DIRECTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT THE WORLD BANK Lifelong Learning in the Global Knowledge Economy Challenges for Developing Countries Lifelong Learning in the Global Knowledge Economy: Challenges for Developing Countries Lifelong Learning in the Global Knowledge Economy: Challenges for Developing Countries A World Bank Report Washington, D.C. © 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: feedback@worldbank.org All rights reserved. 1 2 3 4 05 04 03 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail pubrights@worldbank.org. ISBN 0-8213-5475-2 Credit for cover photos: World Bank Library of Congress cataloging-in-publication data has been applied for. Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................xi Foreword..........................................................................................................xiii Preface................................................................................................................xv Executive Summary......................................................................................xvii Acronyms and Abbreviations .....................................................................xxv 1 The Knowledge Economy and the Changing Needs of the Labor Market ..........................................................................1 Implications of the Knowledge Economy for Education and Training .....................................................................3 Human Capital and Knowledge as Sources of Economic Growth ..........................................................................4 The State of Education in Developing Countries and Transition Economies .................................................................7 Increased Demand for Skills .................................................................8 Women, Technology, and Education .................................................14 Employer Demands and Private Education Sector Responses...............................................................................16 2 Transforming Learning.......................................................................21 Equipping Learners with the Skills and Competencies They Need to Succeed in a Knowledge Economy ...............................................................21 Changing the Way People Learn........................................................28 Expanding Learning Opportunities...................................................44 The Importance of Career Guidance and Counseling ....................54 Conclusion .............................................................................................55 v vi CONTENTS 3 Governing the Lifelong Learning System......................................57 Trends in Governance ..........................................................................57 Framework for Quality Assurance ....................................................65 Increasing Equity ..................................................................................71 Conclusion .............................................................................................72 4 Options for Financing Lifelong Learning ......................................73 The Growing Need to Support Lifelong Learning .............................................................................................73 Principles for Financing Lifelong Learning......................................76 Policy Options for Financing Learning beyond the Core Competencies ....................................................................79 Policy Options for Financing Training and Nontraditional Learning..........................................................92 Financing Lifelong Learning in Developing Countries and Transition Economies.............................................97 Conclusion .............................................................................................99 5 Moving Forward ................................................................................101 Benchmarking National Systems of Lifelong Learning.......................................................................102 The Permanent Nature of Change ...................................................103 The World Bank’s Support for Lifelong Learning ...........................................................................................108 References .......................................................................................................113 Index ...............................................................................................................131 Figures 1.1 Private Returns to Investment in Education, by Level of Education and Country Income Group .........................9 1.2 Returns to Schooling in Brazil, 1982 and 1998 .................................11 2.1 Literacy Levels in Selected Countries, 1994–98 ...............................24 2.2 GNP per Capita and Student Achievement on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study in Selected Countries, 1999........................................26 2.3 Proportion of Part-Time Learners in Higher Education in OECD Countries, 1997....................................47 4.1 Proportion of Private Funding Spent on Educational Institutions in Selected Countries, 1990s ...................75 4.2 Distribution of Public Expenditures by Income Quintile in Selected Countries..............................................78 CONTENTS vii Tables 1.1 Contribution of Computer Hardware to Output Growth, 1990–99...................................................................4 1.2 Evidence on Human Capital Externalities .........................................6 1.3 Value of Higher Education in Industrial Countries, 1970s–1990s........................................................8 1.4 Higher/Secondary Education Earnings Ratios in Middle-Income Countries, 1980s–1990s .......................................10 2.1 Performance of Selected Countries on TIMSS and PISA International Assessments in Science ..............................26 2.2 Knowledge of and Participation in Civil Society in Selected Countries, 1999 .................................................................28 2.3 Characteristics of Traditional and Lifelong Learning Models...................................................................................29 2.4 Effective and Less Effective Teacher Education Strategies in Developing Countries ...................................................35 2.5 Improvements in Performance Attributable to Computer-Assisted Instruction and Knowledge-Based Tutors ....................................................................38 2.6 Annual Computer Costs per User in Selected Countries................................................................................................43 2.7 Gross Enrollment Ratios in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries, 1998 .....................................................44 2.8 Participation in Adult Continuing Education and Training, by Level of Initial Educational Attainment, 1996.............................................................45 2.9 Enrollment and Costs at Selected Open Universities, 1990s .....................................................................51 2.10 Number of Radios, Televisions, and Personal Computers for Use in Educational Institutions in Selected Countries, 1997 ............................................52 2.11 Demand and Supply Factors Driving E-Learning in Corporate Training......................................................54 3.1 Scope, Content, and Delivery of Education and Training in Traditional and Lifelong Learning Models...................................................................................58 3.2 Traditional Role of Government and New Role in the Knowledge Economy .............................................59 4.1 Main Instruments for Financing Direct Costs of Lifelong Learning..................................................................80 4.2 Selected Options for Financing Lifelong Learning .........................88 5.1 Competencies Assessed by Various International Assessments................................................................ 103 viii CONTENTS 5.2 Measuring a Country’s Advance toward Lifelong Learning ...............................................................................104 5.3 Lifelong Learning in World Bank Documents ...............................109 Boxes 1.1 Why Did Intel Choose Costa Rica as the Site of a Multimillion Dollar Plant? ............................................................5 1.2 Technological and Organizational Change: A Case Study of a Commercial Bank in the United States ..............................................................................12 1.3 Impact of Migration of Technology Graduates from India ..............................................................................................13 1.4 Transforming a Pulp and Paper Company into a High-Tech Leader: The Case of Nokia ...................................18 2.1 Encouraging Creativity in Singapore ................................................30 2.2 What Does a Learner-Centered Classroom Look Like? .................30 2.3 Using Technology to Create an Effective Learning Environment in Australia....................................................................37 2.4 Using Intelligent Tutoring to Teach Air Force Technicians How to Troubleshoot Problems ....................................39 2.5 Using the Internet to Educate Students and Teachers ....................40 2.6 Encouraging Teachers in Chile to Learn How to Use Technology ..................................................................... 41 2.7 Affordable Models for ICTs in Rural Areas: Myeke High School, Kwazulu, South Africa ...................................44 2.8 The Limited Supply of Training for Rural Development in Madagascar..............................................................46 2.9 Using Distance Learning to Train Teachers in Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, and Sri Lanka........................50 3.1 Systemic Reform for Lifelong Learning in Finland.........................61 3.2 Forming Creative Partnerships between the Public and Private Sectors to Run Schools .......................................64 3.3 Building a Lifelong Learning System in Chile.................................66 3.4 The Republic of Korea’s Flexible System of Recognizing Learning Outcomes ..................................................67 3.5 The National Qualifications Framework in Namibia .....................70 4.1 Financing Postsecondary Education and Training in Chile...........81 4.2 The Philippines’ Financial Aid Scheme ............................................82 4.3 Trading Human Capital Contracts: MyRichUncle ..........................84 4.4 Investing in the Future Earning Capacity of a Rock Star: Bowie Bonds ...............................................................84 4.5 Australia’s Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) .....................................................................................86 CONTENTS ix 4.6 Namibia’s Income-Contingent Loan Scheme...................................87 4.7 Financing Education with Demand-Side Mechanisms in Denmark.....................................................................91 4.8 Training Levy Schemes in Brazil, France, and Malaysia .........................................................................................93 4.9 Increasing School Enrollment through Stipends in Brazil: The Bolsa Escola Program .................................95 4.10 Individual Learning Accounts in Western Europe..........................96 4.11 Financing Lifelong Learning through Education Savings Accounts in Canada ..............................................................98 5.1 Hungary’s Strategy for Lifelong Learning......................................110 5.2 Developing an Education Strategy for the Knowledge Economy in Jordan........................................................110 Acknowledgments This study was prepared by a team led by Toby Linden and Harry Anthony Patrinos, who worked under the general direction of Ruth Kagia and the immediate supervision of Jamil Salmi. Team members included David Herbert Fretwell, Kyriakos Georgiades, Richard Hopper, Gwang-Jo Kim, Yoshiko Koda, Kathrin Plangeman, Shobhana Sosale, Masako Uchida, and Ayesha Vawda. Dina Abu-Ghaida, Cecile Fruman, Carolyn Winter, and Mary Eming Young provided additional input. Hernán Araneda, Martin Cristóbal, Pedro Hepp, Yoshiko Koda, Robert L. McGough, Walter McMahon, Hessel Oosterbeek, Miguel Palacios, Denis Ralph, and Frances Tsakonas prepared background papers. The team is grateful for the advice and comments of the peer reviewers: Mary Canning, Barry Chiswick (University of Chicago), Carl Dahlman, Lauritz Holm-Nielsen, Barry McGaw (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), and Alan Wagner (State University of New York, Albany). Hermann-Günter Hesse (German Institute for International Educational Research), Trevor Riordan (International Labour Organization), and Akiko Sakamoto (International Labour Organization) provided useful comments. The team also thanks the people who dis- cussed the document at two review meetings: Sue Berryman, Peter Buckland, Amit Dar, Marito Garcia, Indermit Gill, Thomas Hansen, Yoko Nagashima, Norbert Schady, and especially Aya Aoki, William Experton, Juan Prawda, and Francis Steier, who also provided written comments. The team benefited from discussions of a draft of this report at the inter- national conference “Education—Lifelong Learning and the Knowledge Economy,” held in Stuttgart, Germany, in October 2002. Energy James, Inosha Wickramasekera, and especially Micky Ananth and Ma. Lorelei Lacdao helped prepare drafts of the report. xi Foreword The emergence of the global knowledge economy has put a premium on learning throughout the world. Ideas and know-how as sources of eco- nomic growth and development, along with the application of new tech- nologies, have important implications for how people learn and apply knowledge throughout their lives. Lifelong learning is becoming a necessity in many countries. It is more than just education and training beyond formal schooling. A lifelong learning framework encompasses learning throughout the lifecycle, from early childhood to retirement, and in different learning environments, for- mal, nonformal, and informal. Opportunities for learning throughout one’s lifetime are becoming increasingly critical for countries to be com- petitive in the global knowledge economy. Lifelong learning is education for the knowledge economy. Within this lifelong learning framework, formal education structures—primary, sec- ondary, higher, vocational, and so on—are less important than learning and meeting learners’ needs. It is essential to integrate learning programs better and to align different elements of the system. Learners should be able to enter and leave the system at different points. The learning system needs to include a multitude of players, such as learners, families, employers, providers, and the state. Governance in the lifelong learning framework therefore involves more than just ministries of education and labor. Consideration of lifelong learning extends the World Bank’s traditional approach to education, in which subsectors are examined in isolation. In 1995 Priorities and Strategies for Education emphasized the need to look at the education system in a more holistic manner. The 1999 Education Sector Strategy discussed the role of new technologies. In 1999, when he articu- lated the Comprehensive Development Framework, World Bank President James Wolfensohn referred explicitly to lifelong learning as a part of what education means for poverty alleviation. In 2002 the World Bank com- pleted important new policy work on tertiary (higher) education reforms as well as a vision paper on the role of science and technology. This report xiii xiv FOREWORD represents the Bank’s first attempt to lay out an analytical framework for understanding the challenges of developing a lifelong learning system. The World Bank’s involvement in lifelong learning is still at the con- ceptual stage, but two new projects—in Romania and Chile—have already been prepared to address the need for continuing education and lifelong learning. In the years to come we expect to conduct more analytical work on lifelong learning, and the policy dialogue in education will touch more and more on lifelong learning issues. Our lending program will undoubt- edly involve operations to support countries’ efforts to transform their education systems to reflect a lifelong learning approach. This report pro- vides a departure point for these continuing discussions. Ruth Kagia Director, Education Human Development Network World Bank Preface This report explores the challenges to education and training systems that the knowledge economy presents. It outlines policy options for addressing these challenges and developing viable systems of lifelong learning in developing countries and countries with transition economies. It addresses four questions: • What does a national education and training system, including its for- mal and nonformal components, need to do to support knowledge- based economic growth? • How can developing countries and countries with transition economies promote lifelong learning, and what challenges do they face in doing so? • Given limited resources, what type of governance framework pro- motes lifelong learning for people in general and disadvantaged groups in particular? • How can financing of lifelong learning be inclusive, affordable, and sustainable? The report provides a conceptual framework for education-related lending activities reflecting the latest knowledge and successful practices of planning and implementing education for lifelong learning. It encour- ages countries to look beyond traditional approaches to education and training and to engage in a policy dialogue on the pedagogical and eco- nomic consequences of lifelong learning. This is a consultative document, on which the World Bank welcomes comments. Readers should send their comments to the Education Advisory Service, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20433, United States, or e-mail them to eservice@worldbank.org. The World Bank hopes that this report will encourage discussion within developing countries and countries with transition economies. xv Executive Summary A knowledge-based economy relies primarily on the use of ideas rather than physical abilities and on the application of technology rather than the transformation of raw materials or the exploitation of cheap labor. Knowledge is being developed and applied in new ways. Product cycles are shorter and the need for innovation greater. Trade is expanding world- wide, increasing competitive demands on producers. The global knowledge economy is transforming the demands of the labor market throughout the world. It is also placing new demands on cit- izens, who need more skills and knowledge to be able to function in their day-to-day lives. Equipping people to deal with these demands requires a new model of education and training, a model of lifelong learning. A lifelong learning framework encompasses learning throughout the lifecycle, from early childhood through retirement. It encompasses formal learning (schools, training institutions, universities); nonformal learning (structured on-the- job training); and informal learning (skills learned from family members or people in the community). It allows people to access learning opportu- nities as they need them rather than because they have reached a certain age. Lifelong learning is crucial to preparing workers to compete in the global economy. But it is important for other reasons as well. By improv- ing people’s ability to function as members of their communities, educa- tion and training increase social cohesion, reduce crime, and improve income distribution. Developing countries and countries with transition economies risk being further marginalized in a competitive global knowledge economy because their education and training systems are not equipping learners with the skills they need. To respond to the problem, policymakers need to make fundamental changes. They need to replace the information-based, teacher-directed rote learning provided within a formal education system governed by directives with a new type of learning that emphasizes xvii xviii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY creating, applying, analyzing, and synthesizing knowledge and engaging in collaborative learning throughout the lifespan. This report describes several ways this can be done. Creating a Labor Force Able to Compete in the Global Economy In traditional industries most jobs require employees to learn how to per- form routine functions, which, for the most part, remain constant over time. Most learning takes place when a worker starts a new job. In the knowledge economy, change is so rapid that workers constantly need to acquire new skills. Firms can no longer rely solely on new graduates or new labor market entrants as the primary source of new skills and knowl- edge. Instead, they need workers who are willing and able to update their skills throughout their lifetimes. Countries need to respond to these needs by creating education and training systems that equip people with the appropriate skills. The private sector is playing a growing role in education throughout the world Traditionally, the public sector provided most education services. Today that is changing. In many middle-income countries, the private education sector is growing, fostered by the poor quality and coverage of public education and the need to relieve fiscal burdens and promote innovation. Since 1995 the number of students enrolled in higher edu- cation in Brazil has grown more than 70 percent, with most of this increase occurring in private colleges and universities, which now account for 71 percent of higher education enrollment. In China 500 new institutions of higher learning were established between 1995 and 1999. The private education sector is growing rapidly in countries with tran- sition economies as well. Poland alone has 195 private higher education institutions, which educate more than 377,000 students. Private business schools—unheard of in Eastern Europe 10 years ago—are also thriving: in 1998 there were 91 private business schools in Poland, 29 in the Czech Republic, 18 in Romania, and 4 in Bulgaria. At the same time, new providers—private sector trainers, virtual universities, international providers, corporate universities, educa- tional publishers, content brokers, and media companies—have arisen to complement and challenge traditional institutions. This growth of the EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xix private sector reflects the rising demand for more and better education as well as dissatisfaction with the traditional education and training system. Spending on training has increased dramatically Corporations are spending more and more on training to become or remain competitive in the global knowledge economy. Worldwide, annual corporate training expenditures reached $28 billion in 2002, up from $18 billion in 1997. Transforming Learning to Meet Learners’ Lifelong Needs Being successful in the knowledge economy requires mastering a new set of knowledge and competencies. These include basic academic skills, such as literacy, foreign language, math, and science skills, and the ability to use information and communication technology. Workers must be able to use these skills effectively, act autonomously and reflectively, and join and function in socially heterogeneous groups. Many countries have not been successful in providing people with knowledge and competencies Education is inadequate in most developing countries. Coverage is insuf- ficient, access is inequitable (especially in tertiary education and in employee and adult training), and the quality of education is poor. Adult literacy rates are low, and too few children complete basic education. International assessments of secondary school students in math and sci- ence show countries with developing and transition economies trailing significantly, especially when students are tested on their ability to apply and use knowledge. In the transition economies of Europe and Central Asia, the quality of education is inadequate and the education system is too rigid. Rote learn- ing, exam-driven schooling, and the soaring cost of private education have long been policy concerns in some Asian countries. Traditional education methods are ill suited to providing people with the skills they need The traditional learning model differs from lifelong learning methods in important ways: xx EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Traditional learning Lifelong learning • The teacher is the source of • Educators are guides to sources of knowledge. knowledge. • Learners receive knowledge from • People learn by doing. the teacher. • Learners work by themselves. • People learn in groups and from one another. • Tests are given to prevent progress • Assessment is used to guide until students have completely learning strategies and identify mastered a set of skills and to pathways for future learning. ration access to further learning. • All learners do the same thing. • Educators develop individualized learning plans. • Teachers receive initial training • Educators are lifelong learners. plus ad hoc in-service training. Initial training and ongoing pro- fessional development are linked. • “Good” learners are identified • People have access to learning and permitted to continue their opportunities over a lifetime. education. Teacher training needs to change This new learning context implies a different role for teachers and train- ers. Teachers need to learn new skills and become lifelong learners them- selves to keep up to date with new knowledge, pedagogical ideas, and technology. As learning becomes more collaborative, so too must teachers’ professional development, which needs to promote professional net- works and learning organizations within schools and institutions. ICTs can support changes in pedagogy and teacher training—given the appropriate policy framework Information and communication technologies (ICTs) can facilitate learning by doing (through computer simulations, for example). They can vastly increase the information resources available to learners, thereby changing the relationship between teacher and student. They can facilitate collabo- rative learning and provide rapid feedback to learners. These outcomes do not emerge simply through the introduction of computers into the learning setting, however. An appropriate policy framework is needed in which ICTs are used to tackle educational prob- lems; significant investment is made in training teachers and managers to change their knowledge and behavior; qualified technicians and support staff are available; and funding for maintenance, access to the Internet, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xxi and upgrading is sustainable. These conditions are rarely met, especially in developing countries. Formal education institutions need to become more flexible An increasing number of tertiary institutions are offering part-time, evening, weekend, and summer courses to meet the needs of working adults. In Finland the number of adults enrolled in continuing education programs at the tertiary level exceeds the number of young people enrolled in traditional degree courses. Distance education is one way in which countries can offer more flexi- ble learning opportunities. Many countries use interactive radio instruc- tion in basic education. Mexico uses television to educate about 15 percent of its lower secondary school students. In the 1990s the National Teachers Institute in Nigeria graduated more teachers through its distance learning program than all other programs in the country combined. The Internet is beginning to transform higher education and corporate training. In 1999, for example, 92 percent of large corporations in the United States piloted Web-based training programs. Governing a Lifelong Learning System To create effective lifelong learning systems, countries need to make sig- nificant changes to both the governance and the financing of education and training. In many industrial countries, governments that once focused exclusively on public financing and public provision of education and training are now trying to create flexible policy and regulatory frameworks that encompass a wider range of institutional actors. These frameworks include legislation and executive orders; arrangements for ensuring coor- dination across ministries and other institutions involved in education and training activities; and mechanisms for certifying the achievements of learners, monitoring institutional and system performance, and pro- moting learning pathways. Within this framework, the role of incentives is critical. The public sector can no longer be the sole provider of education The state will have to increase its cooperation with the private sector and civil society. The private sector can provide education in both traditional ways (owning and operating private schools and providing inputs, such as books, materials, and equipment) and novel ways (operating public xxii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY schools under contract). Enterprises also provide training and are increas- ingly involved in developing occupational standards and curricula. Government ministries need to coordinate their activities Agreements and ongoing collaboration among central, regional, and local governments in implementation are needed. In some countries, including Germany and the Republic of Korea, coordination has been promoted by merging the departments responsible for education and training. In con- trast, in many developing countries many ministries, including industry- specific ministries, oversee, manage, and finance training. Competition for scarce resources in these countries prevents collaboration, promotion of high-quality training, and development of a continuum of training opportunities. Quality assurance systems are needed to assess learners and inform them about providers The outcomes of learning must be monitored effectively. Quality assur- ance systems need to recognize the range of formal and informal settings in which learning takes place, and they need to provide opportunities for learners to demonstrate their newly acquired skills and knowledge. Quality assurance systems also need to provide prospective learners with information about the offerings and performance of providers. Quality assurance systems can also make it easier for learners to move among different types and levels of learning environments. Namibia, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United Kingdom have national qual- ification systems, which assign qualifications from different institutions to a set of levels, each linked to competency standards. Students at col- leges and universities in the United States can transfer credits from one institution to another. And Europe-wide agreement on equivalences and quality assurance mechanisms is emerging (through the Bologna process). Policymakers need to rethink accreditation of institutions Some industrial and developing countries are beginning to accredit institutions on the basis of output or performance measures (such as graduation rates) rather than on the basis of input measures (such as the number of books in the library or faculty). In Bangladesh, for example, private secondary schools are supposed to achieve certain pass rates on EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xxiii the university entrance examination to remain accredited (although the regulation is rarely enforced). In Armenia a certain percentage of students (currently 50 percent) at private (but not public) higher education institu- tions must pass the final examination. Increasingly, funding of institu- tions is also based on performance. Financing Lifelong Learning More and higher-quality education and training opportunities over a life- time will require increased expenditures, although resources will also need to be used more efficiently and in different ways. These expenditures can- not be met solely from public sources. What is needed is a menu of sus- tainable and equitable options that combine public and private financing. The private and public sectors need to work together to finance learning Governments need to finance lifelong learning for which social returns exceed private returns (for example, basic education). The private sector needs to play a role in financing investments for which private returns are high (for example, most higher and continuing education). Government intervention beyond the basic skills and knowledge should be targeted to learners from low-income or socially excluded groups and others facing high barriers to learning. No single financing system can serve the needs of all learners Policymakers need to consider a range of financing options, including subsidies, mortgage-type loans, human capital contracts, graduate taxes, income-contingent repayment schemes, entitlement schemes, asset- building schemes, and individual learning accounts. Whatever mecha- nisms are used, financing of learning beyond the basic competencies should include both cost-sharing and subsidy components. Subsidies could be the main source of financing for low-income learners. For higher- income groups, most financing could take the form of income-contingent loans at market interest rates. Agenda for the Future The demands of a lifelong learning system are enormous, and most coun- tries will not be able to implement all elements of the system at once. Countries must therefore develop a strategy for moving forward in a xxiv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY systematic and sequenced fashion. An important step is to identify where a country stands, particularly with respect to its international peers. National systems of lifelong learning need to be benchmarked One way in which countries could move forward would be by establishing national benchmarks for measuring lifelong learning outcomes. Such mea- sures are underdeveloped. Traditional measures of educational progress, such as gross enrollment ratios and public spending as a proportion of GDP, do not capture important dimensions of lifelong learning. Gross enrollment ratios measure inputs rather than achievement of core or other competencies. Total education spending includes more than just public spending. Traditional indicators also fail to capture learning in the non- formal and informal sectors, which is becoming increasingly important. A different approach to education reform is needed Continual reform is needed not only to accelerate the pace of reform but also to deepen the extent to which fundamental transformation of learn- ing is carried out. The traditional model of education reform, however, is not amenable to constant change: streams of initiatives and policy changes are viewed as overwhelming to education stakeholders, causing reform fatigue and resistance to set in. Reform and change must therefore be built into institutions’ own processes. In addition, policy changes need broad support and dialogue to facilitate ongoing adjustments during implementation. The World Bank will continue to deepen its understanding and help countries develop concrete strategies National policymakers and stakeholders worldwide need to engage in a dialogue on lifelong learning, helping governments formulate visions and concrete action plans for establishing both lifelong learning and innova- tion frameworks appropriate to their country contexts. The World Bank can help in this effort by deepening the understanding of the implications of the knowledge economy for education and training systems and by disseminating analytical and policy documents on education for the knowledge economy. Acronyms and Abbreviations ESA education savings account IALS International Adult Literacy Survey ICTs information and communication technologies ILA individual learning account IRI Interactive Radio Instruction MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PDA personal development account PISA Programme for International Student Assessment TIMSS Third International Mathematics and Science Study xxv 1 The Knowledge Economy and the Changing Needs of the Labor Market Knowledge is our most powerful engine of production. Alfred Marshall, 1890 All agree that the single most important key to development and to poverty allevi- ation is education. This must start with universal primary education for girls and boys equally, as well as an open and competitive system of secondary and tertiary education . . . . Adult education, literacy, and lifelong learning must be combined with the fundamental recognition that education of women and girls is central to the process of development. James D. Wolfensohn, President of the World Bank, 1999 A knowledge-based economy relies primarily on the use of ideas rather than physical abilities and on the application of technology rather than the transformation of raw materials or the exploitation of cheap labor. It is an economy in which knowledge is created, acquired, transmitted, and used more effectively by individuals, enterprises, organizations, and com- munities to promote economic and social development (World Bank Insti- tute 2001c; World Bank 1998d). Knowledge can either be codified and written down or tacit and in people’s heads. The knowledge economy is transforming the demands of the labor market in economies throughout the world. In industrial countries, where knowledge-based industries are expanding rapidly, labor market demands are changing accordingly. Where new technologies have been introduced, demand for high-skilled workers, particularly high-skilled information and communication technology (ICT) workers, has increased. At the same time, demand for lower-skilled workers has declined (OECD 2001f). 1 2 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Four features of the knowledge economy have far-ranging implications for education and training: • Knowledge is being developed and applied in new ways. The information revolution has expanded networks and provided new opportunities for access to information. It has also created new opportunities for generating and transferring information. Knowledge networks and sharing of information have expedited innovation and adaptation capacity. Changes in ICT have revolutionized the transmission of infor- mation. Semiconductors are getting faster, computer memories are expanding, and ICT prices are falling. Data transmission costs have fallen dramatically and continue to fall, bandwidth is growing, and Internet hosts are expanding and multiplying. Cellular phone usage is growing worldwide, adding to the pace of and capacity for change and innovation. • Product cycles are shorter and the need for innovation greater. In 1990 it took six years to go from concept to production in the automobile industry; today that process takes just two years. The number of patent applica- tions is growing, and more and more international and multiple appli- cations are being filed. Industrial countries filed 82,846 patent applications at the European Patent Office in 1997, a 37 percent increase over 1990 (OECD 2001f). • Trade is increasing worldwide, increasing competitive demands on producers. Countries that are able to integrate into the world economy may be able to achieve higher economic growth and improve health and edu- cation outcomes (World Bank 2002e). • Small and medium-size enterprises in the service sector have become increas- ingly important players, in terms of both economic growth and employment. A knowledge economy rests on four pillars (World Bank Institute 2001c): • A supportive economic and institutional regime to provide incentives for the efficient use of existing and new knowledge and the flourishing of entrepreneurship. • An educated and skilled population to create, share, and use knowl- edge. • A dynamic information infrastructure to facilitate the effective com- munication, dissemination, and processing of information. • An efficient innovation system of firms, research centers, universities, consultants, and other organizations to tap into the growing stock of global knowledge, assimilate and adapt it to local needs, and create new technology. THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 3 This chapter focuses on the role of education and training in helping build the second and fourth pillars of a knowledge economy. Implications of the Knowledge Economy for Education and Training Preparing workers to compete in the knowledge economy requires a new model of education and training, a model of lifelong learning. A lifelong learning framework encompasses learning throughout the life cycle, from early childhood to retirement. It includes formal, nonformal, and informal education and training. • Formal education and training includes structured programs that are recognized by the formal education system and lead to approved certificates. • Nonformal education and training includes structured programs that are not formally recognized by the national system. Examples include apprenticeship training programs and structured on-the-job training. • Informal education and training includes unstructured learning, which can take place almost anywhere, including the home, community, or workplace. It includes unstructured on-the-job training, the most com- mon form of workplace learning. Recent knowledge and the accumulated stock of human capital are inputs in the production of new knowledge and wealth. The speed of change in the knowledge economy means that skills depreciate much more rapidly than they once did. To compete effectively in this constantly changing environment, workers need to be able to upgrade their skills on a continuing basis. Change in the knowledge economy is so rapid that firms can no longer rely solely on new graduates or new labor market entrants as the primary source of new skills and knowledge. Schools and other training institu- tions thus need to prepare workers for lifelong learning. Educational sys- tems can no longer emphasize task-specific skills but must focus instead on developing learners’ decisionmaking and problem-solving skills and teaching them how to learn on their own and with others. Lifelong learning is crucial in enabling workers to compete in the global economy. Education helps reduce poverty; if developing countries do not promote lifelong learning opportunities, the skills and technology gap between them and industrial countries will continue to grow. By improving people’s ability to function as members of their communities, education and training also increase social capital (broadly defined as 4 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY social cohesion or social ties), thereby helping to build human capital, increase economic growth, and stimulate development. Social capital also improves education and health outcomes and child welfare, increases tol- erance for gender and racial equity, enhances civil liberty and economic and civic equity, and decreases crime and tax evasion (Putnam 2001). Education must thus be viewed as fundamental to development, not just because it enhances human capital but because it increases social capital as well. Human Capital and Knowledge as Sources of Economic Growth Investment in human capital is critical for economic growth. Particularly important are new technology, its dissemination through education, and related externalities (Romer 1989; Lucas 1988; Barro 1991; Mankiw, Romer, and Weil 1992). Researchers have documented the external effects of human capital in Austria, China, and Guatemala (Winter-Ebmer 1994; Wang and Mody 1997; Sakellariou 2001). They have tied growth to knowl- edge in Israel and found significant spillover effects of human capital in the Republic of Korea (Bregman and Marom 1993; Feenstra and others 1999). Technology and economic growth are strongly correlated in industrial countries. Computer hardware was linked strongly to output growth in the late 1990s, when it is estimated to have contributed as much as 2.5 per- cent to increases in output (table 1.1). Table 1.1. Contribution of Computer Hardware to Output Growth, 1990–99 (percent) Contribution to Contribution to Country Period output growth Period output growth Australia 1990–95 0.31 1995–99 0.57 Canada 1990–96 0.28 1995–99 0.36 Germany 1990–96 0.19 1995–99 0.14 Finland 1990–95 0.00 1995–99 0.11 France 1990–95 0.00 1996–99 0.10 Italy 1990–96 0.21 1995–99 0.12 Japan 1990–96 0.19 1995–99 0.29 Singapore – – 1977–97 1.50 Korea, Rep. of – – 1980–95 2.50 United Kingdom 1990–95 0.10 1996–99 0.30 United States 1990–95 0.33 1996–98 0.82 – Not available. Source: Original sources cited in Patrinos 2001a. THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 5 The link between education and economic growth strengthens as the rate of technology transfer increases (Sab and Smith 2001). The fact that an impact on growth is observed only in more affluent countries, where the overall level of education is higher, suggests that technology adoption is strongly linked to the education of the labor force (Pohjola 2000). The threshold level of human capital accumulation beyond which a country may experience accelerating growth is estimated at a literacy rate of 40 percent (Azariadis and Drazen 1990). Once countries reach this threshold, they can increase growth by opening their economies to tech- nology transfer, as Costa Rica has done (box 1.1). The impact of education on economic growth may be as high as the pri- vate returns to education estimated in microeconomic studies (see Krueger and Lindahl 1999; Topel 1999). Estimates suggest that changes in educational attainment—as opposed to the initial level of education used in most of the macroeconomic growth literature—affect cross-country income growth at least as much as they affect microeconomic estimates of the private rate of return to years of schooling. Typically, an additional year of schooling raises incomes 10 percent; in very poor countries it can increase incomes 20 percent or more (Psacharopoulos and Patrinos 2002). Data on within-country changes in education and productivity suggest that a one-year increase in average years of schooling for a country’s labor force raises output per worker 5–15 percent (Topel 1999). The quality of education, and therefore of labor, also affects economic growth (Barro 2001; Hanushek and Kimko 2000). Science achievement, for example, has a positive effect on growth. Box 1.1. Why Did Intel Choose Costa Rica as the Site of a Multimillion Dollar Plant? In 1996 Costa Rica beat out Brazil, Chile, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philip- pines, and Thailand to become the site of Intel’s $300 million semicon- ductor assembly and test plant. Many factors made Costa Rica attractive to Intel—its stable economic and political system, its liberalized econ- omy, a growing electronics sector, and incentives and tax breaks—but the crucial factor in securing its selection was its educated labor force. Since 1948, when democracy was restored, Costa Rica has placed strong emphasis on education, adopting a demand-driven approach. The government invested heavily in education and technology train- ing, and it adopted a bilingual ESL (English as Second Language) cur- riculum. Computers were introduced into elementary schools as early as 1988; by 1996 many schools were equipped with them. Source: World Bank 1998a, 2001f. 6 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Technological progress is likely to raise the value of education in pro- ducing human capital (Schultz 1975). As developing countries liberalize their trade regimes and open themselves to technology transfer from industrial countries, the value of education rises. Education thus becomes more important. Of course, the impact of education varies by country; without appro- priate incentives high returns will not materialize (Pritchett 2001; Wolff 2000). As discussed in chapter 2, the quality of education is important. The productivity of schooling may be much lower in countries where the government does not promote an environment favorable to the cre- ation of higher-paying jobs and a significant number of educated work- ers work in the public sector (Pissarides 2000; see also Gundlach 2001). Policies that artificially compress wage differentials also reduce the returns to post-schooling investment. This is particularly true in Sub- Saharan Africa and the Middle East and North Africa, less so in Latin America and Asia. The literature establishes that education matters, but it does not describe the channels through which it affects growth. Large indirect effects of education, operating through intervening variables, raise the social rates of return significantly, sometimes with long delays. The size of these effects is not clear, however, with some estimates yielding negative and others yielding very high positive values (table 1.2). A study of Uganda found that a one-year increase in the average number of years of primary schooling of neighboring farmers was associated with a Table 1.2. Evidence on Human Capital Externalities (percent) Source Social return Private return Cross-country Mincer regressions Benhabib and Spiegel 1994 3.9 – Benhabib and Spiegel 1994 Negative – Heckman and Klenow 1997 23.0 6–10 Heckman and Klenow 1997 10.6 – Topel 1999 22.6 – Topel 1999 6.2 – Micro studies Rauch 1993 (United States) 8.1 4.8 Acemoglou and Angrist 1999 (United States) 14.6 7.3 Acemoglou and Angrist 1999 (United States) 9.1 7.4 Rural farmer studies Appleton and Balihuta 1996 (Uganda) 4.3 2.8 Weir 1999 (Ethiopia) 56.0 2.0 – Not available. Sources: Venniker 2000; Appleton 2000. THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 7 4.3 percent rise in output—a larger increase than the 2.8 percent effect of an increase in the farmer’s own education (Appleton and Balihuta 1996). The indirect feedback effects on per capita economic growth are estimated at about 93 percent of the total effects (direct and indirect) for the com- posite Sub-Saharan Africa average (Appiah and McMahon 2002). In the more advanced African countries, indirect feedback effects account for about 48 percent of the total. Education also has an important effect on several nonmarket out- comes, including crime reduction, social cohesion, income distribution, charitable giving, and more efficient labor market search. The annual value of one year of schooling on these outcomes is about the same as the annual earnings-based effects. That is, the value of incremental schooling reported in standard human capital estimates may capture only about half of the total value of an additional year of schooling (Wolfe and Have- man 2001). Education has an important effect on female productivity in the labor market. Even more important are the positive effects on female labor sup- ply; the associated declines in fertility; and the improvements in the health, education, and life chances of the children of educated women. There is a strong linkage between mothers’ education and children’s development. In India, for example, children raised by literate mothers are more likely to study two additional hours a day than children of illiterate mothers (World Bank 2001f). These findings have important implications for economic growth and lifelong learning from an inter- generational perspective. The State of Education in Developing Countries and Transition Economies Education is inadequate in most developing countries. Coverage is insufficient, access is inequitable (especially in tertiary [higher] education and in employee and adult training), and the quality of education is poor. Adult literacy rates are low, and too few children complete basic educa- tion. The goal of education for all remains elusive in many low-income countries. In the transition economies of Europe and Central Asia, the quality of education is inadequate and the education system is too rigid. Rote learn- ing, exam-driven schooling, and the soaring cost of private education have long been policy concerns in some Asian countries. Evidence from international assessments of students suggests that some developing countries and transition economies lag significantly behind industrial countries in providing their people with the skills needed in the knowledge economy (see chapter 2). Policy actions are 8 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY needed to reduce inequities in the distribution of learning opportunities and discrepancies in the incidence of the costs and benefits of education. Developing countries and transition economies face the dual challenge of addressing the longstanding issues of access, quality, and equity while moving toward a lifelong learning system. Basic education and skills remain the foundation of lifelong learning, and countries with low or declining basic education coverage must set increasing coverage as their top priority. The quality and nature of the learning process must change, however, and outcomes must improve. Increased Demand for Skills Increasing returns to schooling and rising wage inequality are well docu- mented for some industrial countries and a few developing countries in the 1980s and 1990s. These changes partly reflect the important techno- logical developments that took place during this time. Rising Returns to Schooling A reversal of the 1970s trend of declining rewards to higher education and falling rates of return to schooling occurred in the United States and other industrial market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. The gap in wages between educated and less educated workers widened significantly dur- ing the 1980s (table 1.3). Between 1978 and 1987 the rate of return to edu- Table 1.3. Value of Higher Education in Industrial Countries, 1970s–1990s Wage ratio Wage ratio Decade Country Year (higher/secondary) Year (higher/secondary) 1970s Canada 1970 1.65 1980 1.40 Sweden 1968 1.40 1981 1.16 United Kingdom 1974 1.64 1980 1.53 United States 1969 1.49 1978 1.35 1980s Canada 1980 1.29 1989 1.35 Sweden 1981 1.16 1986 1.19 United Kingdom 1980 1.33 1989 1.46 United States 1979 1.47 1987 1.52 1990s Canada 1992 1.62 1997 1.48 Sweden 1992 1.60 1998 1.36 United Kingdom 1992 1.71 1999 1.59 United States 1992 1.64 1999 1.83 Sources: Patrinos 2001a; OECD 1992, 2001b. THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 9 cation for male workers in the United States rose from 7.9 percent to 9.2 percent, and the average number of years of schooling increased from 12.6 to 13.3 years (Ryscavage and Henle 1990). Increasing wage disparity was particularly severe in the rapidly expanding service sector, where the decline in the variance in schooling was most dramatic. Ryscavage and Henle (1990) found that among white- collar workers classified as administrators, officials, and sales workers, more educated workers increased their earnings advantage over less edu- cated workers. The wages of educated workers in traded services increased the most, while goods industries that were declining, such as manufacturing, experienced decreases in output, employment, and wages (Murphy and Welch 1991). The decline in earnings differentials in the mid- to late 1990s suggests that the supply of education caught up with demand. It is noteworthy, however, that in the industrial country with the highest growth during this period, the United States, the demand for educated labor resulted in an increase in earnings differentials between those with higher education and those with only secondary education. In most lower-income countries for which comparable data are avail- able, the returns to primary schooling have declined with the expansion of the supply of education. This is not to say that the returns to schooling are low. On the contrary, returns to schooling are highest in lower-income countries (figure 1.1). As universal primary education is achieved, short- ages of skills in the labor force occur more at the junior and senior sec- ondary levels, and the relative returns to these levels of education rise. Figure 1.1. Private Returns to Investment in Education, by Level of Education and Country Income Group (percent) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Low income Middle income High income Overall Primary Secondary Higher Source: Psacharopulos and Patrinos 2002. 10 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Table 1.4. Higher/Secondary Education Earnings Ratios in Middle-Income Countries, 1980s–1990s 1981 1995 (or nearest year) 1989 (or nearest year) 1999 Years of Years of Years of Years of Country Ratio schoolinga Ratio schoolingb Ratio schooling Ratio schoolingc Argentina 2.44 6.62 1.71 7.77 1.66 8.12 2.03 8.49 Brazil 2.30 2.98 2.01 3.76 2.59 4.17 2.70 4.56 Chile – – – – 2.96 7.53 2.79 7.89 Czech Rep. – – 1.29 9.39 1.63 9.38 – – Greece 1.62 6.56 1.25 6.95 1.28 8.05 – – Uruguay 1.54 5.75 1.54 6.69 1.88 6.88 1.96 7.25 Venezuela 1.82 4.93 1.72 4.89 1.82 5.48 – – – Not available. Note: Ratio = earnings of learners with higher education over earnings of learners with secondary education. a. Data are for 1980. b. Data are for 1990. c. Data are for 2000. Sources: Patrinos 2001a; Carlson 2001; Klazar, Sedmihradsky, and Vancurova 2001; World Bank 1998g. Years of schooling are from Barro and Lee 2000. Later, as universal secondary education is nearly achieved, relative short- ages occur for people with still more advanced skills, and the rates of return to two- and four-year college degrees are highest. In middle-income countries, the earnings ratio appeared to trend downward in the few countries for which 1980s data are available (table 1.4). By the 1990s, however, the trend was clearly upward in the Czech Republic, Greece, and the middle-income Latin American countries. Between 1980 and 2000 the proportion of the population with higher education rose from 7 to 20 percent in Argentina, from 5 to 8 percent in Brazil, from 7 to 16 percent in Chile, from 9 to 11 percent in the Czech Republic, from 8 to 14 percent in Greece, from 8 to 13 percent in Uruguay, and from 7 to 18 percent in Venezuela (Barro and Lee 2000). Returns to schooling increased in Mexico for higher levels of schooling, particularly university-level education. In Brazil returns to higher education rose from 16 percent in 1982 to 20 percent in 1988 (figure 1.2). This evidence suggests that there is increased demand for highly skilled labor, especially in coun- tries with open markets. The relative supply of skilled labor increased at the same time that trade liberalization in Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Uruguay increased demand for partly skilled labor more than demand for unskilled labor (Robbins 1996; World Bank 2002h). This suggests that labor demand in these countries has shifted toward workers with above-average skill THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 11 Figure 1.2. Returns to Schooling in Brazil, 1982 and 1998 20% 16% 1982 12% 1998 Returns to schooling 8% 4% 0% Primary Lower Upper Tertiary secondary secondary Source: Blom, Holm-Nielsen, and Verner 2001. levels, thereby increasing income inequality (Slaughter and Swagel 1997). In Mexico and Venezuela a higher level of foreign investment in an indus- try—often one employing better-educated workers—is associated with higher wages in that industry, also contributing to rising inequality (Aitken, Harrison, and Lipsey 1996). In Poland wages and growth rates are higher in industries with greater foreign presence (Bedi and Cieoelik 2002). In transition economies the longer the reform process—and there- fore the longer market forces, openness, and foreign investment have been allowed to operate—the higher the premium to education over time (World Bank 2002e). If the incomes of more educated workers continue to rise despite an increase in their numbers, demand for these workers can be assumed to have risen more than supply. If increases in demand continue to outstrip increases in supply, returns to schooling (and income inequality) will con- tinue to increase (Psacharopoulos 1989; Tinbergen 1975; see also Welch 1970). The relationship can be viewed as a “race between education and technology” (Tinbergen 1975). 12 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Technological Change and the Demand for Skilled Labor The rise in earnings inequality can be explained by changes in technology, the production process, work organization, and patterns of international trade (Wood 1994). Changes in the production process led to changes in the demand for certain types of labor. Organizational and technological changes may have caused the shift in demand to dominate the shift in supply, leading to a rise in returns to schooling and increased earnings inequality in advanced economies and some middle-income countries. In Malaysia widespread adoption of ICTs has been associated with wage and productivity gains (Tan 2000). Significant “learning effects” occur with experience using ICTs, and productivity gains increase with training (Berman and Machin 2000). Skill-biased technology transfer is central to the increased demand for skilled workers in middle-income countries (Berman and Machin 2000). Education supports innovation and helps speed the diffusion of tech- nology. It not only facilitates learning and communication but also increases substantially the ability to deal creatively with change. Edu- cated workers have a comparative advantage with respect to adjustment to, and implementation of, new technologies (Bartel and Lichtenberg 1987, 1988). Because better-educated workers usually have a broader set of basic skills, it is easier for them to assimilate new knowledge, and their earnings rise more quickly than those with lower educational levels (box 1.2). Better-educated people are also better able to deal with economic Box 1.2. Technological and Organizational Change: A Case Study of a Commercial Bank in the United States Technological change can have vastly different effects, even on depart- ments within the same institution. The same technological change can result in both computer-labor substitution and computer-skill comple- mentarity (skill-biased technological change), depending on the nature of work and the organization of the workplace. Technological change and organizational change are interdependent. Conceptual and prob- lem-solving skills are one set of skills that are likely to be made more valuable by ICTs. To examine how computer technology complements skilled labor, the study looked at what computers do to model and test how computers alter the demand for skilled labor. It found that computers are associated with declining relative demand in the indus- try for routine skills and increased demand for nonroutine cognitive skills. Source: Autor, Levy, and Murnane 2002. THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 13 disequilibria (Schultz 1975). Firms undergoing rapid technological change want to employ better-educated and more talented workers, in whom they are also more willing to invest in training and retraining. Thus the more volatile the state of technology, the more productive education is (Nelson and Phelps 1966; Welch 1970). Migration Another indicator of the premium to human capital is migration of peo- ple from their home countries to countries in which their skills, and the benefits of their educational investment, are more highly rewarded. About 120 million people (2 percent of the world’s population) live in countries in which they were not born (most of these immigrants are lower-skilled workers). The main economic rationale for moving is higher wages and greater employment opportunities. Migration, which is costly in terms of time and out-of-pocket expenditures, represents a form of human capital. It is a powerful means of raising incomes and promoting the diffusion of knowledge. From a global perspective, economic welfare is increased if people are more productive abroad than they would have been in their home country (box 1.3). Migrants thus increase world wel- fare, including in the country they left. In the short term, migration, especially the migration of highly skilled people, can hurt the source country. The loss of people who provide vital public services—doctors, information technology specialists, teachers— can retard low-income countries’ development, even if the number of such emigrants is small. Migration may prevent the source country from being able to reach the critical mass of human capital that may spark innovations, in entrepreneurship or knowledge creation, adaptation, and Box 1.3. Impact of Migration of Technology Graduates from India About 40 percent of India’s technology graduates leave the country and do not return. In 1998 Indian engineers were running more than 775 technology companies in California’s Silicon Valley—companies that together billed $3.6 billion in sales and employed 16,600 people. About 40 percent of Silicon Valley start-ups were established by Indians. Although many Indians never return to their native country, most eventually invest in India and contribute to the development of the local information technology industry. Many Indian expatriates invest in Bangalore, in southern India, the Silicon Valley of India. Other ben- efits include remittances and investments in homes. Source: World Bank 2001b. 14 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY use. A migrant may increase the supply of goods and services only to already wealthy inhabitants of the recipient country. The higher salary earned by a doctor, for example, may reflect the greater ability of rich people to pay for medical services. Given funding sources, the creativity of highly skilled researchers may be used to conduct research on prob- lems that are of primary concern to the industrial world rather than their home countries. Migration pressures will continue to mount in developing countries, especially for highly skilled workers, as countries trade more openly. Industrial countries could help ease these pressures by opening their doors to the less skilled as well as to highly skilled migrants (World Bank 2002e). Source countries could help by adopting economic and other policies that make effective use of human capital in both public and private sec- tors and motivate migrants to return. These policies, which need to dif- ferentiate between the pressures on low- and high-skilled people, include not only economic but political considerations. In countries that have closed the gaps at the secondary and tertiary lev- els but lack a large number of high-quality research centers or doctoral and postdoctoral graduate programs, investments in such programs make good sense. Several countries have innovative programs designed to repatriate and retain high-quality researchers, many of whom were trained at top universities abroad. In Mexico, for example, monthly grants are given to top researchers. The program helps repatriate Mexicans who completed their Ph.D.s abroad and who want to engage in scientific research activities in Mexico. By 2000 the program provided grants to about 7,500 registered researchers, 15 percent of whom had become involved through the repatriation program. Policymakers also need to examine the pricing and financing of higher education, as well as taxation. In many countries, free or low-cost higher education combined with high marginal tax rates encourage high demand for higher education but also emigration. Women, Technology, and Education Gender inequality in access to all levels of schooling persists in most regions of the developing world, with the exception of Latin America. Gender differences in tertiary education enrollments are particularly pro- nounced in the Arab world, in some countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and in South Asia. Even in countries where gender parity in education has been achieved, girls are often channeled into disciplines that lead to low- paying jobs. In Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, women’s enrollment in engineering is low, ranging from less than 2 percent THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 15 in Kenya to 27 percent in Colombia. In medical and health-related courses, female enrollment rates range from 25 percent in Kenya to 68 per- cent in Nicaragua (World Bank 2002d, 2002h). Throughout the world female participation in on-the-job training is significantly lower than male participation, in part because women often work in the informal sector or have lower educational attainment (OECD and Statistics Canada 2002). The low level of education attainment by females has negative conse- quences for society as a whole, especially given the importance of moth- ers’ education for student achievement. Results of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) show that in reading, math, and science literacy, students whose mothers had received higher education performed considerably better than those whose mothers had received only primary or secondary education (OECD 2001e). The implications of gender disparity in education are enormous given the importance of education in the knowledge economy. Much more effort needs to go toward achieving gender equity at the basic education level. While primary education is a foundation for further learning, how- ever, it is clearly not enough. Countries must increase female participation at the upper secondary level. Ensuring equal access to higher levels of education and employment training, especially in science and engineer- ing, is essential if a country is to be able to compete in the knowledge economy. Countries will not achieve education for all if gender inequality persists. To expand the pool of women who pursue careers in science and tech- nology, policymakers need to ensure that careers and role models are not stereotyped as gender specific. They need to develop measures to interest girls in science and math before they reach the tertiary level. Govern- ments could, for example, train more female teachers in science and math, who could serve as role models for girls. But targeting individuals is not enough. New institutional and organi- zational arrangements that ensure female students’ access to higher levels of education must be created, women must be hired as faculty members, and female researchers must participate in research and development activities. At the same time, governments need to overhaul their own staffing policies and practices to interest more female science and engi- neering majors in public sector careers. More could be done to increase public awareness on gender equality by, for example, publishing statistics on gender inequality in job opportunities and wages. Increasing female participation in on-the-job training might require reform of labor regula- tions that allow employers to reduce women’s access to jobs that provide such training (by hiring them only on a temporary basis, for example, or limiting promotion out of fear that women will have children and leave the labor force). 16 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Employer Demands and Private Education Sector Responses In the rapidly changing knowledge economy workers must constantly acquire new skills. In this environment, firms can no longer rely solely on new graduates or new labor market entrants as the primary source of new skills and knowledge. Instead, they need workers who are willing and able to update their skills throughout their lifetimes. To support the new demands, the private sector is playing a growing role in education and training throughout the world. Employer Demands and Employee Training In traditional industries most jobs require employees to learn how to per- form routine functions, which, for the most part, remain constant over time (Nelson and Phelps 1966). Most learning takes place when a worker starts a new job—through formal and informal apprenticeship programs and informal on-the-job training, for example. During this initial training either the worker accepts lower wages while investing time in training (in which case the worker bears the costs) or the employer absorbs the costs in the form of forgone production by the trainee. Learning also occurs in household production and community activi- ties. This informal investment of time over the life cycle is a large and important part of the total investment in lifelong learning, but it is usually unobserved and undocumented. The current rate of technological change has raised the skill require- ments of most jobs and placed a premium on flexibility. Most workers require supplementary skills to remain competitive in their current jobs. Policies need to reflect this change, by creating incentives to keep people learning throughout their working lives (OECD 2001a). In Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, and Taiwan (China) train- ing has a positive and statistically significant impact on firm-level pro- ductivity (Tan and Batra 1995). But not all workers have the same access to training. Employers do not train unskilled workers to the same extent as more highly educated workers. Tan and Batra (1995) found that larger firms, especially multiplant firms, are more likely to provide formal training for skilled workers. Enterprise training, especially in-house train- ing, is most common at high-tech firms, firms relying on advanced tech- nologies, firms with semi- or fully automatic production lines, and export-oriented firms. For workers in small or microenterprises, particu- larly firms that are not exposed to international markets and in which workers have low educational attainment, the gap between those who have access to skill upgrading—and hence higher productivity and THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 17 higher wages—and those who do not will grow. With few exceptions gov- ernment policies to encourage training in small and medium-size enter- prises, through training levies or even grants, have not been very successful (Ziderman 2001). Providing such training represents a major challenge for all countries, especially those in which large proportions of the labor force work in the informal sector. The provision of education and training is now a global market. The global market for education is estimated at more than $2 trillion a year (Moe, Bailey, and Lau 1999). In the late 1990s more than 1.5 million peo- ple pursued higher education outside their home countries, in a market worth almost $30 billion (WTO 1998). While one-third of the global mar- ket is in the United States, a sizable 15 percent is in developing countries and transition economies (Vawda and Patrinos forthcoming). Corporations are spending more and more on training to become com- petitive in the global knowledge economy (box 1.4). International Data Corporation (www.idc.com) estimates that worldwide corporate training expenditures reached $28 billion by the end of 2002, up from $18 billion in 1997. In 1999 about one-third of the $100 billion for-profit education industry in the United States came from corporate and government train- ing (Moe, Bailey, and Lau 1999; www.eduventures.com). In another sign of the growing global market, the World Trade Organi- zation (WTO) has begun negotiations over trade in services, including edu- cation. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) came into force in January 1995. It is the first and only set of multilateral rules covering international trade in services. Negotiated by governments themselves, it sets the framework within which firms and learners can operate. One of the most significant achievements of the Uruguay Round, the GATS offers for trade in services the same stability that arises from mutually agreed on rules, binding market access, and nondiscriminatory commitments that the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) has provided for trade in goods for more than five decades. However, education remains one of the sectors in which WTO members have been least inclined to make liberal- ization commitments (Larsen, Morris, and Martin 2001). By 2003, 53 coun- tries had made commitments for at least one education subsector. Growth of the Private Education and Training Sector The private education and training sector is growing, not only in the United States and other industrial economies but also in low-income countries, including many in Africa. In the United States the number of two-year for-profit degree-granting institutions grew 78 percent and the number of four-year institutions grew 266 percent between 1990 and 2001 (Newman and Couturier 2002). In Brazil the number of tertiary education 18 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 1.4. Transforming a Pulp and Paper Company into a High-Tech Leader: The Case of Nokia Finland transformed its economy from one based on exports of natural resource–based products to one based on exports of high-tech prod- ucts. As late as 1990, computer and telecommunications products accounted for less than 7 percent of Finnish exports; by 2000 the share had increased to nearly 30 percent. Finland made this transformation by steadily establishing an environment that enables innovation and the adaptation of technologies. By the early 1900s Nokia, Ltd., was the largest pulp and paper mill in Finland. Three companies—Nokia, Finnish Rubber Works, and Finnish Cable Works—formed a conglomerate that drew heavily on imported technology. All three companies benefited from access to the large Russian market. In 1967 the three companies merged, establishing four divisions: paper, cable, rubber, and electronics. For many years the electronics division was not profitable, but Nokia made sure that the division had access to the latest technology. By the early 1970s the electronics divi- sion grew with the expansion of the public radiotelephone system, originally developed by Finnish Cable Works. In 1977 Nokia decided to transform itself from a producer of paper, tires, and cable to a global electronics giant. The company knew it lacked the necessary skills and experience to compete in the interna- tional market, however. Raising the level of human resources was essential for Nokia to be able to absorb and diffuse the skills and knowledge it obtained through acquisitions from, and strategic alliances with, technologically advanced foreign firms. It thus engaged in an aggressive human resource development program within the company that encouraged work abroad in foreign affiliates. At the same time Nokia’s Chief Executive Officer, Kari Kairamo, was involved in modernizing the public education system, establishing broad international student-exchange programs, fostering continuous lifelong learning, and promoting close collaboration between industry and academia. By forming strategic alliances with foreign firms and strengthening human capital, Nokia prepared itself to compete in the global telecommunications market by the late 1980s. Sources: Blomström and Kokko 2001; World Bank 2002d. THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY 19 institutions grew more than 70 percent between 1995 and 2002, with most of the growth occurring in private colleges and universities, which accounted for 71 percent of higher education enrollment in 2002 (Souza 2002). In the late 1990s, 15–20 percent of all students in Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, and Senegal attended private institutions. In Côte d’Ivoire, Gam- bia, Ghana, Senegal, and Zimbabwe, 11–14 percent of all primary educa- tion students attended private institutions. In Côte d’Ivoire enrollments in private institutions rose 20 percent at the primary level, 33 percent at the secondary, 140 percent at the technical/professional secondary, and almost 670 percent at the higher education level between 1991 and 1995. In Gambia private school enrollments increased 41 percent at the primary level, 123 percent at the junior secondary level, and 20 percent at the senior secondary level between 1993 and 1996. In Ghana enrollments in private primary schools increased 344 percent between 1986 and 1996 and accounted for 13 percent of all primary enrollments in 1997. In Senegal enrollments in private primary institutions increased 123 percent between 1987 and 1997, when they accounted for more than 12 percent of all pri- mary enrollments (IFC 2001). The private sector is growing rapidly in transition economies as well. Poland has 195 private higher education institutions, enrolling more than 377,000 students. Since the government gave permission for private uni- versities to exist in the late 1990s, the Czech Republic has 26 private higher education institutions. Private business schools—unheard of in Eastern Europe 10 years ago—are also thriving: in 1998 there were 91 pri- vate business schools in Poland, 29 in the Czech Republic, 18 in Romania, and 4 in Bulgaria. Between 1995 and 1999, 500 new higher education insti- tutions were established in China. The growth of the private education sector signals an important change in the market for education. Clearly the demand for more and better edu- cation is increasing. The growth of the education industry in industrial countries has much to do with dissatisfaction with the traditional educa- tion and training system. It also reflects the fact that employers are look- ing for workers able to learn new skills while employed. The global knowledge economy and the impact of technology on edu- cation are driving this change. Technology affects the delivery of educa- tion, giving an edge to providers able to offer flexible learning opportunities. In many middle-income countries, the private education sector is growing, a reflection of the need to expand schooling opportuni- ties, relieve the fiscal burden, and promote innovation (Tooley 1999). Even in low-income countries private education is growing, in an attempt to keep up with technological developments and access global knowledge (Vawda and Patrinos forthcoming). Market forces are thus playing an increasing role in education around the world (Patrinos 2000). 2 Transforming Learning In a time of drastic change, it is the learners who inherit the future. The learned find themselves equipped to live in a world that no longer exists. Eric Hoffer, Vanguard Management, 1989 The challenges facing education and training systems in developing countries and transition economies are immense. They must raise the level of learners’ achievement in the basic skills of language, math, and science. They must equip learners with new skills and competencies. And they must do all of this for more learners with different backgrounds, experiences, levels of motivation, and preferences. Achieving these goals requires a fundamental change in the way learning takes place and the relationship between learner and teacher. Equipping Learners with the Skills and Competencies They Need to Succeed in a Knowledge Economy Operating successfully in the knowledge economy requires mastery of a set of knowledge and competencies. Three categories of competencies are key (Rychen and Salganik 2001; OECD 2002a): • Acting autonomously: Building and exercising a sense of self, making choices and acting in the context of a larger picture, being oriented toward the future, being aware of the environment, understanding how one fits in, exercising one’s rights and responsibilities, determin- ing and executing a life plan, and planning and carrying out personal projects. 21 22 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY • Using tools interactively: Using tools as instruments for an active dia- logue; being aware of and responding to the potential of new tools; and being able to use language, text, symbols, information and knowledge, and technology interactively to accomplish goals. • Functioning in socially heterogeneous groups: Being able to interact effec- tively with other people, including those from different backgrounds; recognizing the social embeddedness of individuals; creating social capital; and being able to relate well to others, cooperate, and manage and resolve conflict. The concept of competency has several features. It is strongly related to context, combines interrelated abilities and values, is teachable (although it can be acquired outside the formal education system), and exists on a continuum. Possession of the key competencies contributes to a higher quality of life across all areas. Performing in the global economy and functioning in a global society require mastery of technical, interpersonal, and methodological skills. Technical skills include literacy, foreign language, math, science, problem- solving, and analytical skills. Interpersonal skills include teamwork, lead- ership, and communication skills. Methodological skills include the ability to learn on one’s own, to pursue lifelong learning, and to cope with risk and change. These competencies are needed because of the rapid proliferation of scientific and practical knowledge, the shortening of the useful life of knowledge because of the continuous production of knowledge, and the growing influence of science and technology, which profoundly change the organization of jobs and lives. The consequences of these changes can- not be reliably foreseen (OECD 1996). These skills also enable citizens to engage more actively in the knowl- edge economy. For example, advances in biotechnology raise many ques- tions that society, not just scientists, need to answer. Being able to make decisions about these issues requires some ability to understand scientific concepts and knowledge. Zambia’s decision in 2002 to return food aid because it contained genetically modified products is one dramatic exam- ple of a decision where scientific issues were central but perhaps not widely understood. Measurement of interpersonal and methodological competencies is in its infancy, although some developments are underway. Social compe- tence, for example, is assessed in the PISA, and new instruments for inter- cultural competence are emerging (Hammer and Bennett 1998; Göbel and Hesse forthcoming). Some private businesses use personality testing, and many companies and organizations are trying to measure interpersonal skills as part of performance evaluations. In no country, however, has a set TRANSFORMING LEARNING 23 of national (or even local) expectations of performance been established. In contrast, most countries have standards for technical skills, several of which have been tested in a comparable way in different countries. Literacy In low-income countries other than China and India, rates of illiteracy remain high. Overall, among people 15 and older, 29 percent of males and 46 percent of females cannot read or write. In contrast, illiteracy is negli- gible in high-income countries (World Bank 2000c). Sobering as these figures are, they actually understate the ability of people in these countries to function in a knowledge economy, since they count as literate anyone who is able to read and write a simple statement. This level of literacy is insufficient for the knowledge economy, in which a secondary-level education is increasingly regarded as basic education. One of the main results of international studies has been the demonstra- tion of the importance of basic skills. Higher-level competencies cannot be developed without fundamental and content-oriented knowledge. The International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) measures literacy per- formance at five levels, with level 3 the minimum required to function in the knowledge economy. The standard for literacy at this level includes the following (OECD and Statistics Canada 2002): • Prose literacy: Learners should be able to locate information that requires low-level inferences or that meets specified conditions. They should be able to identify several pieces of information located in different sen- tences or paragraphs. They should be able to integrate or compare and contrast information across paragraphs or sections of text. • Document literacy: Learners should be able to make literal or synony- mous matches. They should be able to take conditional information into account or match up pieces of information that have multiple fea- tures. They should be able to integrate information from one or more displays of information and to work through a document to provide multiple responses. • Quantitative literacy: Learners should be able to solve some multiplica- tion and division problems. They should be able to identify two or more numbers from various places in a document. They should be able to determine the appropriate operation to use in an arithmetic problem. Performance on the IALS varies considerably across countries (figure 2.1). Even in some high-income countries, sizable proportions of the adult population read below level 3. In all countries participating in 24 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Figure 2.1. Literacy Levels in Selected Countries, 1994–98 100% 80% Level 4/5 60% Level 3 40% Level 2 20% Level 1 0% SWITZ (FR) SWITZ (IT) BEL (FL) HUNGARY SLOVENIA SWITZ (GR) CHILE GER IRE POLAND NOR NDR CZE POR FIN UK SWE CAN NZ DAN AUS USA Note: Results of the IALS. Figures show percentage of population 16-65 reading at each prose literacy level. Countries ranked by percentage of population reading at levels 1 and 2. Source: OECD and Statistics Canada 2000. the IALS (mostly high-income or transition economies), adults with more education performed better than those with less education, and people with basic skills were less likely to become unemployed than those with- out (Murray, Kirsch, and Jenkins 1998; OECD 2001e). The effect is more pronounced at the lower levels of literacy, indicating that even a small increase in skill levels results in large social and economic effects. How- ever, there is huge variation across countries in all types of outcomes for people with similar levels of education. In Finland, for example, only 10 percent of adults who completed upper secondary school could not read at level 3. In contrast, almost 59 percent of adults in the United States with the same level of education had not mastered level 3 literacy (OECD and Statistics Canada 1997). The developing countries and transition economies that participated in the survey—Chile, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia— performed poorly. Except in the Czech Republic, more than 25 percent of the population in each of these countries scored at level 1, and more than 75 percent fell below the level 3 threshold. Mastering literacy early is important for giving young people access to learning. But many children in developing countries face a significant hurdle when they enter formal schooling because the language of instruction is not spoken at home. South Africa’s poor performance on the Third International Mathematics and Science Survey (TIMSS) appears to be attributable in part to the high proportion of learners for whom English (the language of the test in South Africa) was a second language (Howie and others 2000). Children are more likely to enroll in school, learn more, and develop positive psychological attitudes in school and they are less likely to repeat grades or drop out of school when initial basic education is offered in their first language (or at least TRANSFORMING LEARNING 25 in a language they understand) (Klaus, Sedmihradsky, and Vancurova 2002). Skills in an International Language Policymakers in developing countries need to ensure that young people acquire a language with more than just local use, preferably one used internationally. Once children can read and write with confidence in one language, they are more easily able to learn another language (Klaus, Sed- mihradsky, and Vancurova 2002), reinforcing the need for strong literacy skills. More and more institutions of higher learning are offering courses in English. All private universities in Bangladesh and Pakistan, for example, except those providing Islamic education, offer instruction in English. People seeking access to international stores of knowledge through the Internet require, principally, English language skills. Math and Science Skills and Knowledge Competency in math and science is important for participation in the knowledge economy. Male student achievement in science has a statisti- cally positive effect on economic growth, and that correlation is stronger than the correlation between growth and completion of upper secondary or higher education. Male achievement in math is also positively corre- lated with growth, although the effect is not as strong as for science. (Female achievement is not correlated with growth, probably because of discrimination in the labor market.) These effects appear to reflect broad- based scientific literacy, not just the effect of a small cohort of highly trained scientists working in research and development (Koda 2002). The TIMSS is the largest comparative international study on the perfor- mance of students in math and science. It measures achievement at three different ages during primary and secondary education. Many transition economies, including the Czech Republic, Hungary, the Russian Federa- tion, and the Slovak Republic, and some Asian countries, such as the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China), performed well on this assessment, both relative to their per capita GDP and in absolute terms (figure 2.2). Another international study, the PISA, measures learners’ ability to apply their knowledge and skills in real-life situations (OECD 2001e). Transition economies ranked lower on the PISA, which measures the abil- ity to apply knowledge, than they did on the TIMSS, which measures acquisition of knowledge (table 2.1). Two facts are worth noting about these results. First, the two Asian countries that took part in both the PISA and TIMSS assessments—Japan 26 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Figure 2.2. GNP per Capita and Student Achievement on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study in Selected Countries, 1999 600 Taiwan Singapore Hungary 550 Czech Korea Australia England Netherlands Japan Bulgaria Russia Slovak Slovenia Canada Finland Hong New Zealand Kong USA 500 Lithuania Latvia STANDARDIZED SCORES Malaysia Italy Romania Thailand Moldova Macedonia Cyprus Israel 450 Iran and Jordan Turkey Indonesia Tunisia Chile 400 350 Philippines Morocco 300 250 South Africa 200 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 GNP PER CAPITA Source: Koda 2002. and the Republic of Korea—performed well on both, belying the common notion that the Asian education systems are good at ingraining informa- tion but that Asian students lack the creativity to use and apply knowl- edge. Second, the relative performance of developing countries and transition economies was better on the TIMSS than the PISA. Table 2.1. Performance of Selected Countries on TIMSS and PISA International Assessments in Science TIMSS PISA Country Average Rank Average Rank Hungary 552 3 496 15 Japan 550 4 550 2 Korea, Republic of 549 5 552 1 Czech Republic 539 8 511 11 England 538 9 532 4 Finland 535 10 538 3 Russian Federation 529 16 460 29 United States 515 18 499 14 New Zealand 510 19 528 6 Latvia 503 20 460 30 Polanda n.a. n.a. 483 21 OECD average 488 n.a. 500 n.a. n.a. Not applicable. a. Poland did not participate in the TIMSS. Note: Differences in rank do not necessarily imply significant differences in performance. Sources: Martin and others 2000; OECD 2001e. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 27 The TIMSS, the PISA, and the IALS measure different things, but the results seem to lead to three broad conclusions (Koda 2002): • A combination of factors, rather than any single feature, appears to explain countries’ relative performance. This finding suggests that comprehensive reform initiatives are likely to have greater impact on achievement than more limited reforms. • The socioeconomic status of schools had a greater effect on perfor- mance than did the socioeconomic background of students. This find- ing suggests that tracking students into schools with learners of similar backgrounds will reinforce inequalities. It also suggests a potential role for school choice to promote diversity of school populations. • The organization of secondary schooling matters. According to Woess- man (2001), 75 percent of cross-country variation in math and 60 per- cent of variation in science can be explained by institutional differences in educational systems. Factors that make a difference include central examinations, centralized control mechanisms in curricular and bud- getary affairs, school autonomy in process and personnel decisions, incentives and discretion for individual teachers to select teaching methods, limited influence of teacher unions, teacher scrutiny of learn- ers’ educational performance, encouragement of parents to take an interest in teaching matters, an intermediate level of administration performing administrative tasks and educational funding, and compe- tition from private educational institutions. While the hypothesis has not been rigorously tested, it appears that systems with well-defined vocational tracks in which large numbers of learners participate—as they do in the transition economies and in Germany—perform worse than other countries. Participation in Civil Society A 28-country study on citizenship and education (Torney-Purta and others 2001) examined knowledge of and participation in civil society (table 2.2). This measure is important because it is linked to good gov- ernance and the rule of law, which directly affect economic and social development. Lower-income countries generally did not participate in these various international assessments, but it is likely that they would not have per- formed well. The range in performance at lower levels of per capita GDP, however, suggests that even with their more meager resources develop- ing countries can improve their performance—by adopting some of the pedagogical changes discussed below, for example. 28 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Table 2.2. Knowledge of and Participation in Civil Society in Selected Countries, 1999 Civic knowledge Civic engagement Civic attitudes Support Expected Positive for participation Trust in attitudes women’s Conventional in political government about political Country Total citizenship activities institutions immigrants rights Australia M – – + M + Belgiuma – – – M M M Chile – + + M + – Czech Rep. + – – + + + England M – – M – + Estonia – – M – – – Finland + – – M M + Greece + + M + + M Lithuania – + – – – – Poland + + + M + M Russian Fed. M – M – M – Slovak Rep. + + – + – – United States + + + + + + Note: – indicates performance significantly below the international mean; + indicates performance signif- icantly above the international mean; M indicates performance not significantly different from the inter- national mean. a. French-speaking Belgium only. Source: Torney-Purta and others 2001. Changing the Way People Learn Traditional educational systems, in which the teacher is the sole source of knowledge, are ill suited to equip people to work and live in a knowledge economy. Some of the competencies such a society demands—teamwork, problem solving, motivation for lifelong learning—cannot be acquired in a learning setting in which teachers dictate facts to learners who seek to learn them only in order to be able to repeat them. A lifelong learning system must reach larger segments of the popula- tion, including people with diverse learning needs. It must be compe- tency driven rather than age related. Within traditional institutional settings, new curricula and new teaching methods are needed. At the same time, efforts need to be made to reach learners who cannot enroll in programs at traditional institutions. Providing people with the tools they need to function in the knowledge economy requires adoption of a new pedagogical model. This model dif- fers from the traditional model in many ways (table 2.3). Teachers and trainers serve as facilitators rather than transmitters of knowledge, and TRANSFORMING LEARNING 29 Table 2.3. Characteristics of Traditional and Lifelong Learning Models Traditional learning Lifelong learning • The teacher is the source of • Educators are guides to sources of knowledge. knowledge. • Learners receive knowledge from • People learn by doing. the teacher. • Learners work by themselves. • People learn in groups and from each other. • Tests are given to prevent progress • Assessment is used to guide until students have completely learning strategies and identify mastered a set of skills and to pathways for future learning. ration access to further learning. • All learners do the same thing. • Educators develop individualized learning plans. • Teachers receive initial training • Educators are lifelong learners. plus ad hoc in-service training. Initial training and ongoing professional development are linked. • “Good” learners are identified • People have access to learning and permitted to continue their opportunities over a lifetime. education. more emphasis is placed on learning by doing, working on teams, and thinking creatively (box 2.1). The lifelong learning model enables learners to acquire more of the new skills demanded by the knowledge economy as well as more tradi- tional academic skills. In Guatemala, for example, learners taught through active learning—that is, learning that takes place in collaboration with other learners and teachers, in which learners seek out information for themselves—improved their reading scores more and engaged more in democratic behaviors than learners not in the program (de Baessa, Chesterfield, and Ramos 2002) (box 2.2). In the United Kingdom learners taught thinking skills in science were able to improve their performance in other subjects, and the effects increased over time (Adey and Shayer 1994). How People Learn Cognitive research on learning suggests that “how people learn is more important than what people learn in the achievement of successful learn- ing” (OECD 2001h, p. 20). This work has shown that when the right tools and strategies are adopted and learners are motivated, most children can 30 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 2.1. Encouraging Creativity in Singapore Singapore’s leaders have been rethinking that country’s economic and education policies to ensure that they meet the challenges of a knowledge- based economy. In 1997 they launched the Thinking Schools, Learning Nation (TSLN) framework. One of the four pillars of the framework is the emphasis on critical and creative thinking in schools. Specific changes made to encourage creativity include the teaching of thinking skills and the introduction of interdisciplinary and project work. Singapore has adopted a framework that relies on the belief that cre- ativity can be taught. This assumption underlies its Dimensions of Learn- ing program, in which learners are taught eight core skills: focusing, information-gathering, remembering, organizing, analyzing, generating, integrating, and evaluating. This approach is probably appropriate for a country that excels in math and science rather than the arts. Sources: Australia, DEET 2002; Brown and Lauder 2000; Sharpe and Gopinathan 2001. learn almost anything (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). Remedial learners placed in an accelerated pre-algebra program reportedly learned more than their peers in remedial math programs (Peterson 1989). More- over, the learners placed in remedial programs lost ground compared with “regular” learners, whereas some of the remedial learners in the Box 2.2. What Does a Learner-Centered Classroom Look Like? Guatemala’s Nueva Escuela Unitaria (NEU) program tackles some of the country’s poorest and most isolated rural schools. The classrooms in the program reflect the program’s learning-centered model: “. . . one seldom observes any large-group, teacher-dominated instruc- tion. Rather groups of two to six students at a particular grade level can be seen working at a table, a learning corner, the library, or outside work- ing in their self-teaching workbooks. The large chalkboard has been removed from most NEU classrooms, and while these classrooms gener- ally have more instructional materials than a traditional, poor rural school, it is the way materials are used by students rather than their quantity that is exceptional in these classrooms. The library, always under student management, is meant to be used during the school day and books borrowed overnight rather than kept under lock and key. . . . [Evaluations] indicate a very low level of student discipline problems and an extremely high interest level by students ‘doing their work.’” Source: Craig, Kraft, and du Plessis 1998, p. 89. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 31 accelerated program were able to shed their remedial designation. The difference in outcomes appears to be related to the methods used in the two classes. In traditional remedial programs, learners are drilled on low- level tasks. In contrast, in accelerated programs learners are expected to be able to tackle higher-level tasks and understand the conceptual under- pinnings of the subject. The importance of early experiences in the development of the brain and subsequent behavior is well known (Fuchs and Reklis 1994; Mustard 2002; Osborn and Milbank 1987). The development of certain language learning processes (for example, the learning of grammar) depends on a particularly sensitive stage of development that is expected to occur dur- ing a specific time window. Other language learning processes, however, such as mastery of semantics, do not take place only during a particular period; these processes are not constrained by time or age (Greenough 2000). Changes in the brain previously thought to be associated with ado- lescence have now been shown to continue into one’s twenties (OECD 2001g). The material to which learners are exposed and the way they are taught are also significant. Sixth grade students who were introduced to certain concepts using learner-centered methods were better able to solve conceptual physics problems than 11th and 12th graders in the same school who were taught physics using traditional methods (White and Frederickson 1997). Some observers distinguish adult from child learning because adult learning is said to be self-directed (Houle 1961). In fact, learning at any age can be characterized by how self-directed it is. Adults who know lit- tle or nothing about a topic benefit from teacher-directed instruction until they have enough knowledge to begin directing their own learning (Mer- riam 1993). Content and pedagogy are thus inextricably linked. Characteristics of Effective Learning Environments Effective learning environments are environments based on the ways peo- ple learn. They differ from traditional learning settings in that they are learner centered, knowledge rich, assessment driven, and community connected (Desforges 2001; Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). Learner Centered A learner-centered environment recognizes that learners acquire new knowledge and skills best if the knowledge and skills are connected to what they already know. Teachers need to know what learners already know and understand before introducing new material. Learner-centered 32 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY learning produces different outcomes from rote learning and direct teach- ing, where teachers are the source of knowledge and their job is to pro- vide knowledge to learners, who receive it passively, if at all. Rote learning enables learners to retrieve and write down information in a nar- row range of settings, such as examinations, but it does not teach students to connect what they learn or integrate it with what they already know. Learner-centered learning allows new knowledge to become available for use in new situations—that is, it allows knowledge transfer to take place. Knowledge Rich Learners’ ability to transfer what they learn to new contexts requires a grasp of themes and overarching concepts in addition to factual knowl- edge. Knowledge-rich learning thus favors teaching fewer subject areas in depth rather than covering more subjects in less depth (Martin and others 2000; Mullis and others 2000). This kind of learning provides learners with a variety of strategies and tools for retrieving and applying or transferring knowledge to new situations. It also equips them, for example, to assess the tradeoffs between accuracy and speed of different strategies. One of the best ways to develop these strategies is for learners to try to solve real or simulated problems using the knowledge and concepts being taught (Schank 2001). The tradition of learning by doing is long and rich, particularly in apprenticeships and many vocational courses. It has not been central to general education, however, for pedagogical reasons (the prevalence of teacher-directed approaches and the emphasis on “brain work” rather than “manual work”) or practical concerns (logistics and the need to cover a broad curriculum) (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). It is important, however, because people learn some things implicitly. People often learn about the environment without intending to do so, in such a way that the resulting knowledge is difficult to express (OECD 2001g). In learning by doing, learners grasp many details that are difficult or tedious to make explicit. Assessment Driven Assessment-driven learning is based on defining clear standards, identi- fying the point from which learners start, determining the progress they are making toward meeting standards, and recognizing whether they have reached them. Assessment-driven learning helps the educational system define the instructional action plan, which needs to reflect the dif- ferent places from which learners start. Giving learners—even very young learners—a role in the process of tracking their learning achievements TRANSFORMING LEARNING 33 and, especially, engaging them in discussion of the outcomes of these assessments are powerful motivators and tools for improved and inde- pendent learning. Ongoing assessment and feedback is underused in traditional teaching settings. It has the greatest effects in terms of promoting the development of higher-order thinking skills and conceptual understanding (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). Community Connected The circumstances in which learning takes place have an important effect on the way people learn and the likelihood of a successful outcome (Merriam 2001). The setting—the classroom, the school, the institution, the virtual space—must be conducive to learning and to increasing learn- ers’ motivation. The teacher must create an atmosphere of trust, since understanding and rectifying mistakes are important elements in the process through which understanding develops. It is important that learners be able to learn from one another. Giving learners the opportunity to work on joint projects is important for both children and adults (Merriam 2001). Implicit learning is linked to partici- pation in successful social interaction (OECD 2001g). It is also important to link activities inside the classroom with what is happening outside the classroom. Working on real-life problems or issues that are relevant to participants increases interest and motivation and pro- motes knowledge transfer (Cibulka and others 2000; Oxenham and others 2002). Moreover, important sources of information and knowledge exist outside the classroom that learners need to understand and access. These links can take many forms. Apprenticeships that involve alternating peri- ods of institution-based learning of knowledge foundations coupled with the acquisition of work-related skills, competencies, and practices in the workplace are examples of this kind of linkage. Aligning the Four Characteristics of Effective Learning Environments The four characteristics of effective learning environments need to be aligned. Encouraging the development of thinking skills in learners will flounder, for example, if assessment is done through multiple choice tests that assess factual recall. In Jamaica the Reform of Secondary Education (ROSE) program developed new textbooks and trained all teachers in the use of a child-centered pedagogy. But teachers and parents expressed con- cern about whether the new approach would improve student perfor- mance on the end of schooling Caribbean Examinations Council 34 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY examinations, which are traditional examinations of academic content (World Bank 2001g). Implications for Teachers and Teacher Training In the old model of learning, teachers told learners what they needed to know. In the new learning environment, teachers and trainers work as facilitators, enabling learners to access knowledge and develop their con- ceptual understanding. Creating this new environment requires a change of culture, especially where teachers’ status in the classroom and society arises from being perceived as an authority figure. Traditionally, teachers were learners only during pre- and episodic in- service training. Today they need to be lifelong learners. Teachers’ and trainers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, and their initial knowledge and understanding of their curriculum area, are the starting points. If they are ignored, it is likely that new pedagogical practices will not be accepted or will be misunderstood and therefore misused or misapplied (Desforges 2000). Teachers need in-depth knowledge of their subject area, including knowledge of relevant facts, an understanding of the major concepts, and the connections between them. Evidence from the United States suggests that student achievement is higher when teachers have a minor or major university degree in the field they teach (Wenglinsky 2000; Kaplan and Owings 2001). In developing countries, too, teacher quality (as measured by education, knowledge, experience, and proficiency) and basic inputs (such as textbooks and instructional time and the demands made on learners) have been linked to higher student achievement (Scheerens 1999). Teachers also need to know how to teach their discipline (Van Driel, Veal, and Janssen 2001). The way learners come to understand—or mis- understand—a subject varies from subject area to subject area. Teaching methods that work well in math may not work well in art or geography (Blansford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). Like other learners, teachers need to learn by doing. They must prac- tice and use the techniques they are expected to use in the classroom (Navarro and Verdisco 2000), then reflect on the experience, come up with more ideas, and try something new. Training must be relevant to the con- ditions teachers are likely to find in the classroom, which may include dis- advantaged or diverse learners. Teachers with a good knowledge of their subject and who “had learned to work with learners who came from dif- ferent cultures or had special needs [had students who] tested more than one full grade level above their peers” (Kaplan and Owings 2001, p. 4). An effective way to ensure a strong connection between training and what TRANSFORMING LEARNING 35 happens in the classroom is to train teachers in the classroom or at least at the school. The environment in which teachers operate affects their ability to apply what they learn from training. Structural constraints can prevent teachers from applying what they learn, causing them to revert to their old ways of teaching. For this reason cascade models of teaching training—in which a small group of teachers is trained who then train a larger group of teachers, who then teach yet other groups of teachers—are unlikely to be effective (table 2.4). Enough teachers need to be trained at a given school or institution to build a group supporting each others’ struggles to apply new ideas. Professional development needs to be more closely aligned with plans for school or institutional improvement. A learning organization can improve itself by learning from its mistakes and adjusting its structures and the way it works in response to new knowledge. But doing so Table 2.4. Effective and Less Effective Teacher Education Strategies in Developing Countries More effective strategies Less effective strategies • Most training takes place in • Training is done primarily at schools, where trainees observe, universities, normal schools, or the assist, and teach. Training is done ministry of education. in both formal and nonformal settings. • Training occurs throughout the • Training is a one-time preservice teacher’s career. phenomenon. • Training emphasizes actual • Training emphasizes receiving classroom teaching behaviors. certificates and diplomas. • Groups or cohorts of teachers are • Teachers are trained individually. trained together. • Reform of teacher education is an • Reform of teacher education is integral part of curriculum and separate from other attempts to other reforms. reform the system. • The inspection system supports • Teachers are seldom supervised; good teaching practice. when they are it is generally for punitive reasons. • Training begins with teachers • Training begins with theoretical identifying needs and demands. considerations, possibly connected to teacher needs and demands. • Self-study and self-learning are • Only knowledge mediated by critical. the ministry or universities is acceptable. Source: Adapted from Craig, Kraft, and du Plessis 1998. 36 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY requires leadership that fosters collaboration on the common goal of the organization. Effective leadership must be supportive and shared, it must reflect shared values and vision, promote collaborative learning within the organization and incentives to use that learning to improve perfor- mance, create supportive conditions, and provide opportunities for peer review and feedback (Huffman and Hipp 2001). This process of continuous refinement and adjustment contrasts with national reforms and other top-down changes (Venezky and Davis 2002). A professional community within a school promotes learning, provides technical support for innovation, and sustains teachers through a support system. This professional community can be extended beyond a single school. In the Microcentros Program in Chile, for example, teachers from different schools, supervised by provincial representatives, decide when to meet and which topics to focus training seminars on (Navarro and Verdisco 2000; see also Delannoy 2000). The Primary Teacher Mentoring Program in Balochistan, Pakistan, works in a similar way (Craig, Kraft, and du Plessis 1998). Bringing about this change in the way teachers and trainers behave is difficult even in OECD countries (OECD 1998b), partly because teachers’ motivation and needs vary depending on where they are in their careers (Cibulka and others 2000). Effecting change is even more difficult in developing countries. Spending on nonwage recurrent items, such as chalk, textbooks, science equipment, and teachers’ professional develop- ment, is usually very low. Lack of accountability for teacher (and school) performance is the norm, especially where teacher unions are politically powerful. Deeply rooted cultural expectations about the role and status of teachers may also hinder change. Using Technology to Transform Learning ICT has the potential to improve the quality of learning, expand access to learning opportunities, and increase the efficiency of administrative processes (World Bank 2002c). These technologies can support changes in pedagogy and teacher training, deepening and extending planned changes. Before ICT can help improve learning outcomes, however, insti- tutions must be reorganized and teachers must change the way they approach learning (Venezky and Davis 2002). ICT changes the role of the teacher. In Chile and Costa Rica it has helped create a more egalitarian relationship between teacher and learner, with learners making more decisions about their work, speaking their minds more freely, and receiving consultations rather than lectures from their teachers (Alvarez and others 1998). The teacher’s role is no longer to provide content but rather to work with learners to explore new territory. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 37 In some areas, international content can be adapted and aligned with national and local curricula. The availability of on-line curricular material also suggests that developing countries may be able to reallocate funding for curricular development, devoting more funding to course develop- ment of subjects not available through ICT (such as local history, culture, and agriculture). Only a few institutions in the world have used ICT to establish all of the elements of an effective learning environment. Venezky and Davis (2002) identified 94 exemplary schools in OECD countries. In these schools the initial struggles to learn the technology (survival stage) had been overcome: classrooms were becoming more learner centered, and technology had become infused in learning activities (impact stage) (see Mandinach and Cline 1994 for the stages of reform). Very few of the 94 exemplary schools had reached the innovation stage, in which curriculum and learning activities are restructured in ways that go beyond mandated procedures and content (box 2.3). Computers ICT can facilitate the move from learning-by-telling to learning-by-doing (Schank 2001). In science laboratories, simulation software can be used to reduce the time between collecting and graphing data, enabling learners Box 2.3. Using Technology to Create an Effective Learning Environment in Australia One of the best examples of the transformative use of technology in education, according to the OECD, is in the State of Victoria, Australia, where the Department of Education has developed many tools and services that are highly valued by schools. These include SOFWeb, the most popular educational web site in Australia (35,000 documents), used by two out of every three teachers; Schools Television, broadcast by digital satellite; and Curriculum@work, an on-line and CD-ROM one-stop shop for curriculum resources. The State of Victoria has promoted innovation in teaching and learn- ing practices through its Navigator Schools program, launched in 1995. These pilot schools have focused on creativity and cross-disciplinary learning, the integration of computers into the curriculum, and the role of the teacher as learner. Learners in these schools are engaged. They challenge teachers to provide a learning environment that leads to greater learning. Sources: Toomey 2000; Australia, DEET 2002. 38 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY to spend more time discussing, analyzing, and interpreting the data. Pilots can begin learning to fly planes using simulators, reducing the risks and costs associated with training in airplanes. Early computer-assisted instruction, from the 1980s and early 1990s, was often highly repetitive. While these applications improved perfor- mance relative to traditional instruction, they did so over a limited range and promoted only relatively low-level skills. In the United States these types of programs were actually tied to lower student performance on a national math test that demanded higher-level skills (Wenglinsky 1998). Newer software, known as knowledge-based tutors, has been designed based on evidence from the cognitive sciences on how people learn. It is designed to change pedagogical practice and produce gains across more complex sets of skills. Studies of knowledge-based tutors suggest that they are much more effective than the earlier computer-assisted instruction (table 2.5). Learners in kindergarten through 12th grade in the United States who used Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environment (CSILE, pronounced “Cecil”) for science, history, and social studies performed better on standardized tests and came up with deeper explanations than learners in classes without this technology (Roschelle and others 2000). Although all learners using CSILE showed improvement, the effects were especially strong for learners categorized as low or middle achievers. Computer simulations in laboratories have significantly improved learners’ graph-interpretation skills, understanding of scientific concepts, Table 2.5. Improvements in Performance Attributable to Computer-Assisted Instruction and Knowledge-Based Tutors Increase in performance compared Number of with traditional Instructional setting studies Effect size instruction (percent) Computer-assisted instruction Elementary school 28 0.47 68 Secondary school 42 0.42 66 Higher education 101 0.26 60 Adult education 24 0.42 66 Military training 38 0.40 66 Overall 233 0.39 65 Knowledge-based tutors Higher education 1 0.97 83 Military training 1 1.02 84 Secondary school 1 1.00 84 Overall 3 1.00 84 Source: Capper 2000. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 39 and motivation (Roschelle and others 2000). Simulation programs have also proved effective in middle schools. Middle school students who used ThinkerTools, a simulation program that lets them visualize velocity and acceleration, outperformed high school physics students in their ability to apply the basic principles of Newtonian mechanics to real-world situa- tions. The software made science interesting and accessible to a wider range of learners than was possible using traditional approaches (White and Frederickson 1997). Simulations are effective because they are based on learner-centered principles. They require learners to make explicit their underlying assumptions or implicit reasoning; let them visualize the consequences of their reasoning, reflect on those findings, and share them with others; pro- vide pictorial representations and dynamic displays of physical phenom- ena that they can use as bridging analogies when incorporating and amending concepts; and provide graphical analysis to illustrate interrela- tionships of variables in an experiment (Muth and Guzman 2000). Computers can also help assess learning and provide feedback. Some computer programs provide direct feedback to learners. Others provide feedback indirectly by enabling learners to instantly see the effect of changes to parameters in a model (Rochelle and others 2000) (box 2.4). E-mail can be used to provide rapid feedback to distance learners. To the extent that learners are able to study independently or in groups using computers, teachers have more time to work with individual learners. The Internet The Internet can vastly increase the knowledge resources available to an institution (box 2.5). But on-line materials based on the new pedagogy Box 2.4. Using Intelligent Tutoring to Teach Air Force Technicians How to Troubleshoot Problems The Sherlock Project uses computers to teach troubleshooting to U.S. Air Force technicians who work on complex machines involving thou- sands of parts. The project combines a computer simulation program and an expert coach, who offers advice when learners reach impasses. Reflection tools allow users to replay their performance and try possi- ble improvements. Researchers evaluating the program concluded that 20–25 hours of Sherlock training was equivalent to about four years of on-the-job experience. Source: Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000. 40 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 2.5. Using the Internet to Educate Students and Teachers Computer technologies are powerful means of connecting learning to real-world contexts. Through e-mail and the Internet, learners and teachers can communicate with each other and work on joint projects. One project in which they are doing so is GLOBE, a collaborative on-line network linking secondary education students and teachers with scientists from more than 80 countries who study the environ- ment. Learners collect local data on a particular issue. They then send the data to scientists investigating the phenomenon, who send the learners their feedback and post the data graphically on the GLOBE website (http://globe.gov) (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). In the United States, the Public Broadcasting System’s (PBS) TeacherLine, funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Educa- tion, provides teachers with on-line professional development in math and technology integration. In collaboration with the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), and leading educational produc- ers, TeacherLine has developed facilitated modules and self-paced learning opportunities that teachers can access on-line anytime, any- where. PBS member stations work with local education agencies to adapt TeacherLine to meet state and local standards and help deliver TeacherLine to teachers across the country. TeacherLine offers the Virtual Mathematics Academy, where teachers can explore NCTM’s principles and standards on-line; modules (facilitated mini- courses offered through local PBS stations); and the Community Center, where teachers can access on-line chats, find links to resources, and collaborate with teaching professionals across the country (http://teacherline.pbs.org/teacherline/). are still limited. A recent study of 500 educational sites found that only 28 percent used inquiry-based activities and just 5 percent included prob- lem-solving or decision-making. In contrast, 42 percent of the sites fea- tured rote learning and 52 percent involved mainly information retrieval (Mioduser and Nachmias 2002, cited in Venezky and Davis 2002). The number of useful sites providing instruction in languages other than Eng- lish was even more limited. Where the Internet is available to learners on a reliable and affordable basis, the teacher is no longer the sole authority in the classroom. The Internet changes the hierarchical relationship between teacher and learner, with learners able to explore new territory, guided by the teacher. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 41 Once the Internet is available to learners in all countries, learners will no longer be at the mercy of poorly qualified teachers (Schank 2001). Students anywhere in the world, for example, will be able to download course content from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which the university is putting on-line free of charge. Training Teachers to Use Technology ICT can support changes in pedagogy and improvements in student learning. But merely purchasing and putting computers in the classroom will not improve outcomes. The effect of ICT on learning has at least as much to do with factors that are independent of the technology as it has to do with the technology itself (OECD 2002b). The introduction of ICT must be supported by, or supportive of, complementary reforms. A policy for ICT in education should foremost be an education policy. ICT can help change the role of the teacher; it cannot be used to bypass the teacher. Teachers’ attitudes are as important as their skills. If technol- ogy is introduced as part of a move toward a child-centered pedagogy, teachers must understand and want to promote the new model if it is to be successful (Murnane, Sharkey, and Levy 2002). Extensive teacher train- ing in the new technology, especially in its use in the classroom, is needed (Hepp and others forthcoming) (box 2.6). Development of other staff is also necessary. Principals and school man- agers play a key role in promoting a culture of innovation and learning that is supportive of the use of technology and the pedagogical changes it will bring about (Venezky and Davis 2002). The skills to maintain, repair, Box 2.6. Encouraging Teachers in Chile to Learn How to Use Technology As part of its reform and upgrading of basic education in rural areas, Chile created technology microcenters, which teachers can visit on a structured or informal basis to share ideas or obtain training on the use of ICT. The microcenters—and their monthly meetings—turned out to be ideal opportunities to incorporate joint design and reflection about the way to introduce technology in rural classrooms as part of the national ICT initiative. The facilitator who visited ICT school class- rooms participated in the microcenters’ monthly meetings, working with groups of teachers to design activities that they would carry out before the next school visit the following month. Source: Hepp and others forthcoming. 42 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY and upgrade ICTs also need to be developed. As Hepp and others (2002, p. 38) note, “Unreliable technology is the best innovation killer.” Making Policy Choices about Technology Policymakers have a range of choices about what technology to invest in, how to use it, and how to balance these investments against others. Books will continue to have an important place in all learning environments. Computers are important, although studies have not found a single ideal student-to-computer ratio (Venezky and Davis 2002). Having a computer for every learner is undesirable, however, because it reduces teamwork (Hepp and others forthcoming). In some cases technology can reduce costs—by reducing the need for libraries to pay for expensive subscrip- tions and postage for periodicals, for example (World Bank 2002c). E-learning programs used by companies principally as a cost-saving mea- sure have failed to meet either their financial or learning objectives, how- ever (Ashton n.d.). Installing ICTs and training teachers to use them is expensive: hardware costs represent about 25 percent of total costs (teacher training, program development, maintenance, and so on) (World Bank 2001e). Around the world annual ICT costs range from less than $20 to more than $600 a learner (Cawthera 2001; Bakia 2000, cited in Grace and others 2001). In poor countries, where discretionary spending is limited, such expendi- tures represent an enormous burden. In making decisions about computers, policymakers need to consider not just total costs but also the extent to which learners have access to and can use computers. In a primary school in Zimbabwe, for example, the relatively small number of learners with regular access to computers results in an annual cost of roughly $15 per learner (table 2.6). While low in international terms, this cost is high given overall spending on educa- tion in the country. If the school was able to increase the proportion of users in the school with regular access to computers to 80 percent, the annual cost would fall by roughly 70 percent, to about $4 a student. Rural schools are often at a disadvantage in terms of ICT use, because the schools tend to be in poorer areas (reducing local contributions), have fewer students (increasing costs per learner), use multigrade teach- ing (increasing barriers to ICT use), and have less developed telecommu- nication infrastructures (potentially increasing investment and recurrent costs). Government action is needed to reduce these disparities. Some countries have already taken action. Chile is reaching rural schools through its Rural Education Program for Primary Schools (ENLACES) (Hepp and others forthcoming). Schools in South Africa have introduced computers and the Internet (box 2.7). TRANSFORMING LEARNING 43 Table 2.6. Annual Computer Costs per User in Selected Countries Annual cost Learners per regular with Annual user if regular cost 80 percent Cost per Learners use of per of school computer per computer learner community Setting ($) computer (percent) ($) had access ($) Barbados (1998) National program at primary levela 2,000 3:1 – 646 194 Turkey (1999) National program at primary levela 1,100 40:1 – 32 128 Egypt (1998) Secondary school 1,600 27:1 – 75 204 Israel (1998) School 1,850 11:1 – 210 – Zimbabwe (2000) Primary school 1,125–842 29:1 100 15 4 High school (basic) 0 16:1 3 31 4 Telecenter (basic plus)b 250 18:1 – 365 23 South Africa (2000) Primary school 48 22.1 50 10 2 High school 210 11:1 7 96 15 Rural high school 1,000 4:1 12 193 8 College 916 2:1 100 110 28 – Not available. a. Based on assumption that average school has 700 learners. b. Centers were provided with refurbished computers. Sources: Bakia 2000; Cawthera 2001. World Bank Support for Educational Technology The World Bank’s growing support of educational technology reflects the importance it places on using technology, especially computers, to improve educational outcomes. In 1997 just 14 percent of the Bank’s education lend- ing went to technology. That figure rose to 40 percent in 2000 and 27 per- cent in 2001. Between 1997 and 2001 more than three-quarters of World Bank–financed education projects included distance education, education technology, ICT, or education management information system (EMIS) components. Preliminary estimates show that lending for these compo- nents ranged from $150 million to $500 million a year (Georgiades 2001). 44 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 2.7. Affordable Models for ICTs in Rural Areas: Myeke High School, Kwazulu, South Africa Myeke High School has neither grid electricity nor a landline tele- phone connection. But it does have 27 computers, including a com- puter lab with 20 computers. Since September 2000 it has also been connected to the Internet. Satellite technology transmits information to the school’s PCs, while Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) technology is used to send information from the PCs to the satellite. All of the computers are powered by a mixture of solar power and an electric generator fuelled by liquid propane gas. Equipment, software, and a structure to house the equipment and furniture cost about $45,000. Annual costs are less than $50 per user, based on usage by about one-eighth of the school’s students. If usage increased to 80 percent of students, the annual cost per student would fall to about $11. If 80 percent of the staff and community also used the computers, the annual cost per user would fall to just $8. Source: Cawthera 2001. Expanding Learning Opportunities Access to learning opportunities is very unevenly distributed within and across countries (table 2.7). In low-income countries, secondary school enrollment rates are just 46 percent. Moreover, enrollment figures in developing countries tend to overstate access to education, because many of the students who are enrolled are overage. For people already in the labor market, gaining access to learning opportunities is even more difficult. Even across and within OECD coun- tries, rates of training vary considerably (table 2.8). In 1996, the year in which the IALS was conducted, less than half of adults participated in training in every country surveyed but Sweden. In Poland, a country Table 2.7. Gross Enrollment Ratios in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries, 1998 Income level Primary education Secondary education Higher education Low 97 46 8 Middle 119 69 12 High 103 106 62 Source: World Bank 2001i. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 45 Table 2.8. Participation in Adult Continuing Education and Training, by Level of Initial Educational Attainment, 1996 (percent) Non- university Lower Upper higher Total Country Primary secondary secondary education University participation Sweden 27.0 46.7 52.8 66.6 70.4 52.5 New Zealand 6.8 37.8 52.0 60.4 71.5 47.5 United Kingdom 23.4 34.2 53.2 60.7 73.7 43.9 United States 10.3 21.0 30.7 54.9 64.2 39.7 Australia 8.8 27.0 50.6 39.4 60.8 38.8 Ireland 8.6 17.6 29.4 44.1 51.0 24.3 Poland 2.7 9.9 20.6 32.5 34.3 13.9 Source: OECD and Statistics Canada 1997. undergoing profound changes, fewer than one in seven adults was enrolled in retraining. Similar patterns of access to training were found in Chile (the one non-OECD country included in the IALS), where few peo- ple reported participating in training (Araneda and Marín 2002). People with the greatest access to continuing education and training are typically employed, have higher-level educational qualifications, are younger, and work in larger firms (O’Connell 1999), raising questions about equity. Surveys in Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Mexico (Tan and Batra 1995) and in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Zambia, and Zim- babwe (Nielsen and Rosholm 2002) reveal that larger firms conduct more training than smaller firms. Total training capacity in Kenya is estimated at less than 7 percent of the number of new entrants into the labor market, and most of this capacity is for pre-employment training (Haan 2002). Most of the research on labor market policies that offer vocational train- ing for the unemployed indicates poor results (with important but narrow exceptions) and suggests that public resources would be better spent on job search and counseling services (Dar and Gill 1998). The jobs the unem- ployed most often find are much less likely to offer continuing learning opportunities. Thus even when they are effective, these programs repre- sent only the first step in reducing the gap between those who do and those who do not have access to continuing learning opportunities. People in countries in which a high proportion of employment is in the informal sector are especially disadvantaged. Since employers pay for most training, the unemployed or people who work in small companies— who are more often the poor and poorly educated and therefore most in need—are least likely to be able to access learning. Training markets for 46 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 2.8. The Limited Supply of Training for Rural Development in Madagascar Some 70 institutions currently provide education and training for rural development in Madagascar. Thirteen public and two private training institutions offer long certified training courses of study, for which entrance is generally selective. All of these institutions are in larger cities and charge tuition. In recent years these institutions have moved away from providing training solely for civil servants. Some 60 non- formal training centers, mostly managed outside the public sector, also operate in Madagascar. These centers generally provide one or more short (3- to 15-day) sessions on topics such as management, the tech- nical aspects of production, the organization of farmers and producers, and family education. Tuition, where it is charged, is usually in kind or involves only symbolic payment. This network of institutions contin- ues to exclude a significant proportion of rural adults and young adults from learning opportunities, because enrollment is designed for literate people. The programs, particularly those in the nonformal training centers, reinforce stereotypes and gender inequalities. Source: Randriamiharisoa 2001. the informal sector fail for both demand and supply reasons (Vishwanath and Narayan 2001) (box 2.8). The expansion of learning opportunities will need to take place through at least two routes: by making traditional education and institu- tions more flexible and by using technology. Making Traditional Education More Flexible New types of institutions are emerging, particularly at the tertiary level, where nondegree institutions are growing in importance. These institu- tions, such as community colleges, usually offer courses in professional or vocational subjects. Often they also provide contracted customized edu- cation and training services to enterprises. The quasi-public Hungarian Regional Labor Development Centers, for example, earn about a third of their revenue from customized training. One center trains Ford Motor Company mechanics throughout Central and Eastern Europe. Training takes place in a laboratory furnished by Ford, which the Center uses for training when Ford is not using it. Traditional public institutions are also changing to make face-to-face learning more accessible, although this trend is more evident in OECD TRANSFORMING LEARNING 47 Figure 2.3. Proportion of Part-Time Learners in Higher Education in OECD Countries, 1997 14 12 Number of Countries 10 11 Non-University Tertiary Education 8 University-Level Education 6 4 5 5 4 2 0 0 1>25% 26>50% 51>75% 76%> Percentage of Student Distribution Source: OECD 1998a. countries than in developing countries or transition economies. Part-time study at the tertiary level, in which learners take traditional on-campus classes in the evenings or over the summer, are well established in a few OECD countries, although even there the numbers remain low (figure 2.3). Private universities have typically been more flexible about offering part-time and night study. Part-time learners overwhelmingly are older and tend to be employed. Many primary and secondary students also study in the late afternoon or evening. In Brazil about 60 percent of learners in upper secondary edu- cation attend night schools (World Bank and Inter-American Develop- ment Bank 2000). Double-shift primary and secondary schools are widespread in developing countries, where they reduce the opportunity cost of attending school by allowing students to work or perform family duties during part of the day. The quality of education in these schools appears to be as good as that in single-shift schools (Bray 2000). Schools usually operate two shifts in response to a lack of resources or facilities rather than to address learners’ needs, however, and their lack of institu- tionalization makes them unattractive to parents (Linden 2001). For this reason, policymakers often seek to abolish them. Using Technology to Reach More Learners Distance education has a long and, under certain circumstances, success- ful history of providing education that is comparable to or better than that provided in traditional institutional settings in the same country. Although the evidence is more limited and ambiguous, these programs appear cost-effective as well. 48 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Successful distance learning programs using traditional media (print, radio, and television) are operating at all levels of learning. Originally developed in Nicaragua in the 1970s, Interactive Radio Instruction (IRI) has been widely used at the primary level in many countries, including Bolivia, Kenya, South Africa, Thailand, and Venezuela. In Guinea and Lesotho it is being used on a national scale. IRI has been shown to be more effective than conventional teaching in math (World Bank 2001e; Perraton 2000). In its original conception, radio instruction was designed to teach learners directly, using highly structured lessons with pauses for learners to respond or engage in learning activities. In recent years it has been used to supplement instruction and support rather than supplant teachers. In Guinea (World Bank 2001e) and South Africa (Perraton 2000), IRI has been designed to implement a child-centered pedagogy; in Kenya songs and games are used to involve learners in a more participatory way (World Bank 2001e). The introduction of digital radio transmission should allow more coun- tries to adopt IRI. Signal gaps that occur as a result of blockage by hills or buildings can be filled by installing very low power digital radio repeaters in these locations. Unlike conventional receivers, digital radio receivers can sort through several signal paths on the same frequency, a capability that will help conserve scarce radio spectrum. Several digital initiatives are underway at both the national and global levels (Walker and Dhanarajan 2000). WorldSpace is a digital radio system targeting Asia, Africa, and South America through satellite transmission of digital programming. Community broadcasters can access national and international programs by rebroadcasting these programs, making them available to people who would otherwise not have access to them. Digital audio broadcasting also allows text- and graphic-based information to be displayed on a small screen on a digital radio as a supplement to the audio broadcast. Television is the principal medium in the Telesecundaria program, which provides education to about 15 percent of lower secondary stu- dents in Mexico. The program uses high-quality broadcast materials, sup- plemented by workbooks, and local supervisors, who support learners. Evaluations have shown that it contributes significantly to learner out- comes (Perraton 2000). Distance learning is also used for training. At Cisco Networking Acad- emies in more than 145 countries, Cisco trains learners to become Cisco Certified Network Associates and Cisco Certified Network Professionals. The company uses the Internet to distribute up-to-date curricula to under- served populations, assess learner skills, monitor the quality of instruc- tion, provide teachers with advice on technical and pedagogical issues, and enable teachers to keep track of learner progress and grades. The TRANSFORMING LEARNING 49 company’s nearly 10,000 academies enroll more than 250,000 students, who learn how to design, build, and maintain computer networks (Mur- nane, Sharkey, and Levy 2002). Teacher training at a distance is used principally for in-service training, either to train large numbers of recently hired but unqualified teachers (as it is in Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, Swaziland, and Uganda) or to upgrade teacher skills for the introduction of a new curriculum (as it is in China, India, and Pakistan). These models use correspondence and radio instruc- tion, combined with some supervision of classroom practice (in China television has also been used). Several African countries are beginning to use ICTs in conventional teachers’ colleges and teacher resource centers, usually in combination with other modalities (World Bank 2001e). In South Africa thousands of underqualified teachers now have access to ICTs. Pass rates on these courses have been very high; the salary increase following successful completion appears to be a powerful motivator. In the 1990s the distance learning program of the National Teachers Institute in Nigeria graduated more teachers than all other programs in the coun- try combined (UNESCO 2001). High completion and graduation rates make the use of distance edu- cation very cost-effective, especially when used in large-scale programs (box 2.9). The African Virtual University uses a mixture of taped and live lectures delivered by one-way video digital satellite broadcast with two- way audio and e-mail interaction between learners and instructors, sup- plemented by textbooks, course notes, and learner support in the classroom from facilitators. Distance education at the tertiary level is well established, both in industrial and developing countries. Several open universities have more than 150,000 learners—China alone has almost 1.5 million open university students—and these students account for a significant percentage of higher education students in some countries (table 2.9). Per learner costs at these institutions are lower than at traditional cam- puses, partly because distance learning programs rely heavily on printed materials and do not require buildings for students. Distance education through any medium requires a basic infrastruc- ture: a functioning postal system (important in all models); reliable sources of power (electricity or batteries); radio and television broadcast facilities; and receivers, satellites, or cables. The availability of different kinds of infrastructure, which varies significantly across countries (table 2.10), will necessarily influence decisions about the appropriate technology. It will also substantially increase costs if a new infrastructure needs to be put in place to handle a new kind of technology. Distance education can be a cheaper way to provide education, but initial investments—especially the cost of developing materials and 50 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 2.9. Using Distance Learning to Train Teachers in Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, and Sri Lanka Traditionally, 85 percent of in-service funding for continuing profes- sional development in Mongolia went toward travel, food, and lodg- ing (UNESCO 2001). The use of distance education allowed the government to allocate a higher proportion of the budget to training, specifically to creating learning resources for teachers and funding more local workshops. The change increased teachers’ access to learn- ing opportunities. Instead of one week’s professional development per primary teacher once every 10 years, teachers now regularly use dis- tance learning to access radio, printed materials, and group meetings. These changes allowed Mongolia to train half of the country’s teachers in six years. In 1997 the Korean Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Information and Communication created a Cyber Teacher Training Center within the Korean Multi-Media Education Center. The Center developed 11 training courses and a software platform for managing the virtual teacher training. Along with an additional six courses developed in 1998, these virtual teacher training courses are now available through the edunet, an integrated educational service on the Web. The Sri Lanka Institute for Distance Education (SLIDE) offers teacher development courses to untrained teachers using distance learning. Teachers study printed self-instructional materials, then receive supervised teaching and follow-up. They are supported through face-to-face sessions at regional centers and through study cir- cles with other student-teachers. The teachers are supported for three to five years. Conventional courses take two years of full-time study in a teachers’ college (Perraton 2000). About 5,000 teachers were studying with SLIDE in 1993. A 1990 evaluation found that the program was more cost-effective than the two conventional alternatives by a factor of 4.5–6 (Tatto, Nielsen, and Cummings 1991). establishing the technological infrastructure (purchasing radios, televi- sions, and so forth)—can be high. Fixed costs have often been funded by external agencies (USAID was particularly active in the early years of interactive radio instruction). However, the proportion of fixed costs is typically higher for conventional education than for distance delivery (World Bank 2001e), highlighting the need to find a sustainable model of distance learning. Table 2.9. Enrollment and Costs at Selected Open Universities, 1990s Distance education Distance Learner fees as a enrollment as education unit percentage of percentage of cost as distance total tertiary percentage of education unit Institution/country Enrollment learners campus unit cost cost China 1,422,900 24 25–40 – Anadolu University, Turkey 470,072 26 – – South Korea National Open University 208,935 13 – 62 Indira Gandhi National Open University, India 182,000 11 40 26 51 Open University, Thailand 180,000 37 40 76 Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia 170,000 18 13 30 Open University, United Kingdom 154,200 8 39–47 43 University of the Air, Japan 68,000 4 13 – Fédération Interuniversitaire de l’Enseignement à Distance, France 35,000 2 50 50 Open Learning Institute, Hong Kong (China) 20,000 21 – 86 Open University, Sri Lanka 16,400 32 – 30 Universiti Sains, Malaysia 5,500 3 73 – National Centre for Distance Education, Ireland 3,500 5 43–66 70 – Not available. Source: Saint 2000. Table 2.10. Number of Radios, Televisions, and Personal Computers for Use in Educational Institutions in Selected Countries, 1997 (per 1,000 learners) Number of Number Number of personal Region Country of radiosa Country televisions Country computers Africa Angola 54 Ethiopia 5 Burkina Faso <1 Ghana 238 Uganda 26 Zimbabwe 9 Malawi 256 Côte d’Ivoire 64 South Africa 42 52 Asia China 195 Cambodia 124 Pakistan 4 Malaysia 432 India 69 Singapore 399 Latin America and the Caribbean Nicaragua 283 Ecuador 294 Guatemala 3 Uruguay 610 Jamaica 323 Chile 54 Europe and Central Asia Lithuania 404 Czech Rep. 469 Switzerland 348 North America Canada 1,078 United States 847 United States 407 a. Data are for 1996. Source: World Bank 2001e. TRANSFORMING LEARNING 53 Many countries have struggled to meet the recurrent costs of distance learning. As a result, over time these programs tend to rely only on printed materials. Telecurso in Brazil, Telesecundaria in Mexico, and tele- vision universities in China are sustainable partly because they have many learners over whom to spread the costs of developing high-quality materials. Successful distance learning programs allow learners to interact with a teacher, facilitator, or other learners. The secondary school study centers in Africa and the Chinese television universities are examples. The deliv- ery of higher education to Chinese learners through television uses cen- trally prepared written materials combined with television programs beamed by satellite or recorded on video. What makes this model dis- tinctive is that learning is a classroom activity. This classroom support provides answers to learners’ questions plus assessment and feedback on performance—a key dimension of effective learning environments. Feed- back is particularly important at the primary and secondary levels, where learners may not have the skills or motivation for self-directed learning (because of poor education or weaker support from communities and families, who may not themselves be literate). The impact of ICTs on distance education at the primary and secondary levels has so far been marginal (Farrell 2001; Lizardi 2002). Many institu- tions of higher learning are offering on-line courses, however, sometimes in conjunction with other institutions. The National University of Singa- pore and MIT operate a joint master’s program in engineering, in which learners from both campuses attend lectures conducted either at MIT or in Singapore. The program uses video conferencing through a high-speed broadband network (or VBNS) system in the United States, connecting to SINGAREN, Singapore’s high-speed research network. Virtual universities are an emerging phenomenon that offer maximum flexibility for learners. Many countries already have virtual universities, and countries as diverse as Jordan and Nigeria plan to develop them. New providers, such as private sector training, international providers, corporate universities, content brokers, and media, are also emerging to complement and challenge traditional institutions (World Bank 2002c). ICTs are also changing the provision of learning opportunities in com- panies (table 2.11). In 2002 about one-quarter of U.S. corporate spending on education and training was delivered by technology, with e-learning making up about 20 percent of that share. In 1999, 92 percent of large cor- porations implemented Web-based training pilots (Urdan and Weggan 2000). Interestingly, soft skills training (that is, training in management, leadership, communications, team building, sales and marketing, human resources, and professional development) grew twice as rapidly as IT training. 54 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Table 2.11. Demand and Supply Factors Driving E-Learning in Corporate Training Demand Supply • Knowledge and training • Internet access is becoming rapidly become obsolete. standard at work and at home. • Training needs to be delivered • Advances in digital technologies on just-in-time basis. enable creation of interactive, media-rich content. • Businesses need cost-effective • Increasing bandwidth and better delivery ways to meet learning needs platforms make e-learning more attractive. of global workforce. • Skills gap and demographic • Selection of high-quality e-learning changes require new learning products and services is growing. models. • Flexible access to lifelong • Emerging technology standards facilitate learning is needed. compatibility and usability of e-learning products. Source: Urdan and Weggen 2000. The Importance of Career Guidance and Counseling If people are to take responsibility for managing their learning, they need information about themselves, the society in which they live, and the economy in which they function. Career information and guidance poli- cies and services help provide the link between these sources of informa- tion and people’s aptitudes and interests. They facilitate and promote lifelong learning. Developing countries, particularly middle-income countries, are increasingly recognizing the need to implement career development policies; industrial countries are strengthening existing poli- cies and programs. The European Union and the OECD, along with their member countries, and more and more developing countries are refining policies and programs on career guidance. The OECD has begun a major study of career guidance policy (OECD 2000b). The World Bank is con- ducting a parallel study, scheduled to be completed in 2003. Career development policies and services promote social equality and inclusion as well as access to educational and labor market opportunities. Guidance can perform a valuable role in raising the aspirations of the dis- advantaged by making them aware of opportunities and supporting them in securing entry to such opportunities. Such services promote individual liberty and choice and emphasize the active individual. Career guidance services enhance economic efficiency by making the labor market operate more effectively. Guidance can help ensure that the TRANSFORMING LEARNING 55 individual decisions through which the labor market operates are well informed. It can reduce market failures (drop-outs from education and training or mismatches between supply and demand). It can also support institutional reforms designed to improve the functioning of labor. Conclusion The challenge for developing countries—to provide a broader range of opportunities to acquire skills, knowledge, and competencies to more and more of their citizens—is immense. But the emergence of new providers, offering different services and in different ways, represents an opportu- nity for developing countries. It was not and is not possible to extend life- long learning with the traditional model of secondary and higher education; the emerging modalities open the possibility that a learning system driven by the needs of learners can emerge. The hurdles to creat- ing such a system are significant, however. Two more major issues, the role of governments in creating a lifelong learning system and how the system is to be financed, are addressed in the next two chapters. 3 Governing the Lifelong Learning System I am growing old but still learning many things. Solon (c. 650–555 B.C.) As the first two chapters have shown, establishing a system of lifelong learning requires changes in the scope, content, and delivery of education and training (table 3.1). To create high-performance, lifelong learning sys- tems, countries need to make significant changes to both the governance and financing of education and training. Trends in Governance Several broad governance trends are affecting all sectors, including edu- cation and training, across the world. The need to improve public sector management has become more pressing in both industrial and develop- ing countries (Strange 1996; UNCSTD 2001), in part as a response to a more informed citizenry demanding transparency and efficiency in pub- lic sector management (World Bank Institute 2001b). The common trend in government reform has been the quest for smaller government through efficiency gains, achieved by drawing on private sector management principles of efficiency; new processes, such as performance management and reengineering service systems; greater focus on transparency of gov- ernment operations; and a strong emphasis on outcomes and results (Kettle 1999). Governments are trying to harness the power of information and communication technologies to push ahead with these reforms. E-government is giving citizens greater and more rapid access to infor- mation about the policies and outcomes of government (see, for example, Heeks 2001). There is evidence that e-government, greater access to 57 58 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Table 3.1. Scope, Content, and Delivery of Education and Training in Traditional and Lifelong Learning Models Dimension Traditional model Lifelong learning model Scope • Formal schooling from • Learning throughout the primary to higher education lifecycle—in schools, on the job, after retirement Content • Acquisition and repetition • Creation, acquisition, and of knowledge application of knowledge • Curriculum driven • Diverse sources of knowledge • Empowerment of learners • Competency driven Delivery • Limited learning options • Multitude of learning and modalities options, settings, and • Formal institutions modalities • Uniform centralized control • New pedagogical approaches • Supply driven • Technology-supported delivery • Pluralistic, flexible decentral- ized system • Learner driven information, and improved public expenditure management systems have already produced efficiency gains—in the implementation of diag- nostic Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys (PETS) in Ghana, Tanzania, and Uganda (Reinikka and Svensson 2002), for example, and the review of public school teachers’ payroll systems in Argentina and Mexico (World Bank 1998e). A critical aspect of these reforms is the extent to which people in government view the information they have as a public re- source, to be shared and subject to standards (UNESCO and COMNET-IT 2002). Developing countries face a range of challenges to move forward with this agenda, in particular the need to increase transparency in the gover- nance process. Transparency can be understood as openness about policy intentions, formulation, and implementation and the absence of corrup- tion (World Bank 1997). The fight against corruption—including the fight against the loss of resources designated for education—has become a pol- icy focus in developing countries (World Bank 2000b). NGOs active in edu- cation have monitored government performance by tracking education expenditure and outcomes and the extent to which earmarked resources go to specific programs or population groups. These trends provide the context for the dimensions of governance examined in this chapter. In many OECD countries the role of government in the learning system has shifted from focusing principally on public financing and provision of GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 59 education to creating a flexible policy and regulatory framework that encompasses a wider range of institutional actors and partners. In this con- text the main governance challenge is to promote efficient coordination mechanisms and to put increased emphasis on individual learners. This framework needs to be enabling, inclusive of disadvantaged learners, and responsive to learners’ needs (table 3.2). Within this framework incentives assume a greater importance than rigid policy directives and control from government. The framework includes legislation and executive orders; arrangements for ensuring coordination across ministries and other insti- tutions involved in education and training activities; and mechanisms for certifying the achievements of learners, monitoring institutional and sys- tem performance, and promoting learning pathways. Coordinating Policy across Ministries Critical in a lifelong learning perspective are coordination between line ministries in the central government as well as close linkages between general education and vocational education, and training on the one hand and education and work on the other. To promote coordination Table 3.2. Traditional Role of Government and New Role in the Knowledge Economy Policy issue Current role Role in the knowledge economy Integration/coordination Adopts Coordinates multisectoral at national level compartmentalized, approach sectoral approach Coordination across One-way control and Two-way mutual support governance levels regulation and partnerships Government as an Controls and Creates choices, provides enabler regulates information and incentives, facilitates cooperation and provision Linkage between Supply is institution- Demand is learner driven education and the driven labor market/society Qualification assurance National standards, Diverse system of system linked with recognition and quality curriculum and control student assessment Administration and Provides rules and Creates incentives, management regulation facilitates diverse providers 60 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY several OECD countries have combined central ministries. In 2001 the Korean government upgraded the Ministry of Education, renaming it the Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development (MOEHRD). Headed by a deputy prime minister, MOEHRD coordinates the policies of line ministries (for example, the Ministries of Labor, Science and Technology, Information and Communication, and Econ- omy and Finance) that have implications for human resource develop- ment and lifelong learning. In similar moves, Germany created the Federal Ministry of Education and Research in 1998 and Japan created the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in 2001. Other countries have developed knowledge and learning strate- gies that require coordination between education and training min- istries and ministries that deal with such issues as early childhood development, science and technology, information and communication technology, industry, trade, and finance. Australia and the United King- dom, which had combined education and employment ministries, have now separated them to ensure that Cabinet-level discussions focus equally on learning and economic issues. Under the World Bank Lifelong Learning and Training project, Chile is horizontally and vertically changing the way it validates skills acquired on the job or in training institutions and revamping the coverage and quality of tertiary technical education. Vertically, the curriculum offered in grades 11 and 12 in all technical secondary schools is being aligned with that offered in tertiary institutions’ technical and professional courses. The horizontal alignment attempts to link education quality and labor market demands by establishing local collaboration between the business sector and training institutions (World Bank 2002b). In addition, the national government has created a council, headed by the minister of finance and including the ministers of education and training, to oversee the project. Though these reforms are based on good practice elsewhere, it is too early to determine whether these structures as developed in Chile will be effective. The Nordic countries have shown that coordination pays off in improving the transition rates of young people from initial education to working life. In these countries most graduates immediately find jobs, youth unemployment is low, and almost all young people are either in school or working. These countries have achieved these results by emphasizing both prevention and remediation (with a focus on rapid reintegration of school drop-outs); integrated education, labor market, and welfare policies (using subsidized employment to increase skill levels, not just provide young people with jobs); and delivery mecha- nisms that, critically, are managed at the local level and have responsi- bility for and ability to coordinate across several agencies (for example, GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 61 education, employment, health, welfare, and police) at different levels of government (OECD 2000c). Such a system requires a clear frame- work for action, adequate resources, and, especially, administrative capacity to track individuals and work across ministries and levels of government. Finland has used policy coordination to develop an effective lifelong learning system that starts with a vision of lifelong learning. Its lifelong learning strategy begins by offering all children access to preschool education. After completion of compulsory schooling, young people are encouraged to enter upper secondary general or vocational education and to complete their studies. Finland offers many non-university higher edu- cation programs, and it provides opportunities for adults to study for uni- versity degrees. It is also developing methods for recognizing nonformal and informal learning. The strength of the Finnish economy and the opportunities that exist for lifelong learning owe much to the development of a comprehensive and inclusive education and training system and significant investment in human capital (box 3.1). As a result of that investment, Finland’s students are among the best educated in Europe, placing first in reading, third in science, and fourth in math in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (OECD 2001e). Box 3.1. Systemic Reform for Lifelong Learning in Finland For decades Finnish education policy has focused on improving the overall level of education and ensuring equal access to lifelong learn- ing for all groups in all regions of the country. School-age students are required to attend formal schooling. The system also provides oppor- tunities to participate in and complete any level and form of education and training after school age. Finland’s national statement outlines its vision of lifelong learning. That vision includes: • Providing one year of preschool education for all children before comprehensive school. • Helping more young people apply for and complete upper sec- ondary general or vocational education. • Developing students’ learning skills in all sectors of the education system. • Increasing the provision of non-university higher education. • Expanding opportunities for adults to study for a university degree. (continued) 62 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 3.1. (Continued) • Expanding opportunities for adults to study for upper secondary and postsecondary vocational qualifications and to pursue other studies that improve their employability and capacity for further learning. • Developing methods for recognizing nonformal and informal learning. The government provides many incentives to encourage people to pursue education throughout their lives. Compulsory comprehensive schooling, upper secondary education, and vocational education are free. Students pursuing compulsory education through upper secondary schools receive free meals, and meals for higher education students are subsidized. Student housing is free for upper secondary and voca- tional education students. Financial aid is available for full-time post- compulsory studies. Since 1992 Finland has also been developing alternatives to univer- sity studies. Its polytechnic schools offer shorter, more practical courses of study in technology and engineering that meet the needs of high-tech industry. Except for university education, adults can participate in all levels of certificate- and noncertificate-oriented education. Adults can also complete primary or general upper secondary education and take part in the matriculation examination. Provision of basic education for adults (except for compulsory education) is not as strictly regulated as compulsory education. The 1999 Vocational Education Act caters to the needs of adults, providing, for example, the opportunity to pursue dis- tance learning. Finnish universities do not offer special arrangements for adults, but adults account for one-fifth of students at the polytech- nics. Various types of noncertificate-oriented courses are also available to help adults upgrade their skills, and financial support for adults is available. In 1998, 58 percent of Finns between the ages of 25 and 64 reported having participated in learning within the previous 12 months, the highest in the OECD. Sources: Kartovaara 1996; OECD n.d., 2001c, 2001i, 2002c. In some developing countries, such as Jordan and Mauritius, many ministries often oversee, manage, and finance training, and competition for scarce resources prevents collaboration, promotion of high-quality training, and a continuum of training opportunities. Elsewhere, as in Turkey, a single ministry is responsible for both vocational and general education, but there are several specific types of vocational schools. Since GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 63 each type has its own hierarchy within the ministry and its own curricu- lum, management, and financing, the result is a fragmented and ineffec- tive approach. Vertical coordination, in the form of policy guidelines and budget/sub- sidy allocation from the center to the regions, will remain important as countries continue to decentralize their education policy decisions and implementation plans, which in turn will determine the quality and equity of education. Vertical coordination is particularly challenging in transition economies, which only recently moved from centralized command and control systems. Under those systems, at least in theory, coordination was simple, as subnational units were merely implementation agents of the central government (World Bank 2000a). Forming Partnerships with the Private Sector and Civil Society The state will have to play a more pluralistic role in providing, financing, and managing education. It will no longer be the (almost) sole provider and financier of education but will have to cooperate with the private sec- tor (both for-profit and not-for-profit institutions) and civil society, using comparative advantages and synergies to reach common education goals more effectively and more efficiently (OECD 2001d). The private sector can provide education in both traditional ways (owning and operating private schools and providing inputs, such as books, materials, and equipment) and novel ways (operating public schools under contract). Enterprises also provide training and are increas- ingly involved in developing occupational standards and curricula. Policymakers need to create a level playing field between public and private providers. They can do so by, for example, ensuring that publicly funded student loan programs can be used at private institutions (as in the United States) or at institutions that offer distance programs, short- duration training, or other nontraditional courses; by ensuring that subsi- dies to publicly managed institutions do not crowd out private providers in the same fields; and by adopting accreditation procedures that guaran- tee quality and protect learners from fraudulent practice, while respecting the institutional diversity that private institutions bring. Another way in which the private sector can participate in education is for nongovernmental organizations to operate public primary and sec- ondary schools or take responsibility for parts of the curricula in public schools on behalf of the government. Examples include Fe y Alegría in Venezuela (and many other Latin American countries); the SABIS School Network in the Middle East, the United Kingdom, and the United States (box 3.2); and Cisco Systems, which has established “academies” in more 64 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 3.2. Forming Creative Partnerships between the Public and Private Sectors to Run Schools Established in Venezuela in 1955, Fe y Alegría (FyA) is a regional fed- eration of national educational organizations, each of which provides a wide range of educational services in highly marginalized communi- ties. Services focus primarily on delivery of formal primary education and technical training, ranging from farming to secretarial skills. FyA now serves schools in 14 countries, reaching more than 800,000 stu- dents. Governments provide some funding to FyA schools, to meet operating or set-up costs. In 1998 FyA was allowed to take over three failing public schools in two poor neighborhoods of Caracas, Venezuela. Under an agreement with the government, it leased the buildings for 50 years and operates the schools. The SABIS School Network is a network of 22 public and private schools serving more than 18,000 students in the Middle East, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Each school is financially and administratively independent. All schools use the SABIS Educa- tional System, which consists of an internationally oriented college- preparatory curriculum emphasizing English, math, science, and international languages. Sources: O’Donoghue 1998; World Bank reports. than 145 countries that offer computer networking qualifications recog- nized in the labor market. The Universitas 21 consortium brings together 17 major public and private universities from around the world with a publishing company to develop and deliver distance education courses internationally (www.universitas21.com). Heineken reached an agree- ment with unions in the Netherlands that included a guarantee that all current employees would continue to be employed by the company but that they would undergo training, individually or collectively, for their new functions. Redesign was worked out from the bottom up, with trade union representatives and work counselors working on design teams (European Industrial Relations Observatory Online 1999). Enterprises are often the most important providers and financiers of training for workers, even in the poorest countries (Johanson 2002). Developments in education and training delivery mean that, increas- ingly, the capabilities needed to improve and transform the education and training system will reside in the private sector. Private media and pub- lishing houses and technology-driven manufacturing companies already have the skills and knowledge to develop Web-based and multimedia courses and materials for distance learning. GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 65 Developing countries face significant challenges in attracting compe- tent personnel to fill creative, technical, and managerial positions in the education sector, especially where the sector is dominated by public sec- tor terms and conditions (Grace and others 2001). Teachers trained to use new technologies, and math and science teachers, can often find more remunerative jobs outside the education sector. Part of the solution to attracting them to teaching lies in increasing the number of technically competent people, thereby reducing the premium for these skills. The need to do so underscores the point that solutions to problems in the edu- cation and training sectors often require cross-sectoral approaches. Another part of the solution may be more flexible pay scales and condi- tions of employment. Framework for Quality Assurance New quality assurance mechanisms which certify learners and accredit institutions are needed to promote lifelong learning. This is because exist- ing arrangements do not capture new and important skills and compe- tencies, nor do they value informal and nonformal learning. Certifying Learners’ Competencies Learning needs to become more flexible and diverse to allow alternative delivery mechanisms, such as distance education and e-learning, open entry and exit, flexible enrollment, modular courses, and training that is available as and when needed. As this happens, learners’ acquisition of skills and more and more learning will take place outside of formal edu- cational institutions. In addition, a new and diverse set of competencies and skills, described in chapter 2, will be acquired in various nonformal out-of-school learning activities, as well through formal channels. These changes call for a more flexible system of recognizing learning. Such a system should promote alternative pathways for learners within and between different levels of institutions. It should provide linkages between different types of qualifications, vocational and academic. It should articulate training standards and qualifications that help link for- mal and informal education and training and integrate learning, licensing and qualifications, and labor market needs (box 3.3). It should also enable learners to have their achievements recognized across countries. A learning certification system needs to recognize nonformal learning to provide incentives for people who have not completed a level of schooling or who are engaged in nonformal learning. This is particularly important in developing counties, where access to formal education and training institutions is limited. 66 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 3.3. Building a Lifelong Learning System in Chile In Chile, as in most developing countries, barriers exist between the university and non-university sectors. Typically, a student who gradu- ates from a non-university tertiary education institution, such as a voca- tional training institute, a technical institute, or a community college, has no choice but to enter the world of work. It is not possible to trans- fer directly to a university or even to a higher academic level in the non- university sector. It is also very difficult for these graduates to begin formal university studies after a few years of professional experience. A recent initiative by the Universidad de Concepción aims to break this barrier. A two-year postsecondary vocational training center, a four-year technical institute, and the faculty of engineering of the uni- versity will be integrated, under a grant from the Competitive Quality Improvement Fund, supported by an ongoing Bank-financed higher education project. The curricula of all three institutions will be adjusted to allow for direct transfer of credits, and the vocational train- ing center and the technical institute’s qualifications will be recognized in determining admission to the faculty of engineering. Source: Oxenham and others 2002. Several significant issues need to be addressed before a country can move in this direction: • Establishing key competency and assessment standards. Competency and assessment standards set up a universally recognized set of indicators against which all learning can be evaluated (see chapter 2). Many coun- tries have established occupational and training standards for vocational education and training, and some are beginning to develop cross- national approaches and benchmark national standards to international requirements (Fretwell, Morgan, and Arjen 2001). Chile, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Romania have initiated projects with World Bank sup- port to develop a system of national occupational competency and skill standards meeting the specific needs of their economies. • Recognizing nonformal learning. An alternative approach to evaluating learning based on key competencies is to allow learners to demonstrate that their informal learning is equal to formal learning and to issue them certificates from formal learning institutions. Such a system is already in place in France (the bilan de competence) and the Republic of Korea (box 3.4). While the lure of a qualification may serve as an incen- tive for some learners, this approach leaves traditional “supply-side” GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 67 Box 3.4. The Republic of Korea’s Flexible System of Recognizing Learning Outcomes The Korean government has recently strengthened the Bachelor’s Degree Examination Program for Self-Education. The program makes it possible to obtain a bachelor’s degree through individual study without attending a regular college or university by passing the exam- ination administered by the government. The program aims to realize the philosophy of lifelong learning, contribute to individual self-actu- alization, and develop society as a whole. A degree from this program is recognized in the same way as one obtained from a higher education institution. Degrees are offered in Korean, English, and Chinese lan- guage and literature; business administration; public administration; computer science; law; math; agriculture; nursing; early childhood education; and home economics. Source: Bank staff working in the Republic of Korea. institutions, which may or may not reflect the needs of the knowledge economy, in charge of the certification process. • Reducing tensions between formal and nonformal institutions. Some formal institutions, particularly in higher education, may have difficulty accept- ing the idea that learning can take place outside a formal institution. These institutions, and related ministries of education, may feel threat- ened by nonformal learning approaches. For their part, nonformal insti- tutions, such as traditional African apprenticeship systems, may fear that formal recognition may impose inappropriate standards. Enterprises may resist efforts to regulate and recognize their internal training. Accrediting Institutions Policymakers need to rethink the accreditation of institutions. This is because, on the one hand, the relationship between government and increasingly autonomous institutions is changing and, on the other, indi- viduals are less and less likely to start and complete a qualification at a single institution over a single period of time. Reviewing accreditation mechanisms needs to establish a new link between the assessment of individual competencies and the evaluation of institutional capacity and performance. The trend in OECD countries is toward accrediting institutions based on output or performance (such as graduation rates or the acquisition of knowl- edge and competencies) rather than inputs (such as the size of the faculty or 68 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY the number of books in the library). This is also true in some developing countries. In Bangladesh, for example, private secondary schools must achieve certain pass rates on the university entrance examination to remain accredited (although this regulation is rarely enforced). In private (but not public) institutions of higher learning in Armenia, a certain percentage (currently 50 percent) of students must pass the final examination. Increasingly, funding of institutions is also based on performance. A wide range of developing countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean have introduced independent assessment systems at the tertiary level (such systems remain rare in the Middle East and North Africa and in South Asia). Nigeria, for example, has had a system of regular accreditation assessments for 25 years. International experience suggests that while it is important to have a compulsory licensing process to ensure a minimum level of quality, regular accreditation and evaluation should be voluntary activities that institutions value as a way to improve their performance. Accreditation and evaluation can be encouraged through public informa- tion, financial incentives, and nonmonetary rewards (World Bank 2002c). The fact that learners increasingly acquire skills and knowledge from multiple sources poses an even greater challenge to quality assurance, especially at the tertiary level. Currently, learners receive their degree or qualification from the last institution they attend, regardless of the contri- bution of that institution to the learner’s overall learning gains. Where articulation agreements exist, including joint degree programs, both insti- tutions award a degree, even though neither was responsible for provid- ing all the learning gains. These new challenges remain contentious for industrial and developing countries. To control quality and maintain accountability, many countries, includ- ing Chile, Colombia, France, and the United Kingdom, have established national standards and assessments at the primary and secondary educa- tion levels (Leithwood, Edge, and Jantzi 1999). It is important to distin- guish between selection tests for access to the next level of education, which virtually all countries have, and tests at various stages of schooling certifying learning and providing for accountability, which are less com- mon. South Africa, which had no national assessments under apartheid, introduced systemwide national assessments for grades 3, 6, and 9 to boost outcome-based, learner-centered education (Howie and others 2000). The assessments, which focus on achievement of defined learning outcomes, allow students to progress at their own rate and be assessed accordingly. They continually assess performance by monitoring portfo- lios, observation sheets, journals, project work, and assignments. Accreditation and certification systems also help learners move easily and efficiently between different types and levels of learning. Several GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 69 countries have developed national qualifications frameworks that assign qualifications from different institutions to a set of levels, with each level linked to competency standards. In this way learners can see what quali- fications are of equal value and how they are sequenced (OECD 2002c). Since the mid-1980s several countries have been developing such frame- works. English-speaking nations (Australia, England, New Zealand, and Scotland) were the earliest to do so. More recently many other countries (China, Mauritius, Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago, South Africa, and Uganda) and regions (the Southern African Development Community and the Pacific Islands Forum) have developed or announced plans to develop frameworks (South Africa, Departments of Education and Labour 2002). A report on South Africa’s experience (South Africa, Departments of Education and Labour 2002) suggests that most countries’ national quali- fication frameworks have changed significantly, often following compre- hensive reviews. It notes that debate is both an inevitable and positive part of the development process, since different traditions of education and training have to learn to speak to each other in common terms. Frameworks for certifying qualifications come in various types, and all have evolved over time. (See box 3.5 for Namibia’s experience.) Frame- works vary by the types of qualifications covered (occupational or voca- tional only, academic only, both); types of institutions included (university institutions only, all types of tertiary institutions); levels of qualifications involved (higher education, secondary education, first degree, postgraduate); fields of study (all vocational and academic fields, selected fields for which standards are developed); and how institutional participation is encouraged (voluntary, public funding available only for qualifications within the framework). Perhaps the most developed example of a regional framework is that being established by the European Union (EU) to create a European Higher Education Area. The emphasis is on increasing mobility across undergraduate and graduate programs, in conjunction with the EU’s European Credit Transfer System. Vocational and technical skills are not covered, nor are non-university institutions. Making Information Available to Learners Quality assurance systems must also make available information about the performance and offerings of learning providers. The Netherlands and the United Kingdom release information on assessment results by school, allowing parents to choose the public school they would like their child to attend. Reliable information should be provided about programs offered by international providers. The fact that accreditation and evaluation 70 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 3.5. The National Qualifications Framework in Namibia In 1996 Namibia passed the Namibia Qualifications Authority (NQA) Act, intended to help transform education and training and recognize the learning that results rather than merely draw equivalences among different types of qualifications. To oversee the process, it established a 35-member council, made up of representatives of government min- istries, labor unions, the private sector, and nongovernmental organiza- tions. The council is chaired by the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Higher Education, Training, and Employment Creation. The National Qualification Framework was intended to embrace all learning and all qualifications. The NQA Council adopted an eight- level framework, starting with compulsory schooling at level 1 and ending with doctorates at level 8. The Council approved 12 thematic areas, with the intention that a national standards-setting body would develop standards in each area following national consultation. Industrial or occupational groups are responsible for developing national standards in each area, based on a common set of steps devel- oped by the Council. There has been considerable flexibility in devel- oping the standards, which use international standards as the starting point. The lack of an accreditation process for training providers has slowed implementation of the National Qualification Framework. The need for accreditation has become more urgent, especially given the presence of foreign providers. But funding for the Council’s work has been inadequate, and the Council suffers from staff shortages. Source: South Africa, Departments of Education and Labour 2002. schemes of domestic institutions are weak in developing countries sug- gests that monitoring international providers will be difficult. Effective grievance procedures and protections can be useful in ensuring quality and protecting against fraud. A survey in India revealed that 46 of 144 foreign providers (32 percent) advertising higher education programs in the newspapers were neither recognized nor accredited in their country of origin (World Bank 2002c). This raises the question of how learners can make informed choices about value. Hong Kong (China), India, and Singapore require that distance educa- tion offerings by international providers be subject to the same quality assurance procedures in their originating countries that on-campus courses in those countries face (World Bank 2002c). The development of international quality assurance mechanisms is another option. GOVERNING THE LIFELONG LEARNING SYSTEM 71 Increasing Equity Access to learning—and consequently learning achievement—is highly inequitably distributed in all societies. While the nature of the disadvan- taged groups varies across countries, women, people in rural areas, ethnic minorities, the unemployed, people who work in the informal sector, and older workers generally have less opportunity to learn. The barriers these groups face are varied and in many cases individuals face multiple hur- dles. For example, discrimination against women in the labor market reduces their incentive to invest in or complete education (Gill, Fluitman, and Dar 2001). Lack of access to schools within reasonable walking dis- tance disadvantages rural children in Africa (World Bank 2001d). Employ- ers tend to fund training of employees with higher levels of education and training (Hong and Batra 1995; O’Connell 1999). The World Conference on Education for All, held in Jomtien, Thailand, in 1991 declared that all children should be able to complete primary education and that girls should have the same access as boys. People with only basic literacy and numeracy skills may have been able to func- tion in mass production, agricultural, or informal economies (although disparities in education lead to social divisions). But, in the global knowl- edge economy, access to continuing education and training—that is, to lifelong learning—is a necessity for people who want to have high val- ued-added and secure well-paid jobs. A major focus of a government’s policy for lifelong learning, therefore, must be improving the ability of disadvantaged groups and those with low educational attainment to access learning. This report describes several ways this can be done. Changing the learning process, both by focusing on a broader range of competencies and transforming pedagogy, will enable more people to achieve the skills they need. Establishing accountability systems, often mediated by guid- ance and counseling systems, could help learners and their families make informed choices, not restricted by prejudiced or ill-informed word of mouth. Recognizing that informal and nonformal learning is a route to genuine skill acquisition enables people with less formal training to demonstrate the skills they have. Gender assessments in education have proved useful in identifying specific gender gaps in access to education and the use of knowledge as girls try to enter the labor market. They can help policymakers develop community- and country-specific mecha- nisms that address obstacles. Another important policy tool is decentralization. The transfer of responsibilities from central ministries of education to local education authorities, communities, postsecondary institutions, and schools has become common. In Colombia, for example, decentralization reforms, 72 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY designed with a focus on equity, have empowered poor communities through targeting mechanisms and voucher systems (Fiske 1996). Conclusion Refocusing government policy and reforming the policymaking system requires fundamental changes across a wide range of issues. These changes require a move toward a learner-centered system, the deploy- ment of public resources and effort on learners with the greatest needs, and the creation of a flexible system of learning opportunities that responds to the different aptitudes, circumstances, and goals of learners. Making a lifelong learning system a reality will depend on giving people, enterprises, and communities the resources they need to pursue their learning goals—the subject of the next chapter. 4 Options for Financing Modern economies require that people invest in the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and information throughout most of their lives. Gary S. Becker, Nobel Laureate, Economic Sciences, 1992 Providing more and better education and training opportunities over a lifetime will require increased expenditures, although resources will also need to be used more efficiently and in different ways. These expendi- tures cannot be met solely from public sources. A creative partnership between the private and public sectors is required. The financing of lifelong learning requires public spending on levels of education for which social returns exceed private returns (such as basic education) and increased private spending on investments that yield higher private returns (such as most higher and continuing education). Government intervention beyond the basic levels should target learners from low-income backgrounds. This chapter focuses on the government’s role in financing learning. As noted in chapter 3, governments also need to perform other roles to ensure the effective operation of a learner-centered lifelong learning sys- tem. Enhancing the choices available to potential learners by increasing the information flow about and among education institutions is critical for ensuring the effective use of resources. The Growing Need to Support Lifelong Learning Moving toward a lifelong learning system is costly in developing coun- tries because participation rates are low at all levels and the quality of education is often poor. Average gross enrollment rates are lowest in 73 74 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY low-income countries, where they averaged 97 percent at the primary, 46 percent at the secondary, and 8 percent at the tertiary level in 1998. These figures fail to capture the wastage in schools, especially in countries in which delayed entry, repetition, and drop-out rates are high. Marginal- ized populations are usually the poor, women, ethnic and religious minorities, and people living in rural or remote areas. It is estimated that in 2003 one out of every five children between the ages of 6 and 11 in developing countries—an estimated 113 million children—is not in school (http://www1.worldbank.org/education/ adultoutreach/). In 2000 an estimated 40 percent of the out-of-school pop- ulation lived in Sub-Saharan Africa, another 40 percent lived in South Asia, and more than 15 percent lived in the Middle East and North Africa. Sixty percent are girls (UNESCO 2000). The education level of most adults in developing countries remains too low to enable them to participate effectively in a global economy. Some 600 million women and 300 million men remain illiterate. Adults average just 0.8 years of formal education in Mali and Niger, 1.1 years in Mozam- bique and Ethiopia, 2.0 years in Nepal, and 2.5 years in Bangladesh (World Bank 2002a). Greater investments in adult education, especially for women, are needed to eliminate illiteracy and build human capital. With such low levels of basic skills, however, the priority for these coun- tries remains universal basic education. Many industrial countries have set targets for lifelong learning. Meet- ing these targets would require large increases in spending beyond the 5 percent of GDP these countries currently spend on average on public education (OECD 2001a). The OECD (2000d) argues for increasing the benefits and reducing the costs of education so that individuals, enter- prises, and societies invest in lifelong learning. Even the most optimistic scenarios for achieving universal primary completion by 2015 suggest that Sub-Saharan Africa would require a sev- enfold increase in foreign assistance for primary education (World Bank 2002a). Sub-Saharan African countries would need to allocate nearly 4 per- cent of GNP to secondary schooling alone to achieve 60 percent gross enrollment; achieving 100 percent secondary gross enrollment would require spending of more than 6 percent of GNP (Lewin and Caillods 2001). Improving quality will prove even more costly for developing coun- tries. While the bulk of spending on education is based on local costs, other inputs, especially computers, laboratories, and Internet access, are priced internationally. Public sources account for more than half of education spending in developing countries as a group, and most governments spend 10–20 per- cent of their budgets on education (3–7 percent of GNP). Public finance is thus inadequate to extend lifelong learning opportunities to all. OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 75 In addition to public spending, individuals and companies contribute to education, especially at postcompulsory levels. Global spending on education is more than $2 trillion, or 5 percent, of world GDP (Moe, Bailey, and Lau 1999). The private sector accounts for about 20 percent of this spending, often in the form of fees, donations, sponsorships, and loans and investments made by philanthropists, learners, parents, corporations, lending agencies, communities, NGOs, and cultural organizations. In addition, about $2 trillion in earnings are forgone each year to pursue education. This investment is financed by parents or by learners who accept below-market wages as apprentices or interns while in training in return for higher returns later. Evidence from 41 countries suggests that private spending makes up a larger proportion of total direct education spending in developing countries (25 percent) than in Western Europe (12 percent), suggesting a potential equity issue. Wage differentials—which provide an incentive to invest in skills—are widening in the knowledge economy. Narrowing the wage differentials among workers with different levels of education is expected to be very costly—perhaps as high as $1.66 trillion in the United States alone (Heckman, Roselius, and Smith 1994). Providing lifelong learning oppor- tunities will require increased spending on education and training (by both the public and the private sector), but building in incentive schemes (capital accumulation) could reduce the investment needed. Private direct expenditures on education are substantial in some coun- tries and are on the rise (figure 4.1). For all education subsectors com- bined, private direct spending averaged 45 percent of all spending in Figure 4.1. Proportion of Private Funding Spent on Educational Institutions in Selected Countries, 1990s (percent) Philippines 40.3 55.8 38.2 Peru 55.4 Thailand 37.3 67.5 Chile 31.3 75.8 Turkey 21.8 5.8 Post-secondary non-university Indonesia 18.2 56.4 University Argentina 10.6 25.7 Hungary 8.0 23.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Source: OECD 2000a. 76 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Chile, 24 percent in Ghana, 37 percent in Indonesia, and 57 percent in Uganda in the early to mid-1990s. Between 1995 and 2000, only 15 percent of enrollment growth in higher education was publicly funded in Brazil. This trend is likely to continue there, as enrollments are expected to more than double, from 2.1 million in 2000 to more than 5 million in 2008 (Klor de Alva 2001). In China, with its massive need for skilled labor, the demand for learning is increasing, but lack of spaces at higher education institutions meant that almost 95 percent of high school graduates were denied entry to univer- sities in 1995. Families use their savings to send their children to private tertiary institutions (Klor de Alva 2001), but additional resources are needed. Principles for Financing Lifelong Learning Given the rising demand for—and expenditures on—learning, what prin- ciples should guide policy decisions about the balance between public and private resources for financing different learning opportunities? The overarching principle is that the system should promote learning throughout the lifetime. Achieving this goal will take time, even for industrial countries. Even countries that need to make substantial progress in basic education need to ensure that any system of financing will be sustainable in the long run, as lifelong learning demands increase. Several financing mechanisms are consistent with the principles out- lined here. Before choosing a mechanism, policymakers need to study its impact on the labor market and on the decisions people make about where to work and when to learn. Four principles underlie investments in lifelong learning: • All learners should master basic competencies. • Learners should be responsible for their own learning. • Governments must be committed to promoting equity. • A lifelong learning system should promote efficiency in education and labor markets. All Learners Should Master Basic Competencies The foundation of education for the knowledge economy is the set of basic knowledge and competencies outlined in chapter 2. In addition to providing the tools for effective engagement in the knowledge economy and society, these skills are associated with high social returns. Govern- ments should finance or guarantee opportunities for all to acquire this basic set of competencies. These opportunities include primary and lower OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 77 secondary education for young people as well as adult education for peo- ple who missed out on an effective education the first time around. They could also include early childhood interventions. As countries approach universal basic education, they will need to expand lower and upper secondary education. Enrollment in postcom- pulsory secondary education is relatively low in many developing and even middle-income countries. The availability of this level of schooling is imperative for providing incentives to learners who complete basic education and for preparing workers for the knowledge economy as well as for additional education and training. Countries will need to expand secondary education in a cost-effective and sustainable manner. One objective is to ensure that learners not likely to benefit from traditional secondary schooling are provided with alternatives. Innovative ways of increasing secondary school enrollment include offering selective scholarships and targeted vouchers. Scholarships for girls in Bangladesh have increased higher secondary school enrollment rates (Jeria and Hovde 2002). Targeted vouchers allowed learners from lower socioeconomic groups to attend secondary schools in Colombia (Angrist and others 2001). The scheme was also cost-effective. Another approach would be to increase cost recovery at the upper secondary level among those who can pay and to provide targeted scholarships for those who cannot. To provide adequate secondary schooling and ensure that the system is sustainable, policymakers should also consider providing education through the private sector, through distance learning, and on-line. To facilitate alternative delivery of secondary schooling, Japan and the Republic of Korea have for years used tax incentives to privatize upper secondary education (Yoon 2002; Japan, MESSC 1991). In Burkina Faso, where the government cannot sustain the recurrent costs of a significant expansion in secondary school enrollment, partnerships are being fos- tered with the private sector to provide good-quality secondary education (Maman and Scobie 2002). The initiatives include constructing three lower secondary schools in underserved areas and delegating their man- agement to nonpublic organizations at no recurrent cost to the govern- ment; providing lease financing for the construction of 10 private schools to be operated and paid for on easy terms by private sector operators or self-financed municipalities, with a transfer of ownership to the nonpub- lic operator after payment in full; and jointly constructing 160 additional classrooms at existing private schools. Reallocating public resources would also help. In many countries in which secondary education is underfunded, higher education is over- funded. Adopting alternative financing mechanisms for higher education 78 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY would allow more resources to be redeployed toward expanding sec- ondary education enrollments. Other efficiency-enhancing measures include using teachers and facilities more intensively. Learners Should Be Responsible for Their Own Learning For learning beyond the core set of competencies, learners, employers, and in some cases society should be principally responsible for learning decisions. Learners should be responsible for deciding what to learn and when to continue learning. The public sector role is to ensure that risk- adverse and liquidity- or wealth-constrained learners and companies do not underinvest in learning. It can do so by providing financial incentives and making sure that relevant and timely information is dis- seminated. Governments Must Be Committed to Promoting Equity Certain socioeconomic groups displaced by new technologies become unemployed and marginalized from educational opportunities. They require targeted efforts by governments. Current public expenditure disproportionately favors higher-income groups in many countries, including the poorest countries (figure 4.2). On average in developing countries the poorest 20 percent receive about one-fifth of the primary education subsidy, about one-tenth of the secondary education subsidy, and a tiny percentage of the tertiary level subsidy. Services in poorer rural communities are generally inferior to those provided at urban schools (Castro-Leal and others 1999; see also Li, Steele, and Glewwe 1999). Figure 4.2. Distribution of Public Expenditures by Income Quintile in Selected Countries (percent) 50 40 30 20 10 0 Armenia Côte d’Ivoire Nepal Nicaragua Romania Vietnam 1996 1995 1996 1993 1994 1991 Poorest 2 3 4 Richest Source: Data from Li, Steele, and Glewwe 1999. OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 79 A Lifelong Learning System Should Promote Efficiency in Education and Labor Markets Policies for financing lifelong learning should enhance the choices avail- able to learners, expand the information available to them, and increase competition in the learning marketplace. The impact of a policy on the labor market should also be taken into account. Financing mechanisms should be analyzed in terms of their contribution to work effort and labor market decisions by individuals. Policy Options for Financing Learning beyond the Core Competencies Learning beyond the core knowledge and competencies is funded with two types of financing components: cost-sharing schemes and govern- ment subsidies. Education savings accounts, private sector loans, human capital contracts, government-guaranteed student loans, individual development accounts, vouchers and entitlements, grants, tax credits, and other mechanisms all include one or both of these components (table 4.1). Most countries use a variety of instruments (box 4.1) Cost-sharing, especially in advanced vocational programs and at the tertiary level, promotes efficiency, but without other policy measures such a system largely excludes the poor. Innovative cost-sharing schemes such as income-contingent student loans and human capital contracts are cur- rently largely conceptual. Most cannot be implemented in low-income countries because of the lack of necessary institutional arrangements. Effectively targeted public subsidies can promote equity, but they may not be sustainable on a large scale. Cost-Sharing Schemes In cost-sharing schemes learners are expected to pay for at least part of the cost of their learning. This approach is commonly advocated in higher education on grounds of efficiency and equity (Barr 2001; Johnstone 2001). Cost-sharing is efficient because learners bear the marginal costs of their education. They therefore make better (less wasteful) choices and study harder. Cost-sharing is equitable in theory because it asks those who ben- efit from education to pay for it. However, if cost-sharing schemes are not introduced carefully, they can make it difficult for low-income learners to obtain additional education. Four main cost-sharing instruments are tra- ditional loans, human capital contracts, the graduate tax, and income- contingent loans (for details, see Palacios 2002). Table 4.1. Main Instruments for Financing Direct Costs of Lifelong Learning Who ultimately pays Who finances Collection Repayment terms Instrument Learner Learner n.a. n.a. Education savings account Private sector Private sector Fixed Private sector loan Combined Private sector income-contingent loan Variable Human capital contract Public sector Fixed Government-guaranteed student loan Combined Institutional income-contingent loan Variable Institutional human capital contract Public sector Private sector Fixed Privately collected public sector loan Combined Variable 80 Public sector Fixed Public sector loan Combined Public sector income-contingent loan Variable Graduate tax Community Variable Individual development account Employer Private sector n.a. Variable On-the-job training Training levy Public sector Public sector Variable Employer’s graduate tax Government n.a. n.a. n.a. Direct funding (taxpayer) n.a. Vouchers and entitlements n.a. Grants n.a. Interest subsidy on loans n.a. Tax credits n.a. Not applicable. Source: Based on Palacios 2002. OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 81 Box 4.1. Financing Postsecondary Education and Training in Chile Chile uses several instruments to finance education and training at the postsecondary level, including direct funding from the state, vouchers, directed subsidies, tax rebates, and income-contingent loans. The system now finances nontraditional learners as well. The main source of funds for universities is transfers from the state. Other sources of public funding include an institutional development fund and a fund for the development of priority areas, to which all uni- versities have access. These funds represent 12 percent of public transfers. Different treatment of traditional and new higher education insti- tutions (most of which are private) makes tuition much lower at tradi- tional institutions. The difference in fees is not compensated for by financial help to learners in the form of grants or loans. As a result, financing an education at a traditional school, at which courses are longer and the opportunity costs of not working higher, is less of a bur- den than doing so at a nontraditional institution, putting low-income learners at a disadvantage. Thus although 30 percent of high school graduates in Chile went on to higher education institutions in 1999, 85 percent of students at the new private universities came from the two highest socioeconomic quintiles. The second most important type of public funds is grants to learn- ers from underprivileged backgrounds. The grants, which are distrib- uted according to various criteria, represented 27 percent of state funding of higher education in 1999. Indirect fiscal contributions, the third source of public funds, are similar to a voucher scheme. The amount each institution receives depends on the number of first-year students who are top perform- ers on the entrance examination. The result is competition among institutions to attract the best learners, who usually come from the highest-income families (because of the very high correlation between test scores and parental income). Indirect fiscal contribu- tions represented 10 percent of public spending on higher education in 1999. The government offers a tax rebate for staff training programs. The scheme allows firms to set training costs of up to 1 percent of annual payroll against corporate tax payments. A firm can also use 10 percent of the rebate to pay for a diagnosis of its training needs and 15 percent to run a training department. Chile also uses cost-sharing schemes to finance higher education. The two most important are the university credit and the Corfo credit. (continued) 82 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 4.1. (Continued) The university credit is an income-contingent loan in which the learner pays the lower of a fixed payment or 5 percent of income. The real interest rate on the loan is 2 percent, and interest is accrued from the moment the loan is made. This credit is collected by the universities and has had low recovery rates, averaging 59 percent in 1998 for tradi- tional schools. The Corfo credit is offered by banks, which can charge a maximum real interest rate of 9 percent. All credits have a maximum repayment period of 15 years. Neither credit is adequate to satisfy the demand for financing education, particularly for learners from low- income backgrounds and learners pursuing risky careers. Source: Camhi and Latuf 2000. Mortgage-Type Loans To make cost-sharing more equitable, many countries have introduced student finance systems. The most popular instrument—traditional mort- gage-type loans—are likely to be offered only to families who already have enough assets to serve as collateral—that is, precisely those who need financial aid the least. Traditional student loans have been collected by the state, by private banks, and by universities. Collection has been poor or costly where the taxing power of the state has not been used as a last resort to collect the loans. In some cases, as in the Philippines (box 4.2), poor collection rates have caused such schemes to operate at a loss. Box 4.2. The Philippines’ Financial Aid Scheme The Philippines developed a financial aid scheme in the 1980s to pro- vide financial support to students attending public tertiary institu- tions. The system provides traditional mortgage-type loans, which are managed by a government agency. The amount of the loan, set at about $1,000 in the 1970s, was never adjusted for inflation, making it worth about $141 today. The system enrolls only 2,000 students a year; due to high administration costs and low repayment rates, it produces a loss. Proposals to reform the system envision making it more responsive to the needs of students while at the same time recovering from students part of the costs of their education. Source: Palacios 2002. OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 83 Human Capital Contracts A human capital contract is a contract in which students agree to pay a percentage of their income for a specified period after graduation in exchange for funds to finance their education. Originally proposed by Milton Friedman (Friedman and Kuznets 1945; Friedman 1955), the idea of such contracts has re-emerged in recent years. The development of financial markets since the 1980s has created favorable conditions for a private initiative to invest in human capital. An essential characteristic of human capital contracts is that investors determine the percentage of future income that students have to commit, which could vary depending on the type of learning undertaken and the investor’s judgment about the borrower’s likely future income. From an efficiency perspective, optimal results are achieved when market forces determine the percentage of income that learners have to commit and externalities are covered by public subsidy. For the outcomes to optimize social welfare, distributional considerations must also be taken into account by targeting public subsidies in order to achieve equity. Implementation of human capital contracts is constrained by the diffi- culty of obtaining information on learners, the need for a developed tax collection agency, and the problem of adverse selection (Palacios 2002). No market for effectively trading human capital currently exists, but that could change (boxes 4.3 and 4.4). Graduate Taxes The idea of the graduate tax gained popularity during the 1960s and again during the 1980s. Graduate taxes are not in operation anywhere in the world. A graduate tax taxes all earnings, without discriminating between earnings due to additional education and those due to other factors, such as ability or industry. As a result, the graduate tax creates a disincentive for people who would have obtained high earnings without education to pursue additional training. In addition, high-earning graduates would pay far more than they borrowed (even allowing for interest on the loan amount), raising fairness concerns. Another concern with the graduate tax is what Barr (2001) calls the Mick Jagger effect. Mick Jagger attended the London School of Econom- ics and Political Science for two semesters before dropping out and start- ing his career as a rock musician. Barr questions whether it would be fair to tax Jagger for attending school when his education presumably had nothing to do with his financial success. 84 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 4.3. Trading Human Capital Contracts: MyRichUncle Established in 1999, MyRichUncle is the world’s sole provider of human capital contracts. It represents the securitization of human cap- ital (Davis and Meyer 2000). As of January 2002 the firm had provided financial support to 65 people. MyRichUncle offers financing to people who want to study in exchange for a fixed percentage (1–5 percent) of their income over a specified period of time (typically 10 years for graduate students and 15 years for undergraduate students). The percentage of income the borrower pays depends on the amount provided, the school attended, and the course of study, among other factors. One potential problem is selecting learners. Because high-income earners may see MyRichUncle’s offer as expensive, they may not take it. As a result, at least in theory, learners with lower incomes are more likely to participate, reducing the average payments that MyRichUncle can expect to receive. MyRichUncle responds to these concerns by stat- ing that it can distinguish between high- and low-income potential learners and set rates accordingly. It claims that applications do not reflect any bias toward learners with low-income potential. People who have studied the company’s business model also question the firm’s capacity to collect payments. MyRichUncle has been receiving attention from the media, and the firm is receiving a growing number of applications. It is too early to tell if it will succeed. Regardless of the company’s performance, it is open- ing a new path for financing education that can transform the way other private institutions and governments think about this alterna- tive. The fact that the company has customers shows that there is demand for human capital contracts even in the United States, where resources for financing education are widely available. Source: Palacios 2002. Box 4.4. Investing in the Future Earning Capacity of a Rock Star: Bowie Bonds Bowie Bonds, issued in 1997 by the Pullman Group, allowed the singer David Bowie to obtain funds in exchange for a percentage of his income from royalties and concerts. Issue of the bonds indicates that there are investors willing to invest in the future earnings capacity of an individual. The Bowie Bonds opened up a path for others to trade future earnings, probably in the highest-earning professions. Source: Palacios 2002. OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 85 Income-Contingent Repayment Schemes Several countries have implemented income-contingent repayment schemes (box 4.5). These schemes satisfy fairness concerns, since learners end up paying less than the value of the loan if they have low incomes during the repayment period. Unlike human capital contracts, income- contingent repayment schemes do not attract immediate private funding; in the short run, the additional resources come from the public purse. The collection mechanism contributes significantly to the success of any loan scheme. Australia’s continued success with the HECS is due largely to the income tax system. Countries with less efficient tax collec- tion regimes have worked out alternative mechanisms. Namibia uses the social security system, thereby keeping marginal costs of collection low (box 4.6). All of these cost-sharing mechanisms have been designed for young students entering higher education for the first time and studying full- time. But there is no reason in principle why these schemes could not be made available to part-time and older learners. The United States has revised the eligibility requirement in terms of number of hours studied, a change that would allow part-time learners to access financing options. Financing nontraditional learners increases the risk of nonpayment, how- ever, because the period of repayment is shorter for older learners. It also raises marginal administration costs, since nontraditional learners take fewer courses (and therefore borrow less money) and are enrolled over a longer period of time (and therefore begin repayments years after the loan is made). Subsidization Mechanisms A variety of subsidization mechanisms could be used to finance lifelong learning (table 4.2). Demand-side financing includes a range of interven- tions that channel public funds for education and training (provided by public or private institutions) to learners or their families (box 4.7). The focus is on putting the resources in the hands of those who demand edu- cation rather than those who supply it. The aim is to reduce the con- straints that prevent learners from attending school or continuing their education in other ways and to provide an incentive for institutions to respond to learner needs. Some private initiatives support both basic education and lifelong learning skills. The Africa Educational Trust (www.iprt.org/africa_educa- tional_trust.htm), a charitable organization, operates the Somali Educa- tional Incentives for Girls and Young Men (SEIGYM), which provides educational vouchers to enable disadvantaged girls and young ex-militia 86 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 4.5. Australia’s Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) Australia’s Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) aims to eliminate the inequity of free higher education, increase the resources available to expand the supply of higher education, and improve access for learners from low-income backgrounds. Under HECS every learner pays a fee for attending a higher education institution. The fee can be paid immediately at a 25 percent discount, or it can be financed through an income-contingent loan. Repayments of the loan are made through the tax collection agency and depend on income, with the per- centage paid ranging from 3 percent to 6 percent. In 1996 learners had to pay $1,900, regardless of the field of study. The amount was increased that year and differential fees ranging from $3,300 to $5,500 applied, depending on the field of study. The interest rate on the loan is adjusted to equal the rate of inflation, making the real rate of inter- est zero. HECS brought in $80 million in 1989, the year of its inception, and generated $700 million in 2001. The cost of collection is about 1.7 per- cent of the value of payments. The resources HECS has brought in have allowed the state to increase the supply of higher education by 60 percent. Participation by the lowest income quartile, middle half, and top quartile has increased in absolute terms since 1989. HECS’ success is due, at least in part, to two key factors: a devel- oped tax collection agency and the discount for up-front payments. The successful widespread collection of payments to HECS would be virtually impossible without a developed tax collection agency or an equivalent institution that has information on learners’ incomes and can collect payments from them. The discount that learners receive if they pay up front was the key to the program having had such an impact from the first year. A lesson for revenue generation is that learn- ers should always have the alternative to pay up front. The greatest limitation of HECS is that the government has not been able to sell to the private sector the $6 billion that learners owe. The pri- mary reason is fear of a political change that would wipe out the oblig- ation of learners to pay back their loans. Not being able to use capital from the private sector limits the financing of higher education, or any other investment, to current resources. The inability to tap private funds might prevent increases in the supply of higher education in countries facing more pressing budget constraints. Sources: Chapman 2001; Johnstone 2001; Johnstone and Aemero 2001; Andrews 1997. OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 87 Box 4.6. Namibia’s Income-Contingent Loan Scheme Namibia finances higher education through an income-contingent loan scheme. It uses the recently established social security system, rather than the tax collection agency, to collect payments from learners. The system consists of two types of loans, one covering tuition and the other covering living and other expenses. The first type of loan is universally available and provides $700 in financing. The second type of loan is offered only to some borrowers, who receive $1,000. These amounts can be renewed each year as the learner progresses. In addi- tion to the loan, the package can include a grant. For loans available to all learners, a discount of 10 percent is granted to those who pay their fees when commencing their courses. In general, the amount available for loans depends on the government’s budget. Repayments are income contingent and can cost as much as 10 percent of postgraduate salary, with payments starting when the learner reaches a minimum weekly income of about $17 a week. The loan carries an interest of 1–2 percent above inflation, and there is no upper limit to the repayment period. Namibia’s scheme was designed in 1996 and established shortly thereafter. Little is known about outcome, but two important points can be made. First, contrary to expectations, income-contingent loans were widely accepted by learners. Their acceptance is attributed to the fact that both learners and institutional student welfare officers were closely involved in the design of the program. Second, countries can consider sources for collecting payments other than the tax collection agency (although it is still early to tell whether the social security sys- tem will be a good collector of payments and collection will be cost- efficient). Source: Nicholls 1998. men who are unable to benefit from normal schooling to attend special afternoon or evening lessons. The project issues vouchers to the students to help them pay for courses of their choice in literacy, numeracy, small- scale industry, and computer training. Student loans can help defray costs to the government and allow a greater number of students to receive higher education. The World Bank–financed Mexico Higher Education Financing Project promotes equity and quality in the university system. A private sector student loan program helps improve access to private education for learners who are academically able but financially needy (World Bank 1998f). Table 4.2. Selected Options for Financing Lifelong Learning Instrument Description Main variables Strengths Weaknesses Examples Cost-sharing mechanisms Traditional Fixed payments, Amount borrowed, Implementation Requires collateral, Numerous loan specific period of interest rate, relatively easy, therefore benefits time repayment instrument easy to wealthier more; not period understand attractive to students as the terms of repay- ment do not adjust to capacity to pay; poor collection record Human Student commits Percentage of Creates a market for Information on MyRichUncle capital part of future future income to investing in skills, individuals difficult (United States) contract earnings for be repaid, decreases risks of to obtain, requires 88 fixed period in repayment default, offers developed tax exchange for period, collection measure of expected collection (or similar) capital for of payments value of education, agency, adverse financing adjusts payments to selection, could create education earnings capacity, disincentive to work equitable Income- Collects percentage Percentage of Decreases risk to Requires developed tax Australia, Ghana, contingent of income until future income to individuals, collection (or similar) Hungary, loan value of loan be repaid, eliminates default agency but (see box Namibia, New repaid or repayment risk, equitable, 4.6) does not fully Zealand, maximum period promotes incentive reflect expected value Sweden, United repayment to study of education Kingdom period reached (continued) Graduate tax Tax on learner’s Tax rate Universal, flexible, Payments throughout future earnings payments lifetime, requires throughout lifetime developed tax of individual collection (or similar) agency, all earnings treated equally, could create disincentive to study, no private initiative Subsidization mechanisms Voucher (and Channels public Costs of schooling, Funding based on Need to market, funds Bangladesh, Chile, other funds for public target demand/enroll- could be misused, Guatemala, demand- and private population/ ments, efficient, may not be Netherlands, side education to schooling level, equitable, quality of sustainable Pakistan, Sweden 89 financing individuals or demand-side schooling mecha- their families financing nisms) Entitlement Voucher and loan Amount of Targets individuals Need to market, funds Theoretical, but combination entitlement based on income could be misused U.S. GI Bill and (voucher and and motivation, Brazil’s Bolsa loan), cofinance helps build Escola (box 4.9) amount, individual’s assets, comes close; repayment terms sustainable numerous student loan schemes (continued) Table 4.2. (Continued) Instrument Description Main variables Strengths Weaknesses Examples Subsidization mechanisms (Continued) Individual Incentives for Individual subsidy, Individual Funds could be Netherlands, Learning investing in cofinance responsibility, misused, need to Scandia (Sweden Account education and amount, type of private sector market, may not be (public and training training participation sustainable private initiatives), Spain, Sweden (proposed), Switzerland, United Kingdom (suspended) Education Incentives for Individual subsidy, Individual Need to market, may Canada 90 Savings savings for cofinance responsibility, not be sustainable Account education and amount, tax builds assets, training discount targeted Learning tax Taxes reduced in Tax discount, Individual Lack of equity, may not United States credit proportion to spending responsibility, be sustainable spending on maximum private sector approved participation education and training OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 91 Box 4.7. Financing Education with Demand-Side Mechanisms in Denmark Denmark uses several demand-side financing mechanisms to promote choice and efficiency. Choice and competitive funding characterize the higher education system. Basic and secondary schools are financed based on student demand, through a funding formula that allocates resources directly to institutions based on enrollments. To provide equal opportunities for people 18 and older to participate in education regardless of socioeconomic background, the Danish gov- ernment has taken over the responsibility of supporting students. It does so through the State Education Grant and Loan Scheme. Students enrolled at institutions of higher learning are entitled to 70 monthly grant and loan disbursements (vouchers). The vouchers are calculated as the normal maximum stipulated duration of a tertiary education course of 58 months (corresponding to a total of 5 years of study) plus an accepted delay of 12 months. Students can use their vouchers for one long study program or one or more shorter programs. They are free to change from one course to another at the same or another educational institution (provided they are admitted). Courses need not be taken consecutively. To improve efficiency and allocate resources on an outcome-based basis, in 1990 Denmark adopted an innovative financing system known as a taximeter, or activity-based, allocation system. Originally introduced for upper secondary technical college level and business colleges, the system was expanded to include private primary, lower secondary schools, tertiary education, adult vocational training, “folk” high schools, and production schools (schools based on production of goods as part of the learning process). Today it is the principal mecha- nism in Denmark for channeling to institutions the funds they need to manage their operating and capital costs. Under the system, individual educational institutions remain free to set their own priorities for allocating funds without being hampered by central educational frameworks. Schools receive grants based on the number of learners, their age, the seniority of teachers, and school activities. They receive four kinds of grants: a basic grant, a teaching grant, an operational grant, and a building grant to cover rent, interest, debt servicing, and maintenance. Incentives to make the education system and lifelong learning more effective are strategically designed by putting the institutions under competitive pressure using two mechanisms. First, as education (continued) 92 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 4.7. (Continued) consumers have autonomy to select their providers and providers are paid only for the number of learners enrolled, the institutions have an incentive to provide good-quality education in order to attract learn- ers. Second, by allowing educational institutions to retain any excess in taximeter rates over actual costs and forcing them to pay any costs in excess of the taximeter rates, the system encourages institutions to find more efficient ways to offer education and training. Funding for learners is limited to the period of active study, over a continuous period or with breaks. Funding for institutions becomes available only when learners pass their examinations. Two features of this system stand out. First, because taximeter pay- ments are guaranteed to approved institutions as long as they enroll students, they can enroll large numbers. To address the associated budget uncertainty, in 1999 the authorities agreed to create a reserve of 1–2 percent of the total allocation for the scheme to cover unforeseen surges in enrollments. Second, if the taximeter rates are adjusted too frequently to take account of efficiency gains, providers may have less incentive to pursue efficiency-enhancing innovations; if taximeter rates are adjusted too slowly, there may be a loss in overall efficiency to the extent that some providers continue to use less efficient methods. Although the government has no intention of recapturing the “profits” realized by institutions whose actual costs are below the taximeter rates, there may be some adjustment in rates to improve the overall efficiency of the system. Sources: Anthony 2001; OECD 1999, 2001c; Patrinos 2001b. Policy Options for Financing Training and Nontraditional Learning As learners pursue learning throughout their lifetimes, they will require more flexible financing options. A financial aid package for each learner consisting of financial grants and a voucher (both means-tested), some student loans, and some expected private contribution from the learner, his or her parents, or both, holds the greatest potential for meeting these lifelong learning needs (Oosterbeek 1998). The relative importance of each of these elements would vary over the learner’s lifetime. Providing such a package—in combination with loans for high-income, highly motivated learners—could support an effective and sustainable mode of financing based on two principal parameters: the income level and the motivation level of the student. Such a package would build on OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 93 components that have been successfully implemented in developing countries and elsewhere. At the primary level the package would consist only of grants. For secondary education, higher education, and adult learning, the package could include a mix of schemes. Payroll Levies Payroll levies are often used to finance occupational training (box 4.8). In some countries, including Brazil and France, they are used to finance civics education. There are two general approaches. In the first the government levies a payroll tax on employers. The central government or a quasi-gov- ernment agency then conducts training using funds from the levy. In some countries, such as Nigeria, this model has encountered problems, because it tends to create large, self-perpetuating bureaucracies. Some countries, including the United Kingdom, have stopped imposing such levies. An alternative model is one in which employers manage the levy. In this model, in place in France, Hungary, and Malaysia, employers who Box 4.8. Training Levy Schemes in Brazil, France, and Malaysia Brazil: As they do in many Latin American countries, national training organizations in Brazil receive payroll tax funds to provide training for workers in enterprises and to sponsor apprentices on a cost-sharing basis. The level of financing, which is under review, is currently about 2.9 percent of wages. There is some concern that the organizations are overfunded, and options for refining the system are being discussed. France: Since 1971 French enterprises with more than 10 employees have had to devote 1.5 percent of gross payroll to training their staff, either internally or by contracting with an external training provider. Enterprises that choose to train their employees themselves do so within the framework of an annual or multiyear training plan. The employer can choose the type of training and designate which employ- ees should attend it. This system is believed to have contributed to a large increase in training in enterprises and to have helped ensure equity and access to training by workers in small enterprises. Malaysia: The 1992 Human Resources Development Act instituted a human resources development levy of 1 percent of the total monthly basic wages or fixed allowances of the employees. It currently covers firms with 10 or more employees and represents one of the major streams for financing training in Malaysia. Source: Fretwell and Colombano 2000. 94 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY document that they have provided training to their employees are for- given part of the levy. One problem with this approach is that companies can use the funds for other activities and charge them to training. More- over, even these levies can create entrenched bureaucracies. Levies can also drive up the cost of labor. Brazil, for example, has multiple payroll taxes, including training levies, which amount to 80–110 percent of net wages. The net impact of these levies also remains unclear, as the policy may encourage employers to provide more internal training than they otherwise would have. Entitlement Schemes Entitlement schemes embrace different types of learning (including on- the-job training) over a learner’s lifetime (Levin and Schütze 1983; Levin 2002). Learners are entitled to receive from the government an amount to spend on education. The funds can be used in a wide variety of accredited institutions, and they are adjusted for inflation during the learner’s life- time. The entitlement consists of a voucher and a loan. The voucher por- tion can be used to target groups of students. To facilitate learners’ choices, the government provides information and increases the efficiency of the market. The subsidy/loan package is very similar to the U.S. GI Bill, which financed both college education and adult vocational training for millions of veterans after World War II and for a period thereafter (Dohmen 2000). Education vouchers are typically used to finance primary and sec- ondary education, but they are also being used to finance preschool and higher education. Several countries also provide them for training. Paraguay has used vouchers to finance training since 1995 (Botelho and Goldmark 2000). Kenya provides training vouchers to entrepreneurs in the jua kali (cottage industry) sector through the Micro-Small Enterprise Training Fund (Middleton, Ziderman, and Adams 1993). Five of Austria’s eight provinces provide training vouchers cofinanced by the provincial government and voucher recipients (West, Sparkes, and Balabanov 2000). Private and company-sponsored voucher schemes are also in place. In the United Kingdom the Ford Employee Development and Assistance Pro- gram has been operating since 1989 (West, Sparkes, and Balabanov 2000). It functions as a voucher that allows employees to receive education and training. (For more information on training vouchers, see Ziderman 2001.) Asset-Building Schemes Schemes that enable learners to build human capital and financial assets have increased primary school enrollment and completion in Brazil (box 4.9), and they have been adopted in other countries. In the past few OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 95 Box 4.9. Increasing School Enrollment through Stipends in Brazil: The Bolsa Escola Program In 1995 the municipality of Brasilia launched the innovative Bolsa Escola program with the goal of increasing educational attainment and reducing the incidence of child labor. Bolsa Escola aims to break the vicious cycle of poverty and low educational attainment in Brazil. The relevance of this program for lifelong learning is based on its use of voucher-like instruments that include grants to offset the opportunity cost of attending school. The program also includes a savings program that creates an incen- tive for staying in school. The school savings program deposits money into the account of each child whose family is a beneficiary of the schol- arship program if the child is promoted to the next grade. Half of the amount deposited can be withdrawn when the child reaches the fifth grade. Withdrawals can be made again upon successful completion of the eighth grade and secondary school. A similar program in Mexico, Progresa, has reduced child labor, increased educational attainment, and improved health and nutrition for the poor (www.progresa.gob.mx). Source: World Bank 2001a. years, important demand-side financing initiatives in education have been implemented in several countries. These programs include Progresa/ Oportunidades in Mexico, scholarships and food for education in Bangladesh, scholarships for girls in Guatemala, and secondary school scholarships in Indonesia (Patrinos and Ariasingam 1997). Financial incen- tives to families that allow their children to attend school and programs that channel public funds for education through beneficiaries and their families can be efficient and effective uses of resources. Such schemes could be important for financing lifelong learning in the developing world. Individual Learning Accounts Individual learning accounts (ILAs) encourage savings for education while providing vouchers to people interested in pursuing training. An ILA is a base amount of resources set aside for an individual to use for his or her learning. ILAs can be used to develop knowledge, skills, and abili- ties that increase their human capital. The United Kingdom introduced such accounts (although it has since abandoned the program because of fraudulent activity by training providers), and several other European countries are either piloting or considering setting them up (box 4.10). 96 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 4.10. Individual Learning Accounts in Western Europe The Netherlands: An ILA initiative has been running in the Netherlands since 2001. It involves eight pilot projects, each serving up to 150 peo- ple. The project includes contributions from learners, employers, and the state. State contributions are budgeted at about $400 per learner; employers contribute about $130–$400 per learner. So far the pilot has been confined to particular training fields. The Netherlands intends to launch personal development accounts (PDAs) in 2003. Like ILAs, PDAs promote lifelong learning by offering a subsidy to learners using a personal account. PDAs use tax incentives for contributions made to the account. ILAs are expected to expire shortly after the PDAs are introduced. Both employees and employers show interest in this scheme, with trainees motivated by actually managing the account. ILAs can be an effective stimulus for learners with few skills, who would not other- wise participate in additional training. Spain: The Basque Country launched a program in September 2000 that gives secondary school teachers vouchers worth $130–$600. The funds cover 75 percent of training costs and are intended to be used for enhancing computer skills. Sweden: Sweden has proposed creating ILAs in which learners and employers deposit funds for competency training. These funds would be tax free when placed in the account but treated as income once with- drawn. Accumulating assets in the learning account would thus allow learners to defer taxes. The subsidy comes as a tax reduction when the individual withdraws funds from the account. The tax reduction depends on two factors: the amount the individual withdraws and the “scope of competency development,” measured by a predetermined scale for each kind of training. The proposal thus uses a voucher that is proportional to the amount invested by the individual and to an objective measurement of the intensity of the program. As an alternative to state-sponsored initiatives, the corporation Scandia introduced “competency assurance” accounts in Sweden. These accounts allow learners to save up to 20 percent of their income for future use to cover training expenses and, when studying full time, forgone income. The employer contributes the same amount that the learner does to the account. This example stands out as a private ini- tiative to financing lifelong learning. United Kingdom: The United Kingdom introduced ILAs in 1997 to encourage learners to take responsibility for their learning. Learners received about $215 for opening an account; thereafter they obtained (continued) OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 97 Box 4.10. (Continued) discounts of 20 percent for additional training at approved learning providers (80 percent for basic computing, numeracy, and literacy courses). Contributions to an ILA by an employer were tax free, con- stituting an additional contribution from the state. Government officials closed the system after receiving clear evi- dence of abuse and fraud. Some unscrupulous learning providers used learners’ personal information to claim discounts from the government without learners’ knowledge. A few providers increased their prices to take advantage of the additional demand created by the discounts offered by government. Source: Palacios 2002. In the United States individual development accounts (IDAs)— dedicated savings accounts similar in structure to Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs)—can be used only for education, job training, capitaliz- ing a small business, or purchasing a first home. The accounts are man- aged by community organizations and held at local financial institutions. Contributions for lower-income participants are matched using both pri- vate and public sources (Edwards 1997; Scanlon 2001). Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) in Canada use the same general approach (box 4.11). Unlike in an entitlement program, in which each learner is entitled to a certain amount, in an ESA the amount to which a person is entitled depends on the amount saved and the kind of training pursued. Financing Lifelong Learning in Developing Countries and Transition Economies An idea worth pursuing, especially in developing countries and transi- tion economies, is the subsidy/loan package. This kind of program allows learners to save and invest in building their human capital, and it meets the financing needs of people at different stages in the learning cycle. A package to encourage lifelong learning through sustainable mechanisms would consider the interaction between motivation for learning and financing needs. The focus would be on motivating learners to acquire new, productive skills throughout the lifecycle. Thus subsidies would play a larger role for low-income learners, and loans (at market interest rates) would be more important for higher-income and more highly moti- vated groups. The idea is to facilitate and encourage the accumulation of savings and assets while increasing incentives to invest in education. The role of the government as a provider of information would become criti- cal to ensure effective decisionmaking. 98 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 4.11. Financing Lifelong Learning through Education Savings Accounts in Canada Canada’s Learn/Save program stresses the role of savings for financ- ing lifelong learning. Under the program an individual’s contributions are matched by the state in a ratio of 3 to 1. The maximum amount that an individual can save is about $3,750 a year. Program participants, or their families, can use the funds in the account for learning activities or to capitalize a small business. Learn/Save targets low-income families. One of the interesting features of Learn/Save is the evaluation pro- gram the government plans to use to assess its effectiveness. The eval- uation, which will be conducted by an independent research organization, will draw on surveys of more than 4,600 learners 18, 36, and 54 months after the initiation of the program. The study will com- pare the results among people who received only financial support, people who also received other kinds of support, and a control group. Source: Palacios 2002. Government and donor funds for financial grants and vouchers must reach the largest number of learners possible, targeting those who need help most. Since financial barriers (including forgone earnings) are one of the most important reasons people drop out of school, the size of the grant should be adjusted to the amount needed to provide learners with the motivation to participate. Simple means tests would go a long way toward reducing poorly targeted public expenditures and not crowd out private contributions (McMahon 1989). Means tests are unnecessary at basic education levels, since primary education needs to be delivered uni- versally; they are not needed in the case of most government-guaranteed student loan schemes (since learners are expected to repay). Attracting private capital to finance lifelong learning remains a chal- lenge. The main barriers are the difficulty of assessing future earnings and collecting from large numbers of borrowers. None of the programs cited in this chapter has been successful in attracting private resources (except the very small MyRichUncle, which operates in a high-income country). Partial public subsidy through means-tested vouchers supplemented by financial grants to help with living costs can attract private capital. This is because private financiers acknowledge that learners, who bear part of the cost of their training, have incentive to participate in their learning activities. Furthermore, there is viable demand for the services provided. The financing of lifelong learning requires continued public spending on levels of education where social returns exceed private returns (basic OPTIONS FOR FINANCING LIFELONG LEARNING 99 knowledge and competencies), a greater private role in investments that yield higher private returns (tertiary, continuing education), and govern- ment intervention targeting low-income individuals to achieve greater equity. Thus the financing of lifelong learning requires a menu of options that are sustainable and equitable—ideally a strategic mix of cost-sharing and voucher schemes. Conclusion Offering a variety of financing options may be helpful in responding to diverse needs. Governments typically use a wide variety of mechanisms to fund both learners and institutions. These programs work in different ways and create different incentives (and disincentives); interactions between them can be complex. Policymakers need to ensure alignment. The following chapter addresses the need to benchmark performance of a country’s learning system within the global knowledge economy and takes up the issue of reform. 5 Moving Forward L’éducation ne devrait pas abandonner les individus au moment où ils sortent des écoles, elle devrait embrasser tous les âges . . . assurer aux hommes dans tous les âges de la vie la facilité de conserver leurs connaissances ou d’en acquérir de nouvelles. [Education should not end when individuals leave school, it should embrace all ages . . . to ensure that men at each stage of their lives are able to maintain their knowledge or acquire new knowledge.] Diderot, 1792 To participate in the emerging knowledge economy, people need to update their skills continuously. Lifelong learning will thus become a norm. Providing lifelong learning entails securing affordable access to a variety of learning opportunities, both formal and nonformal. This means that the learning system and its governance must change and that more resources will have to be allocated. Given limited public resources, rely- ing on cost-sharing, involving private providers, and increasing the effi- ciency of the education system are critical. Creating a lifelong learning framework based on these principles requires complex changes in a coun- try’s entire learning system. Developing countries and transition economies are at risk of being fur- ther marginalized in a competitive global knowledge economy because their education systems are not prepared to support the acquisition and application of knowledge. This lack of preparation stems from the low coverage and low quality of education and training, outdated curricula and the lack of feedback mechanisms, the overemphasis on rote learning and exam outcomes, the lack of institutional diversification of learning 101 102 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY providers, the inappropriate role of the state, and the lack of articulation between different aspects of the system. Benchmarking National Systems of Lifelong Learning One way countries could move forward would be by establishing national benchmarks for measuring lifelong learning outcomes. Such measures are underdeveloped. Traditional measures of educational progress, such as gross enrollment ratios and public spending as a pro- portion of GDP, do not capture important dimensions of lifelong learning. Gross enrollment ratios measure inputs rather than the achievement of core or other competencies; public spending does not include the sub- stantial amount of private spending on training in most countries. Tradi- tional indicators often fail to capture nonformal and informal learning, such as that which takes place in the workplace or outside the formal edu- cation and training system, activities that are becoming increasingly important. Most developing countries will need to make many changes as they move toward a lifelong learning system in which people have access to many types of learning opportunities. It is unrealistic to embark on every- thing at once, however, and developing countries will need to develop realistic strategies with which to proceed. An important step is to identify the current situation, particularly with respect to systems of international peers. Much international information is available that can help countries benchmark their performance, both in terms of inputs (unit costs of edu- cation and training, student-teacher ratio, teaching time in learning activities) and outputs (learner assessment). International assessments, such as the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), the International Association for Evaluation of Educational Achieve- ment Citizenship and Education Study (CES), the Programme for Inter- national Student Assessment (PISA), the International Adult Literacy Study Survey (IALS), and the new Adult Literacy and Lifeskills Survey (ALL), can help countries identify their relative weaknesses and strengths within an internationally developed framework. In Chile, for example, poor performance on the IALS created an awareness of the need for more relevant policies and programs. These assessments focus increasingly on the key competencies for effective participation in the knowledge economy (table 5.1). At the national level, school-level data are rarely collected and ana- lyzed in most developing countries and transition economies. Case stud- ies from six Central and Eastern European countries suggest that lack of MOVING FORWARD 103 Table 5.1. Competencies Assessed by Various International Assessments Competency TIMSS PISA IALS ALL CES Literacy ✓ ✓ ✓ Numeracy ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Scientific literacy ✓ ✓ Problem solving 2003 ✓ Information and communication technologies 2006 ✓ Working with others ✓ ✓ Tacit knowledge ✓ Capacity to manage learning ✓ Attitude toward learning ✓ ✓ Civics knowledge ✓ Notes: Different assessments often measure different aspects of the same competency (see chapter 2 for examples). PISA will measure competence in problem-solving in 2003 and adeptness with information and communication technologies in 2006. Source: OECD 2001e, 2002c. transparent, accurate, and timely information is an important barrier to improving access and quality of learning (World Bank Institute 2001b). Countries can gauge their progress toward creating lifelong learning opportunities based on a set of indicators (table 5.2). The list is not com- prehensive, and not all of the measures are applicable to all countries. More refined ways of measuring progress are needed. The Permanent Nature of Change Continuous reform is needed not only to accelerate the pace of reform but also to deepen the extent to which fundamental transformations of learn- ing are carried out (New Zealand, Information Technology Advisory Group 1999). Implementation of these strategies will, however, have to take into account the political aspects of reform. The traditional model of education reform is not amenable to constant change: a stream of initiatives and pol- icy changes becomes overwhelming to education stakeholders, and reform fatigue and resistance set in. Institutions themselves must take responsibility for their own change, evolution, and improvement in response to learner demand and institutional performance. The incentive and regulatory frameworks must encourage them to do so. Table 5.2. Measuring a Country’s Advance toward Lifelong Learning Lifelong learning Examples from developing countries concept Measures/indicators or transition economies Transformation of learning Identifying new • Adoption of national standards and accredi- • Romania Higher Education Project, Romania skills and tation systems Education Reform Project, Chile Lifelong Learning competencies • Participation and improvement of learners Project (definition of standards, accreditation, (knowledge • Adult performance in assessments that mea- assessment mechanisms) creation and sure new skills • Participation in IALS: Chile, Czech Republic, application) Hungary, Poland, Slovenia • Participation in PISA: Brazil, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Poland, Russian 104 Federation • Participation in TIMSS: 17 developing countries in 1995, 22 developing countries in 1999 Change in learning • Adoption of learner-centered education • Active learning and learner-centered pedagogy: process practices Guatemala • Use of ICT as levers for change in the learning process: Chile, Costa Rica • Alignment of quality control mechanisms • Reform of secondary education: Jamaica (curriculum, learning materials, and assessment) to implement learner-centered pedagogy • Changes in teacher education and training • Teacher training for learner-centered pedagogy: focusing on learner-centered pedagogical Jamaica’s Reform of Secondary Education practice • Increase in flexible delivery of learning • Interactive radio instruction for primary edu- opportunities (for example, distance cation: Bolivia, Kenya, Nicaragua, South education, use of ICTs) Africa, Thailand • Distance teacher training program: Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, Swaziland, Uganda • Joint degree programs: Singapore • Telecenters: Benin, India, Mali, Mozambique, Pakistan, Philippines, Senegal • Changed quality assurance mechanisms • National evaluation or independent accreditation (certification and accreditation) agencies for higher education: Argentina, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Ghana, Hungary, Indonesia, Jordan, Nigeria, Romania, Slovenia Governance 105 Outcome-driven • Improvement in articulation between differ- • New articulation system: Chile governance ent types of learning and recognition of • Competency-based national assessment: Romania, informal learning South Africa • Competency-based assessment and • Skills training programs including integrating qualification conventional literacy programs with livelihoods • Policy deepening linkage between education training programs: Hungary, Nepal, Romania, and labor market Uganda (continued) Table 5.2. Measuring a Country’s Advance toward Lifelong Learning (Continued) Lifelong learning Examples from developing countries concept Measures/indicators or transition economies Enabling governance • Increase in degree of administrative and • Increased enrollment, education coverage, and financial decentralization and participation local capacity building as a result of of stakeholders in decision-making process decentralization: El Salvador, India, Nicaragua • Increase in degree of openness within a coun- • Open investment policy for foreign direct invest- try and toward international community ment: Costa Rica Inclusive and • Decline in inequity between and within • TV-based education expanding learning effective countries through policy measures (for opportunities of remote areas: Brazil, Mexico governance example, engagement of the poor, provision of information) • Adoption of sound education management • Cost-effective delivery of management control 106 system (for example, use of information in using an Integrated Financial Management System government operations, focus on outcomes) (IFMS): Tanzania with monitoring and evaluation system • E-procurement: Chile, Mexico • E-citizens initiative: Brazil, South Africa • Information boutiques: Burkina Faso Responsive • Improvement in accountability and • Implementation of diagnostic Public Expenditure governance transparency (e-government and greater Tracking Surveys (PETS): Ghana, Tanzania, participatory approaches and openness Uganda about policy intentions, formulation, and implementation) • Creation of legal regulatory framework that • Strong legal basis to promote education and creates level playing field between public lifelong learning: Brazil (1996 Education Law) and private providers and provides informa- • Publication of institutional results: Chile tion about institutional performance Financing options Increased spending • Increase in share of total education resources • Lifelong learning framework: Chile on lifelong learning Cost-sharing among • Use of traditional loans, human capital • Income-contingent loans: Chile (the University stakeholders contracts, graduate tax, income-contingent Credit), Ghana, Hungary, Namibia (use of social repayment loans security system for cost recovery) Targeted • Use of vouchers, entitlements, individual • Vouchers: Bangladesh, Chile (indirect fiscal subsidization to learning accounts, education savings contribution contingent on the amount of the promote equity accounts, learning tax credits highest performance of first-year students enrolled), Guatemala, Pakistan 107 Changing roles of • Decrease in direct administration and • Subsidy/loan package to reduce child labor: Brazil government increase in subsidies in certain types of (Bolsa Escola) learning 108 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Another source of anxiety for policymakers is the lack of a blueprint for change. All countries—industrial and developing countries alike—are struggling to put the pieces together to make their education and training systems more responsive to the needs of today and tomorrow. As the tra- ditional education and training institutions come under attack for being unresponsive and their services are delivered by an array of niche providers, institutions will have to examine what type of learning institu- tions will emerge as valuable and valued and how policymakers should support them. The World Bank’s Support for Lifelong Learning The theme of lifelong learning has been embraced by the OECD, the Euro- pean Union, the World Bank, and other international organizations. In 1999 World Bank President James Wolfensohn referred explicitly to life- long learning as a component of what education means for poverty alle- viation (World Bank 1999d). The World Bank has developed strategies for traditional education, but its involvement is still at an early stage and it has not yet fully explored the implications of lifelong learning. Some work has been done, however (table 5.3). Priorities and Strategies for Education (World Bank 1995) empha- sized lifelong learning and private provision of education. Also notable was the attention to nonpublic provision in Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience (World Bank 1994). The regional strategy for transition economies of Europe (World Bank 2000a) was the strongest in terms of lifelong learning concepts and nonpublic provision. Cross-sectoral strate- gies tackle private provision (IFC 2001) and some lifelong learning con- cepts (for example, World Bank 2002f). Three projects with lifelong learning components have been implemented ($5.6 million in Romania, $71 million in Chile, and $150 million in Hungary) (box 5.1), and the World Bank is working with the government of Jordan to develop an e-learning strategy for the knowledge economy (box 5.2). Most of these strategies, however, have looked at individual elements of the lifelong learning system rather than seeing the overall framework and connec- tions between these elements. As lifelong learning becomes a priority in more and more countries, the World Bank will need to articulate a comprehensive strategy for education and the knowledge economy. That strategy will then need to be translated into concrete operations in specific countries. The World Bank will continue to work on this important question by disseminating its strategies, devel- oping diagnostic tools, and undertaking studies on particular countries. The themes the World Bank will address include changing learning par- adigms brought about by the knowledge economy, resources for lifelong MOVING FORWARD 109 Table 5.3. Lifelong Learning in World Bank Documents Type Document Title Education • Priorities and Strategies for Education (World Bank 1995) sector • Education Sector Strategy (World Bank 1999b) policy • Vocational and Technical Education and Training (World papers Bank 1991b) • Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience (World Bank 1994) • Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education (World Bank 2002c) Regional • Education and Training in the East Asia and Pacific Region strategies (World Bank 1998b) • Education in the Middle East and North Africa (World Bank 1999a) • Educational Change in Latin America and the Caribbean (World Bank 1999c) • A Chance to Learn: Knowledge and Finance for Education in Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank 2001d) • Hidden Challenges to Education Systems in Transition Economies (World Bank 2000a) Cross-sectoral • Social Protection Sector Strategy: From Safety Net to strategies Springboard (World Bank 2001h) • World Bank Strategy for Science and Technology in Development (World Bank 2002h) • Information and Communication Technologies (World Bank 2002f) • Rural Strategy: Reaching the Poor (World Bank 2002g) • Investing in Private Education (IFC 2001) Projects • Hungary: Human Resources Project (World Bank 1991a) • Romania: Reform of Higher Education and Research Project (World Bank 1996) • Chile: Lifelong Learning and Training Project (World Bank 2002b) learning, governance and management challenges for the new learning system, and the equity aspects of lifelong learning. An assessment toolkit will measure a country’s progress toward lifelong learning. Research and pilot studies, conducted in collaboration with development partners, will focus on distance learning, ICTs, knowledge and skills, lifelong learning and training policies, knowledge transfer, rural women’s knowledge, capacity building, and career development and guidance. Case studies 110 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Box 5.1. Hungary’s Strategy for Lifelong Learning A $150 million project, successfully completed in 1997, was initiated by the Hungarian government immediately after the move to a democra- tic market economy. The primary goals of the project were to adapt human resources institutions to emerging economic and social demand and to facilitate lifelong learning for a developing knowledge economy. The project was comprehensive and included employment and training, higher education, and research components. The employment and training component developed career guid- ance and information services to promote labor mobility; improved occupational training and continuing education for adults by provid- ing support for labor market-based training, including a regional net- work of Human Resource Development Centers with strong links to private and public employers; and initiated reform of secondary schooling by developing new curricula with more general education and broader training to replace the outdated and narrow curricula that had been used in vocational schools. The higher education and research components supported the intro- duction of competition-based grant funding for higher education pro- grams based on criteria that emphasized greater collaboration and resource sharing among institutions of higher education and research as well as new interdisciplinary programs. It developed a program of prac- tically oriented foreign language training. It also supported the devel- opment of human resources for science and technology by earmarking a portion of the competition-based National Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) for younger researchers, improving the management of and refurbishing the centers of scientific instrumentation financed by OTKA, and upgrading the national research and development com- puter network used by academic and industrial researchers. Source: World Bank 1991a, 1998c. Box 5.2. Developing an Education Strategy for the Knowledge Economy in Jordan Under the leadership of King Abdullah, Jordan is establishing a national education and training strategy to help Jordan compete in the global economy. The E-Learning Strategic Framework is a comprehensive strategy for incorporating ICT in the learning process. More work is required to increase affordable access to lifelong learning opportunities, discussed during the Vision Forum held in Amman in September 2002. MOVING FORWARD 111 will cover evaluation of possible mechanisms for financing lifelong learn- ing, cost-effectiveness of different models of learning, teacher policies, multinational corporations and education, assessment of soft skills, indi- cators of lifelong learning, spending on lifelong learning, returns to life- long learning, lifelong learning as a strategic economic strategy, and analysis of the PISA and TIMSS. There is a need to engage national policymakers and stakeholders worldwide in a dialogue on lifelong learning, helping governments for- mulate visions and concrete action plans for establishing both lifelong learning and innovation frameworks appropriate to their country con- texts. The World Bank can assist in this effort by helping deepen the understanding of the implications of the knowledge economy for educa- tion and training systems and by disseminating analytic documents on education for the knowledge economy. References Acemoglu, D., and J. Angrist. 1999. “How Large Are the Social Returns to Education? Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws.” NBER Working Paper 7444. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cam- bridge, Mass. Adey, P., and M. Shayer. 1994. “Improving Learning through Cog- nitive Intervention.” General Teaching Council for England, London (www.gtce.org.uk/research/raisestudy.asp) Aitken, B., A. Harrison, and R.E. Lipsey. 1996. “Wages and Foreign Own- ership: A Comparative Study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States.” Journal of International Economics 40 (1/2): 345–371. Alvarez, Maria Ines, Francisca Roman, Maria Cecilia Dobles, Jeanina Umana, Magaly Zuniga, Jackeline Garcia, Barbara Means, Michael Potashnik, and Laura Rawlings. 1998. “Computers in Schools: A Qual- itative Study of Chile and Costa Rica.” Education and Technology Series Special Issue. World Bank, Human Development Network, Edu- cation Group, Washington, D.C. Andrews, Les. 1997. “The Effect of HECS on Interest in Undertaking Higher Education.” Department of Employment, Education, Training, and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division, Canberra, Australia. Angrist, Joshua, Eric Bettinger, Erik Bloom, Elizabeth King, and Michael Kremer. 2001. “Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment.” NBER Working Paper 8343. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Anthony, Susanne. 2002. “The Voucher System: The Danish State Education Grant and Loan Scheme for Higher Education.” Government of Den- mark, Copenhagen. Processed. 113 114 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Appiah, Elizabeth, and Walter McMahon. 2002. “The Social Outcomes of Education and Feedbacks on Growth in Africa.” Journal of Development Studies 38 (4): 27–68. Appleton, Simon. 2000. “Education and Health at the Household Level in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Center for International Development Working Paper 33. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Appleton, Simon, and A. Balihuta. 1996. “Education and Agricultural Pro- ductivity in Uganda.” Journal of International Development 8 (3): 415–444. Araneda, Hernán, and Cristóbal Marín. 2002. “Meeting the Challenge of the Knowledge Economy.” World Bank, Human Development Net- work, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. Ashton, David N. n.d. “E-Learning: Has the Bubble Burst and Just What Is it Good for?” Univeristy of Leicester, Centre for Labour Market Studies, United Kingdom. (www.clms.le.ac.uk) Australia, Department of Education, Employment and Training (DEET). 2001. Interviewed by Cecile Fruman. Face-to-face interview. August 25, Victoria. Autor, D.H., F. Levy, and R.J. Murnane. 2002. “Upstairs, Downstairs: Computers and Skills on Two Floors of a Large Bank.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55 (3): 432–447. Azariadis, C., and A. Drazen. 1990. “Threshold Externalities in Economic Development.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105 (2): 501–526. Bakia, Marianne. 2000. “The Costs of Computers in Classrooms: Data from Developing Countries.” Consortium for School Networking, Washington, D.C. Barr, Nicholas. 2001. The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barro, Robert J. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2):407–444. ____. 2001 “Human Capital and Growth.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 91 (2): 12–17. Barro, Robert J., and Jong-Wha Lee. 2000. “International Data on Educa- tional Attainment: Updates and Implications.” Center for Interna- tional Development Working Paper 42. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. (http:/ /www2.cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/) Bartel, A.P., and F.R. Lichtenberg. 1987. “The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology.” Review of Eco- nomics and Statistics 69 (1): 1–11. ____. 1988. “Technical Change, Learning, and Wages.” NBER Working Paper 2732. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Bedi, Arjun S., and Andrzej Cieoelik. 2002. “Wages and Wage Growth in Poland: The Role of Foreign Direct Investment.” Economics of Transi- tion 10 (1): 1–27. REFERENCES 115 Benhabib, J., and M.M. Spiegel. 1994. “Role of Human Capital in Eco- nomic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 143–173. Berman, E., and S. Machin. 2000. “Skill-Biased Technology Transfer around the World.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16 (3): 12–22. Blom, Andreas, Lauritz Holm-Nielsen, and Dorte Verner. 2001. “Educa- tion, Earnings, and Inequality in Brazil, 1982–98: Implications for Education Policy.” World Bank, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Education Sector Unit, Washington, D.C. Blomström, Magnus, and Ari Kokko. 2001. “From Natural Resources to High-Tech Production: The Evolution of Industrial Competi- tiveness in Sweden and Finland.” Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden. Botelho, Caren Addis, and Lara Goldmark. 2000. “Paraguay Vouchers Revisited: Strategies for the Development of Training Markets.” Paper presented at conference on Business Services for Small Enter- prises in Asia: Developing Markets and Measuring Performance, Hanoi, April 3–6. (www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/ent/ papers/voucher.htm) Bransford, John D., Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, eds. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Bray, Mark. 2000. Double-Shift Schooling: Design and Operation for Cost- Effectiveness. London: Commonwealth Secretariat and United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Inter- national Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP). Bregman, A., and A. Marom. 1993. “Growth Factors in Israel’s Business Sector, 1958–1988.” Discussion Paper 93.02. Bank of Israel Research Department, Jerusalem. Brown, P., and H. Lauder. 2000. “The Future of Skill Formation in Singa- pore.” Working Paper 3. Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences, United Kingdom. Camhi, Rosita, and Rosana Latuf. 2000. “Evaluación del Sistema de Ayu- das Estudiantiles a la Educación Superior.” Working paper. Instituto Libertad y Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile. Capper, Joanne. 2000. “Teacher Training and Technology: An Overview of Case Studies and Lessons Learned.” Techknowlogia 2 (6) (November/ December): 17–19. Carlson, Beverley A. 2001. “Education and the Labour Market in Latin America: Why Measurement Is Important and What it Tells Us about Policies, Reforms, and Performance.” Desarrollo Productivo Serie 114. Economic Commission for Latin America and Caribbean (CEPAL), Santiago, Chile. 116 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Castro-Leal, Florencia, Julia Dayton, Lionel Demery, and Kalpana Mehra. 1999. “Public Social Spending in Africa: Do the Poor Benefit?” World Bank Research Observer 14 (1): 49–72. Cawthera, Andy. 2001. “Computers in Secondary Schools in Developing Countries: Costs and Other Issues.” DFID Education Research Paper 43. London: Department for International Development. Chapman, Bruce. 2001. “The Australian Income Contingent Charge for Higher Education: Lessons from the Colonies.” Paper presented at the Funding Higher Education in the 21st Century Conference, Univer- sity of Nottingham, United Kingdom, November 5. Cibulka, James, Sharon Coursey, Michelle Nakayama, Jeremy Price, and Shelly Stewart. 2000. “Schools as Learning Organizations: A Review of the Literature.” University of Maryland, National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching, College Park. (www.ericsp.org/pages/digests/ProfDevLitRev.htm) Craig, Helen J., Richard J. Kraft, and Joy du Plessis. 1998. “Teacher Development: Making an Impact.” USAID and World Bank, Wash- ington, D.C. Dar, Amit, and Indermit S. Gill. 1998. “Evaluating Retraining Programs in OECD Countries: Lessons Learned.” World Bank Research Observer 13 (1): 79–101. Davis, Stan, and Christopher Meyer. 2000. Future Wealth. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press. De Baessa, Yetilú, Ray Chesterfield, and Tanya Ramos. 2002 “Active Learning and Democratic Behaviour in Guatemalan Rural Primary Schools.” Compare 32 (2): 205–218. Delannoy, Françoise. 2000. “Education Reforms in Chile, 1980–98: A Les- son in Pragmatism.” Country Studies, Education Reforms and Man- agement Publication Series 1 (1). World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Desforges, Charles. 2000. “Familiar Challenges and New Approaches: Necessary Advance in Theory and Methods in Research on Teaching and Learning.” Desmond Nuttall/Carfax Memorial Lecture, British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff, United King- dom, September 7–9. ____. 2001. “Knowledge Base for Teaching and Learning.” Teaching and Learning Research Programme Newsletter 3: 3–4. Dohmen, Dieter. 2000. “Vouchers in Higher Education: A Practical Approach.” Paper presented at the Education and Socio-Economical Research & Consulting (ECER) Conference, Cologne, Germany, Sep- tember 20–23. Edwards, Karen. 1997. “Individual Development Accounts: Creative Sav- ings for Families and Communities.” Working paper. University of Washington, Center for Social Development, St. Louis. REFERENCES 117 European Industrial Relations Observatory Online. March 1999. “Com- parative on Work Organisation: The Netherlands.” (www.eiro.euro- found.ie/1999/03/word/nl9903123s.doc) Farrell, Glen M., ed. 2001. The Changing Faces of Virtual Education. Van- couver: Commonwealth of Learning. Feenstra, R.C., D. Madani, T.-H. Yang, and C.-Y. Liang. 1999. “Testing Endogenous Growth in South Korea and Taiwan.” Journal of Develop- ment Economics 60 (2): 317–341. Fiske, Edward. 1996. Decentralization of Education: Politics and Consensus. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Fretwell, David, and Joe Colombano. 2000. “Adult Continuing Education: An Integral Part of Lifelong Learning: Emerging Policies and Pro- grams for the 21st Century in Upper- and Middle-Income Countries.” Human Development Network Working Paper 22062. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Fretwell, David, Morgan V. Lewis, and Arjen Deij. 2001. “A Framework for Defining and Assessing Occupational and Training Standards in Developing Countries.” ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Columbus, Ohio, World Bank, Washington, D.C., and European Training Foundation, Turin, Italy. Friedman, Milton. 1955. “The Role of Government in Education.” In Robert A. Solo, ed., Economics and the Public Interest. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Friedman, Milton, and Simon Kuznets. 1945. Income from Independent Professional Practice. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Fuchs, V., and D.M. Reklis. 1994. “Mathematical Achievement in Eighth Grade: Interstate and Racial Differences.” NBER Working Paper 4784. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Georgiades, Kyriakos A. 2001. “Use of Technology in World Bank Education Projects: An Operational Review, Fiscal Years 1997–2000.” World Bank, Human Development Network, Washington, D.C. Processed. Gerster, Richard, ed. 2001. “Linking Work, Skills, and Knowledge: Learn- ing or Survival and Growth.” Swiss Agency for Development and Co- operation (SDC), Berne. (http://www.workandskills.ch/downloads/ ConferenceReportWS.pdf) Gill, Indermit S., Fred Fluitman, and Amit Dar. 2000. Vocational Education and Training Reform: Matching Skills to Markets and Budgets. New York: Oxford University Press. Göbel, K., and H.-G. Hesse. Forthcoming. “A Measurement Device for the Assessment of Intercultural Competence in the English as a Foreign Language Class.” Frankfurt: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF). 118 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Grace, Jeremy, Charles Kenny, Christine Qiang, Jia Liu, and Taylor Reynolds. 2001. “Information and Communication Technologies and Broad-Based Development: A Partial Review of the Evidence.” Greenough, W. 2000. “Brain’s Mechanisms of Learning and Memory.” Paper presented at the First High-Level Forum on Learning Sciences and Brain Research: Potential Implications for Education Policies and Practices: Brain Mechanisms and Early Learning, Sackler Institute, New York, June 16–17, organized by the OECD. (www.oecd.org/ pdf/M00019000/M00019809.pdf) Gundlach, E. 2001. “Education and Economic Development: An Empiri- cal Perspective.” Journal of Economic Development 26 (1): 37–60. Haan, Hans C., with Nicholas Serriere. 2002. Training for Work in the Infor- mal Sector: Fresh Evidence from West and Central Africa. Turin: Interna- tional Training Centre of the International Labor Office. Hammer, M.R., and M.J. Bennett. 1998. The Intercultural Development Inven- tory Manual. Portland, Ore.: Intercultural Communication Institute. Hanushek, Eric A., and Dennis D. Kimko. 2000. “Schooling, Labor-Force Quality, and the Growth of Nations.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1184–1208. Heckman, James, and P.J. Klenow. 1997. “Human Capital Policy.” Univer- sity of Chicago, Department of Economics, Chicago, Ill. Heckman, James J., Rebecca L. Roselius, and Jeffrey A. Smith. 1994. “U.S. Education and Training Policy: A Reevaluation of the Underlying Assumptions behind the ‘New Consensus.’” In A. Levenson and L.C. Solmon, eds., Labor Markets, Employment Policy, and Job Creation. Santa Monica, Calif.: Milken Institute. Heeks, Richard. 2001. “Understanding E-Governance for Development.” I-Government Working Paper 11. University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management, United Kingdom. (http://idpm.man.ac.uk/idpm/igov11.htm) Hepp, Pedro K., S. Enrique Hinostroza, M. Ernesto Laval, and F. Lucio Rebién. Forthcoming. “Technology in Schools: Advice for Policymak- ers.” World Bank, Washington, D.C. Hong, W. Tan, and Geeta Batra. 1995. “Enterprise Training in Five Devel- oping Countries: Overview of Incidence, Determinants, and Produc- tivity Outcomes.” Paper presented at the Conference on Enterprise Training Strategies and Productivity, World Bank, Washington, D.C., June 12–13. Houle, C.O. 1961. The Inquiring Mind: A Study of the Adult Who Continues to Learn. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Howie, S. J., T.A. Marsh, J. Allummoottil, M. Glencross, C. Deliwe, and C.A. Hughes. 2000. “Middle School Students’ Performance in Mathe- matics in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study: South African Realities.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 26 (1): 61–77. REFERENCES 119 Huffman, Jane B., and Kristine A. Hipp. 2001. “Creating Communities of Learners: The Interaction of Shared Leadership, Shared Vision, and Supportive Conditions.” International Journal of Education Reform 10 (3): 215–235. IFC (International Finance Corporation). 2001. Investing in Private Educa- tion: IFC’s Strategic Directions. Washington, D.C. Japan, Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture (MESSC). 1991. “Japanese Government Policies in Education, Science and Culture 1991.” In White Paper Database. Tokyo. Jeria, Ana Maria, and Kate Hovde. 2002. “Education for All Case Study: Expansion of Secondary Education for Girls.” World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Johanson, Richard K., and Arvil V. Adams. 2003. “Skills Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Bank, Africa Region, Human Develop- ment Network, Washington D.C. Johnstone, Bruce. 2001. “The Economics and Politics of Income- Contingent Repayment Plans.” State University of New York, Buffalo. (www.gse.buffalo.edu/FAS/Johnston/Loans.html) Johnstone, D. Bruce, and Abebayehu Aemero. 2001. “The Applicability for Developing Countries of Income-Contingent Loans or Gradu- ate Taxes, with Special Consideration of an Australian HECS-Type Income-Contingent Loan Program for Ethiopia.” State University of New York, Graduate School of Education, Buffalo, New York. (www.gse.buffalo.edu/org/IntHigherEdFinance/textForSite/ ApptoDevCountry.pdf) Kaplan, Leslie S., and William A. Owings. 2001. “Teacher Quality and Stu- dent Achievement: Recommendations for Principals.” National Asso- ciation of Secondary School Principals Bulletin 85 (628) (November). (www.principals.org/news/bltn_tch_qul_stdnt_ach1101.html) Kartovaara, Eija. 1996. “Secondary Education in Finland.” Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. Kettle, Donald F. 1999. “Global Reinvention: Basic Issues, Questions Ahead.” Paper prepared for the Global Forum on Reinventing Gov- ernment, U.S. Department of State, Washington, D.C., Jan. 14–15. (www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/Views/Papers/Kettl/global.htm) Klaus, David, Charlie Tesar, and Jane Shore. 2002. “Language of Instruction: A Critical Factor in Achieving Education for All.” World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. Klazar, Stanislav, Milan Sedmihradsky, and Alena Vancurova. 2001. “Returns of Education in the Czech Republic.” International Tax and Public Finance 8 (4): 609–620. Klor de Alva, Jorge. 2001. “Beyond U.S. Borders: Analyzing Investment Potential in International Markets.” Paper presented at the Education Industry Investment Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, March 13. 120 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Koda, Yoshiko. 2002. “Benchmarking to International Assessments: Diagnosing Education System Towards the Knowledge Economy.” World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. Krueger, Alan B., and Mikael Lindahl. 1999. “Education for Growth in Sweden and the World.” NBER Working Paper 7190. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Larsen, Kurt, Rosemary Morris, and John P. Martin. 2001. “Trade in Edu- cational Services: Trends and Emerging Issues.” Working Paper CERI/CD/RD (2001) 6. OECD, Paris. Leithwood, Kenneth A., Karen Edge, and Doris Jantzi. 1999. Educational Accountability: The State of the Art. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers. Levin, Henry M. 2002. “Post-Compulsory Entitlements: Vouchers for Life- Long Learning.” Occasional Paper 46. Columbia University, Teachers College, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, New York. Levin, Henry M., and Hans G. Schütze, eds. 1983. Financing Recurrent Edu- cation. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. Lewin, Keith, and Françoise Caillods. 2001. Financing Secondary Educa- tion in Developing Countries: Strategies for Sustainable Growth. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Li, Guo, Diane Steele, and Paul Glewwe. 1999. “Distribution of Govern- ment Education Expenditures in Developing Countries: Preliminary Estimates.” World Bank, Development Research Group, Poverty Team, Washington, D.C. Linden, Toby. 2001. “Double-Shift Secondary Schools: Possibilities and Issues.” Secondary Education Series. World Bank, Human Develop- ment Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Lizardi, Anthony. 2002. “Virtual High Schools: Development, Trends, and Issues.” Techknowlogia 42 (2) (April–June): 36–39. Lucas, R.E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (1): 3–22. Maman, Carole, and Tanya Scobie. 2002. “Burkina Faso: Public-Private Partnership in Education Initiative under Post-Primary Education Project.” International Finance Corporation, Health and Education Department, Washington, D.C. Mandinach, Ellen B., and Hugh F. Cline. 1994. Classroom Dynamics: Imple- menting a Technology-Based Learning Environment. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Mankiw, N. Gregory, David Romer, and David Weil. 1992. “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 407–437. REFERENCES 121 Martin, Michael O., Ina V.S. Mullis, Eugenio J. Gonzalez, Kelvin D. Gre- gory, Teresa A. Smith, Steven J. Chrostowski, Robert A. Garden, and Kathleen M. O’Connor. 2000. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Sci- ence Study at the Eighth Grade. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College, Lynch School of Education, International Study Center. McMahon, Walter W. 1989. “Potential Resource Recovery in Higher Edu- cation in the Developing Countries and the Parents’ Expected Contri- bution.” Economics of Education Review 7 (1): 135–52. Merriam, Sharan B. 1993. “Adult Learning: Where Have We Come From? Where Are We Headed?” In Sharan B. Merriam, ed., An Update on Adult Learning Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ____. 2001. The New Update on Adult Learning Theory: New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Middleton, John, Adrian Ziderman, and Arvil Van Adams. 1993. Skills for Productivity: Vocational Education and Training in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press. Mioduser, David, and Rafi Nachmias. 2002. “WWW in Education: An Overview.” In H. Adelsberger, B. Colis, and M. Pawlowski, eds., Handbook on Information Technologies and Education and Training. New York: Springer. Moe, Michael T., Kathleen Bailey, and Rhoda Lau. 1999. The Book of Knowl- edge: Investing in the Growing Education and Training Industry. San Francisco: Merrill Lynch and Co., Global Securities Research and Eco- nomic Group, and Global Fundamental Equity Research Department. Mullis, Ina V.S., Michael O. Martin, Eugenio J. Gonzalez, Kelvin D. Gre- gory, Robert A. Garden, Kathleen M. O’Connor, Steven J. Chrostowski, and Teresa A. Smith. 2000. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston Col- lege, Lynch School of Education, International Study Center. Murnane, Richard J., Nancy Sharkey, and Frank Levy. 2002. “Can the Internet Help Solve America’s Education Problems? Lessons from the Cisco Networking Academies.” In P. Grahma and N. Stacey, eds., The Knowledge Economy and Post-Secondary Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Murphy, K., and F. Welch. 1991. “The Role of International Trade in Wage Differentials.” In Marvin Kosters, ed., Workers and Their Wages: Chang- ing Patterns in the United States. Washington, D.C.: American Enter- prise Institute. Murray, T.S., I.S. Kirsch, and L. Jenkins. 1998. Adult Literacy in OECD Countries: Technical Report on the First International Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 122 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Mustard, J. Fraser. 2002. “Early Child Development and the Brain: The Base for Health, Learning, and Behavior throughout Life.” In Mary Eming Young, ed., From Early Childhood to Human Development: Invest- ing in Our Children’s Future. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Muth, Rod, and Nadyne Guzman. 2000. “Learning in a Virtual Lab: Distance Education and Computer Simulations.” University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colo. (http:/ /web.uccs.edu/bgaddis/ leadership/topicfocus3D1.htm) Navarro, Juan Carlos, and Aimee Verdisco. 2000. Teaching Training in Latin America: Innovations and Trends. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank. Nelson, R.R., and E.S. Phelps. 1966. “Investment in Humans, Technologi- cal Diffusion, and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review 65 (2): 69–75. Newman, Frank, and Lara K Couturier. 2002. “Trading Public Good in the Higher Education Market.” Observatory on Borderless Higher Edu- cation, London. New Zealand, Information Technology Advisory Group to the Minister for Information Technology. 1999. The Knowledge Economy. Welling- ton, New Zealand: Ernst & Young. Nicholls, Jane. 1998. “Student Financing in the Developing World: Apply- ing Income-Contingent Approaches to Cost Recovery.” University of Melbourne, Department of Science & Maths Education, Australia. Nielsen, Helena Skyt, and Michael Rosholm. 2002. “Evaluation of Train- ing in African Enterprise.” World Bank, Africa Region, Human Devel- opment Department, Washington, D.C. O’Connell, Philip J. 1999. “Adults in Training: An International Compari- son of Continuing Education and Training.” CERI/WD (99) 1. OECD, Paris. O’Donoghue, Patrick J. 1998. “Fe y Alegría Starts Innovative Educational Project Amid Protests from Teachers Unions.” (vheadline.com) (August 28) OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). n.d. The Financing of Lifelong Learning: Finland’s Country Report for the OECD. Paris. ____. 1992. Education at a Glance. Paris. ____. 1996. Education and Training: Learning and Working in a Society in Flux. Paris. ____. 1998a. Education at a Glance OECD Indicators 1998. Paris. ____. 1998b. Staying Ahead: In-Service Training and Professional Development. Paris. ____. 1999. “Alternative Approaches to Financing Lifelong Learning: Country Report—Denmark.” Paris. REFERENCES 123 ____. 2000a. Education at a Glance 2000. Paris. ____. 2000b. “Follow-Up of the Thematic Review on Transition from Ini- tial Education to Working Life: Policies for Information, Guidance and Counselling Services: Making Lifelong Learning a Reality.” Paris. (www.oecd.org/els/education/reviews) ____. 2000c. Transition from Initial Education to Working Life. Paris. ____. 2000d. Where Are the Resources for Lifelong Learning? Paris. ____. 2001a. Economics and Financing of Lifelong Learning. Paris. ____. 2001b. Education at a Glance. Paris. ____. 2001c. Education Policy Analysis. Paris. ____. 2001d. Government of the Future. Paris. ____. 2001e. Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000. Exec- utive Summary. (www.pisa.oecd.org.) ____. 2001f. OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Scoreboard: Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris. ____. 2001g. “Preliminary Synthesis of the Third High Level Forum on Learning and Sciences and Brain Research: Potential Implications for Education Policies and Practices. Brain Mechanisms and Youth Learn- ing.” http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00019000/M00019809.pdf ____. 2001h. Thematic Review on Adult Learning: Finland Background Report. Paris. ____. 2002a. “Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations (DeSeCo): Strategy Paper on Key Compe- tencies, A Frame of Reference for a Coherent Assessment and Research Program.” DEELSA/ED/CERI/CD(2002)9. Paris. ____. 2002b. “ICT: Policy Challenges for Education. A Proposal.” Paris. ____. 2002c. “The Role of National Qualification Systems in Promot- ing Lifelong Learning: Thematic Issues Groups.” OECD Secretariat, Paris. OECD and Statistics Canada 1997. Literacy Skills for the Knowledge Society: Further Results from the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris. ____. 2002. Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris. (www.oecd.org/EN/document/0,,EN- document-601-5-no-27-21891-601,00.html) Oosterbeek, Hessel. 1998. “Innovative Ways to Finance Education and Their Relation to Lifelong Learning.” Education Economics 6 (3): 219–251. Osborn A.F., and J.E. Milbank. 1987. The Effects of Early Education: A Report from the Child Health and Education Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Oxenham, John, Abdoul Hamid Diallo, Anne Ruhweza Katahoire, Anna Petkova-Mwangi, and Ouma Sall. 2002. “Skills and Literacy Training for Better Livelihoods: A Review of Approaches and Experiences.” World Bank, Africa Region Human Development Working Paper Series. Washington, D.C. 124 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Palacios, Miguel. 2002. “Options for Financing Lifelong Learning.” World Bank, Human Development Department, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. Patrinos, Harry Anthony. 2000. “Market Forces in Education.” European Journal of Education 35 (1): 61–79. ____. 2001a. “The Impact of Technology on Education Premiums.” World Bank, Human Development Department, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. ____. 2001b. “School Choice in Denmark.” World Bank, Human Develop- ment Department, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. Patrinos, Harry Anthony, and David Lakshmanan Ariasingam. 1997. Decentralization of Education: Demand Side Financing. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Perraton, Hilary. 2000. Open and Distance Learning in the Developing World. London: Routledge. Peterson, J.M. 1989. “Remediation Is No Remedy.” Educational Leadership 46 (6): 24–25. Pissarides, Christopher A. 2000. “Human Capital and Growth: A Synthe- sis Report.” Technical Paper 168. OECD Development Centre, Paris. Pohjola, M. 2000. “Information Technology and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis.” World Institute for Development Econom- ics Research Working Paper 173. United Nations University, Helsinki. Pritchett, L. 2001. “Where Has All the Education Gone?” World Bank Eco- nomic Review 15 (3): 367–391. Psacharopoulos, George. 1989. “Time Trends of the Returns to Education: Cross-National Evidence.” Economics of Education Review 8 (3): 225–231. Psacharopoulos, George, and Harry Anthony Patrinos. 2002. “Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update.” Policy Research Work- ing Paper 2881. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Putnam, Robert. 2001. “Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences.” In John Helliwell, ed. The Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-Being. Quebec: OECD and Human Resources. Randriamiharisoa, Dephin. 2001. “Formal and Non-Formal Delivery of Training for Rural Producers in Madagascar.” In Richard Gerster, ed., “Linking Work, Skills, and Knowledge: Learning for Survival and Growth.” Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Berne. (http:/ /www.workandskills.ch/downloads/Conference ReportWS.pdf) Rauch, J. 1993. “Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 34 (3): 3–33. REFERENCES 125 Reinikka, Ritva, and Jacob Svensson. 2002. “Assessing Frontline Service De- livery.” World Bank, Development Research Group, Washington, D.C. Robbins, D.J. 1996. “Evidence on Trade and Wages in the Developing World.” Technical Paper 119 (December). Paris: OECD Development Centre. Romer, Paul M. 1989. “Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evi- dence.” NBER Working Paper 3173. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Roschelle, Jeremy M., Roy D. Pea, Christopher M. Hoadley, Douglas N. Gordin, and Barbara M. Means. 2000. “Changing How and What Children Learn in Schools with Computer-Based Technologies.” Chil- dren and Computer Technology in the Future of Children 10 (2): 76–101. (www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/vol10no2Art4%2Epdf) Rychen, Dominique Simone, and Laura Hersh Salganik, eds. 2001. Defin- ing and Selecting Key Competencies. Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe and Huber. Ryscavage, P., and P. Henle. 1990. “Earnings Inequality Accelerates in the 1980s.” Monthly Labor Review 113 (12) (December): 3–16. Sab, R., and S.C. Smith. 2001. “Human Capital Convergence: International Evidence.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/01/32. Washington, D.C. Saint, William. 2000. “Tertiary Distance Education and Technology in Sub- Saharan Africa.” Education and Technology Technical Notes Series. World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Sakellariou, C.N. 2001. “Identifying the External Effects of Human Capi- tal: A Two-Stage Approach.” Applied Economics Letters 8 (3): 191–194. Scanlon, Edward. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Financial Savings and Child Well-Being: Implications for Research on a Children and Youth Sav- ings Account Policy Demonstration.” Research Background Paper CYSAPD 01–11. University of Washington, Center for Social Devel- opment, St. Louis. Schank, Roger. 2001. “Educational Technology: The Promise and the Myth.” World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed Scheerens, J. 1999. “School Effectiveness in Developed and Developing Countries: A Review of the Research Evidence.” World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. Schultz, T.W. 1975. “The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria.” Journal of Economic Literature 13 (3): 827–846. Sharpe, Leslie, and S. Gopinathan. 2001. “After Effectiveness: New Directions in the Singapore School System.” Paper presented at the International Forum on Education Reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region: Globalization, Localization, and Individualization, Hong Kong, February 14–16. 126 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Slaughter, M.J., and P. Swagel. 1997. “The Effect of Globalization on Wages in the Advanced Economies.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/97/43. Washington, D.C. South Africa, Departments of Education and Labour. 2002. Report of the Study Team on the Implementation of the National Qualifications Frame- work. Pretoria. (www.labour.gov.za/docs/reports/NQFSTUDY.PDF) Souza, Paulo Renato. 2002. “Post-Secondary Education and Opportunities for Investment and Trade.” Paper presented at the OECD Forum on Trade in Educational Services, Washington, D.C., May 23–24. (www.oecd.org/pdf/M00030000/M00030829.pdf ) Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tan, Hong W. 2000. “Information Technology and Skills in Malaysia.” World Bank Institute, Washington, D.C. Tan, Hong W., and Geeta Batra. 1995. “Enterprise Training in Developing Countries: Overview of Incidence, Determinants, and Productivity Outcomes.” Private Sector Development Department Occasional Paper No. 9. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Tatto, Maria Teresa, H. Dean Nielsen, and William K. Cummings. 1991. Comparing the Effects and Costs of Different Approaches for Educating Pri- mary School Teachers: The Case of Sri Lanka. Cambridge, Mass.: Basic Research and Implementation in Developing Education Systems. Tinbergen, J. 1975. Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Tooley, James N. 1999. The Global Education Industry: Lessons from Private Education in Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: International Finance Corporation. Toomey, Ron, with Christine EkinSmyth, Colin Warner, and Darrell Fraser. 2000. “A Case Study of ICT and School Improvement at Glen Waverly Secondary College, Victoria, Australia.” OECD/CERI ICT Program, ICT and the Quality of Learning. (www.gwsc.vic.edu.au/ oecd/oecdgwsc.pdf) Topel, R. 1999. “Labor Markets and Economic Growth.” In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, eds., Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Torney-Purta, Judith, R. Lehmann, H. Oswald, and W. Schulz. 2001. Cit- izenship and Education in Twenty-Eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development (UNCSTD). 2001. Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sus- tainable Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. REFERENCES 127 UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organiza- tion). Education for All Year 2000 Assessment: Statistical Document. Paris. ____. 2001. Teacher Training through Distance Learning: Technology, Curricu- lum, Cost, Evaluation: Summary of Case Studies. Paris. UNESCO and COMNET-IT (Commonwealth Network of Information Technology for Development Foundation). 2002. Country Profiles of E-Governance. Paris. Urdan, Trace A., and Cornelia C. Weggen. 2000. “Corporate E-Learning: Exploring a New Frontier.” San Francisco: WR Hambrecht. Van Driel, Jan H., William R. Veal, and Fred. J. M. Janssen. 2001. “Peda- gogical Content Knowledge: An Integrative Component within the Knowledge Base for Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (8): 979–986. Vawda, Ayesha, and Harry Anthony Patrinos. Forthcoming. “Private Education in West Africa: The Technological Imperative.” Journal of Educational Planning and Administration. Venezky, Richard L., and Cassandra Davis. 2002. “Quo Vademus? The Transformation of Schooling in a Networked World.” Version 8c. OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris. (www.oecd.org/pdf/M00027000/M00027107.pdf) Venniker, R. 2000. “Social Returns to Education: A Survey of Recent Liter- ature on Human Capital Externalities.” CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis Report 00/1. The Hague. Vishwanath, Tara, and Ambar Narayan. 2001. “Informal Economy: Safety Valve or Growth Opportunity?” In Richard Gerster, ed., “Linking Work, Skills, and Knowledge: Learning for Survival and Growth.” Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Berne. (http://www.workandskills.ch/downloads/ConferenceReportWS.pdf) Walker, David, and Gajaraj Dhanarajan. 2000. “Education for All: The Mass Media Formula.” Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. (www.col.org/speeches/00efa.htm). Wang, F.-Y., and A. Mody. 1997. “Explaining Industrial Growth in Coastal China: Economic Reforms . . . and What Else?” World Bank Economic Review 11 (2): 293–325. Weinberg, B.A. 2000. “Computer Use and the Demand for Women Work- ers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53 (2): 290–308. Weir, Sharada. 1999. “The Effects of Education on Farmer Productivity in Rural Ethiopia.” Working Paper WPS/99.7. Oxford University, Department of Economics, Centre for the Study of African Economies, United Kingdom. Welch, F. 1970. “Education in Production.” Journal of Political Economy 78 (1): 35–59. 128 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY Wenglinsky, H. 1998. “Does It Compute? The Relationship between Edu- cational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics.” Edu- cational Testing Service Policy Information Report. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey. ____. 2000. “How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality.” Educational Testing Service, Prince- ton, New Jersey. West, Anne, Jo Sparkes, and Todor Balabanov. 2000. “Demand-Side Financing: A Focus on Vouchers in Post-Compulsory Education and Training: Discussion and Case Studies.” European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP). Thessaloniki, Greece. (http://www2.trainingvillage.gr/etv/publication/download/ panorama/6003_en.pdf) White, B.Y., and J.R. Fredrickson. 1997. The ThinkerTools Inquiry Project: Making Scientific Inquiry Accessible to Students. Princeton, N.J.: Center for Performance Assessment, Educational Testing Service. Winter-Ebmer, R. 1994. “Endogenous Growth, Human Capital, and Industry Wages.” Bulletin of Economic Research 46 (4): 289–314. Woessmann, Ludger. 2001. “Schooling Resources, Educational Institu- tions, and Student Performance: The International Evidence.” Kiel Institute for World Economics, Kiel, Germany. Wolfe, B., and R. Haveman. 2001. “Accounting for the Social and Non- Market Benefits of Education.” In J. Helliwell, ed., The Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well Being. Paris: OECD. Wolff, E.N. 2000. “Human Capital Investment and Economic Growth: Exploring the Cross-Country Evidence.” Structural Change and Eco- nomic Dynamics 11 (4): 433–472. Wood, Adrian. 1994. North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality: Chang- ing Fortunes in a Skill-Driven World. Oxford: Clarendon Press. World Bank. 1991a. “Hungary Human Resources Project.” Staff Appraisal Report No. 9183-HU. Europe and Central Asia Region, Human Devel- opment Sector Unit, Washington, D.C. ____. 1991b. Vocational and Technical Education and Training. Washington, D.C. ____. 1994. Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience. Washington, D.C. ____. 1995. Priorities and Strategies for Education: A World Bank Review. Washington, D.C. ____. 1996. “Romania: Reform of Higher Education and Research Project.” Staff Appraisal Report No. 15525. Europe and Central Asia Region, Human Development Sector, Washington, D.C. ____. 1997. World Development Report. Washington, D.C. REFERENCES 129 ____. 1998a. “Attracting High-Technology Investment: Intel’s Costa Rican Plant.” Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, D.C. ____. 1998b. Education and Training in the East Asia and Pacific Region. Washington, D.C. ____. 1998c. “Hungary Human Resources Development Project.” Imple- mentation Completion Report No. 17584. Europe and Central Asia Region, Human Development Sector Unit, Washington, D.C. ____. 1998d. World Development Report. Washington, D.C. ____. 1998e. Latin America and the Caribbean: Education and Technology at the Crossroads. Washington, D.C. ____. 1998f. “Mexico Higher Education Financing Project.” Staff Appraisal Report No. 17174. Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Human Development Sector, Washington, D.C. ____. 1998g. “Venezuela: Stylized Facts and the Characteristics of the Labor Supply in Venezuela: What Can Be Done to Improve the Out- come?” Report 17901-VE. Latin America and Caribbean Region, Human Development Unit, Washington, D.C. ____. 1999a. Education in the Middle East and North Africa: A Strategy Towards Learning for Development. Washington, D.C. ____. 1999b. Education Sector Strategy. Washington, D.C. ____. 1999c. Educational Change in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, D.C. ____. 1999d. “A Proposal for a Comprehensive Development Framework.” Washington, D.C. ____. 2000a. Hidden Challenges to Education Systems in Transition Economies. Washington, D.C. ____. 2000b. Reforming Public Institutions and Strengthening Governance. Washington, D.C. ____. 2000c. World Development Report. Washington, D.C. ____. 2001a. Brazil: An Assessment of the Bolsa Escola Programs. Latin Amer- ica and Caribbean Regional Office, Washington, D.C. ____. 2001b. Brazil: The New Growth Agenda. Latin America and Caribbean Region, Washington, D.C. ____. 2001c. Brazil: Secondary Education Profile. Human Development Net- work, Education Group, Washington, D.C. ____. 2001d. A Chance to Learn: Knowledge and Finance for Education in Sub- Saharan Africa. Washington, D.C. ____. 2001e. Distance Education and Information and Communication Tech- nologies for Learning in Africa. Africa Region Human Development Working Paper Series, Washington, D.C. ____. 2001f. Engendering Development through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. Washington, D.C. 130 LIFELONG LEARNING IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY ____. 2001g. “Jamaica ROSE II Project.” Project Appraisal Document No. 10745. Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Human Develop- ment Sector, Washington, D.C. ____. 2001h. Social Protection Sector Strategy: From Safety Net to Springboard. Washington, D.C. ____. 2001i. World Development Indicators 2001. Washington, D.C. ____. 2002a. “Achieving Education for All by 2015: Simulation Results for 47 Low-Income Countries.” Human Development Network, Educa- tion Group, Washington, D.C. Processed. ____. 2002b. “Chile Lifelong Learning and Training Project.” Project Appraisal Document No. 23632. Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Human Development Sector, Washington, D.C. ____. 2002c. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education. Washington, D.C. ____. 2002d. From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy: Trade and Job Quality. Washington, D.C. ____. 2002e. Globalization, Growth, and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy. Washington, D.C. ____. 2002f. Information and Communication Technologies. Washington, D.C. ____. 2002g. Rural Strategy: Reaching the Rural Poor. Washington, D.C. ____. 2002h. “World Bank Strategy for Science and Technology in Devel- opment.” Washington, D.C. Processed. ____. 2002i. World Development Indicators 2002. Washington, D.C. World Bank and IADB (Inter-American Development Bank). 2000. Sec- ondary Education in Brazil: A Time to Move Forward. Washington, D.C. World Bank Institute. 2001a. China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century. Washington, D.C. ____. 2001b. Decentralizing Education in Transition Societies: Case Studies from Central Eastern Europe. Washington, D.C. ____. 2001c. Korea and the Knowledge-Based Economy. Washington, D.C. WTO (World Trade Organization). 1998. “Education Services.” Back- ground note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/49, 98-3691. Geneva. Yoon, Yangro. 2002. “Effectiveness Born out of Necessity: A Comparison of Korean and East African Education Policies.” World Bank, Eastern Europe and Central Asia Region, Washington, D.C. Ziderman, Adrian. 2001. “Financing Vocational Training to Meet Policy Objectives: Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Bank, Africa Region, Human Development Department, Washington, D.C. Index A Angola, 52 accelerated vs. remedial programs, 30–31 Arab world, see Middle East, and specific access to learning countries adult continuing education and training, Argentina, 9, 75 45 Armenia, xxiii, 78 assessment results by school, access to, Asia, see also Middle East, and specific 69–70 countries equity of, 14–15, 71–72, 78 Central Asia, xix, 7, 51, 68 expansion of, 44–46 distance learning, 51 technology and computer access, 41–42 East Asia, 109 women’s disparity in education and math and science skills, 25–26 technology training, 14–15 policy concerns, xix accreditation, xxii–xxiii, 67–70 South Asia, 14, 68, 74 acronyms, list of, xxv wage differentials, artificial compression administration and governance, see of, 6 governance and policy issues women, disparity in education of, 14 adult continuing education and training assessment and certification standards, xxii, access to, 45 63–69, 102–103 basic competencies, universal mastery assessment-driven learning, 32–33 of, 77 asset-building schemes, 94–95 financing, 91, 92–97 Australia income-contingent repayment adult continuing education and training, schemes, 85 access to, 45 increasing importance of, xxi assessment and certification standards, nature of child vs. adult learning, 31 69 Adult Literacy and Lifeskills Survey (ALL), civil society, participation in, 27 102 computer hardware and output growth, 4 Africa, see also Sub-Saharan Africa, and coordination across ministries, 60 specific countries Higher Education Contribution Scheme distance learning, 49, 51, 53 (HECS), 85, 86 equity in education, 71 literacy, 24 North Africa, 68, 74, 109 technology used to create effective private sector education and training, 17 learning environment, 37 women, disparity in education of, 14 TIMSS performance compared to per Africa Educational Trust, 85 capital GNP, 26 ALL (Adult Literacy and Lifeskills Survey), Austria, 93 102 autonomous action as knowledge economy allocation of resources, 77–78, 91 competency, 21 131 132 INDEX B Chile Bangladesh, xxii, 25, 68, 74, 95 adult continuing education and training, Barbados, 42 access to, 45 basic knowledge and competencies, assessment and certification standards, mastery of, xix–xx, 21–28, 76–78, 103, 66, 68 104 civil society, participation in, 27 Basque Country, 96 coordination across ministries, 60 Becker, Gary S., 73 financing post-secondary education, Belgium, 24, 27 81–82 benchmarking, xxiv, 102–107 IALS performance, effect of, 102 Bolivia, 48 literacy, 24 Botswana, 49 Microcentros Program, 36 Bowie Bonds, 84 private education funding, 75, 76 Brazil rates of return on education, 9 asset-building schemes, 94, 95 teacher training in technology, 41 Bolsa Escola program, 95 technology and computer access, 42 distance learning, 53 TIMSS performance compared to per higher education enrollment, xviii capital GNP, 26 night schools, 47 vocational vs. university training, barrier payroll levies, 93, 94 between, 66 private/public education funding, 76 World Bank project in, xiv, 60, 108, 109 private sector education and training, China xviii, 17 assessment and certification standards, rates of return on education, 9, 10 69 Bulgaria, xviii, 19, 26 distance learning, 49, 51, 52, 53 Burkina Faso, 77 higher education enrollment, xviii Hong Kong, 26, 51, 70 C literacy, 23 Canada number of spaces in higher education, 76 computer hardware and output growth, private sector education and training, 4 xviii, 19 distance learning, 52 Taiwan, 16, 25, 26 education savings accounts (ESAs), Cisco Systems, 48, 63 97, 98 Citizenship and Education Study (CES), literacy, 24 International Association for rates of return on education, 8 Evaluation of Educational TIMSS performance compared to per Achievement, 102 capital GNP, 26 civil society, see society and community career guidance and counseling, 54–55 Colombia Caribbean, 14, 33–34, 51, 68, 109, see also adult continuing education and training, specific countries access to, 45 Central and Eastern Europe, xviii–xix, 19, assessment and certification standards, 46, 68, 108 68 Central Asia, xix, 7, 51, 68 decentralization reforms, 71 certification of student competencies, 63–69 employer demands and employee CES (Citizenship and Education Study), training, 16 International Association for rates of return on education, 9 Evaluation of Educational targeted voucher programs, 77 Achievement, 102 women, disparity in education of, 15 child development and mothers’ education, community, see society and community relationship between, 7 competencies and skills for a knowledge child vs. adult learning, 31 economy, xix–xx, 21–28, 76–78, 103, 104 INDEX 133 Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Denmark, 24, 91–92 Environment (CSILE), 38 developing and transitional economies, computers, see also information and xiii–xviii communication technology (ICT); access to learning, 44 Internet accreditation, xxii, 67–68 case study of technological and changes to promote lifelong learning in, organizational change due to, 13 101–102 cost issues, 41–42 civil society, participation in, 27 education technology, used as, 37–39 education and training, 7–8 number available for use in selected financing lifelong learning in, 74, 97–99 countries, 52 governance and policy issues, 58 output growth and computer hardware, literacy, 23–24 4 low education and skill levels, problems policy choices regarding, 42–43 with, 74 World Bank support for educational math and science skills, 25, 26 technology, 43 private sector education and training, continuing education, see adult continuing 17–19 education and training rates of return on education, 7–9 coordination of educational governance teacher training strategies, 35 across ministries, xxii, 59–63 World Bank documents, 109 core competencies, mastery of, xix–xx, Diderot, Denis, 101 21–28, 76–78, 103, 104 digital radio transmission and studio corporations broadcasting for distance learning, 48 adult continuing education and training, disparate/equitable availability of access to, 45 education, 14–15, 71–72, 78 e-learning (distance learning), 53–54 distance learning, xxi, 47–54, 64, 70, 77 employer demand and employee diversity, ability to cope with as knowledge training, xix, 17 economy competency, 22 technology and organizational change, document literacy, 23 13, 18 cost issues generally, see financing lifelong E learning e-government, 57–58 cost-sharing schemes, 79–85, 88–89 e-learning, 53–54, 110 Costa Rica, 5, 9 early childhood education Côte d’Ivoire, 19, 45, 78 computers in Costa Rican schools, 5 cross-sectoral strategies (public-private enrollment levels in low-income partnerships), 63–65, 108, 109 countries, 74 CSILE (Computer-Supported Intentional financing, 74, 76–78, 91, 93–94, 98 Learning Environment), 38 gender equity, 1, 15 Cyprus, 26 governance and policy issues, 58, 60, Czech Republic 62–64, 67–68, 71 civil society, participation in, 27 importance of lifelong learning in, xiii, literacy, 24 xvii, 3 math and science skills, 25 national lifelong learning projects, 105 private sector education and training, private sector, 19 xviii, 19 transforming learning, 25, 26, 38, 42, 43, rates of return on education, 9 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 53 TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 wage differentials and returns on schooling, 6, 9, 11 D East Asia, 109 decentralization, 71–72 Eastern and Central Europe, xviii–xix, 19, demand-side financing, 85, 89, 91–92, 95 46, 68, 108 134 INDEX economic growth and education, 4–7 Europe, see also specific countries economics of education funding, see Central and Eastern Europe, xviii–xix, 19, financing lifelong learning 46, 68, 108 education and training, see also more developing and transitional economies, specific topics education and training in, 7 developing and transitional economies, distance learning, 51 7–8 individual learning accounts (ILAs) in economic growth and, 5–7 Western Europe, 95–97 efficiency promoted by lifelong learning European Union (EU), see also specific systems, 79 countries employer demands, 16–17 assessment and certification standards, flexibility, increasing, 46–47 xxii, 69, 70 how vs. what is learned, 29–31 career guidance and counseling knowledge economy’s implications for, programs, 54 3–4 support for lifelong learning concept, 108 learning environments, 31–34 low education and skill levels, problems F with, 73–76 family financial incentives to keep children market forces driving, 19 in school, 95 methods of learning, 28–31 Fe y Alegría, 63, 64 private sector growth, 17–19 female education, see women and girls return to schooling, rising rate of, 8–11 financing lifelong learning, xxiii, 73–99 social and private returns, 6 benchmarking progress, 107 traditional vs. lifelong learning models, chart of main instruments for, 80 28–29 computers, 41–42 vocational and technical, 62, 66, 92–97, 109 core competencies and universal basic wage differentials and rates of return on education, 76–78 education, 8–11 cost-sharing schemes, 79–85, 88–89 women, see women and girls demand-side financing, 85, 89, 91–92, 95 education savings accounts (ESAs), 90, 97, developing and transitional economies, 98 74, 97–99 educational technology, see computers; distance learning, 49–53 information and communication family financial incentives, 95 technology (ICT); Internet; technology guiding principles, 76–79 effective learning environments, 31–34 learning beyond core competencies, efficiency promoted by lifelong learning 79–92 systems, 79 private spending, xxiii, 75–77, 80, 85, 87, Egypt, 42 98 electronic government (e-government), public/government spending, xxiii, 57–58 73–76, 80, 98–99 electronic learning (e-learning), 53–54, 110 reallocation of resources, 77–78, 91 emigration/immigration/migration, 13–14 subsidization mechanisms, 79, 85–92 employers and employees, xix, 16–17, training and nontraditional learning, 92–97 80–81, 92–97 Finland England, see United Kingdom adult education enrollment, xxi entitlement schemes, 89, 94 civil society, participation in, 27 environments for learning, 31–34 computer hardware and output growth, equity in education, 14–15, 71–72, 78 4 ESAs (education savings accounts), 90, 97, coordination across ministries, 61 98 literacy, 24 Estonia, 27 Nokia Ltd., organizational and Ethiopia, 74 technological transformation of, 18 INDEX 135 systemic reform for lifelong learning, public-private partnerships, 63–65 61–62 quality assurance, xxii, 65–70 TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 technology, 42–43 flexibility of traditional education, traditional vs. new role of government in increasing, xxi, 46–47 knowledge economy, 59 Ford Motor Company, 46, 93 trends in, 57–65 foreign language skills, 25 graduate taxes, 83, 89 frameworks for certifying qualifications, 69, Greece, 9, 27 70 gross domestic product (GDP), educational France, 5, 51, 66, 68, 93 budget as percentage of, xxiv, 74–75, funding, see financing lifelong learning 102 future agenda for lifelong learning, gross national product (GNP) xxiii–xxiv, 101–111 civil society, measurement of participation in, 27 G education budget as percentage of, 74 Gambia, 19 TIMSS performance levels measured as GDP (gross domestic product), educational per capita percentage of, 25, 26 budget as percentage of, xxiv, 74–75, 102 Guatemala, 30, 95 gender-based disparities, see women and Guinea, 48 girls General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade H (GATT), 17 Heineken public-private partnerships, 64 General Agreement on Trade in Services heterogeneity, ability to cope with as (GATS), 17 knowledge economy competency, 22 Germany, 4, 24, 60 high-income countries, see industrialized Ghana, 19, 45, 52, 58, 76 economies global economy higher education, see tertiary education employer demands and employee highly skilled workers training, 17 low education and skill levels, problems knowledge economy as, 2, 19 with, 73–76 knowledge economy, global, see migration of, 13–14 knowledge economy need for, 1, 8–14 migration/immigration/emigration, rates of return on education for, 8–11 13–14 technological change and, 12–13 skills and competencies required for, 22 Hoffer, Eric, 21 GLOBE, 40 Hong Kong (China), 26, 51, 70 GNP, see gross national product (GNP) horizontal coordination of educational governance and policy issues, xxi–xxiii, governance, 59–63 57–72 human capital accreditation, xxii–xxiii, 67–70 asset-building schemes, 94–95 assessment and certification standards, changing needs of market, meeting, 63–69 xviii–xix, 1–19 benchmarking progress, 105–106 economic growth, as source of, 4–7 computers, 42–43 efficiency promoted by lifelong learning coordination across ministries, xxii, systems, 79 59–63 social and private returns on investment decentralization, 71–72 in, 6 e-government, 57–58 human capital contracts, 83, 84, 88 equity in education, 71–72 Hungary financing, see financing lifelong learning Human Resources project, 108, 109, 110 political aspects of education reform, literacy, 24 103 math and science skills, 25 136 INDEX Hungary (continued ) International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS), payroll levies, 93 23–24, 27, 102, 104 private education funding, 75 International Association for Evaluation of Regional Labor Development Centers, 46 Educational Achievement Citizenship TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 and Education Study (CES), 102 Internet, xxi, 39–41 I distance learning, 48, 53–54 IALS (International Adult Literacy Survey), e-government, 57–58 23–24, 27, 102 e-learning, 53–54, 110 ICTs, see information and communication financing lifelong learning, 77 technologies public-private partnerships, 64 IDAs (individual development accounts), 97 Iran, 26 ILAs (individual learning accounts), 90, 95–97 Ireland, 24, 45, 51 illiteracy/literacy, 5, 23–25, 102–103 IRI (Interactive Radio Instruction), 48 immigration/emigration/migration, 13–14 Israel, 26, 42 income-contingent repayment schemes, Italy, 4, 26 85–88 income, learning charged against, 83–88 J India, 7, 13, 23, 51, 70 Jagger, Mick, 83 individual development accounts (IDAs), 97 Jamaica, 33, 104 individual learning accounts (ILAs), 90, 95–97 Japan, 4, 26, 51, 77 Indonesia Jordan, 26, 53, 62, 110 adult continuing education and training, access to, 45 K distance learning, 51 Kagia, Ruth, xiv employer demands and employee Kenya, 15, 45, 48, 49, 93 training, 16 knowledge-based tutors, 38 national measures of advancement knowledge economy, xiii–xviii, 1–19 toward lifelong learning, 105 developing and transitional economies, private education funding, 75, 76 education and training in, 7–8 TIMSS performance compared to per employer demands, 16–17 capital GNP, 26 global economy, as, 2, 19 industrialized economies, 4, 8, 23–24, 44, 74 government role in, 59 informal learning, recognition of, 66–67 highly skilled workers, increased information and communication demand for, 1, 8–14 technologies (ICTs), see also computers; human capital, importance of investing Internet in, 4–7 benchmarking, 103 implications for education and training, distance learning, 53 3–4 Jordan’s E-Learning Strategic skills and competencies required for, Framework, 110 xix–xx, 21–28, 76–78, 103, 104 need for competent ICT workers, 1, 12 women, disparity in education of, teachers and teacher training, 41–42 14–15 transformation of learning via, xx–xxi, World Bank documents, 109 36–44 knowledge-rich learning, 32 World Bank documents, 109 Korea, Republic of, see Republic of Korea inputs, benchmarking educational systems by, 102 L Intel’s Costa Rica plant, 5 language and language skills, 24–25, 31 Interactive Radio Instruction (IRI), 48 Latin America, see also specific countries interactive use of tools as knowledge accreditation, 68 economy competency, 22 Caribbean, 14, 33–34, 51, 68, 109 INDEX 137 distance learning, 51 Mali, 74 public-private partnerships, 63 Marshall, Alfred, 1 wage differentials, artificial compression Massachusetts Institute of Technology of, 6 (MIT), 41, 53 women, disparity in education of, 14 math and science skills, 25–27 World Bank documents, 109 Mauritius, 62, 69 Latvia, 26 means testing, 98 learner-centered environments, 31–32 methods of learning, 28–31 learners’ responsibility for own learning, Mexico 78, 80 adult continuing education and training, learning, see education and training access to, 45 learning management and attitude assessment and certification standards, assessment as benchmark, 103 69 learning tax credit, 90 employer demands and employee Lesotho, 48 training, 16 levies on payroll, 93–94 Higher Education Financing Project, 87 lifelong learning, xiii–xviii, see also migration of technology graduates, 14 education and training, and more Progresa/Oportunidades, 95 specific topics rates of return on education, 9 efficiency promoted by, 79 Telesecundaria program (distance financing, xxiii, 73–99 learning), xxi, 48, 53 future agenda, xxiii–xxiv, 101–111 Mick Jagger effect, 83 governance and policy issues, xxi–xxiii, Middle East 57–72 accreditation, 68 knowledge economy, xiii–xviii, 1–19 low education and skill levels, problems traditional learning models vs., xix–xx, with, 74 28–29, 58 public-private partnerships, 63, 64 transforming learning, xix–xxi, xxiv, wage differentials, artificial compression 21–55, 101–111 of, 6 literacy/illiteracy, 5, 23–25, 102–103 women, disparity in education of, 14 Lithuania, 26, 27, 52 World Bank documents, 109 loans, 82, 87, 88, 92 middle-income countries, 9, 44 low education and skill levels, problems migration, 13–14 with, 73–76 MIT (Massachusetts Institute of low-income countries, see developing and Technology), 41, 53 transitional economies Moldova, 26 Mongolia, 50 M Morocco, 26 Macedonia, 26 mortgage-type loans, 82 Madagascar, 46 Mozambique, 74 Malawi, 49, 52 MyRichUncle, 84, 98 Malaysia adult continuing education and training, N access to, 45 Namibia, xxii, 69, 70, 87 assessment and certification standards, 66 Nepal, 78 distance learning, 51, 52 Netherlands, 24, 26, 64, 69, 96 employer demands and employee New Zealand, xxii, 24, 26, 45, 69 training, 16 NGOs (non-governmental organizations), ICT workers, 12 58, 75 payroll levies, 93 Nicaragua, 15, 48, 52, 78 TIMSS performance compared to per Niger, 74 capital GNP, 26 Nigeria, xxi, 49, 53, 68, 93 138 INDEX Nokia Ltd., 18 civil society, participation in, 27 non-governmental organizations (NGOs), literacy, 24 58, 75 private sector education and training, nonformal learning, recognition of, 66–67 xviii, 19 Nordic countries, 60–61, see also specific rates of return on education, 10 countries TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 North Africa, 68, 74, 109, see also specific policy issues, see governance and policy countries issues North America, distance learning in, 51 political aspects of education reform, 103, Norway, 24 see also governance and policy issues numeracy assessment as benchmark, 103 Portugal, 24 postsecondary education, see tertiary O education online learning, see distance learning; primary education, see early childhood Internet education open/virtual universities (tertiary distance private sector, xxi–xxii, 17–19 learning), 49, 51, 53 financing lifelong learning, xxiii, 75–77, Organisation for Economic Co-operation 80, 85, 87, 98 and Development (OECD) growing role of, xviii–xix accreditation, xxii public-private partnerships (cross- career guidance and counseling sectoral strategies), 63–65, 108, 109 programs, 54 secondary schooling provided through, 77 support for lifelong learning concept, 108 World Bank support for lifelong learning, organizational change and technology, 13, 18 108 outputs problem solving assessment as benchmark, accreditation by output or performance 103 measures, xxii–xxiii, 67–68 Programme for International Student benchmarking educational systems by, Assessment (PISA), 15, 25–27, 102, 103, 102, 105 111 prose literacy, 23 P Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys Pacific Islands Forum, 69 (PETS), 58 Pacific Region, 109 public-private partnerships (cross-sectoral Pakistan, 25, 36 strategies), 63–65, 108, 109 Paraguay, 93 public spending on education, xxiii, 73–76, part-time learning, xxi, 47, 85 80, 98–99 partnerships, public-private (cross-sectoral strategies), 63–65, 108, 109 Q payroll levies, 93–94 quality assurance, xxii, 65–70 PDAs (personal development accounts), 96 quantitative literacy, 23 pedagogy, see education and training personal development accounts (PDAs), 96 R Peru, 75 radio for distance learning, 48, 52 PETS (Public Expenditure Tracking reallocation of resources, 77–78, 91 Surveys), 58 reform of educational systems, agenda for, Philippines, 26, 66, 75, 82 xxiii–xxiv, 101–111 PISA (Programme for International Student remedial vs. accelerated programs, 30–31 Assessment), 15, 25–27, 102, 103, 111 Republic of Korea planning for change, 108 computer hardware and output growth, Poland 4 adult continuing education and training, coordination across ministries, 60 access to, 45 distance learning, 50, 51 INDEX 139 math and science skills, 25 self-directed learning, 31 nonformal learning, recognition of, 66, 67 Senegal, 19 private secondary education, 77 simulations, computer-based, 38–39 TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 Singapore, 4, 26, 30, 53, 70 responsibility of learners for own learning, skilled labor, see highly skilled workers 78, 80 skills and competencies for a knowledge Romania economy, xix–xx, 21–28, 76–78, assessment and certification standards, 66 103, 104 distribution of public expenditures by Slovak Republic, 25, 26, 27 income quintile, 78 Slovenia, 24, 26 private sector education and training, social capital, 3–4 xviii, 19 social heterogeneity, ability to cope with TIMSS performance compared to per as knowledge economy competency, capital GNP, 26 22 World Bank project in, xiv, 108, 109 society and community Russian Federation, 25, 26, 27 benchmarking, 103 community-connected learning, 33 S participation in civil society as SABIS school network, 63, 64 knowledge economy competency, savings programs, 90, 95–98 27–28 Scandia, 96 public-private partnerships, 63–65 Scandinavian countries, 60–61, see also socioeconomic background, role of, 27, 78 specific countries Solon, 57 scholarship programs, 77, 95 Somali Educational Incentives for Girls and schooling, see education and training Young Men (SEIGYM), 85–87 schools, socioeconomic and organizational South Africa features of, 27 assessment and certification standards, science and math skills, 25–27, 103 xxii, 68, 69 Scotland, see United Kingdom distance learning, 48, 49 secondary education language of instruction, 24–25 assessment standards and accreditation, technology and computer access, 42, 43 xix, xxii TIMSS performance compared to per basic competencies, requirements for capital GNP, 26 mastering, 77 South America, see Latin America developing and transitional economies, 1 South Asia, 14, 68, 74 distance learning, xxi South Korea, see Republic of Korea enrollment levels in low-income Southern African Development countries, 74 Community, 69 financing, 74, 75, 77–78, 91–96 Spain, 96 gender equity, 15 Sri Lanka, 50, 51 governance and policy issues, 60–63, student loans, 82, 87, 88, 92 68–69 Sub-Saharan Africa, see also specific Hungarian project, 110 countries Jamaica project, 104 accreditation, 68 migration/emigration/immigration, 14 human capital, social and private returns private sector, xxii, 19 on investment in, 7 transforming learning, 23–27, 33, 38, 40, low education and skill levels, problems 44–45, 47–48, 53, 55 with, 74 wage differentials and returns on wage differentials, artificial compression schooling, 8–11 of, 6 SEIGYM (Somali Educational Incentives women, disparity in education of, 14 for Girls and Young Men), 85–87 World Bank documents, 109 140 INDEX subsidization mechanisms, 79, 85–92 governance and policy issues, 58, 60–62, Swaziland, 49 66–71 Sweden, 8, 24, 45, 96 Hungarian project, 110 Switzerland, 24 migration/emigration/immigration, 14 part-time and continuing education, xxi T private sector, xviii, xxiii, 17, 19, 76 tacit knowledge assessment as benchmark, Romanian project, 104 103 transforming learning, 25, 38, 44, 46–47, Taiwan (China), 16, 25, 26 49, 50–51, 53, 55 Tanzania, 58 wage differentials and returns on targeted vouchers, 77, 94 schooling, 8–11 taxation World Bank projects, 109 graduate taxes, 83, 89 World Bank report, xiii–xiv, 108, 109 learning tax credit, 90 Thailand, 26, 48, 71, 75 payroll levies, 93–94 ThinkerTools, 39 staff training, Chilean rebate for, 81 Third International Mathematics and teachers and teacher training Science Study (TIMSS), 24–27, 102, changing learning environment, 111 implications of, xx, 34–36 traditional education distance learning, 49–50 flexibility, increasing, xxi, 46–47 ICTs, 36–37 lifelong learning model vs., xix–xx, public-private partnerships, 65 28–29, 58 technology, 41–42 pace and depth of change, technical and vocational education and accommodating, xxiv, 103 training, 62, 66, 92–97, 109 training, see education and training technology, 1, 5, 7, 12–13, see also transforming learning, xix–xxi, xxiv, 21–55, computers; information and 101–111 communication technologies (ICTs); access to learning, expansion of, 44–46 Internet benchmarking, xxiv, 102–107 cost issues, 41–42 career guidance and counseling, 54–55 distance learning, 47–54 distance learning, 47–54 economic growth and, 5, 7 effective learning environments, 31–34 highly skilled workers, need for, 12–13 methods of learning, changing, 28–31 organizational change and, 13, 18 pace and depth of change, policy choices regarding, 42–43 accommodating, 103 public-private partnerships, 64 planning for change, 108 teachers and teacher training, 41–42 skills and competencies, 21–28 transforming learning by use of, 36–44 teachers and teacher training, 34–36 women, disparity in education of, 14–15 technology, 36–44 World Bank support, 43 transitional economies, see developing and television for distance learning, 48, 52, 53 transitional economies tertiary education Trinidad and Tobago, 69 accreditation based on student Tunisia, 26 achievement, xxiii Turkey, 26, 42, 51, 62, 75 developing and transitional economies, 7, 17 U enrollment levels in low-income Uganda, 6–7, 49, 58, 69, 76 countries, 74 United Kingdom equity of access to, xix, 78 adult continuing education and training, financing, 76–79, 81–82, 85–87, 91, 93–94, access to, 45 97, 99 assessment and certification standards, gender equity, 14–15 xxii, 68, 69 INDEX 141 civil society, participation in, 27 vocational and technical education and computer hardware and output growth, training, 62, 66, 92–97, 109 4 vouchers, 77, 89 coordination across ministries, 60 Bolsa Escola program, Brazil, 95 distance learning, 51 indirect fiscal contributions in Chile, 81 individual learning accounts (ILAs), 95, Somali Educational Incentives for Girls 96–97 and Young Men (SEIGYM), 87 literacy, 24 targeted vouchers, 77, 94 payroll levies, halt to, 93 public-private partnerships, 63, 64 W rates of return on education, 8, 9 wage differentials TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 artificial compression of, 6 vouchers, 93 education rates of return on, 8–11 United States financing education for reduction of, 75 adult continuing education and training, Western Europe, see Europe; European access to, 45 Union (EU) Air Force technicians, computer-assisted Wolfensohn, James D., xiii, 1, 108 learning programs for, 39 women and girls civil society, participation in, 27 disparity in education and technology commercial bank, case study of training, 14–15, 71 technological and organizational intergenerational effect of education, 7 change at, 13 productivity and labor supply, effect of computer-assisted learning, 38–39 education and training on, 7 computer hardware and output growth, 4 scholarships for girls in Guatemala, 95 G.I. Bill, 94 Somali Educational Incentives for income-contingent repayment schemes, Girls and Young Men (SEIGYM), 85 85–87 individual development accounts (IDAs), World Bank 97 assessment and certification standards, Internet learning, 40 66 literacy, 24 cross-sectoral strategies (public-private private sector education and training, 17 partnerships), 108, 109 public-private partnerships, 63, 64 documents, 108, 109 rates of return on education, 8 ICT in education, support for, 43 TIMSS and PISA performance, 26 Lifelong Learning and Training project, wage differentials, financing education 60, 109 for reduction of, 75 lifelong learning concept, support for, universal basic education, 76–78 xiii–xiv, xxiv, 108–111 Uruguay, 9, 52 Mexico Higher Education Financing USAID, 50 Project, 87 projects, 60, 108–111 V World Conference on Education for All, Venezuela, 9, 48, 63, 64 Jomtien, Thailand, 71 vertical coordination of educational World Trade Organization (WTO), 17 governance, 59–63 Vietnam, 78 Z virtual/open universities (tertiary distance Zambia, 45 learning), 49, 51, 53 Zimbabwe, 19, 42, 45