E4198 Environmental and Social Management Plan Checklist and Format for Low-risk Topologies For low-risk topologies, an alternative to the commonly used “full text� ESMP format is to have a checklist approach. The goal is to provide a more streamlined approach to preparing ESMPs. This checklist-type format (“ESMP Checklist,� see Annex 3) has been developed to provide “pragmatic good practice� and designed to be user friendly and compatible with safeguards r e- quirements. A blank sample is attached as Annex 3. The checklist-type format attempts to cover typical mitigation approaches to common low-risk topologizes with temporary localized impacts. It is anticipated that this format provides the key elements of an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) to meet World Bank Envi- ronmental Assessment requirements under OP/BP 4.01 (see Annex 1). The ESMP (Annex 2) format has two sections:  Part I: constitutes a descriptive part (“site passport�) that describes the project specifics in terms of physical location, the institutional and legislative aspects, the project description, in- clusive of the need for a capacity building program and description of the public consultation and participation process. This section could be up to two pages long. Attachments for addi- tional information can be supplemented if needed.  Part II: includes the environmental and social screening in a simple Yes/No format followed by mitigation measures for any given activity and the monitoring plan for activities during project construction and implementation. It retains the same format required for standard World Bank ESMPs. Application of the ESMP-Checklist The practical application of the ESMP-checklist would include the filling in of Part I to obtain and document all relevant site characteristics and activities. In Part 2 the type of foreseen works, as obtained from the design documents, would be checked and the resulting provisions listed be- low highlighted (e.g. by hatching the field or copy pasting the relevant text passages into the spe- cial provisions of the tender documents. The whole filled in tabular ESMP is additionally attached as integral part to the works contract and, analogous to all technical and commercial terms, has to be signed by the contract parties. For the monitoring of the Contractor’s safeguards due diligence, the designated construction in- spector works with Part Cof the ESMP Checklist, the monitoring plan. This should be devel- oped site specifically and in necessary details, defining clear criteria and parameters which can be included in the works contracts, which reflect the status of environmental and social practice on the construction site and which can be observed/measured/ quantified/verified by the inspec- tor during the construction works. Part C would thus be filled in during the detailed design of the small works to be implemented, to fix key monitoring criteria which can be checked during and after works for compliance as- surance and ultimately the Contractor’s remuneration. ANNEX 1: Documents generally required by World Bank’s Safeguard Policies Documents / deliverables required during Policy No. Topic preparation implementation operation EA process, in- Environmental As- OP/BP 4.01 cluding ESMF, ESMP / MP (ESMP) / MP sessment (EA) ESIA, ESMP, MP compensation Natural included in EA plan, included in included in EMP + OP/BP 4.04 Habitats under OP 4.01 ESMP + MP, OP MP, OP 4.01 4.01 Pest included in EA Pest Management (reference in OP 4.09 Management under OP 4.01 Plan (PMP) ISR/ICR) Indigenous social assessment, (reference in OP/BP 4.10 IPP / RAP Peoples IPP ISR/ICR) Physical Cultural included in EA PCR management (reference in OP/BP 4.11 Resources under OP 4.01 plan (part of EA) ISR/ICR) Involuntary Reset- RAP (and other RAP (and other (reference in OP/BP 4.12 tlement instruments) instruments) ISR/ICR) included in EA included in ESMP included in ESMP OP/BP 4.36 Forest under OP 4.01 + MP, OP 4.01 + MP, OP 4.01 DSR & emergency dam safety report DSR & emergency preparedness Safety 1 OP/BP 4.37 (DSR), TOR for preparedness plan plan , dam instru- of Dams PoE (ERP) mentation & moni- toring plan SCR, disclosure of contd. information OP/BP 17.50 Disclosure SIR ESIA & ESMP & consultation International Water- OP/BP 7.50 notification of all affected riparian states ways Disputed OP/BP 7.60 legal / political negotiations Areas Fields hatched in grey: no specific documents required at preparation stage Acronyms: DSR dam safety report EA environmental assessment process ESIA environmental and Social impacts as- ESMF environmental and socialmanagement sessment report framework ESMP environmental and Social management ESIA environmental / social impact assessment plan ERP emergency response plan IPP indigenous peoples plan ICR implementation completion report MP monitoring plan ISR implementation status report PoE Panel of Experts PCR physical cultural resources RAP resettlement action plan SCR stakeholder consultation report SIR stakeholder identification report 1 This is commonly not released to the Public. ANNEX 2: Format for Environmental and Social Management Plan Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Maputo Peri-Urban Sanitation Project MOZAMBIQUE April 5, 2013 PART I: Activity Description 1. INTRODUCTION Uncontrolled urban growth is worsening issues of urban poverty,with 62% of Mozambique’s ur- ban population (5.1 million people) currently lacking access to basic improved water and sanita- tion facilities. This is receiving increasing attention from the Government, for which improve- ment of urban sanitation is indeed an explicit goal (as evidenced by the CAS, PRSP and an inter- ministerial initiative). With about two thirds of Mozambique’s population growth between now and 2050 estimated to be in urban areas, access to improved sanitation facilities in such areas is set to continue to be a critical challenge. The current project aims at supporting such initiatives. 2. Project Objective: The Project Development Objective is to improve the sanitation conditions and practices of about 140,000 people (c.71,000 women/girls and c.69,000 men/boys) in 11 unplanned peri-urban neighborhoods of Maputo, and pilot and develop effective approaches for replication, by the end of the two year project period, thus contributing to the wider goal of improved health, reduced poverty and progress towards the MDGs, particularly MDGs 7 and 4, in peri-urban areas of Ma- puto. 3. Project Description: The above project objective will be achieved through three complementary project components, as detailed below: a. Sanitation infrastructure – construction of shared user facilities and promotion of the construction or improvement of household facilities, increasing access to and usage of improved facilities to 90% of the population in the target bairros. b. Development of desludging services – supporting desludging service providers to pro- vide professional, hygienic services, ensuring that new and existing pit latrines are emp- tied and fecal waste is disposed of safely. c. Community level sanitation and hygiene promotion and monitoring – the monitoring activity in itself has proven (at least on a small scale) to be a powerful promotional tool, and will increase the impact of promotional programs, so that households change their behaviors and sustain sanitation improvements. The monitoring system will provide con- tinued downward pressure on community members to maintain adequate sanitation standards, and upward pressure on the authorities to provide the necessary complemen- tary inputs. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FOOTPRINT The project is designed to service the poorest 11 low income, unplanned peri-urban bairros of Nlhamankulo District, Maputo, Mozambique, namely Chamanculo A, Chamanculo B, Chaman- culo C, Chamanculo D, Malanga, Aeroporto A, Aeroporto B, Unidade 7, Munhuana, Mikadjuine and Xipamanine. Nlhamankulo is one of 7 districts that make up the municipality of Maputo.The environmental and social footprint of the proposed activities is located within this area, more precisely on land free of any claim, ceded by local beneficiaries and approved by local authori- ties. These small plots have been identified and agreed upon through series of intensive and par- ticipatory public consultations with local recipients of the project. Given the size and location of these small land plots, the foreseen environmental and social risks/impacts are very minimal to negligible, site specific, and easily manageable. 5. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK Preparation and implementation of proposed project activities is grounded on the basis of both the national legislation and World Bank operational safeguards policies, namely OP/BP 4.01 and OP/BP 4.12. Compliance to the above will be maintained throughout project’s lifecycle, includ- ing the preparation of (Abbreviated) Resettlement Action Plans as and when necessary. 6. RELEVANT WORLD BANK POLICIES The two safeguards policies applicable to this project are OP/BP 4.01 (Environmental Assess- ment) and OP/BP 4.12 (Involuntary Resettlement). This ESMP constitutes proof of compliance to the safeguards requirements. 7. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS WSUP (Water and Sanitation for the Urban Poor), working in collaboration with and under the guidance of WSP, with the support from local CBOs and NGOs, and under the guidance of an international Project Director and local Project Coordinator will be responsible for the overall management of the project, monitoring and evaluation, and donor reporting. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SCREENING, ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT Preparation of this ESMP was based on an environmental and social screening form attached hereto (see Annex2/Part 2) to further guide the future activities of the project. 9. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS As described above, given the site specific nature of the proposed activities, the foreseen impacts are localized, negligible and easy to deal with. Possible impacts could include hygiene and health issues that could negatively impact the poor beneficiaries (waterborne diseases, skin rash, etc.). Provision has been made in the ESMP to adequately mitigate the likely impacts. 10. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT APPROACH Though the foreseen impacts are site specific and easy to manage, WSUP will be further sup- ported by the World Bank Safeguards Team to improve its safeguards knowledge and manage- ment skills to implement the ESMP recommendations. Specific Environmental and Social Safe- guards capacity will be provided to the WSUP by a joint MICOA and World Bank Safeguards team, hence ensuring WSUP has the needed “know-how� on safeguards to tangibly implement the ESMP recommendations. Furthermore, Contractors will have, as part of their contracts, spe- cific environmental and social clauses (ESC) for their due consideration during construction phases. Finally, as part of the delivery of the infrastructure to the recipient community, a com- prehensive package/kit including awareness raising on hygiene and health for the target commu- nities, and protective equipment for desludging service providers(gloves and goggles, brush, liq- uid soap and sanitizers, etc.) will be offered after a quick demonstration. In addition to setting up a “Pit Emptying Service ProvidersAssociation – PESPA�, 2 persons from each provider will also be trained on how to maintain the equipment for its sustainability. The estimated cost for implementing these measures (~$50,000) are covered in the project budget. 11. MONITORING AND REPORTING WSUP's Quarterly Reporting System will be the mechanism through which in-country teams re- port on progress in terms of (a) a predefined WSUP-wide set of 20 progress checks, (b) a struc- tured narrative report, and (c) the indicators and milestones specific to this particular project. In addition, participatory approaches, particularly focus group approaches, will be used to keep track of the attitudes and responses of key stakeholder groups. All data will be collected on a gender-disaggregated basis to ensure that the needs of women, girls and vulnerable groups are being adequately addressed. WSUP’s Secretariat based M&E Manager will provide practical support to local staff to enable them to use WSUP’s M&E toolkit and guide, which includes a catalogue of suggested objectively verifiable indicators and means of verification. Part II : ESMP Checklist for Activities PART A: INSTITUTIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE Country Mozambique Project title Maputo Peri-Urban Sanitation Scope of project The objective of the Project is to improve the sanitation conditions, services and practices in tar- and activity get areas of Maputo and pilot and develop effective approaches for replication. Institutional WB Project Team Project Management: Local Counterpart and Recipient arrangements LeaderPeter Hawkins Project Director Water & Sanitation for the Urban (Name and phawkins@worldbank.org (international): Poor (WSUP) in Maputo contacts) +258-828-009-650 V.R. Baghirathan Contact: Carla Costa baghi.baghirathan@ch2m.com +44-20-3170-0935 Project Coordinator (in-country): Carla Costa carla@care.org.mz +258-823-192-430 Implementation Safeguards Supervision Local Counterpart Local Inspectorate Contractor arrangements Cheikh SAGNA Supervision Supervision TBD (Name and csagna@worldbank.org TBD MICOA contacts) +258-21-482-946 SITE DESCRIPTION Name of site 11peri-urban bairros of Nlhamankulo District, Maputo, will be targeted: Chamanculo A, Chamanculo B, Chamanculo C, Chamanculo D, Malanga, Aeroporto A, Aeroporto B, Unidade 7, Munhuana, Minkadjuine and Xipamanine. Describe site  Peri-urban Attachment 1: Site MapAttached location  Unplanned  Low-income and poorest Who owns the Maputo Municipal Council (CMM) land? Geographic The target bairros are within the city Municipal limits and located to the north and northeast of description the centre of the city of Maputo, and accessible via the city road network. However the standard of road access within the bairros is generally poor and unpaved with unsatisfactory drainage (dif- ficult accessibility, especially during the rainy season). LEGISLATION Identify nation- 1. Criação da Direcção Nacional de Aguas (DNA) - portaria 352/77 al & local legis- 2. Lei de �guas nº16/91 lation & permits 3. PoliticaNacional de �guas - Resolução 7/95 that apply to 4. Lei de Terra de 19/97 project activity 5. Regulamento da Lei de terra - Decreto nº66/98 6. Quadro legal para a definição de critérios e autorização, objectivos a atingir e mecanismos de actuação das Organizações não Governamentais - Decreto nº55/98 7. Regulamentosobre o processo de Avaliação do ImpactoAmbiental (EIA) - Decreto nº76/98 8. Manual de Implementação de Projectos de Abastecimento de �gua Rural Vol1, 2001 9. Regulamento sobre a Gestão do Lixo Biomédico - Artigo 9 de 2004 10. Regulamento sobre os Padroes de QualidadeAmbiental e de Emissão 06/2004 11. Decreto de Alargamento do Abastecimento de água 05/2004 12. Regulamento dos SistemasPúblicos de Distribuição de �gua e de Drenagem de �guasResi- duais - Decreto 30/2003 13. Regulamento Sobre Padrões de Qaulidade Ambiental e de Emissão de Efluentes (18/2004) 14. Regulamento dos SistemasPrediais de Distribuição de �gua de Drenagem de �guasResi- duais -Decreto 15/2004 15. Regulamentoqueaprova a qualidade de águaengarrafadadestinadasaoconsumoHumano - De- creto 39/2006 16. Politica de �guas- Resolução46/2007 17. Regulamento de Licenças e Concessões de �guas - Decreto 43/2007 18. Alarga o âmbito de abrangência do Quadro da GestãoDelegada do Abastecimento de �guaaosSistemasPúblicos de Distribuição de �gua e de Drenagem de �guasResiduais - De- creto Nº18/2009 19. Criação da Administração de Infraestruturas de �gua e Saneamento -Decreto 19/2009 20. Ajustamento da Tarifa de �gua Potável Resolução 1/2010 21. Revisão da Taxa de Novas Ligações Domiciliárias Domesticas de �gua Potavel - Resolução Nº2/2010 22. Criação do FIPAG- Decreto 7/2010 23. Modelo de Licença e Concessão de �gua - Decreto Municipal 7/2010 24. AcordoRegulatórioreferente a todososSistemasPúblico de distribuição de �gua sob re- sponsabilidade do FIPAG -Resolução Nº1/2012 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION Identify when / Participatory appraisal methods were used in June 2011 (between June 13-16) to carry out base- where the pub- line studies and extensive broader public consultations and participatory design in the target lic consultation communities (sample from Malanga, Munhuana, Chamanculo C and Aeroporto B bairros show process took that a total of 162 households (76 women, 86 men) had been consulted in a very participatory and place effective manner). Major findings were that many residents, particularly in rented accommoda- tion, have very poor sanitation facilities, and that the management of fecal sludge from latrines is extremely chaotic, unhygienic and perceived as a major problem by users, and the neighborhood, especially during the rainy season, during which time flooding often occurs. A World Bank safe- guards mission (February 12, 2013) further confirmed the awareness of local communities, as well as the seriousness of the needs and the urgency of the interventions in these targeted bairros, where the level of poverty of these targeted households/beneficiaries is very clear to see. Since public consultation and participation is not a one-stop-shop but rather an iterative approach, fully participatory public consultations will be conducted in the targeted communitiesat the pro- ject outset and throughout the project lifecycle so to ensure beneficiaries get appropriate infra- structure, basic capacity building and efforts are being made to ensure their sustainability. INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITYBUILDING Will there be Attachment 2 includes the capacity building program. The core capacity building will be tailored any capacity to fit the WSUP technical needs to implement the environmental and social safeguards measures. building? PART B: ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL SCREENING Will the site activity Activity and potential issues and/or impacts Status Additional references include/involve any 1. Building rehabilitation [ ] Yes [X] No See Section B below of the following  Site specific vehicular traffic potential issues  Increase in dust and noise from demolition and/or con- and/or impacts: struction  Construction waste 2. New construction [X] Yes [ ] No See Section B below  Excavation impacts and soil erosion  Increase sediment loads in receiving waters  Site specific vehicular traffic  Increase in dust and noise from demolition and/or con- struction  Construction waste 3. Individual wastewater treatment system [] Yes [X] No See Section C below  Effluent and / or discharges into receiving waters 4. Historic building(s) and districts [ ] Yes [X] No See Section D below  Risk of damage to known/unknown historical or archaeo- logical sites 5. Acquisition of land2 [] Yes [X] No See Section E below  Encroachment on private property  Relocation of project affected persons  Involuntary resettlement  Impacts on livelihood incomes 6. Hazardous or toxic materials3 [ ] Yes [X] No See Section F below  Removal and disposal of toxic and/or hazardous demoli- tion and / or construction waste  Storage of machine oils and lubricants 7. Impacts on forests and/or protected areas [ ] Yes [X] No See Section G below  Encroachment on designated forests, buffer and /or pro- tected areas  Disturbance of locally protected animal habitat 8. Handling / management of medical waste [ ] Yes [X] No See Section H below  Clinical waste, sharps, pharmaceutical products (cytoxic and hazardous chemical waste), radioactive waste, organ- ic domestic waste, non-organic domestic waste  On site or off-site disposal of medical waste 9. Traffic and Pedestrian Safety [X] Yes [ ] No See Section I below  Site specific vehicular traffic  Site is in a populated area 2 Land acquisitions includes displacement of people, change of livelihood encroachment on private property this is to land that is purchased/transferred and affects peo- ple who are living and/or squatters and/or operate a business (kiosks) on land that is being acquired. 3 Toxic / hazardous material includes and is not limited to asbestos, toxic paints, removal of lead paint, etc. ACTIVITY PARAMETER GOOD PRACTICES MITIGATION MEASURES CHECKLIST A. General Condi- Notification and Worker Safety (a) Contractors will comply with the Environmental and Social Clauses (ESC) to ensure adequate safeguards compli- tions ance; (b) The local construction and environment inspectorates and communities have been notified of upcoming activities (c) The public has been notified of the works through appropriate notification in the media and/or at publicly acces- sible sites (including the site of the works) (d) All legally required permits (to include not limited to land use, resource use, dumping, sanitary inspection per- mit) have been acquired for construction and/or rehabilitation (e) All work will be carried out in a safe and disciplined manner designed to minimize impacts on neighboring resi- dents and environment. (f) Workers’ PPE will comply with international good practice (always hardhats, as needed masks,gloves and safety goggles, harnesses and safety boots) (g) Appropriate signposting of the sites will inform workers of key rules and regulations to follow. B. General Rehabil- Air Quality (a) During interior demolition use debris-chutes above the first floor itation and /or Con- (b) Keep demolition debris in controlled area and spray with water mist to reduce debris dust struction Activities (c) Suppress dust during pneumatic drilling/wall destruction by ongoing water spraying and/or installing dust screen enclosures at site (d) Keep surrounding environment (sidewalks, roads) free of debris to minimize dust and accidents (e) There will be no open durnping of construction / waste material at the site (f) There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites Noise (a) Construction noise will be limited to restricted times agreed to in the permit (b) During operations the engine covers of generators, air compressors and other powered mechanical equipment should be closed, and equipment placed as far away from residential areas as possible Water Quality (a) The site will establish appropriate erosion and sediment control measures such as e.g. hay bales and / or silt fences to prevent sediment from moving off site and causing excessive turbidity in nearby streams and rivers. Waste management (a) Waste collection and disposal pathways and sites will be identified for all major waste types expected from demolition and construction activities. (b) Mineral construction and demolition wastes will be separated from general refuse, organic, liquid and chemical wastes by on-site sorting and stored in appropriate containers. (c) Construction waste will be collected and disposed properly by licensed collectors (d) The records of waste disposal will be maintained as proof for proper management as designed. (e) Whenever feasible the contractor will reuse and recycle appropriate and viable materials (except asbestos) C. Individual Water Quality (a) The approach to handling sanitary wastes and wastewater from building sites (installation or reconstruction) wastewater treat- must be approved by the local authorities ment system (b) Before being discharged into receiving waters, effluents from individual wastewater systems must be treated in order to meet the minimal quality criteria set out by national guidelines on effluent quality and wastewater treatment (c) Monitoring of new wastewater systems (before/after) will be carried out D. Historic build- Cultural Heritage (a) If the building is a designated historic structure, very close to such a structure, or located in a designated historic ing(s) district, notify and obtain approval/permits from local authorities and address all construction activities in line with local and national legislation (b) Ensure that provisions are put in place so that artifacts or other possible “chance finds� encountered in excav a- tion or construction are noted, officials contacted, and works activities delayed or modified to account for such finds. E. Acquisition of Land Acquisition Plan/Framework (a) If expropriation of land was not expected and is required, or if loss of access to income of legal or illegal users land of land was not expected but may occur, that the World Bank Task Team Leader and Safeguards Adviserareduly consulted. (b) The approved Land Acquisition Plan/Framework (if required by the project) will be implemented F. Toxic Materials Asbestos management (a) If asbestos is located on the project site, mark clearly as hazardous material (b) When possible the asbestos will be appropriately contained and sealed to minimize exposure (c) The asbestos prior to removal (if removal is necessary) will be treated with a wetting agent to minimize asbestos dust (d) Asbestos will be handled and disposed by skilled & experienced professionals (e) If asbestos material is be stored temporarily, the wastes should be securely enclosed inside closed containments and marked appropriately (f) The removed asbestos will not be reused Toxic / hazardous waste manage- (a) Temporarily storage on site of all hazardous or toxic substances will be in safe containers labeled with details of ment composition, properties and handling information (b) The containers of hazardous substances should be placed in an leak-proof container to prevent spillage and leaching (c) The wastes are transported by specially licensed carriers and disposed in a licensed facility. (d) Paints with toxic ingredients or solvents or lead-based paints will not be used G. Affects forests Protection (a) All recognized natural habitats and protected areas in the immediate vicinity of the activity will not be damaged and/or protected or exploited, all staff will be strictly prohibited from hunting, foraging, logging or other damaging activities. areas (b) For large trees in the vicinity of the activity, mark and cordon off with a fence large tress and protect root sys- tem and avoid any damage to the trees (c) Adjacent wetlands and streams will be protected, from construction site run-off, with appropriate erosion and sediment control feature to include by not limited to hay bales, silt fences (d) There will be no unlicensed borrow pits, quarries or waste dumps in adjacent areas, especially not in protected areas. H. Disposal of med- Infrastructure for medical waste (a) In compliance with national regulations the contractor will insure that newly constructed and/or rehabilitated ical waste management health care facilities include sufficient infrastructure for medical waste handling and disposal; this includes and not limited to:  Special facilities for segregated healthcare waste (including soiled instruments “sharps�, and human tissue or fluids) from other waste disposal: a. Clinical waste: yellow bags and containers b. Sharps – Special puncture resistant containers/boxes c. Domestic waste (non-organic): black bags and containers  Appropriate storage facilities for medical waste are in place; and  If the activity includes facility-based treatment, appropriate disposal options are in place and operational I.Traffic and Pedes- Direct or indirect hazards to public (b) In compliance with national regulations the contractor will insure that the construction site is properly secured trian Safety traffic and pedestrians by construc- and construction related traffic regulated. This includes but is not limited to tion activities  Signposting, warning signs, barriers and traffic diversions: site will be clearly visible and the public warned of all potential hazards  Traffic management system and staff training, especially for site access and near-site heavy traffic. Provi- sion of safe passages and crossings for pedestrians where construction traffic interferes.  Adjustment of working hours to local traffic patterns, e.g. avoiding major transport activities during rush hours or times of livestock movement  Active traffic management by trained and visible staff at the site, if required for safe and convenient pas- sage for the public.  Ensuring safe and continuous access to office facilities, shops and residences during renovation activities, if the buildings stay open for the public. PART 3:C MONITORING PLAN Phase What Where How When Why Cost Who (Is the parameter to be (Is the parameter to be (Is the parameter to be (Define the frequency / or (Is the parameter being (if not included in (Is responsible for monitored?) monitored?) monitored?) continuous?) monitored?) project budget) monitoring?) During activity prep- aration During activity implementation During activity supervision MAP OF PROJECT AREA Nhlamankulo (DM2) in Relation to Maputo City Scale: 1 square = 2.5 km Satellite Image of Nhlamankulo (DM2 – Municipal District #2) ATTACHMENT 2:Capacity Building Program Description of Activity Responsibility By When? Budget Training of Latrines Users Associa- WSUP Continuous $7,500 tion members Distribution of Hygiene and Sanita- WSUP/LUAs At reception of in- $15,000 tion Kits (Package) frastructure Awareness raising on Hygiene and WSUP Continuous $15,000 Sanitation (use of cleaning products, waterborne diseases, skin rash, ma- laria, etc.) Basic Environmental and Social MICOA/WB Project Launch & $5,000 Safeguards MT Monitoring and Evaluation of Sus- WSUP/MICOA/WB $7,500 tainability TOTAL BUDGET $50,000