Zahoor Rudolf Pakistan Private Ltd Finance Head Javed SMEDA DGM Nadeem Khan SCBS CEO Shazia Suleman WCCI Lahore Exective Member Dr. Jamshed Poultry CEO Muhammad Basit M.F Enterprises G.M CEO Sami Public Private partenership cell Head Saad Afzal SOS villages Pakistan Manager Mohd Tahseen South Asia Partnership Role L.D Dr.Raheel Punjab Revenue Authority Chairman Mauaz Raza Us Consulate General Lahore Economic Specialist Dr.Saima GCLL Lahore HOD Ali Ashghar UMT Lahore Research Fellow Al Waqar GCU Lahore Researcher Uzooba Mureen PERI Socialist Sabih Zaka Punjab small industries Dr.M Amjad Saqib Akhuwat Exective Director 49 Hasan Raza U.S Consulate General Lahore Specialist Haroon Rashid S.M Enterprises Partner Jamil Nasir Customs Collector Hamid Shahruh CEO Sajid Latif DGLE-Gen PITB Dr. Yaamina Suleman Institute of Admin. Sciences Assistant Professor Nadia Farwa Trade Development Authority Deputy Director Dr.S.M Naeem Punjab ECO Research Fellow Naveed Ahmed Pharmacy-Health Care Ltd Skills Manager Muhammad Nawaz Abedin MD Hussain Ashraf Group of Industries Manager Commercial Maria PPCBL OG-2 50 Annexure 7: Select Media Mentions Islamabad Special Round Table Meeting on “Achieving Export Competitiveness in Pakistan” September 26, 2017 The Express Tribune Islamabad, September 27, 2017 Official sit down to discuss export competitiveness By Our Correspondent https://tribune.com.pk/story/1517123/officials-sit-discuss-export-competitiveness/ Daily Times Islamabad, September 27, 2017 Commerce Secretary stresses joint efforts to boost export competitiveness By Staff Reporter http://dailytimes.com.pk/business/27-Sep-17/commerce-secy-stresses-joint-efforts-to-boost-export- competitiveness Pakistan Today Islamabad, September 27, 2017 Commerce sector urges broader national consultation to boost export By Staff Report https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/09/26/commerce-sec-urges-broader-national-consultation-to- boost-export/ Daily Parliament Times, Islamabad, September 27, 2017 Secy MoC for joint efforts to promote exports sector https://www.dailyparliamenttimes.com/secy-moc-joint-efforts-promote-exports-sector/ Urdu Papers Daily Express Islamabad, September 27, 2017 ‫تجارت‬ ‫سیکرٹری‬ ،‫گا‬ ‫ہو‬ ‫نکالنا‬ ‫کر‬ ‫بیٹھ‬ ‫مل‬ ‫حل‬ ‫کا‬ ‫مسائل‬ ‫برآمدی‬ ‫ء‬2017 ‫ستمبر‬ 27 ،‫آباد‬ ‫اسالم‬ ،‫ایکسپریس‬ ‫روزنامہ‬ https://www.express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1104578788&Issue=NP_ISB&Date=201 70927 51 Daily Jehan Pakistan Islamabad, September 27, 2017 ‫ڈھاگہ‬ ‫یونس‬ ،‫گا‬ ‫ہو‬ ‫نکالنا‬ ‫حل‬ ‫سے‬ ‫مشاورت‬ ‫قومی‬ ‫کا‬ ‫رکاٹوں‬ ‫برآمدات‬ ‫ء‬2017 ‫ ستمبر‬27 ،‫ اسالم آباد‬،‫روزنامہ جہان پاکستان‬ http://www.jehanpakistan.com/epaper/epaper/islamabad/270917/P3-12.jpg Daily Ausaf Islamabad, September 27, 2017 ‫ڈھاگہ‬ ‫یونس‬ ،‫ہیں‬ ‫رہے‬ ‫کر‬ ‫دور‬ ‫رکاوٹیں‬ ‫میں‬ ‫راہ‬ ‫کی‬ ‫برآمدات‬ ‫ء‬2017 ‫ ستمبر‬27 ،‫ اسالم آباد‬،‫روزنامہ اوصاف‬ http://epaper.dailyausaf.com/popup.php?newssrc=issues/2017-09-27/27446/314.gif Peshawar The News Islamabad/Rawalpindi, October 20, 2017 ‘Public-private competitiveness must to enhance exports’ By Our correspondent E-paper link: http://e.thenews.com.pk/pindi/10-20-2017/page17.asp The News Islamabad/Rawalpindi, October 20, 2017 Need stressed for joint efforts to boost exports Bureau report https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/238341-Need-stressed-for-joint-efforts-to-boost-exports The Express Tribune Islamabad, October 20, 2017 Roundtable Pakistan fails to achieve desired results from GSP Plus Our Correspondent https://tribune.com.pk/story/1536106/pakistan-fails-achieve-desired-results-gsp-plus/ The Nation Islamabad, October 20, 2017 Joint efforts of public, private sectors a must for exports revival By Staff Reporter http://nation.com.pk/business/20-Oct-2017/joint-efforts-of-public-private-sectors-a-must-for-exports-revival 52 Mettisglobal.news, Karachi October 19, 2017 KP traders, manufacturers stress broad-based consultations to boost exports http://mettisglobal.news/kp-traders-manufacturers-stress-broad-based-consultations-to-boost-exports/ The News Islamabad/Rawalpindi, October 20, 2017 ‘Public-private competitiveness must to enhance exports’ By Our correspondent E-paper link: http://e.thenews.com.pk/pindi/10-20-2017/page17.asp The News Islamabad/Rawalpindi, October 20, 2017 Need stressed for joint efforts to boost exports Bureau report https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/238341-Need-stressed-for-joint-efforts-to-boost-exports The Express Tribune Islamabad, October 20, 2017 Roundtable Pakistan fails to achieve desired results from GSP Plus Our Correspondent https://tribune.com.pk/story/1536106/pakistan-fails-achieve-desired-results-gsp-plus/ The Nation Islamabad, October 20, 2017 Joint efforts of public, private sectors a must for exports revival By Staff Reporter http://nation.com.pk/business/20-Oct-2017/joint-efforts-of-public-private-sectors-a-must-for-exports-revival Mettisglobal.news, Karachi October 19, 2017 KP traders, manufacturers stress broad-based consultations to boost exports http://mettisglobal.news/kp-traders-manufacturers-stress-broad-based-consultations-to-boost-exports/ 53 Karachi Business Recorder Islamabad, November 7, 2017 Government to develop next STPF in consultation with private sector By Parvez Jabri https://www.brecorder.com/2017/11/07/379516/government-to-develop-next-stpf-in-consultation-with- private-sector/ Business Recorder Islamabad, November 13, 2017 Strategic Trade Policy Framework By BR Research http://epaper.brecorder.com/2017/11/13/2-page/681789-news.html 54 Lahore Business Recorder Islamabad, November 15, 2017 2018-2023: ‘STPF must be based on constructive engagement between public and private sectors’ By Recorder Report https://fp.brecorder.com/2017/11/20171115235093/ Pakistan Observer Islamabad, November 15, 2017 Public-private dialogue to be backbone of trade policy By Salim Ahmed https://pakobserver.net/public-private-dialogue-backbone-trade-policy/ The Nation Lahore, November 15, 2017 Newsbrief Public-private dialogue to be backbone of forthcoming trade policy framework http://nation.com.pk/15-Nov-2017/newsbrief The Express Tribune Islamabad, November 15, 2017 Pakistan’s trade policy should be based on public-private dialogue By Our Correspondent https://tribune.com.pk/story/1558498/2-pakistans-trade-policy-based-public-private-dialogue/ The Frontier Post Peshawar, November 15, 2017 Public-private talks must for trade policy framework, says DG By F. P. Reporter http://thefrontierpost.com/public-private-talks-must-trade-policy-framework-says-dg/ Profit Magazine, Pakistan Today Islamabad, November 14, 2017 Public-private dialogue to be backbone of forthcoming trade policy framework: DG By INP https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/11/14/public-private-dialogue-to-be-backbone-of-forthcoming- trade-policy-framework-dg/ 55 Daily Aftab, Lahore November 14, 2017 ‘Trade policy to formed with mutual dialogue’ By Ramzan Asghar http://dailyaftab.pk/2017/11/14/trade-policy-to-formed/ 56 Annexure 8: Select Photos from the Meetings The inaugral session of the Islamabad meeting underway Left to right: Dr. Vaqar Ahmed (SDPI), Ms. Nadia Rocha (WBG), Mr. Younus Dagha (Secretary Commerce), Mr. Patchamuthu Illangovan, Country Director WBG Pakistan, Mr. Gonzalo J. Varela (WBG) 57 Shanza Anwar (Anwar Industries) speaking to the group of current exporters with representation from Ali Implex, Pakistan Ordnance Factory, National Enterprises, KSB Pumps, APTMA and Bio Labs amongst others 58 The past exporters group discussion with Mian Waqas Masud (Fazal Industries), Mahwish Afridi & Umer Tariq (RCCI) and Wajid Iqbal Amrelli Steel amongst other participants 59 The services sector discussing exports constraints. Mr. Asim Ghaffar (Code for Pakistan/LMKR), representations from PASHA and the Pakistan Chemical Manufacturer's Association are present amongst others 60 The potential exporters including Dr. Shimail Daud (Mariam Memorial Hospital), Mr. Faheem Sardar (Askari Securities), Mr. Jawad Ahmed (Fori Mazduri) discussing the challenges which inhibit them from becoming exporters 61 SDPI Team Working on World Bank Group's Private Sector Engagement Project (Left to Right standing)Yasir Dil, Shahbaz Tufail, Asif Javed, Shujaat Ahmed, Dr. Vaqar Ahmed, Mohammad Umair, Ahad Nazir & Ahmad Durrani (Left to Right Sitting) Abbas Makan, Maryum Waqar, Yamna Arshad & Rabia Manzoor 62 63